• Analogue to Digital Voice issues

    From Jeff Layman@Jeff@invalid.invalid to uk.telecom on Wed May 20 22:27:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    I've just changed from analogue (BT) to Digital Voice (Zen. I've been
    using them as my ISP for 10 years. FTTC for the last two years). The
    phone is a Panasonic DECT Cordless KX-TG8062E, 13 years old.

    It wasn't without issue. Firstly, I hadn't noticed that the phone plug
    to the NTE5 (431A) and that to the Fritz!Box router (RJ11-4) weren't the
    same! At first I couldn't find the 431A - RJ11 adaptor, so used a spare
    RJ11-4 - RJ11-4 cable I had. After rebooting the router, I soon got a
    dialling tone on the DECT handset. As I keyed a number, I heard the
    tones when the keys were pressed; after a few seconds I heard an engaged
    tone. When I tried again a few minutes later the same thing happened,
    and again with a different number. I contacted the first number with my
    mobile without problem, and was told the phone hadn't been engaged. I
    then called my mobile from the DECT phone. I could hear ringing tones on
    my DECT phone, but the mobile didn't ring.

    I emailed Zen, and they replied quickly that there had been "an issue
    with the finalisation" (whatever that means). Next morning, I was able
    to call and receive calls without problem. So the issue was resolved by
    Zen within a few hours.

    There remains a strange problem, though, when using the DECT
    answerphone. This had always worked without problem when analogue, but I
    tried it calling the phone from my mobile, and letting it go to
    answerphone mode. After recording a few words, I touched "end call" on
    the mobile. I immediately heard about a half-dozen or so "engaged" tones
    on the mobile before the call disconnected. Even more oddly, when I
    played back my recorded words the engaged tones had been recorded too!

    Anyone experienced anything like this with their Digital Voice DECT answerphone? The Fritz!Box does have an answerphone facility, but it's
    more awkward to use than the DECT answerphone.

    Anyway, I'm pleased that I took the decision to get Digital Voice now. I wonder what will happen when the rush happens next year and there are
    similar problems to those I had to be sorted out with a large number of customers.
    --
    Jeff

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 07:40:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Anyone experienced anything like this with their Digital Voice DECT answerphone?

    No, but my setup isn't directly comparable to yours ...

    I have VoIP service from voipfone instead of Digital Voice from my ISP,
    with a Gigaset DX800a (combined desk phone, DECT base and answer machine).

    The Gigaset no longer uses any RJ11 or BT431A connection as its "phone
    line", it has an ethernet connection.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Layman@Jeff@invalid.invalid to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 08:10:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 21/05/2026 07:40, Andy Burns wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Anyone experienced anything like this with their Digital Voice DECT
    answerphone?

    No, but my setup isn't directly comparable to yours ...

    I have VoIP service from voipfone instead of Digital Voice from my ISP,
    with a Gigaset DX800a (combined desk phone, DECT base and answer machine).

    That's an impressive feature-rich phone (with a price to match)! I see
    that, according to the Amazon reviews page, it requires "converters" to
    work in the UK as it's meant for use in Germany.

    The Gigaset no longer uses any RJ11 or BT431A connection as its "phone
    line", it has an ethernet connection.

    I don't use the ethernet capabilities of the Fritz!Box now, although I
    have used it in the past with an old Panasonic PVR which didn't have
    WiFi. The Fritz!Box has a DECT facility to connect directly to the
    handset (if it's compatible - I haven't checked yet). However, staying
    with with RJ11 connection I might set up the Fritz!Box's answerphone
    facility just to see if that records the engaged tone as well. If it
    does, that would suggest that the issue lies in whatever Zen is using to connect to my Digital Voice phone.

    I'm afraid that I'm ignorant of how DV actually works. Is there still an "exchange" somewhere? If not, how does "the system" know how to connect
    anyone phoning me from their phone - DV or otherwise - to my DV phone?
    --
    Jeff
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 08:58:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    Jeff Layman wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    Gigaset DX800a (combined desk phone, DECT base and answer
    machine).

    That's an impressive feature-rich phone (with a price to match)!

    The original one developed a weird fault, replaced with a secondhand one
    for -u54

    I see that, according to the Amazon reviews page, it requires
    "converters" to work in the UK as it's meant for use in Germany.

    Maybe if it was used on an ISDN line, but I've never used any "converters"
    The Gigaset no longer uses any RJ11 or BT431A connection as its "phone
    line", it has an ethernet connection.

