• Re: Piccadilly line update

    From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.transport.london on Thu Jun 11 15:36:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:37:50 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    It seems they're digging up the sidings at arnos grove. No idea why, they
    can't make them any longer unless they buy up and demolish the building >behind.


    The trains are about 7m longer, which will almost certainly require some >reorganisation of the sidings.

    Can't see how they'll do it unless they cut down the number of roads and
    join them up much closer to the station but if you look on google maps
    you'll see there's very little room to play with.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london on Thu Jun 11 16:14:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:37:50 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    It seems they're digging up the sidings at arnos grove. No idea why, they >>> can't make them any longer unless they buy up and demolish the building
    behind.


    The trains are about 7m longer, which will almost certainly require some
    reorganisation of the sidings.

    Can't see how they'll do it unless they cut down the number of roads and
    join them up much closer to the station but if you look on google maps
    you'll see there's very little room to play with.


    If you change the point work, moving them all closer to the station,
    thererCOs scope to lengthen the sidings.

    Google finds:

    Quattro Group is working with Transport for LondonrCOs (TfL) ballasted track team to upgrade and extend the train sidings at Arnos Grove.

    The project involves excavating to formation level and installing new
    track. The existing seven sidings are being upgraded to accommodate the new Piccadilly line trains, which feature walk-through carriages and are longer than the current fleet.

    Quattro is utilizing its Road-Rail Vehicles (RRVs) to carry out these heavy excavation and track-laying tasks directly on-site.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.transport.london on Fri Jun 12 10:18:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:14:06 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:37:50 GMT
    Can't see how they'll do it unless they cut down the number of roads and
    join them up much closer to the station but if you look on google maps
    you'll see there's very little room to play with.


    If you change the point work, moving them all closer to the station, >thererCOs scope to lengthen the sidings.

    Maybe for one or two roads, not all of them.

    The project involves excavating to formation level and installing new
    track. The existing seven sidings are being upgraded to accommodate the new >Piccadilly line trains, which feature walk-through carriages and are longer >than the current fleet.

    Quattro is utilizing its Road-Rail Vehicles (RRVs) to carry out these heavy >excavation and track-laying tasks directly on-site.

    Will be interesting to see how they manage that.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Able@stuck@home.com to uk.transport.london on Fri Jun 12 16:47:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On 11/06/2026 17:14, Recliner wrote:

    Quattro is utilizing its Road-Rail Vehicles (RRVs) to carry out these heavy excavation and track-laying tasks directly on-site.


    Yes, always a good idea to excavate directly on-site. ;-}
    --
    PA
    --


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london on Fri Jun 12 18:29:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:18:02 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:14:06 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:37:50 GMT
    Can't see how they'll do it unless they cut down the number of roads and >>> join them up much closer to the station but if you look on google maps
    you'll see there's very little room to play with.


    If you change the point work, moving them all closer to the station, >>thererCOs scope to lengthen the sidings.

    Maybe for one or two roads, not all of them.

    Well, they seem to think it'll work. Remember, the existing sidings are probably longer than needed by the 73TS, as
    those trains are shorter than their predecessors. So the extension needed might be quite short.

    Note how they haven't had to physically extended station platforms for the 24TS, just bring back into use the end
    sections that were fenced off for the shorter 73TS.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.transport.london on Fri Jun 12 17:57:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:29:21 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:18:02 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote: >>Maybe for one or two roads, not all of them.

    Well, they seem to think it'll work. Remember, the existing sidings are >probably longer than needed by the 73TS, as
    those trains are shorter than their predecessors. So the extension needed >might be quite short.

    Could be.


    Note how they haven't had to physically extended station platforms for the >24TS, just bring back into use the end
    sections that were fenced off for the shorter 73TS.

    Wonder if it'll go back to the train cabs being in tunnel at stations again
    now that platform monitors have been replaced by in cab monitors.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london on Fri Jun 12 18:42:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:29:21 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:18:02 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    Maybe for one or two roads, not all of them.

    Well, they seem to think it'll work. Remember, the existing sidings are
    probably longer than needed by the 73TS, as
    those trains are shorter than their predecessors. So the extension needed
    might be quite short.

