• Has anyone been moved from Plusnet to EE?

    From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 18 16:52:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a landline,
    and found them generally satisfactory. But this week I, like many
    others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we have to
    choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline but save a
    few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband hub with a
    socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not. Apart
    from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and we barely
    use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for nearly all
    calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run
    we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or whether
    to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a study. I
    think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the master socket.
    I guess it would still be feasible to split these connection off from
    the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub - but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be capable of ringing.
    --
    Clive Page
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BrightonRock@harrymandispose-news@yahoo.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 18 17:28:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 18/04/2026 16:52, Clive Page wrote:
    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a landline,
    and found them generally satisfactory.-a But this week I, like many
    others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we have to
    choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline but save a
    few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband hub with a
    socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not.-a Apart from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and we barely
    use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for nearly all
    calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our district.-a But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult.-a I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or whether
    to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a study.-a I
    think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the master socket. I guess it would still be feasible to split these connection off from the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub - but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be capable of ringing.


    You may have more options than you mention in your post. Have a look at https://community.plus.net/t5/Forum/ct-p/Forum There is a lot of experience/advice there, particularly on the Full Fibre & Home Phone
    threads. Also a source of knowledgable answers to specific questions.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 18 16:32:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a landline,
    and found them generally satisfactory. But this week I, like many
    others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we have to
    choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline but save a
    few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband hub with a
    socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not. Apart from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and we barely
    use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for nearly all
    calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or whether
    to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a study. I
    think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the master socket.
    I guess it would still be feasible to split these connection off from
    the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub - but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be capable of ringing.



    If you are already contemplating giving up the landline IrCOd argue for
    giving it up. I ported my landline number to A&A VOIP, a couple,of quid a month. IrCOve never bothered to connect a voip phone to it. Their servicerCOs voicemail emails you a recording of any incoming calls. I use that to mop
    up any residual calls that come to my landline. Pretty much all spam calls
    now.

    We have CityFibre. The service works without issue and I value the
    symmetrical up/download speeds.

    If you are able to get CF now, IrCOd suggest getting that in now, and then
    port your landline number. That porting can kill your existing FTTC
    service, depending on how competent Plusnet are feeling. Otherwise EE are likely to try to tie you to a long contract.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Woody@harrogate3@ntlworld.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 18 17:43:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On Sat 18/04/2026 16:52, Clive Page wrote:
    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a landline,
    and found them generally satisfactory.-a But this week I, like many
    others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we have to
    choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline but save a
    few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband hub with a
    socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not.-a Apart from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and we barely
    use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for nearly all
    calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our district.-a But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult.-a I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or whether
    to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a study.-a I
    think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the master socket. I guess it would still be feasible to split these connection off from the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub - but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be capable of ringing.



    You need to track back through this NG up to maybe the beginning of this
    year - there have been a number of discussions on how to get around it.

    Basically AIUI you get a VoIP account with number from one of the VoIP suppliers and have that up and running before the changeover time
    arrives. You will also need to get your FTTP in place before the
    changeover day comes around to give you time to make sure it works.

    Before the changeover day you dial 65075 from your existing BT line to
    get a PAC number. You give this PAC number (it is valid for 30 days) to
    your VoIP provider and arrange when the move takes place.
    Theoretically it should go quite smoothly.

    Shop around when you look for a VoIP provider - many people on this NG
    will help you - to get the one that has a good reputation and that has
    service and call charges that suit you. IME Sipgate are reasonable but
    they have done away with their free system access. Things like CLI can
    be changed in your account pages. You will get voicemail and the like
    often f.o.c. - indeed most SPs send you an email with an mp3 of the
    message left.

    Good luck.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 18 18:15:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    Rupert, an occasional poster here (or another uk.telecom* group), I think
    ended up in legal action against EE because their hub didn't work. Might be worth searching the history.

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or whether
    to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a study. I
    think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the master socket.
    I guess it would still be feasible to split these connection off from
    the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub - but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be capable of ringing.

    Typically the extensions are plugged into a faceplate which fits into the middle of the master socket - the inner socket goes only to the line, and
    the faceplate connects your extensions. The idea was BT could disconnect
    the extensions to diagnose problems by removing this faceplate. There are 'voice re-injection' attachments which can inject voice signals back into
    the master socket - ie instead of the phone socket on the front being an
    output to your phone, it's an input from the phone port on your router.

    Another option is to just pair DECT handsets with your hub directly - the BT Hub can do that, I assume the EE hub is the same. Call quality should be better.

    The nuclear option (as mentioned in other posts and much discussed here) is
    to port your number to a standalone VOIP provider and then it's just another third party service running over your broadband. This can cost from -u1.80
    per month (+calls, which are cheap). If you do want to use landlines for
    any reason then this is probably the way to go.

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 18 18:25:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    Clive Page wrote:

    within a month we have to choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and
    have no landline but save a few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a
    new broadband hub with a socket for the phone

    If you choose (a) you can then move your old number to any VoIP
    provider, such an A&A or voipfone. You may already have suitable
    hardware for that e.g. many Siemens/Gigaset DECT basestations support
    VoIP, or you might need to buy a cheap ATA.

    But you will have severed the link between your broadband provider and
    phone provider, so will be able to change one without touching the other
    in future ...

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roger Mills@mills37.fslife@gmail.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Sun Apr 19 19:00:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 18/04/2026 16:52, Clive Page wrote:
    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a landline,
    and found them generally satisfactory.-a But this week I, like many
    others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we have to
    choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline but save a
    few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband hub with a
    socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not.-a Apart from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and we barely
    use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for nearly all
    calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our district.-a But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult.-a I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or whether
    to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a study.-a I
    think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the master socket. I guess it would still be feasible to split these connection off from the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub - but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be capable of ringing.


    Up to a few months ago, I would a-have asked whther you have any Plusnet-related email addresses and/or webspace which you need to keep
    because these would would have been lost by moving to EE. But now that Plusnet's email and hosting services have been migrated to Greenby, it
    may not matter. I'm assuming that you don't need to be using a Plusnet connection in order to use Greenby's services - but I could be wrong.