    I don't use the ethernet capabilities of the Fritz!Box now, although I
    have used it in the past with an old Panasonic PVR which didn't have
    WiFi. The Fritz!Box has a DECT facility to connect directly to the
    handset (if it's compatible - I haven't checked yet). However, staying
    with with RJ11 connection I might set up the Fritz!Box's answerphone facility just to see if that records the engaged tone as well. If it
    does, that would suggest that the issue lies in whatever Zen is using to connect to my Digital Voice phone.


    Do Zen fully manage the Fritz!Box, or can you configure it? Maybe the
    line impedance matching, or ring cadence isn't quite right and confusing
    your DECT phone?

    > I'm afraid that I'm ignorant of how DV actually works. Is there
    still an
    "exchange" somewhere? If not, how does "the system" know how to connect anyone phoning me from their phone - DV or otherwise - to my DV phone?

    I don't know all the details, but in effect your phone number is
    looked-up in a database and "redirected" to a VoIP gateway, to be
    delivered over a second VLAN on PPPoE over your FTTC connection, the
    router then breaks that out to its analogue (FXS) port ... something
    like that.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Richmond@dnomhcir@gmx.com to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 09:11:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> writes:

    got a dialling tone on the DECT handset. As I keyed a number, I heard
    the tones when the keys were pressed; after a few seconds I heard an
    engaged tone. When I tried again a few minutes later the same thing
    happened, and again with a different number. I contacted the first
    number with my mobile without problem, and was told the phone hadn't
    been engaged. I then called my mobile from the DECT phone. I could
    hear ringing tones on my DECT phone, but the mobile didn't ring.

    I hear an engaged tone at the end of calls, where the other person hangs
    up. In the days of analog phone I think there was silence, followed by a continuous tone.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick Finnigan@nix@genie.co.uk to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 10:27:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 20/05/2026 22:27, Jeff Layman wrote:

    Anyone experienced anything like this with their Digital Voice DECT answerphone? The Fritz!Box does have an answerphone facility, but it's more awkward to use than the DECT answerphone.

    Have you tried pairing your phone with the built in DECT of the Fritz!Box? https://www.zen.co.uk/help-support/pair-dect

    (I'm not with zen, my panasonic DECT phones have better audio connected
    to the router's DECT, but can only save the CLID with a wired connection).
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Davey@davey@example.invalid to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 10:37:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Thu, 21 May 2026 10:27:29 +0100
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:

    On 20/05/2026 22:27, Jeff Layman wrote:

    Anyone experienced anything like this with their Digital Voice DECT answerphone? The Fritz!Box does have an answerphone facility, but
    it's more awkward to use than the DECT answerphone.

    Have you tried pairing your phone with the built in DECT of the
    Fritz!Box? https://www.zen.co.uk/help-support/pair-dect

    (I'm not with zen, my panasonic DECT phones have better audio
    connected to the router's DECT, but can only save the CLID with a
    wired connection).

    I am with Zen and Digital Voice, and I have 4 Panasonic DECT handsets,
    with the base station plugged into the FON socket on the Fritz!Box. They perform as expected, I use the handsets' answering machine, and I see
    the full (apparent) calling number displayed with no problem.
    So it can work.
    --
    Davey.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 11:26:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Jeff Layman wrote:

    I'm afraid that I'm ignorant of how DV actually works. Is there still
    an "exchange" somewhere? If not, how does "the system" know how to
    connect anyone phoning me from their phone - DV or otherwise - to my DV phone?

    I don't know all the details, but in effect your phone number is
    looked-up in a database and "redirected" to a VoIP gateway, to be
    delivered over a second VLAN on PPPoE over your FTTC connection, the
    router then breaks that out to its analogue (FXS) port ... something
    like that.

    Roughly speaking, the 'exchange' is now a server box in their datacentre, hooked up to the internet.

    Your router keeps registered with your ISP's SIP server. I'm not sure
    there's VLANs involved, at least for some ISPs you can connect over the internet if you can find out the login details (which they try to hide from you). The router finds out these details as part of its account
    provisioning (eg via TR-104 over TR-069).

    An incoming call goes first to the owner of the number range (eg Openreach
    if it was originally on a BT exchange) who look it up in their database and redirect it to the ISP. The ISP posts a route saying 'the server handling 01234 567890 is sip.isp.net'.

