• TV Aerial Question

    From Java Jive@java@evij.com.invalid to uk.tech.digital-tv on Fri Sep 25 15:55:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    Despairing on local installers ever coming back to me, I've started my
    own TV aerial installation. It's going fine, but I have a technical
    question which I am not qualified to answer, and while searches on the internet suggest that I don't have a problem, the results don't seem
    quite definitive enough to satisfy me, so I would like some advice from experienced installers.

    My question is, can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of
    the chimney pot, which will be almost at right-angles to the left side
    of the aerial, or will the pot itself affect the received signal so I
    should make it higher? I need some sort of advice on this to decide the length of the pole. If I need to mount it above the level of the pot completely, I will have to use the full length of the pole, but, mindful
    of the wind loading, I'm wondering if I can get away with putting it
    about the level of the middle of the pot? A rough calculation leads me
    to think that the surface of the pot will end up being about 450mm from
    the centre of the mast, which will also be the nearest point of the axis
    of the aerial.

    Full details ...

    The house is aligned with its longest side to Loch Shin, which lies
    along an axis roughly 39 degrees off north-south, with the south end
    being to the east and the north to the west. The Lairg relay (BV) is on
    The Ord, a hill roughly SW of Lairg centre and approximately south of
    here, so the aerial is to be mounted on the southernmost chimney.

    There is a neighbouring property in the direction of the relay, but I am
    on higher ground and from the level of the middle of the chimney pot,
    quite a tall one, I can see the relay comfortably over the highest point
    of their property.

    There are three corners of that chimney where mounting an aerial could
    see the relay comfortably, I chose the one to W-N-W because that is the direction of the prevailing winds, so the mast will be in the stiller
    air that there tends to be just in front of the chimney, and I feel
    happier about the wind trying to blow the aerial onto the chimney rather
    than it trying to rip it off either of the other two corners.

    So, still thinking about the wind problem, I've mounted TWO 8" chimney
    strap brackets ...


    <https://www.blake-uk.com/8-stack-strap-ratchet-cradle-mitre-bracket.html>

    ... the higher being about 200mm from the top of the chimney proper,
    about 250mm from the top of the flaunching, and the lower bracket almost touching the upper (this is perhaps a little nearer the top of the
    chimney than recommended, but the latter isn't tall enough to put the
    assembly lower with the lower strap still being able to clear the roof
    apex - I'm not too worried about this, the chimneys were remade about
    10 years ago and, as far as I can tell from the pebble dashing, are
    still in good condition).

    It's not a very powerful relay, so I have a log-periodic with a masthead amplifier, one of these (obviously, I'm not using the pole and mounting supplied):

    <https://www.screwfix.com/p/labgear-log-megaboost-tv-aerial/799jr>

    Any advice on the height issue, and possible effects of the pot?
    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website: www.macfh.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.tech.digital-tv on Fri Sep 25 17:25:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    Java Jive wrote:

    can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of the chimney pot

    I'd say best avoided, if it's a red/brown pot, maybe 10% iron oxide
    content, higher if its blue/black pot.

    I've mounted TWO 8" chimney strap brackets ... <https://www.blake-uk.com/8-stack-strap-ratchet-cradle-mitre-bracket.html>

    I found those to be brilliant, when I fitted my aerials (shame Blake cheaped-out with a steel bracket, no way I'll go upon the roof nowadays).
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to uk.tech.digital-tv on Fri Sep 25 16:28:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    The Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:

    Despairing on local installers ever coming back to me, I've started my
    own TV aerial installation. It's going fine, but I have a technical questionrCa

    [rCa]

    Any advice on the height issue, and possible effects of the pot?

    The signal strength as seen by your aerial will be the sum of all the
    signal paths that arrive there. There will be the direct signal, and reflections from the roof, chimney pot, possibly the guttering, random
    nearby objects, etc.

    The general rule of thumb would be to mount the aerial on a mast of
    sufficient height that would reduce the sum of these multipaths. A 2m mast should help with that.
    --
    Spike
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Java Jive@java@evij.com.invalid to uk.tech.digital-tv on Fri Sep 25 19:58:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 2026-09-25 17:25, Andy Burns wrote:
    Java Jive wrote:

    can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of the chimney pot

    I'd say best avoided, if it's a red/brown pot, maybe 10% iron oxide
    content, higher if its blue/black pot.

    It's a tall white one, a type common in this part of Scotland, about
    550mm tall by 280mm diameter. However, it does have a terracotta
    coloured cap on it.

    <https://www.macfh.co.uk/Temp/Chimney_3.jpg>

    -aI've mounted TWO 8" chimney strap brackets ...
    <https://www.blake-uk.com/8-stack-strap-ratchet-cradle-mitre-bracket.html>

    I found those to be brilliant, when I fitted my aerials (shame Blake cheaped-out with a steel bracket, no way I'll go upon the roof nowadays).

    I think my technique wasn't the best. The moment one opens the roll of strapping, it turns into a twisted mess, and trying to put it around the chimney without twists is a right royal PITA. The first, the lower, one wasn't too bad, but the second took several attempts to get it right.

    I'm slightly miffed that the strapping isn't quite horizontal. It's not
    out by much, certainly not enough for it to be worth redoing it, but
    just enough to be annoyingly noticeable.