    I make very few calls via my landline but we still get incoming calls
    and SWMBO prefers using it rather than a mobile - which makes no
    economic sense - but who am I to argue!

    I had expected to lose the copper landline a while ago, and signed up
    for an A&A VoIP account and bought a Grandstream ATA. This is curently
    not used but the plan is - when the time comes - to port my landline
    number to A&A and then use Plusnet's internet-only service. I have
    checked that A&A VoIP works ok, but still have some outstanding issues
    with my trueCall call blocker when used on VoIP.
    --
    Cheers,
    Roger
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 20 10:33:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 19/04/2026 19:00, Roger Mills wrote:
    On 18/04/2026 16:52, Clive Page wrote:
    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a
    landline, and found them generally satisfactory.-a But this week I,
    like many others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we
    have to choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline
    but save a few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband
    hub with a socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not.
    Apart from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and
    we barely use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for
    nearly all calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to
    run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then
    switch to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up
    our district.-a But I've see a few reports saying that getting an
    analogue phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult.-a I wondered
    if anyone here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or
    whether to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a
    study.-a I think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the
    master socket. I guess it would still be feasible to split these
    connection off from the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub -
    but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be
    capable of ringing.


    Up to a few months ago, I would a-have asked whther you have any Plusnet-related email addresses and/or webspace which you need to keep because these would would have been lost by moving to EE. But now that Plusnet's email and hosting services have been migrated to Greenby, it
    may not matter. I'm assuming that you don't need to be using a Plusnet connection in order to use Greenby's services - but I could be wrong.

    I make very few calls via my landline but we still get incoming calls
    and SWMBO prefers using it rather than a mobile - which makes no
    economic sense - but who am I to argue!

    I had expected to lose the copper landline a while ago, and signed up
    for an A&A VoIP account and bought a Grandstream ATA. This is curently
    not used but the plan is - when the time comes - to port my landline
    number to A&A and then use Plusnet's internet-only service. I have
    checked that A&A VoIP works ok, but still have some outstanding issues
    with my trueCall call blocker when used on VoIP.

    Thanks for all the suggestions/advice. I had also expected to lose the landline before now, but the timescale of the Plusnet migration is still
    not clear. We have one month to decide, then presumably Plusnet will
    take some time to send us a new router for the migration to EE.

    I had, like you, thought of getting an ATA such as the Grandstream ones recommended by A&A, but they seem to be remarkably expensive - as much
    as equivalent to 2 years of rental for a VOIP number from A&A.

    Another uncertain issue is whether we can leave Plusnet right away penalty-free on the grounds that their service is ceasing - the
    conditions of the current Plusnet contract are remarkably impenetrable.
    If not then I guess I'll carry on with Plusnet till the contract runs
    out in about 6 months.
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jack Harry Teesdale@noreply492000-medic@yahoo.co.uk to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 20 13:29:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 18/04/2026 16:52, Clive Page wrote:
    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a landline,
    and found them generally satisfactory.-a But this week I, like many
    others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we have to
    choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline but save a
    few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband hub with a
    socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not.-a Apart from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and we barely
    use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for nearly all
    calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our district.-a But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult.-a I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or whether
    to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a study.-a I
    think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the master socket. I guess it would still be feasible to split these connection off from the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub - but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be capable of ringing.


    I have had a similar problem but found that a 3 phone cordless system
    works with the base station plugged into the router does the job, the 2
    remote handsets just need pugging into a nearby socket outlet.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roger Mills@mills37.fslife@gmail.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 20 14:53:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 20/04/2026 10:33, Clive Page wrote:
    On 19/04/2026 19:00, Roger Mills wrote:
    On 18/04/2026 16:52, Clive Page wrote:
    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a
    landline, and found them generally satisfactory.-a But this week I,
    like many others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we
    have to choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline
    but save a few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband
    hub with a socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not.
    Apart from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and
    we barely use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for
    nearly all calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to
    run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then
    switch to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up
    our district.-a But I've see a few reports saying that getting an
    analogue phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult.-a I wondered
    if anyone here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or
    whether to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a
    study.-a I think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the
    master socket. I guess it would still be feasible to split these
    connection off from the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub
    - but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will
    be capable of ringing.


    Up to a few months ago, I would a-have asked whther you have any
    Plusnet-related email addresses and/or webspace which you need to keep
    because these would would have been lost by moving to EE. But now that
    Plusnet's email and hosting services have been migrated to Greenby, it
    may not matter. I'm assuming that you don't need to be using a Plusnet
    connection in order to use Greenby's services - but I could be wrong.

    I make very few calls via my landline but we still get incoming calls
    and SWMBO prefers using it rather than a mobile - which makes no
    economic sense - but who am I to argue!

    I had expected to lose the copper landline a while ago, and signed up
    for an A&A VoIP account and bought a Grandstream ATA. This is curently
    not used but the plan is - when the time comes - to port my landline
    number to A&A and then use Plusnet's internet-only service. I have
    checked that A&A VoIP works ok, but still have some outstanding issues
    with my trueCall call blocker when used on VoIP.

    Thanks for all the suggestions/advice.-a I had also expected to lose the landline before now, but the timescale of the Plusnet migration is still
    not clear.-a We have one month to decide, then presumably Plusnet will
    take some time to send us a new router for the migration to EE.

    I had, like you, thought of getting an ATA such as the Grandstream ones recommended by A&A, but they seem to be remarkably expensive - as much
    as equivalent to 2 years of rental for a VOIP number from A&A.

    Another uncertain issue is whether we can leave Plusnet right away penalty-free on the grounds that their service is ceasing - the
    conditions of the current Plusnet contract are remarkably impenetrable.
    If not then I guess I'll carry on with Plusnet till the contract runs
    out in about 6 months.


    It seems a bit strange to compare the cost of an ATA with A&A's number
    rental fee, seeing as the latter is pretty cheap!

    I would have thought that if PN move the goalposts by withdrawing the
    landline before the end of your contract, they would be deemed to be
    breaking the contract - leaving you free to leave without penalty if you
    wish. Whatever happens I will stay with PN in the short term but -
    despite the Greenby thing - I am busy migrating all my my email
    addresses awayfrom PN (I now have my own domain) so that I am free to
    leave if and when I wish.