    The ISP server looks up the number in the database, finds which client it
    needs to talk to. It sends a message to the SIP client in your router
    saying 'incoming call for 01234 567890'. The SIP client then negotiates
    media (a channel over the internet for audio to be sent back and forth) with the caller. Then the router rings the attached phone.

    I believe in the case of Zen they aren't running their own SIP server,
    they're renting an Openreach one. So in that case the infrastructure is Openreach's rather than Zen's, but it works the same way.
    (it's possible in this specific case they use VLANs - I know Sky don't)

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Wade@g4ugm@dave.invalid to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 19:08:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 20/05/2026 22:27, Jeff Layman wrote:
    I've just changed from analogue (BT) to Digital Voice (Zen. I've been
    using them as my ISP for 10 years. FTTC for the last two years). The
    phone is a Panasonic DECT Cordless KX-TG8062E, 13 years old.

    It wasn't without issue. Firstly, I hadn't noticed that the phone plug
    to the NTE5 (431A) and that to the Fritz!Box router (RJ11-4) weren't the same! At first I couldn't find the 431A - RJ11 adaptor, so used a spare RJ11-4 - RJ11-4 cable I had. After rebooting the router, I soon got a dialling tone on the DECT handset. As I keyed a number, I heard the
    tones when the keys were pressed; after a few seconds I heard an engaged tone. When I tried again a few minutes later the same thing happened,
    and again with a different number. I contacted the first number with my mobile without problem, and was told the phone hadn't been engaged. I
    then called my mobile from the DECT phone. I could hear ringing tones on
    my DECT phone, but the mobile didn't ring.

    I emailed Zen, and they replied quickly that there had been "an issue
    with the finalisation" (whatever that means). Next morning, I was able
    to call and receive calls without problem. So the issue was resolved by
    Zen within a few hours.

    There remains a strange problem, though, when using the DECT
    answerphone. This had always worked without problem when analogue, but I tried it calling the phone from my mobile, and letting it go to
    answerphone mode. After recording a few words, I touched "end call" on
    the mobile. I immediately heard about a half-dozen or so "engaged" tones
    on the mobile before the call disconnected. Even more oddly, when I
    played back my recorded words the engaged tones had been recorded too!


    Widely reported problem with answerphones and the Fritz!box.


    Anyone experienced anything like this with their Digital Voice DECT answerphone? The Fritz!Box does have an answerphone facility, but it's
    more awkward to use than the DECT answerphone.

    yes, i just ignored the beeps. These days I use answerphone in the
    Fritz!box and it e-mails the messages to my gmail account.

    Dave


    Anyway, I'm pleased that I took the decision to get Digital Voice now. I wonder what will happen when the rush happens next year and there are similar problems to those I had to be sorted out with a large number of customers.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Davey@davey@example.invalid to uk.telecom on Thu May 21 20:04:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Thu, 21 May 2026 19:08:33 +0100
    David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> wrote:

    Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid>
    Subject: Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues
    Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 19:08:33 +0100
    User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
    Newsgroups: uk.telecom
    Organisation: A noiseless patient Spider

    On 20/05/2026 22:27, Jeff Layman wrote:
    I've just changed from analogue (BT) to Digital Voice (Zen. I've
    been using them as my ISP for 10 years. FTTC for the last two
    years). The phone is a Panasonic DECT Cordless KX-TG8062E, 13 years
    old.

    It wasn't without issue. Firstly, I hadn't noticed that the phone
    plug to the NTE5 (431A) and that to the Fritz!Box router (RJ11-4)
    weren't the same! At first I couldn't find the 431A - RJ11 adaptor,
    so used a spare RJ11-4 - RJ11-4 cable I had. After rebooting the
    router, I soon got a dialling tone on the DECT handset. As I keyed
    a number, I heard the tones when the keys were pressed; after a few
    seconds I heard an engaged tone. When I tried again a few minutes
    later the same thing happened, and again with a different number. I contacted the first number with my mobile without problem, and was
    told the phone hadn't been engaged. I then called my mobile from
    the DECT phone. I could hear ringing tones on my DECT phone, but
    the mobile didn't ring.

    I emailed Zen, and they replied quickly that there had been "an
    issue with the finalisation" (whatever that means). Next morning, I
    was able to call and receive calls without problem. So the issue
    was resolved by Zen within a few hours.

