On 02/02/2026 15:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Take analogue TV, the audio may be considered to be on a separate
transmitted frequency, but the chroma is-a multiplexed onto the same
'channel' as the video.
The way it is specified, and the way that analogue TVs recovered the
audio, is that both audio and chroma are on sub-carriers, not one on a sub-carrier, and one as an adjacent carrier.
Analogue TVs recover the
audio as a 6MHz signal, embedded within the demodulated vidwo, and feed
it into a 6MHz IF amplifier; they don't down convert to, say, the
10.7MHz IF typically used for FM broadcast sound.
(Note that 6Mhz is for the UK.-a Other sub-carrier frequencies were used
in other countries.)
Chroma is interesting, because, if you treat it as a single sub-carrier,
you have to treat the modulating signal as being a complex number.
An analogue tv signal was transmitted via two transmitters:
One for video (vestigal sideband modulation) on the channel frequency,
One for audio on a frequency 5,5 or 6 MHz higher than video frequency.
Some TV systems used FM for audio, some used AM.
Later the BBC used NICAM for audio. (was NICAM on another frequency?) Tugether they form the "TV-channel", with a bandwidth of about 7 MHz.
In VHF the channel width was 7 MHz (for B & G),
in UHF 8 MHz.
There was no 6 (or 5,5) MHz IF amplifier,
the audio was demodulated from 33,4 MHz in case of B/G.
Chroma is interesting, because, if you treat it as a single sub-
carrier, you have to treat the modulating signal as being a complex
number.
I'm not sure what you mean with this.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 62:46:10 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,046 |