    In your earlier post, you asked about extension wiring etc. I would hope
    that the EE router's phone socket would have a REN of 4, but I don't
    have confirmation of that.

    All my extension wiring meets at a single point where it connects to the 'phone' side of my trueCall call blocker, so I can change to VoIP easily simply by unplugging the trueCall from the master socket and plugging it
    into the ATA. [I have always installed my own extension wiring, so I'm
    not dependent on anything BT etc. has done.]
    --
    Cheers,
    Roger
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Carver@mark@invalid.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 20 15:50:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 18/04/2026 17:43, Woody wrote:

    Before the changeover day you dial 65075 from your existing BT line to
    get a PAC number. You give this PAC number (it is valid for 30 days) to
    your VoIP provider and arrange when the move takes place.

    Really ? Show me in any Ofcom or Telco documentations, evidence that
    65075 is used for obtaining a *landline* PAC ?

    That code only applies to Mobile accounts (and it is the short code
    number, you text your request to) ?
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 20 17:19:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 20/04/2026 14:53, Roger Mills wrote:
    It seems a bit strange to compare the cost of an ATA with A&A's number rental fee, seeing as the latter is pretty cheap!

    Well I suppose it does. But if we decide to keep the landline for say
    another two years using VOIP then the overall cost would be about -u45
    for the A&A fee, and rather more than that for the ATA box (unless it
    has a resale value after that, of course), depending on which one we get.


    I would have thought that if PN move the goalposts by withdrawing the landline before the end of your contract, they would be deemed to be breaking the contract - leaving you free to leave without penalty if you wish. Whatever happens I will stay with PN in the short term but -
    despite the Greenby thing - I am busy migrating all my my email
    addresses awayfrom PN (I now have my own domain) so that I am free to
    leave if and when I wish.

    You may well be right on this, and indeed I hope so. This afternoon I
    have trawled through all the clauses in the Plusnet contract and am
    still pretty unsure. Two of their conditions reference clause 18.9
    which simply does not exist, so I suspect the whole convoluted clause structure of the contract has been written by AI while having a
    hallucination. :-)
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 20 17:21:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 20/04/2026 13:29, Jack Harry Teesdale wrote:
    On 18/04/2026 16:52, Clive Page wrote:
    We've had Plusnet broadband for several years with FTTC and a
    landline, and found them generally satisfactory.-a But this week I,
    like many others I expect, got an email saying that within a month we
    have to choose either (a) to stay with Plusnet and have no landline
    but save a few quid on rental, or (b) move to EE with a new broadband
    hub with a socket for the phone at the same monthly cost as before.

    We haven't quite decided whether we still need a landline or not.
    Apart from junk calls we only get a real call every month or two and
    we barely use the landline to make calls as mobiles are cheaper for
    nearly all calls now.

    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to
    run we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then
    switch to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up
    our district.-a But I've see a few reports saying that getting an
    analogue phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult.-a I wondered
    if anyone here has any experience of this migration?

    If we decide to keep our landline another problem will be how or
    whether to connect up the extensions - one in a bedroom and one a
    study.-a I think these were wired up in BT days to the back of the
    master socket. I guess it would still be feasible to split these
    connection off from the phone when it's plugged into the EE home hub -
    but I can't see any information anywhere on how many phones it will be
    capable of ringing.


    I have had a similar problem but found that a 3 phone cordless system
    works with the base station plugged into the router does the job, the 2 remote handsets just need pugging into a nearby socket outlet.

    Thanks. That had occurred to me and would be a better solution, but of
    course it means even more capital investment, which for at most one or
    two phone calls per month is hard to justify.
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 20 16:25:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 20/04/2026 14:53, Roger Mills wrote:
    It seems a bit strange to compare the cost of an ATA with A&A's number
    rental fee, seeing as the latter is pretty cheap!

    Well I suppose it does. But if we decide to keep the landline for say another two years using VOIP then the overall cost would be about -u45
    for the A&A fee, and rather more than that for the ATA box (unless it
    has a resale value after that, of course), depending on which one we get.


    I would have thought that if PN move the goalposts by withdrawing the
    landline before the end of your contract, they would be deemed to be
    breaking the contract - leaving you free to leave without penalty if you
    wish. Whatever happens I will stay with PN in the short term but -
    despite the Greenby thing - I am busy migrating all my my email
    addresses awayfrom PN (I now have my own domain) so that I am free to
    leave if and when I wish.

    You may well be right on this, and indeed I hope so. This afternoon I
    have trawled through all the clauses in the Plusnet contract and am
    still pretty unsure. Two of their conditions reference clause 18.9
    which simply does not exist, so I suspect the whole convoluted clause structure of the contract has been written by AI while having a hallucination. :-)


    Do you really need an ATA box? As you originally said, you are increasingly using your mobiles. Just use the A&A voicemail to email to catch the odd important inbound call on the landline.

    I would have thought PNrCOs T&Cs to be irrelevant. They are breaking the contract by ceasing to provide part of your service.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 20 17:41:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Do you really need an ATA box? As you originally said, you are increasingly using your mobiles. Just use the A&A voicemail to email to catch the odd important inbound call on the landline.

    Or a softphone app on your mobiles. Since it's VOIP it can go anywhere, including when you're not at home.

    I would have thought PNrCOs T&Cs to be irrelevant. They are breaking the contract by ceasing to provide part of your service.

    Indeed. Either they let you off or you sue for breach of contract. I
    very much expect they'll opt for the former.

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rupert Moss-Eccardt@news@moss-eccardt.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 21 12:28:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 18 Apr 2026 18:15:11 +0100 (BST), Theo wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run
    we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    Rupert, an occasional poster here (or another uk.telecom* group), I think ended up in legal action against EE because their hub didn't work. Might be worth searching the history.

    I didn't go quite as far as legal action but got to the Ombudsman.
    EE convinced him that they can't be expected to provide a reliable
    voice service because it isn't realty their technology.

    Symptoms: after a Hub reboot, Digital Voice (DV) worked but after a
    period of time it would fail. This would manifest itself either with
    outbound calls not working (less common) or inbound calls going
    straight to voicemail or just silence. This happened as soon as 10
    days or as long as three weeks. Of course the actual time wasn't
    certain as I didn't check it every day.