    There remains a strange problem, though, when using the DECT
    answerphone. This had always worked without problem when analogue,
    but I tried it calling the phone from my mobile, and letting it go
    to answerphone mode. After recording a few words, I touched "end
    call" on the mobile. I immediately heard about a half-dozen or so
    "engaged" tones on the mobile before the call disconnected. Even
    more oddly, when I played back my recorded words the engaged tones
    had been recorded too!

    Widely reported problem with answerphones and the Fritz!box.


    Thankfully I have never had that problem.
    --
    Davey.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From grinch@grinch@somewhere.net to uk.telecom on Fri May 22 10:26:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 21/05/2026 20:04, Davey wrote:
    On Thu, 21 May 2026 19:08:33 +0100
    David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> wrote:

    Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid>
    Subject: Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues
    Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 19:08:33 +0100
    User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
    Newsgroups: uk.telecom
    Organisation: A noiseless patient Spider

    On 20/05/2026 22:27, Jeff Layman wrote:
    I've just changed from analogue (BT) to Digital Voice (Zen. I've
    been using them as my ISP for 10 years. FTTC for the last two
    years). The phone is a Panasonic DECT Cordless KX-TG8062E, 13 years
    old.

    It wasn't without issue. Firstly, I hadn't noticed that the phone
    plug to the NTE5 (431A) and that to the Fritz!Box router (RJ11-4)
    weren't the same! At first I couldn't find the 431A - RJ11 adaptor,
    so used a spare RJ11-4 - RJ11-4 cable I had. After rebooting the
    router, I soon got a dialling tone on the DECT handset. As I keyed
    a number, I heard the tones when the keys were pressed; after a few
    seconds I heard an engaged tone. When I tried again a few minutes
    later the same thing happened, and again with a different number. I
    contacted the first number with my mobile without problem, and was
    told the phone hadn't been engaged. I then called my mobile from
    the DECT phone. I could hear ringing tones on my DECT phone, but
    the mobile didn't ring.

    I emailed Zen, and they replied quickly that there had been "an
    issue with the finalisation" (whatever that means). Next morning, I
    was able to call and receive calls without problem. So the issue
    was resolved by Zen within a few hours.

    There remains a strange problem, though, when using the DECT
    answerphone. This had always worked without problem when analogue,
    but I tried it calling the phone from my mobile, and letting it go
    to answerphone mode. After recording a few words, I touched "end
    call" on the mobile. I immediately heard about a half-dozen or so
    "engaged" tones on the mobile before the call disconnected. Even
    more oddly, when I played back my recorded words the engaged tones
    had been recorded too!

    Widely reported problem with answerphones and the Fritz!box.


    Thankfully I have never had that problem.


    Neither have I
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Woolley@david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid to uk.telecom on Fri May 22 11:46:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 21/05/2026 11:26, Theo wrote:
    Your router keeps registered with your ISP's SIP server. I'm not sure there's VLANs involved, at least for some ISPs you can connect over the internet if you can find out the login details (which they try to hide from you).

    This only applies to ISPs like BT retail, who provide a combined
    service. Some ISPs don't provide telephony and some sell their ITSP and
    ISP services as different, and separable, products, so you can use the telephony over any other ISP, who doesn't block the ports used. The
    sort of provider that sells independent products doesn't lock down the
    login credentials.

    BT use a VLAN to carry the PPP over Ethernet for their combined voice
    service, and distinguish it from the PPP over Ethernet for the internet service. I think it would be theoretically possible to use their voice service with a different head end internet service provider.

    With providers that provide ITSP services separately, the SIP user agent
    need not be part of the router, or you could have one in the router, and
    also direct IP connections to other ones. They would use the same PPP
    over Ethernet connection for both internet and telephone.


    The ISP server looks up the number in the database, finds which client it needs to talk to. It sends a message to the SIP client in your router

    Pet peeve. It sends it to the SIP server in the router. It might be technically valid to say a VoIP client, but SIP is a symmetric protocol, unlike analogue telephony, and the side initiating the call is the SIP
    Client User Agent (UAC), and the side receiving it is the SIP Server
    User Agent (UAS), so once one introduces SIP, one should align with the
    SIP usage of client and server. (Actually, it is possible for UAS and
    UAC client roles to switch during a call.)
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Trolleybus@ken@birchanger.com to uk.telecom on Sat May 23 12:13:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Thu, 21 May 2026 10:37:33 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 21 May 2026 10:27:29 +0100
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:

    On 20/05/2026 22:27, Jeff Layman wrote:

    Anyone experienced anything like this with their Digital Voice DECT
    answerphone? The Fritz!Box does have an answerphone facility, but
    it's more awkward to use than the DECT answerphone.