    Could be.


    Note how they haven't had to physically extended station platforms for the >> 24TS, just bring back into use the end
    sections that were fenced off for the shorter 73TS.

    Wonder if it'll go back to the train cabs being in tunnel at stations again now that platform monitors have been replaced by in cab monitors.

    IrCOm not sure, but itrCOs possible.

    Incidentally, the 59TS trains were 112m long, vs the 24TS 113.7m. So,
    assuming the sidings were laid out for the 59TS, they wonrCOt need much rejigging to fit the slightly longer new trains.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.transport.london on Sat Jun 13 09:12:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:42:02 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    Wonder if it'll go back to the train cabs being in tunnel at stations again >> now that platform monitors have been replaced by in cab monitors.

    IrCOm not sure, but itrCOs possible.

    Incidentally, the 59TS trains were 112m long, vs the 24TS 113.7m. So, >assuming the sidings were laid out for the 59TS, they wonrCOt need much >rejigging to fit the slightly longer new trains.

    Thats a good point. So I wonder what they're up to? Maybe just taking the opportunity to reballast and reset the tracks.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london on Sat Jun 13 12:05:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:42:02 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    Wonder if it'll go back to the train cabs being in tunnel at stations again >>> now that platform monitors have been replaced by in cab monitors.

    IrCOm not sure, but itrCOs possible.

    Incidentally, the 59TS trains were 112m long, vs the 24TS 113.7m. So,
    assuming the sidings were laid out for the 59TS, they wonrCOt need much
    rejigging to fit the slightly longer new trains.

    Thats a good point. So I wonder what they're up to? Maybe just taking the opportunity to reballast and reset the tracks.

    I suspect itrCOs a complete track replacement. The existing tracks have probably been there for at least 60 years, and are due to be replaced, and
    this is a good opportunity to replace both the track and the points. It may also serve to make it easier to install the desperately-needed new
    signalling when funds permit. Perhaps the idea is that the trains will be
    able to drive themselves into and out of the sidings when ATO is enabled?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.transport.london on Sat Jun 13 14:50:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:05:52 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:42:02 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    Wonder if it'll go back to the train cabs being in tunnel at stations again

    now that platform monitors have been replaced by in cab monitors.

    IrCOm not sure, but itrCOs possible.

    Incidentally, the 59TS trains were 112m long, vs the 24TS 113.7m. So,
    assuming the sidings were laid out for the 59TS, they wonrCOt need much
    rejigging to fit the slightly longer new trains.

    Thats a good point. So I wonder what they're up to? Maybe just taking the
    opportunity to reballast and reset the tracks.

    I suspect itrCOs a complete track replacement. The existing tracks have >probably been there for at least 60 years, and are due to be replaced, and >this is a good opportunity to replace both the track and the points. It may >also serve to make it easier to install the desperately-needed new
    signalling when funds permit. Perhaps the idea is that the trains will be >able to drive themselves into and out of the sidings when ATO is enabled?

    Given the EL does it at paddington there's no technical reason it couldn't
    be done but AFAIK LU hasn't implemented that anywhere on the other ATO lines but I could be wrong.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london on Sat Jun 13 16:14:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:05:52 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:42:02 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    Wonder if it'll go back to the train cabs being in tunnel at stations again

    now that platform monitors have been replaced by in cab monitors.

    IrCOm not sure, but itrCOs possible.

    Incidentally, the 59TS trains were 112m long, vs the 24TS 113.7m. So,
    assuming the sidings were laid out for the 59TS, they wonrCOt need much >>>> rejigging to fit the slightly longer new trains.

    Thats a good point. So I wonder what they're up to? Maybe just taking the >>> opportunity to reballast and reset the tracks.

    I suspect itrCOs a complete track replacement. The existing tracks have
    probably been there for at least 60 years, and are due to be replaced, and >> this is a good opportunity to replace both the track and the points. It may >> also serve to make it easier to install the desperately-needed new
    signalling when funds permit. Perhaps the idea is that the trains will be
    able to drive themselves into and out of the sidings when ATO is enabled?