    I was not the only one, it seems, suffering from this.
    So I now have an A&A VOIP number and a Grandstream ATA. Rather nicely,
    I can use my GPO 746 with the Grandstream!

    I have something similar going on as well with two things:
    1.) Wi-Fi calling
    Incoming calls go to voicemail without ringing. The notification/text
    telling me so arrives quite some time later.
    Outgoing calls also fail
    Incoming texts are also delayed.
    I can fix this by re-registering the phone (switch off Wi-Fi, wait a
    bit and then switch it on again - mobile signal is poor around here so
    Wi-Fi calling is needed)
    2.) App and Hub Manager
    Once it a while the EE app won't work.
    At the same time going to 192.168.1.254 also doesn't work.
    A hub reboot is needed. And, each time, A&A tell me the IP address has
    changed. So I guess there is a problem with the EE DHCP server. Or
    rather something doesn't update other things once there is a new lease.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rupert Moss-Eccardt@news@moss-eccardt.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 21 12:28:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 18 Apr 2026 18:15:11 +0100 (BST), Theo wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run
    we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    Rupert, an occasional poster here (or another uk.telecom* group), I think ended up in legal action against EE because their hub didn't work. Might be worth searching the history.

    I didn't go quite as far as legal action but got to the Ombudsman.
    EE convinced him that they can't be expected to provide a reliable
    voice service because it isn't realty their technology.

    Symptoms: after a Hub reboot, Digital Voice (DV) worked but after a
    period of time it would fail. This would manifest itself either with
    outbound calls not working (less common) or inbound calls going
    straight to voicemail or just silence. This happened as soon as 10
    days or as long as three weeks. Of course the actual time wasn't
    certain as I didn't check it every day.

    I was not the only one, it seems, suffering from this.
    So I now have an A&A VOIP number and a Grandstream ATA. Rather nicely,
    I can use my GPO 746 with the Grandstream!

    I have something similar going on as well with two things:
    1.) Wi-Fi calling
    Incoming calls go to voicemail without ringing. The notification/text
    telling me so arrives quite some time later.
    Outgoing calls also fail
    Incoming texts are also delayed.
    I can fix this by re-registering the phone (switch off Wi-Fi, wait a
    bit and then switch it on again - mobile signal is poor around here so
    Wi-Fi calling is needed)
    2.) App and Hub Manager
    Once it a while the EE app won't work.
    At the same time going to 192.168.1.254 also doesn't work.
    A hub reboot is needed. And, each time, A&A tell me the IP address has
    changed. So I guess there is a problem with the EE DHCP server. Or
    rather something doesn't update other things once there is a new lease.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rupert Moss-Eccardt@news@moss-eccardt.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 21 11:29:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    This article was cancelled from within NewsgroupsRT.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 21 11:58:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    Rupert Moss-Eccardt <news@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:
    On 18 Apr 2026 18:15:11 +0100 (BST), Theo wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run
    we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch
    to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    Rupert, an occasional poster here (or another uk.telecom* group), I think
    ended up in legal action against EE because their hub didn't work. Might be >> worth searching the history.

    I didn't go quite as far as legal action but got to the Ombudsman.
    EE convinced him that they can't be expected to provide a reliable
    voice service because it isn't realty their technology.

    Symptoms: after a Hub reboot, Digital Voice (DV) worked but after a
    period of time it would fail. This would manifest itself either with
    outbound calls not working (less common) or inbound calls going
    straight to voicemail or just silence. This happened as soon as 10
    days or as long as three weeks. Of course the actual time wasn't
    certain as I didn't check it every day.

    I was not the only one, it seems, suffering from this.
    So I now have an A&A VOIP number and a Grandstream ATA. Rather nicely,
    I can use my GPO 746 with the Grandstream!

    I have something similar going on as well with two things:
    1.) Wi-Fi calling
    Incoming calls go to voicemail without ringing. The notification/text
    telling me so arrives quite some time later.
    Outgoing calls also fail
    Incoming texts are also delayed.
    I can fix this by re-registering the phone (switch off Wi-Fi, wait a
    bit and then switch it on again - mobile signal is poor around here so
    Wi-Fi calling is needed)
    2.) App and Hub Manager
    Once it a while the EE app won't work.
    At the same time going to 192.168.1.254 also doesn't work.
    A hub reboot is needed. And, each time, A&A tell me the IP address has changed. So I guess there is a problem with the EE DHCP server. Or
    rather something doesn't update other things once there is a new lease.



    Are you saying EE keep giving you a different public IP address?

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rupert Moss-Eccardt@news@moss-eccardt.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Fri Apr 24 21:15:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 21 Apr 2026 11:58, Tweed wrote:
    Rupert Moss-Eccardt <news@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:
    On 18 Apr 2026 18:15:11 +0100 (BST), Theo wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run >>>> we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch >>>> to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue
    phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone
    here has any experience of this migration?

    Rupert, an occasional poster here (or another uk.telecom* group), I think >>> ended up in legal action against EE because their hub didn't work. Might be
    worth searching the history.

    I didn't go quite as far as legal action but got to the Ombudsman.
    EE convinced him that they can't be expected to provide a reliable
    voice service because it isn't realty their technology.

    Symptoms: after a Hub reboot, Digital Voice (DV) worked but after a
    period of time it would fail. This would manifest itself either with
    outbound calls not working (less common) or inbound calls going
    straight to voicemail or just silence. This happened as soon as 10
    days or as long as three weeks. Of course the actual time wasn't
    certain as I didn't check it every day.

    I was not the only one, it seems, suffering from this.
    So I now have an A&A VOIP number and a Grandstream ATA. Rather nicely,
    I can use my GPO 746 with the Grandstream!

    I have something similar going on as well with two things:
    1.) Wi-Fi calling
    Incoming calls go to voicemail without ringing. The notification/text
    telling me so arrives quite some time later.
    Outgoing calls also fail
    Incoming texts are also delayed.
    I can fix this by re-registering the phone (switch off Wi-Fi, wait a
    bit and then switch it on again - mobile signal is poor around here so
    Wi-Fi calling is needed)
    2.) App and Hub Manager
    Once it a while the EE app won't work.
    At the same time going to 192.168.1.254 also doesn't work.
    A hub reboot is needed. And, each time, A&A tell me the IP address has
    changed. So I guess there is a problem with the EE DHCP server. Or
    rather something doesn't update other things once there is a new lease.