    Have you tried pairing your phone with the built in DECT of the
    Fritz!Box? https://www.zen.co.uk/help-support/pair-dect

    (I'm not with zen, my panasonic DECT phones have better audio
    connected to the router's DECT, but can only save the CLID with a
    wired connection).

    I am with Zen and Digital Voice, and I have 4 Panasonic DECT handsets,
    with the base station plugged into the FON socket on the Fritz!Box. They >perform as expected, I use the handsets' answering machine, and I see
    the full (apparent) calling number displayed with no problem.
    So it can work.

    Similar here, but I soon threw out my Panasonic DECT base station and
    connected my Panasonic and Siemens handsets to the Fritz!Box's DECT
    base station. All worked correctly.

    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline
    calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics and
    added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to divert to answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I
    have call screening.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Davey@davey@example.invalid to uk.telecom on Sat May 23 12:44:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:13:19 +0100
    Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 May 2026 10:37:33 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 21 May 2026 10:27:29 +0100
    Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:

    On 20/05/2026 22:27, Jeff Layman wrote:

    Anyone experienced anything like this with their Digital Voice
    DECT answerphone? The Fritz!Box does have an answerphone
    facility, but it's more awkward to use than the DECT
    answerphone.

    Have you tried pairing your phone with the built in DECT of the
    Fritz!Box? https://www.zen.co.uk/help-support/pair-dect

    (I'm not with zen, my panasonic DECT phones have better audio
    connected to the router's DECT, but can only save the CLID with a
    wired connection).

    I am with Zen and Digital Voice, and I have 4 Panasonic DECT
    handsets, with the base station plugged into the FON socket on the >Fritz!Box. They perform as expected, I use the handsets' answering
    machine, and I see the full (apparent) calling number displayed with
    no problem. So it can work.

    Similar here, but I soon threw out my Panasonic DECT base station and connected my Panasonic and Siemens handsets to the Fritz!Box's DECT
    base station. All worked correctly.

    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline
    calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics and
    added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to divert to answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I
    have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed, then
    the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen the call. I
    see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an advantage either.
    Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside
    handset as an alarm clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I
    have the 'phone right there with me.
    Horses for courses.
    --
    Davey.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to uk.telecom on Sat May 23 20:29:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 2026/5/23 12:44:43, Davey wrote:
    []
    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed, then
    the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen the call. I
    see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an advantage either. Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside
    handset as an alarm clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I
    have the 'phone right there with me.
    Horses for courses.

    By "barred", I presume you mean the list of numbers calls from which are blocked. As you say, horses for courses - I suppose some people _will_
    have such numbers, for personal or business reasons; for just blocking
    spam, phishing etc. purposes, I've never found any point (since all the
    ones I've tried to 1572-1 have been "unknown" anyway [whatever 1471 says]).
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    "We're plumbing shallows we didn't know existed here" - Jeremy Paxman
    (as quizmaster of "University Challenge"), 1998 (when losing team
    suddenly put on a spurt by showing knowledge of things like the
    Eurovision Song Contest ...)
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Trolleybus@ken@birchanger.com to uk.telecom on Sun May 24 10:42:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline
    calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics and
    added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to divert to
    answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I
    have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed, then
    the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen the call. I
    see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an advantage either. >Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside
    handset as an alarm clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I
    have the 'phone right there with me.
    Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Layman@Jeff@invalid.invalid to uk.telecom on Sun May 24 11:30:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline
    calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics and
    added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to divert to
    answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I
    have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed, then
    the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen the call. I
    see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an advantage either.
    Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside
    handset as an alarm clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I
    have the 'phone right there with me.
    Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the DECT
    handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio connection to the
    DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's working at present - the
    "engaged" tone with answerphone is a minor annoyance - and CLI still
    works well. I asked Zen Support if, when using the Fritz!Box in
    answerphone mode, the Fon led lights up when a recorded message is left,
    but haven't had a reply.
    --
    Jeff
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Davey@davey@example.invalid to uk.telecom on Sun May 24 13:36:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline
    calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics
    and added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to
    divert to answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the
    Fritz!FON, so I have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed,
    then the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen
    the call. I see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an
    advantage either. Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory.
    I use my bedside handset as an alarm clock, and if the
    Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I have the 'phone right there with
    me. Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the DECT handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio connection to
    the DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's working at present -
    the "engaged" tone with answerphone is a minor annoyance - and CLI
    still works well. I asked Zen Support if, when using the Fritz!Box in answerphone mode, the Fon led lights up when a recorded message is
    left, but haven't had a reply.