    Given the EL does it at paddington there's no technical reason it couldn't
    be done but AFAIK LU hasn't implemented that anywhere on the other ATO lines but I could be wrong.


    I had thought Victoria Line trains did this to and from the depot, but
    canrCOt find any confirmation, so probably not.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.transport.london on Sun Jun 14 07:52:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:14:52 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:05:52 GMT
    Given the EL does it at paddington there's no technical reason it couldn't >> be done but AFAIK LU hasn't implemented that anywhere on the other ATO lines >> but I could be wrong.


    I had thought Victoria Line trains did this to and from the depot, but >canrCOt find any confirmation, so probably not.

    No they don't. There was something I watched a few months back that focused
    on the victoria line depot - can't remember if it was youtube or on TV - and the trains are driven manually to and from the tunnel portal.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london on Sun Jun 14 08:08:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:14:52 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:05:52 GMT
    Given the EL does it at paddington there's no technical reason it couldn't >>> be done but AFAIK LU hasn't implemented that anywhere on the other ATO lines
    but I could be wrong.


    I had thought Victoria Line trains did this to and from the depot, but
    canrCOt find any confirmation, so probably not.

    No they don't. There was something I watched a few months back that focused on the victoria line depot - can't remember if it was youtube or on TV - and the trains are driven manually to and from the tunnel portal.

    Yes, so it seems. Perhaps it was only a proposal that never came to
    fruition?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.transport.london on Sun Jun 14 09:00:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:08:54 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:14:52 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:05:52 GMT
    Given the EL does it at paddington there's no technical reason it couldn't >>>> be done but AFAIK LU hasn't implemented that anywhere on the other ATO >lines
    but I could be wrong.


    I had thought Victoria Line trains did this to and from the depot, but
    canrCOt find any confirmation, so probably not.

    No they don't. There was something I watched a few months back that focused >> on the victoria line depot - can't remember if it was youtube or on TV - and >> the trains are driven manually to and from the tunnel portal.

    Yes, so it seems. Perhaps it was only a proposal that never came to
    fruition?

    Given the people wandering around the depot and the trains having no
    obstacle detection I doubt it was ever seriously considered, would be far
    too dangerous. With arnos grove sidings though I can't imagine staff wander around them unless they're drivers going to their train so maybe it could
    work there.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.transport.london on Sun Jun 14 09:06:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:08:54 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:14:52 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:05:52 GMT
    Given the EL does it at paddington there's no technical reason it couldn't
    be done but AFAIK LU hasn't implemented that anywhere on the other ATO
    lines
    but I could be wrong.


    I had thought Victoria Line trains did this to and from the depot, but >>>> canrCOt find any confirmation, so probably not.

    No they don't. There was something I watched a few months back that focused >>> on the victoria line depot - can't remember if it was youtube or on TV - and
    the trains are driven manually to and from the tunnel portal.

    Yes, so it seems. Perhaps it was only a proposal that never came to
    fruition?

    Given the people wandering around the depot and the trains having no
    obstacle detection I doubt it was ever seriously considered, would be far
    too dangerous. With arnos grove sidings though I can't imagine staff wander around them unless they're drivers going to their train so maybe it could work there.

    I wonder what the workflow is there? A driver takes a train in thatrCOs
    going to sit there for a few hours, but where does the driver go? Is there
    a crew depot there? Or do they walk back to the station? That seems
    unlikely. And when itrCOs time to bring the train back into service, where does the driver come from?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.transport.london on Sun Jun 14 09:32:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.transport.london

    On Sun, 14 Jun 2026 09:06:10 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    Given the people wandering around the depot and the trains having no
    obstacle detection I doubt it was ever seriously considered, would be far
    too dangerous. With arnos grove sidings though I can't imagine staff wander >> around them unless they're drivers going to their train so maybe it could
    work there.

    I wonder what the workflow is there? A driver takes a train in thatrCOs >going to sit there for a few hours, but where does the driver go? Is there
    a crew depot there? Or do they walk back to the station? That seems >unlikely. And when itrCOs time to bring the train back into service, where >does the driver come from?

    Yeah, there's crew booking on/off offices right next to them. You often see drivers changing at Arnos and then wandering down the path alongside the
    tracks to them.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2