    Are you saying EE keep giving you a different public IP address?

    Oh yes.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 25 06:14:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    Rupert Moss-Eccardt <news@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:
    On 21 Apr 2026 11:58, Tweed wrote:
    Rupert Moss-Eccardt <news@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:
    On 18 Apr 2026 18:15:11 +0100 (BST), Theo wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run >>>>> we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch >>>>> to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue >>>>> phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone >>>>> here has any experience of this migration?

    Rupert, an occasional poster here (or another uk.telecom* group), I think >>>> ended up in legal action against EE because their hub didn't work. Might be
    worth searching the history.

    I didn't go quite as far as legal action but got to the Ombudsman.
    EE convinced him that they can't be expected to provide a reliable
    voice service because it isn't realty their technology.

    Symptoms: after a Hub reboot, Digital Voice (DV) worked but after a
    period of time it would fail. This would manifest itself either with
    outbound calls not working (less common) or inbound calls going
    straight to voicemail or just silence. This happened as soon as 10
    days or as long as three weeks. Of course the actual time wasn't
    certain as I didn't check it every day.

    I was not the only one, it seems, suffering from this.
    So I now have an A&A VOIP number and a Grandstream ATA. Rather nicely,
    I can use my GPO 746 with the Grandstream!

    I have something similar going on as well with two things:
    1.) Wi-Fi calling
    Incoming calls go to voicemail without ringing. The notification/text
    telling me so arrives quite some time later.
    Outgoing calls also fail
    Incoming texts are also delayed.
    I can fix this by re-registering the phone (switch off Wi-Fi, wait a
    bit and then switch it on again - mobile signal is poor around here so
    Wi-Fi calling is needed)
    2.) App and Hub Manager
    Once it a while the EE app won't work.
    At the same time going to 192.168.1.254 also doesn't work.
    A hub reboot is needed. And, each time, A&A tell me the IP address has
    changed. So I guess there is a problem with the EE DHCP server. Or
    rather something doesn't update other things once there is a new lease.



    Are you saying EE keep giving you a different public IP address?

    Oh yes.

    YourCOd think that EE being BT, and having been in the game from the early days, would have enough IPv4 addresses not to play those games. ItrCOs one of the advantages of the likes of A&A and IDNet that you get a static IPv4 address.

    Do EE support IPv6?

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rupert Moss-Eccardt@news@moss-eccardt.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 25 09:04:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 25 Apr 2026 06:14, Tweed wrote:
    Rupert Moss-Eccardt <news@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:
    On 21 Apr 2026 11:58, Tweed wrote:
    Rupert Moss-Eccardt <news@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:
    On 18 Apr 2026 18:15:11 +0100 (BST), Theo wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    Since there's still several months of the Plusnet contract still to run >>>>>> we'll probably stay with Plusnet/EE until that expires and then switch >>>>>> to a supplier of FTTP using City Fibre who recently fibred up our
    district. But I've see a few reports saying that getting an analogue >>>>>> phone to work with the EE hub can be difficult. I wondered if anyone >>>>>> here has any experience of this migration?

    Rupert, an occasional poster here (or another uk.telecom* group), I think >>>>> ended up in legal action against EE because their hub didn't work. Might be
    worth searching the history.

    I didn't go quite as far as legal action but got to the Ombudsman.
    EE convinced him that they can't be expected to provide a reliable
    voice service because it isn't realty their technology.

    Symptoms: after a Hub reboot, Digital Voice (DV) worked but after a
    period of time it would fail. This would manifest itself either with
    outbound calls not working (less common) or inbound calls going
    straight to voicemail or just silence. This happened as soon as 10
    days or as long as three weeks. Of course the actual time wasn't
    certain as I didn't check it every day.

    I was not the only one, it seems, suffering from this.
    So I now have an A&A VOIP number and a Grandstream ATA. Rather nicely, >>>> I can use my GPO 746 with the Grandstream!

    I have something similar going on as well with two things:
    1.) Wi-Fi calling
    Incoming calls go to voicemail without ringing. The notification/text
    telling me so arrives quite some time later.
    Outgoing calls also fail
    Incoming texts are also delayed.
    I can fix this by re-registering the phone (switch off Wi-Fi, wait a
    bit and then switch it on again - mobile signal is poor around here so >>>> Wi-Fi calling is needed)
    2.) App and Hub Manager
    Once it a while the EE app won't work.
    At the same time going to 192.168.1.254 also doesn't work.
    A hub reboot is needed. And, each time, A&A tell me the IP address has >>>> changed. So I guess there is a problem with the EE DHCP server. Or
    rather something doesn't update other things once there is a new lease. >>>>


    Are you saying EE keep giving you a different public IP address?

    Oh yes.

    YourCOd think that EE being BT, and having been in the game from the early days, would have enough IPv4 addresses not to play those games. ItrCOs one of the advantages of the likes of A&A and IDNet that you get a static IPv4 address.

    Do EE support IPv6?

    The amount of churn the BT infrastructure has, as well as moving people
    about as they do network upgrades (inc. FTTP) does imply a certain
    degree of active IPAM is needed.
    For a time, their top-end router didn't do DDNS but now it does so,
    other than this apparent problem, there isn't an issue.

    Yes, EE/BT does support IPv6 but still with dynamic addresses I believe.



    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bob Pullen@me@privacy.net to uk.telecom.broadband on Sat Apr 25 09:41:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 18/04/2026 18:15, Theo wrote:
    --8<--SNIP--8<--
    Another option is to just pair DECT handsets with your hub directly - the BT Hub can do that, I assume the EE hub is the same. Call quality should be better.

    Yes, the EE hub is the same. You can plug a traditional phone into the
    BT socket on the back of the hub, or use BT/EE provided DECT handsets
    that will pair directly with the hub over the air.