    According to the manual:
    "Fon/DECT LED:
    flashing. Messages in your voice mailbox.
    (Function must be supported by the telephony provider.)
    off. No devices registering ".
    --
    Davey.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Layman@Jeff@invalid.invalid to uk.telecom on Sun May 24 15:24:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 24/05/2026 13:36, Davey wrote:
    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline
    calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics
    and added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to
    divert to answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the
    Fritz!FON, so I have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed,
    then the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen
    the call. I see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an
    advantage either. Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory.
    I use my bedside handset as an alarm clock, and if the
    Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I have the 'phone right there with
    me. Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the DECT
    handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio connection to
    the DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's working at present -
    the "engaged" tone with answerphone is a minor annoyance - and CLI
    still works well. I asked Zen Support if, when using the Fritz!Box in
    answerphone mode, the Fon led lights up when a recorded message is
    left, but haven't had a reply.


    According to the manual:
    "Fon/DECT LED:
    flashing. Messages in your voice mailbox.
    (Function must be supported by the telephony provider.)
    off. No devices registering ".

    Yep. That's what I found in the manual, so asked Zen (the "telephony provider") before I bothered fiddling with the Fritz!Box's answerphone.
    If it doesn't work, there's no point in using it - the Panasonic's led
    lights when there's a message waiting.
    --
    Jeff
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Davey@davey@example.invalid to uk.telecom on Sun May 24 16:41:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 15:24:02 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 13:36, Davey wrote:
    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming
    landline calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the
    Panasonics and added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the
    Fritx!Box to divert to answerphone after 10s and play the audio
    through the Fritz!FON, so I have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum
    allowed, then the answering machine part answers, and allows me
    to screen the call. I see nothing wrong with your setup, but I
    don't see an advantage either. Except probably a bigger 'Barred'
    number memory. I use my bedside handset as an alarm clock, and
    if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I have the 'phone right
    there with me. Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the
    DECT handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio
    connection to the DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's
    working at present - the "engaged" tone with answerphone is a
    minor annoyance - and CLI still works well. I asked Zen Support
    if, when using the Fritz!Box in answerphone mode, the Fon led
    lights up when a recorded message is left, but haven't had a reply.


    According to the manual:
    "Fon/DECT LED:
    flashing. Messages in your voice mailbox.
    (Function must be supported by the telephony provider.)
    off. No devices registering ".

    Yep. That's what I found in the manual, so asked Zen (the "telephony provider") before I bothered fiddling with the Fritz!Box's
    answerphone. If it doesn't work, there's no point in using it - the Panasonic's led lights when there's a message waiting.

    It Flashes, even. The other handsets display it at the bottom of the
    tiny screen, you have to check closely to see it.
    --
    Davey.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Trolleybus@ken@birchanger.com to uk.telecom on Mon May 25 10:26:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 16:41:18 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 15:24:02 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 13:36, Davey wrote:
    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming
    landline calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the
    Panasonics and added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the
    Fritx!Box to divert to answerphone after 10s and play the audio
    through the Fritz!FON, so I have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum
    allowed, then the answering machine part answers, and allows me
    to screen the call. I see nothing wrong with your setup, but I
    don't see an advantage either. Except probably a bigger 'Barred'
    number memory. I use my bedside handset as an alarm clock, and
    if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I have the 'phone right
    there with me. Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the
    DECT handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio
    connection to the DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's
    working at present - the "engaged" tone with answerphone is a
    minor annoyance - and CLI still works well. I asked Zen Support
    if, when using the Fritz!Box in answerphone mode, the Fon led
    lights up when a recorded message is left, but haven't had a reply.


    According to the manual:
    "Fon/DECT LED:
    flashing. Messages in your voice mailbox.
    (Function must be supported by the telephony provider.)
    off. No devices registering ".

    Yep. That's what I found in the manual, so asked Zen (the "telephony
    provider") before I bothered fiddling with the Fritz!Box's
    answerphone. If it doesn't work, there's no point in using it - the
    Panasonic's led lights when there's a message waiting.

    It Flashes, even. The other handsets display it at the bottom of the
    tiny screen, you have to check closely to see it.