    They also offer these - https://ee.co.uk/help/home-phone/getting-started/setup-use-digital-home-phone-adapter

    Mains powered adapters with their own BT socket. The idea being that you
    plug a traditional phone into the socket on the adapter, and then the
    adapter connects over DECT back to the hub, essentially mimicking the
    behavior of an extension socket.
    --
    Bob Pullen
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.telecom.broadband on Sun Apr 26 16:46:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 20/04/2026 17:21, Clive Page wrote:
    On 20/04/2026 13:29, Jack Harry Teesdale wrote:
    [snip]
    I have had a similar problem but found that a 3 phone cordless system
    works with the base station plugged into the router does the job, the
    2 remote handsets just need pugging into a nearby socket outlet.

    Thanks.-a That had occurred to me and would be a better solution, but of course it means even more capital investment, which for at most one or
    two phone calls per month is hard to justify.

    Just for amusement I can report this. In the post yesterday (yes a
    Saturday postal delivery, what a miracle) we got a letter from Plusnet, confirming what the email said, i.e. we need to choose what to do to
    replace our present landline.

    This enclosed a coloured booklet extolling the EE phone system which is
    the default successor. On p3 it says:

    "From now on, include the area code when when dialling local numbers.
    For example dial <0207> if you're dialling in the London area."

    I don't think I want to entrust my VoiP service to a company which has
    such a poor understanding of area codes.
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to uk.telecom.broadband on Sun Apr 26 19:35:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 2026/4/26 16:46:14, Clive Page wrote:
    []
    Just for amusement I can report this. In the post yesterday (yes a
    Saturday postal delivery, what a miracle) we got a letter from Plusnet, confirming what the email said, i.e. we need to choose what to do to
    replace our present landline.

    (Does it say "if you do nothing ..."?)

    This enclosed a coloured booklet extolling the EE phone system which is
    the default successor. On p3 it says:

    Is it just the 'phones that would transfer to EE, the BB staying with PN
    (if so, what does it suggest the standing change and per-minute would
    be), or does it say both would go to EE?

    "From now on, include the area code when when dialling local numbers.
    For example dial <0207> if you're dialling in the London area."

    I don't think I want to entrust my VoiP service to a company which has
    such a poor understanding of area codes.

    Was the booklet produced by PN or EE?

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Who is Art, and why does life imitate him?
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 27 09:53:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 26/04/2026 19:35, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    On 2026/4/26 16:46:14, Clive Page wrote:
    []
    Just for amusement I can report this. In the post yesterday (yes a
    Saturday postal delivery, what a miracle) we got a letter from Plusnet,
    confirming what the email said, i.e. we need to choose what to do to
    replace our present landline.

    (Does it say "if you do nothing ..."?)

    This enclosed a coloured booklet extolling the EE phone system which is
    the default successor. On p3 it says:

    Is it just the 'phones that would transfer to EE, the BB staying with PN
    (if so, what does it suggest the standing change and per-minute would
    be), or does it say both would go to EE?

    "From now on, include the area code when when dialling local numbers.
    For example dial <0207> if you're dialling in the London area."

    I don't think I want to entrust my VoiP service to a company which has
    such a poor understanding of area codes.

    Was the booklet produced by PN or EE?

    It looks as if it was produced by EE but designed for those currently
    with Plusnet and being forced to migrate. Both phone and BB would
    transfer to EE. It says "Pay the same as you do today with Plusnet" i.e.
    no guarantee over future price increases.

    I'm leaning towards giving up the home phone which will avoid being
    forced to move to EE.
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 27 10:57:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 2026/4/27 9:53:37, Clive Page wrote:
    On 26/04/2026 19:35, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    []
    Is it just the 'phones that would transfer to EE, the BB staying with PN
    (if so, what does it suggest the standing change and per-minute would
    be), or does it say both would go to EE?

    "From now on, include the area code when when dialling local numbers.
    For example dial <0207> if you're dialling in the London area."

    I don't think I want to entrust my VoiP service to a company which has
    such a poor understanding of area codes.

    Was the booklet produced by PN or EE?

    It looks as if it was produced by EE but designed for those currently
    with Plusnet and being forced to migrate. Both phone and BB would
    transfer to EE. It says "Pay the same as you do today with Plusnet" i.e.
    no guarantee over future price increases.

    Ah, so no individual breakdown, and certainly not a cost-per-minute
    revelation (what are you on with PN - no calls included, evenings and
    weekends, or anytime?).

    I'm leaning towards giving up the home phone which will avoid being
    forced to move to EE.

    So as to stay with PN? Out of curiosity, why? They've closed news,
    outsourced email and (for those that had it) web, they're not doing VoIP
    ... I too am staying with them for the moment, but I do keep asking
    myself why. The actual product is fine (but then that's just them
    reselling Openreach's product), but the customer service - especially
    anything to do with billing - has plummeted.

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The modern world so often thinks that the way to relax is by doing
    absolutely nothing, and I've never really understood that.
    Nigella Lawson in RT 2015/10/31-11/6
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Davey@davey@example.invalid to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 27 11:01:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:57:31 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:


    So as to stay with PN? Out of curiosity, why? They've closed news,
    outsourced email and (for those that had it) web, they're not doing
    VoIP ... I too am staying with them for the moment, but I do keep
    asking myself why. The actual product is fine (but then that's just
    them reselling Openreach's product), but the customer service -
    especially anything to do with billing - has plummeted.

    The billing practices were what drove me away from BT. They were like a
    version of the Three Card Trick.
    I moved to Zen, who kept the same price for years, in fact until I
    changed to Fibre.
    --
    Davey.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 27 17:08:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 27/04/2026 11:01, Davey wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:57:31 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:


    So as to stay with PN? Out of curiosity, why? They've closed news,
    outsourced email and (for those that had it) web, they're not doing
    VoIP ... I too am staying with them for the moment, but I do keep
    asking myself why. The actual product is fine (but then that's just
    them reselling Openreach's product), but the customer service -
    especially anything to do with billing - has plummeted.

    The billing practices were what drove me away from BT. They were like a version of the Three Card Trick.
    I moved to Zen, who kept the same price for years, in fact until I
    changed to Fibre.


    Plusnet's bills are just as intractable as BT's were in years gone by -
    lots of charges and countervailing discounts which means only the
    overall total makes any sense.