    My Panasonic flashes when there's a message in the Fritz!Box, as did
    the old Giogaset that i've binned.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Trolleybus@ken@birchanger.com to uk.telecom on Mon May 25 10:28:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100, Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline
    calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics and
    added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to divert to
    answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I
    have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed, then
    the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen the call. I
    see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an advantage either.
    Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside
    handset as an alarm clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I
    have the 'phone right there with me.
    Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the DECT >handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio connection to the
    DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's working at present - the
    "engaged" tone with answerphone is a minor annoyance - and CLI still
    works well. I asked Zen Support if, when using the Fritz!Box in
    answerphone mode, the Fon led lights up when a recorded message is left,
    but haven't had a reply.

    Of course you don't need a base station. Just a dumb charging cradle
    at the point where you keep the handset. The base station
    functionality (i.e. what we might today call the server) is now inside
    the Fritz!Box.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Davey@davey@example.invalid to uk.telecom on Mon May 25 11:29:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Mon, 25 May 2026 10:26:35 +0100
    Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 16:41:18 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 15:24:02 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 13:36, Davey wrote:
    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey
    <davey@example.invalid> wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming
    landline calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of
    the Panasonics and added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured
    the Fritx!Box to divert to answerphone after 10s and play
    the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I have call screening.


    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum
    allowed, then the answering machine part answers, and allows
    me to screen the call. I see nothing wrong with your setup,
    but I don't see an advantage either. Except probably a bigger
    'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside handset as an alarm
    clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I have the
    'phone right there with me. Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to
    keep a redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything
    physically into the router, which is in a room that doesn't
    need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the
    DECT handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio
    connection to the DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's
    working at present - the "engaged" tone with answerphone is a
    minor annoyance - and CLI still works well. I asked Zen Support
    if, when using the Fritz!Box in answerphone mode, the Fon led
    lights up when a recorded message is left, but haven't had a
    reply.

    According to the manual:
    "Fon/DECT LED:
    flashing. Messages in your voice mailbox.
    (Function must be supported by the telephony provider.)
    off. No devices registering ".

    Yep. That's what I found in the manual, so asked Zen (the
    "telephony provider") before I bothered fiddling with the
    Fritz!Box's answerphone. If it doesn't work, there's no point in
    using it - the Panasonic's led lights when there's a message
    waiting.
    It Flashes, even. The other handsets display it at the bottom of the
    tiny screen, you have to check closely to see it.

    My Panasonic flashes when there's a message in the Fritz!Box, as did
    the old Giogaset that i've binned.


    Does the FON light flash also? Not that I care, I don't intend to use
    the Fritz!Box as an answerphone, but for completion of the puzzle.
    And I wonder if this a function of the Fritz!Box for any provider, or
    only those which support the flashing function?
    So many questions....
    --
    Davey.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Layman@Jeff@invalid.invalid to uk.telecom on Mon May 25 12:35:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 25/05/2026 10:28, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100, Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline
    calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics and >>>>> added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to divert to >>>>> answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I >>>>> have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed, then >>>> the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen the call. I >>>> see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an advantage either. >>>> Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside
    handset as an alarm clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I
    have the 'phone right there with me.
    Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the DECT
    handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio connection to the
    DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's working at present - the
    "engaged" tone with answerphone is a minor annoyance - and CLI still
    works well. I asked Zen Support if, when using the Fritz!Box in
    answerphone mode, the Fon led lights up when a recorded message is left,
    but haven't had a reply.

    Of course you don't need a base station. Just a dumb charging cradle
    at the point where you keep the handset. The base station
    functionality (i.e. what we might today call the server) is now inside
    the Fritz!Box.

    Apologies for using "base station" as a term for the dumb charger as
    well. Panasonic just refer to it as the "charger". Actually, according
    to the Panasonic manual, over a year there would be only 3.5kWh
    difference in consumption between the two, so around -u1 at present costs.
    --
    Jeff
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Wade@g4ugm@dave.invalid to uk.telecom on Mon May 25 17:45:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On 25/05/2026 12:35, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 25/05/2026 10:28, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100, Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline >>>>>> calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics and >>>>>> added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to divert to >>>>>> answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I >>>>>> have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed,
    then
    the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen the
    call. I
    see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an advantage
    either.
    Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside
    handset as an alarm clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I >>>>> have the 'phone right there with me.
    Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the DECT
    handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio connection to the
    DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's working at present - the
    "engaged" tone with answerphone is a minor annoyance - and CLI still
    works well. I asked Zen Support if, when using the Fritz!Box in
    answerphone mode, the Fon led lights up when a recorded message is left, >>> but haven't had a reply.

    Of course you don't need a base station. Just a dumb charging cradle
    at the point where you keep the handset. The base station
    functionality (i.e. what we might today call the server) is now inside
    the Fritz!Box.

    Apologies for using "base station" as a term for the dumb charger as
    well. Panasonic just refer to it as the "charger". Actually, according
    to the Panasonic manual, over a year there would be only 3.5kWh
    difference in consumption between the two, so around -u1 at present costs.

    One advantage is that its one less device that needs battery backup in
    the event of a power fail. For Panasonic handsets, you lose the voice announcement. Its generated in the Panasonic base station.

    I have one handset paired to both the router and the DECT base station.
    Then in the event of a power cut I can swap it over.

    I like the answerphone in the router. It can e-mail me the voice mails
    via GMAIL (you need an app password).

    Dave
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Trolleybus@ken@birchanger.com to uk.telecom on Tue May 26 09:13:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Mon, 25 May 2026 11:29:00 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 25 May 2026 10:26:35 +0100
    Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 16:41:18 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 24 May 2026 15:24:02 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 13:36, Davey wrote:
    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100
    Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    .

    My Panasonic flashes when there's a message in the Fritz!Box, as did
    the old Giogaset that i've binned.


    Does the FON light flash also? Not that I care, I don't intend to use
    the Fritz!Box as an answerphone, but for completion of the puzzle.
    And I wonder if this a function of the Fritz!Box for any provider, or
    only those which support the flashing function?
    So many questions....

    I don't know, as I never look at the router.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Trolleybus@ken@birchanger.com to uk.telecom on Tue May 26 09:16:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.telecom

    On Mon, 25 May 2026 17:45:27 +0100, David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 25/05/2026 12:35, Jeff Layman wrote:
    On 25/05/2026 10:28, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:42 +0100, Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 24/05/2026 10:42, Trolleybus wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 12:44:43 +0100, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:


    Since then, due to my very low volume of genuine incoming landline >>>>>>> calls, I've binned the Siemens and all but one of the Panasonics and >>>>>>> added a single Fritz!FON. I've configured the Fritx!Box to divert to >>>>>>> answerphone after 10s and play the audio through the Fritz!FON, so I >>>>>>> have call screening.

    My DECT 'phones let an incoming call ring for the maximum allowed, >>>>>> then
    the answering machine part answers, and allows me to screen the
    call. I
    see nothing wrong with your setup, but I don't see an advantage
    either.
    Except probably a bigger 'Barred' number memory. I use my bedside
    handset as an alarm clock, and if the Intruder/Fire alarm goes off, I >>>>>> have the 'phone right there with me.
    Horses for courses.

    The only advantage I'm claiming is that I no lomger need to keep a
    redundant DECT base station, nor plug anything physically into the
    router, which is in a room that doesn't need a landline phone.

    But you need a base station (even just a "dumb" one) to keep the DECT
    handset charged. I haven't tried the Fritz!Box radio connection to the >>>> DECT phone yet. I'm content with how it's working at present - the
    "engaged" tone with answerphone is a minor annoyance - and CLI still
    works well. I asked Zen Support if, when using the Fritz!Box in
    answerphone mode, the Fon led lights up when a recorded message is left, >>>> but haven't had a reply.

    Of course you don't need a base station. Just a dumb charging cradle
    at the point where you keep the handset. The base station
    functionality (i.e. what we might today call the server) is now inside
    the Fritz!Box.

    Apologies for using "base station" as a term for the dumb charger as
    well. Panasonic just refer to it as the "charger". Actually, according
    to the Panasonic manual, over a year there would be only 3.5kWh
    difference in consumption between the two, so around u1 at present costs.

    One advantage is that its one less device that needs battery backup in
    the event of a power fail. For Panasonic handsets, you lose the voice >announcement. Its generated in the Panasonic base station.

    I have one handset paired to both the router and the DECT base station.
    Then in the event of a power cut I can swap it over.

    I like the answerphone in the router. It can e-mail me the voice mails
    via GMAIL (you need an app password).

    Dave
    All this fuss and discussion over what is for me about 7 spam calls a
    week and 2-3 genuine calls per year.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2