    I'm also thinking of leaving Plusnet: my current contract lasts another
    6 months but whether I stay with them for phoneless broadband or move to
    EE it means taking out another contract for at least 12 months, and
    probably 24 months to get a reasonable rate. So it isn't really a continuation of the same service.

    They would charge rather a lot if the customer left early but they are effectively ending the contract early themselves by forcing me to take
    out another one for a longer period. I think I deserve compensation for
    that but I doubt if I can get anything.

    At present nearly all these broadband companies think they can get away
    with a price increase of 10% or more every year, without any
    justification at all. Which makes Zen seem good as their price is fixed throughout the contract - but their current offering would only last 18 months, and I'm not sure whether their price would then rise.
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 27 16:33:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 27/04/2026 11:01, Davey wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:57:31 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:


    So as to stay with PN? Out of curiosity, why? They've closed news,
    outsourced email and (for those that had it) web, they're not doing
    VoIP ... I too am staying with them for the moment, but I do keep
    asking myself why. The actual product is fine (but then that's just
    them reselling Openreach's product), but the customer service -
    especially anything to do with billing - has plummeted.

    The billing practices were what drove me away from BT. They were like a
    version of the Three Card Trick.
    I moved to Zen, who kept the same price for years, in fact until I
    changed to Fibre.


    Plusnet's bills are just as intractable as BT's were in years gone by -
    lots of charges and countervailing discounts which means only the
    overall total makes any sense.

    I'm also thinking of leaving Plusnet: my current contract lasts another
    6 months but whether I stay with them for phoneless broadband or move to
    EE it means taking out another contract for at least 12 months, and
    probably 24 months to get a reasonable rate. So it isn't really a continuation of the same service.

    They would charge rather a lot if the customer left early but they are effectively ending the contract early themselves by forcing me to take
    out another one for a longer period. I think I deserve compensation for that but I doubt if I can get anything.

    At present nearly all these broadband companies think they can get away
    with a price increase of 10% or more every year, without any
    justification at all. Which makes Zen seem good as their price is fixed throughout the contract - but their current offering would only last 18 months, and I'm not sure whether their price would then rise.


    Try IDNet. IrCOm on year 3 with them and the price has gone down rather than up.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Woody@harrogate3@ntlworld.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Mon Apr 27 19:52:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On Mon 27/04/2026 17:08, Clive Page wrote:
    On 27/04/2026 11:01, Davey wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:57:31 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    So as to stay with PN? Out of curiosity, why? They've closed news,
    outsourced email and (for those that had it) web, they're not doing
    VoIP ... I too am staying with them for the moment, but I do keep
    asking myself why. The actual product is fine (but then that's just
    them reselling Openreach's product), but the customer service -
    especially anything to do with billing - has plummeted.
    The billing practices were what drove me away from BT. They were like a
    version of the Three Card Trick.
    I moved to Zen, who kept the same price for years, in fact until I
    changed to Fibre.


    Plusnet's bills are just as intractable as BT's were in years gone by -
    lots of charges and countervailing discounts which means only the
    overall total makes any sense.

    I'm also thinking of leaving Plusnet: my current contract lasts another
    6 months but whether I stay with them for phoneless broadband or move to
    EE it means taking out another contract for at least 12 months, and
    probably 24 months to get a reasonable rate.-a So it isn't really a continuation of the same service.

    They would charge rather a lot if the customer left early but they are effectively ending the contract early themselves by forcing me to take
    out another one for a longer period.-a I think I deserve compensation for that but I doubt if I can get anything.

    At present nearly all these broadband companies think they can get away
    with a price increase of 10% or more every year, without any
    justification at all.-a Which makes Zen seem good as their price is fixed throughout the contract - but their current offering would only last 18 months, and I'm not sure whether their price would then rise.

    Zen will keep the fixed price for existing customers, but any newcomer
    will get an annual price rise of (IMSMC) about -u3.50.
    Been there, done that, etc etc.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Woody@harrogate3@ntlworld.com to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 28 09:51:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On Mon 27/04/2026 19:52, Woody wrote:
    On Mon 27/04/2026 17:08, Clive Page wrote:
    On 27/04/2026 11:01, Davey wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:57:31 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    So as to stay with PN? Out of curiosity, why? They've closed news,
    outsourced email and (for those that had it) web, they're not doing
    VoIP ... I too am staying with them for the moment, but I do keep
    asking myself why. The actual product is fine (but then that's just
    them reselling Openreach's product), but the customer service -
    especially anything to do with billing - has plummeted.
    The billing practices were what drove me away from BT. They were like a
    version of the Three Card Trick.
    I moved to Zen, who kept the same price for years, in fact until I
    changed to Fibre.


    Plusnet's bills are just as intractable as BT's were in years gone by
    - lots of charges and countervailing discounts which means only the
    overall total makes any sense.

    I'm also thinking of leaving Plusnet: my current contract lasts
    another 6 months but whether I stay with them for phoneless broadband
    or move to EE it means taking out another contract for at least 12
    months, and probably 24 months to get a reasonable rate.-a So it isn't
    really a continuation of the same service.

    They would charge rather a lot if the customer left early but they are
    effectively ending the contract early themselves by forcing me to take
    out another one for a longer period.-a I think I deserve compensation
    for that but I doubt if I can get anything.

    At present nearly all these broadband companies think they can get
    away with a price increase of 10% or more every year, without any
    justification at all.-a Which makes Zen seem good as their price is
    fixed throughout the contract - but their current offering would only
    last 18 months, and I'm not sure whether their price would then rise.

    Zen will keep the fixed price for existing customers, but any newcomer
    will get an annual price rise of (IMSMC) about -u3.50.
    Been there, done that, etc etc.

    Correcting myself - I believe the above WAS the situation last time I
    checked but looking at the Zen offers in CityFibre it looks as though
    Zen have reinstated their fixed-price-for-life pricing. I could be wrong
    of course!


    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Wade@dave@g4ugm.invalid to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 28 11:35:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 28/04/2026 10:51, Woody wrote:
    On Mon 27/04/2026 19:52, Woody wrote:
    On Mon 27/04/2026 17:08, Clive Page wrote:
    On 27/04/2026 11:01, Davey wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:57:31 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    So as to stay with PN? Out of curiosity, why? They've closed news,
    outsourced email and (for those that had it) web, they're not doing
    VoIP ... I too am staying with them for the moment, but I do keep
    asking myself why. The actual product is fine (but then that's just
    them reselling Openreach's product), but the customer service -
    especially anything to do with billing - has plummeted.
    The billing practices were what drove me away from BT. They were like a >>>> version of the Three Card Trick.
    I moved to Zen, who kept the same price for years, in fact until I
    changed to Fibre.


    Plusnet's bills are just as intractable as BT's were in years gone by
    - lots of charges and countervailing discounts which means only the
    overall total makes any sense.

    I'm also thinking of leaving Plusnet: my current contract lasts
    another 6 months but whether I stay with them for phoneless broadband
    or move to EE it means taking out another contract for at least 12
    months, and probably 24 months to get a reasonable rate.-a So it isn't
    really a continuation of the same service.

    They would charge rather a lot if the customer left early but they
    are effectively ending the contract early themselves by forcing me to
    take out another one for a longer period.-a I think I deserve
    compensation for that but I doubt if I can get anything.

    At present nearly all these broadband companies think they can get
    away with a price increase of 10% or more every year, without any
    justification at all.-a Which makes Zen seem good as their price is
    fixed throughout the contract - but their current offering would only
    last 18 months, and I'm not sure whether their price would then rise.

    Zen will keep the fixed price for existing customers, but any newcomer
    will get an annual price rise of (IMSMC) about -u3.50.
    Been there, done that, etc etc.

    Correcting myself - I believe the above WAS the situation last time I checked but looking at the Zen offers in CityFibre it looks as though
    Zen have reinstated their fixed-price-for-life pricing. I could be wrong
    of course!


    Well my price has stayed the same since 2023 but I have had a speed
    increase from 500Mbps to 900Mbps and a new router for a charge of -u9.95...

    Dave

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 28 10:38:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    David Wade wrote:

    I have had a speed increase from 500Mbps to 900Mbps

    Genuine question, did you find any use to that increase, or is it just
    "on paper"?
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Davey@davey@example.invalid to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 28 10:46:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 06:14:35 -0000 (UTC)
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Are you saying EE keep giving you a different public IP address?

    Oh yes.

    YourCOd think that EE being BT, and having been in the game from the
    early days, would have enough IPv4 addresses not to play those games.
    ItrCOs one of the advantages of the likes of A&A and IDNet that you get
    a static IPv4 address.
    So do Zen.
    --
    Davey.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 28 11:42:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 28/04/2026 09:51, Woody wrote:
    On Mon 27/04/2026 19:52, Woody wrote:
    On Mon 27/04/2026 17:08, Clive Page wrote:
    On 27/04/2026 11:01, Davey wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:57:31 +0100
    "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    So as to stay with PN? Out of curiosity, why? They've closed news,
    outsourced email and (for those that had it) web, they're not doing
    VoIP ... I too am staying with them for the moment, but I do keep
    asking myself why. The actual product is fine (but then that's just
    them reselling Openreach's product), but the customer service -
    especially anything to do with billing - has plummeted.
    The billing practices were what drove me away from BT. They were like a >>>> version of the Three Card Trick.
    I moved to Zen, who kept the same price for years, in fact until I
    changed to Fibre.


    Plusnet's bills are just as intractable as BT's were in years gone by
    - lots of charges and countervailing discounts which means only the
    overall total makes any sense.

    I'm also thinking of leaving Plusnet: my current contract lasts
    another 6 months but whether I stay with them for phoneless broadband
    or move to EE it means taking out another contract for at least 12
    months, and probably 24 months to get a reasonable rate.-a So it isn't
    really a continuation of the same service.

    They would charge rather a lot if the customer left early but they
    are effectively ending the contract early themselves by forcing me to
    take out another one for a longer period.-a I think I deserve
    compensation for that but I doubt if I can get anything.

    At present nearly all these broadband companies think they can get
    away with a price increase of 10% or more every year, without any
    justification at all.-a Which makes Zen seem good as their price is
    fixed throughout the contract - but their current offering would only
    last 18 months, and I'm not sure whether their price would then rise.

    Zen will keep the fixed price for existing customers, but any newcomer
    will get an annual price rise of (IMSMC) about -u3.50.
    Been there, done that, etc etc.

    Correcting myself - I believe the above WAS the situation last time I checked but looking at the Zen offers in CityFibre it looks as though
    Zen have reinstated their fixed-price-for-life pricing. I could be wrong
    of course!


    Well at present they are quoting me a price of -u28/month with no price
    rises during the contract (good) but the contract is only for 18 months
    (not so good).
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Wade@dave@g4ugm.invalid to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 28 13:36:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    On 28/04/2026 11:38, Andy Burns wrote:
    David Wade wrote:

    I have had a speed increase from 500Mbps to 900Mbps

    Genuine question, did you find any use to that increase, or is it just
    "on paper"?

    I was more interested in the uplink speed increase from 70 to 100. I
    manage a couple of web sites so upload large files from time to time.
    I also VPN through my home setup so I can watch UK TV when I am not in
    the UK. Both these actions are limited by the uplink speed, so this
    speed increase is noticeable.

    Dave
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.telecom.broadband on Tue Apr 28 13:03:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom.broadband

    David Wade wrote:
    On 28/04/2026 11:38, Andy Burns wrote:
    David Wade wrote:

    I have had a speed increase from 500Mbps to 900Mbps

    Genuine question, did you find any use to that increase, or is it just
    "on paper"?

    I was more interested in the uplink speed increase from 70 to 100.

    Yes, that would be about the only reason I'd consider hugely faster
    download speed to get a bump of upload speed compared to FTTC.

    Openreach claim we should get FTTP in this area "this year", they seem
    to be in the early stages of work, lots of spray marking of pavements/manholes/telegraph poles going on.

    It would be nice to think they'll implement the new symmetric flavour of XGSPON instead of GPON.

    I manage a couple of web sites so upload large files from time to
    time. I also VPN through my home setup so I can watch UK TV when I
    am not in the UK. Both these actions are limited by the uplink
    speed, so this speed increase is noticeable.
    Dave

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2