    It's Murphy's law I suppose, like when working on a farm, if you have
    wobble in the line when you're sowing, it never seems to happen in some
    quiet hollow away from the road, but on a slope plainly visible from the
    road, so for the rest of that growing season all your farming neighbours
    can have a little chuckle at your expense every time they drive past.
    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website: www.macfh.co.uk

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From tony sayer@tony@bancom.co.uk to uk.tech.digital-tv on Sun Sep 27 22:11:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    In article <1196210$3m70h$1@dont-email.me>, Java Jive
    <java@evij.com.invalid> scribeth thus
    Despairing on local installers ever coming back to me, I've started my
    own TV aerial installation. It's going fine, but I have a technical >question which I am not qualified to answer, and while searches on the >internet suggest that I don't have a problem, the results don't seem
    quite definitive enough to satisfy me, so I would like some advice from >experienced installers.

    My question is, can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of
    the chimney pot, which will be almost at right-angles to the left side
    of the aerial, or will the pot itself affect the received signal so I
    should make it higher? I need some sort of advice on this to decide the >length of the pole. If I need to mount it above the level of the pot >completely, I will have to use the full length of the pole, but, mindful
    of the wind loading, I'm wondering if I can get away with putting it
    about the level of the middle of the pot? A rough calculation leads me
    to think that the surface of the pot will end up being about 450mm from
    the centre of the mast, which will also be the nearest point of the axis
    of the aerial.

    Full details ...



    http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=1058

    I'd be interested to see where that relay's Log's are pointed to and the
    ERP which is probably the square root of not a lot.

    Also I'd be tempted to use a larger log with an external amp if needed
    its a watered down one that relay with not all MUX's available

    I would have thought that the pot would not be that much of a problem as
    log as the aerial points away , ish, from it ..

    how far are you from that Tx?..




    The house is aligned with its longest side to Loch Shin, which lies
    along an axis roughly 39 degrees off north-south, with the south end
    being to the east and the north to the west. The Lairg relay (BV) is on
    The Ord, a hill roughly SW of Lairg centre and approximately south of
    here, so the aerial is to be mounted on the southernmost chimney.

    There is a neighbouring property in the direction of the relay, but I am
    on higher ground and from the level of the middle of the chimney pot,
    quite a tall one, I can see the relay comfortably over the highest point
    of their property.

    There are three corners of that chimney where mounting an aerial could
    see the relay comfortably, I chose the one to W-N-W because that is the >direction of the prevailing winds, so the mast will be in the stiller
    air that there tends to be just in front of the chimney, and I feel
    happier about the wind trying to blow the aerial onto the chimney rather >than it trying to rip it off either of the other two corners.

    So, still thinking about the wind problem, I've mounted TWO 8" chimney
    strap brackets ...


    <https://www.blake-uk.com/8-stack-strap-ratchet-cradle-mitre-bracket.html>

    ... the higher being about 200mm from the top of the chimney proper,
    about 250mm from the top of the flaunching, and the lower bracket almost >touching the upper (this is perhaps a little nearer the top of the
    chimney than recommended, but the latter isn't tall enough to put the >assembly lower with the lower strap still being able to clear the roof
    apex - I'm not too worried about this, the chimneys were remade about
    10 years ago and, as far as I can tell from the pebble dashing, are
    still in good condition).

    It's not a very powerful relay, so I have a log-periodic with a masthead >amplifier, one of these (obviously, I'm not using the pole and mounting >supplied):

    <https://www.screwfix.com/p/labgear-log-megaboost-tv-aerial/799jr>

    Any advice on the height issue, and possible effects of the pot?

    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Java Jive@java@evij.com.invalid to uk.tech.digital-tv on Mon Sep 28 01:49:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 2026-09-27 22:11, tony sayer wrote:

    http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=1058

    I'd be interested to see where that relay's Log's are pointed to and the
    ERP which is probably the square root of not a lot.

    Also I'd be tempted to use a larger log with an external amp if needed
    its a watered down one that relay with not all MUX's available

    I would have thought that the pot would not be that much of a problem as
    log as the aerial points away , ish, from it ..

    It will be pointing down the side of the chimney but about 30 degrees
    away from it, something like this ASCII art (if necessary copy and paste
    into a text editor with a fixed font, such as notepad):

    +----------+
    | |
    | | /
    | | /
    +----------+/

    how far are you from that Tx?..

    7.53km, 4.68mi

    Tx to you and Andy for the advice.
    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website: www.macfh.co.uk

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to uk.tech.digital-tv on Mon Sep 28 11:03:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:

    My question is, can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of
    the chimney pot, which will be almost at right-angles to the left side
    of the aerial, or will the pot itself affect the received signal so I
    should make it higher?

    Although dependent on the exact design of the antenna, reasonably
    significant sidelobes can be expected at 60 to 90 degrees to the main lobe.

    So mounting the antenna at the same height as the chimney pot and at right angles to its sounds to be a very bad idea, unless the pot itself is made
    out of radar absorbing materials.

    Mount the aerial so that it is higher up, on two grounds.

    Firstly, it will take the antenna side lobes away from the the chimney pot, thus reducing its effect.

    Secondly, it will put the antenna further into the transmitterrCOs own
    vertical lobe thus increasing the received direct signal (think of the technique of rCOpecking the lobesrCO used by aircraft that want to minimise the risk of being detected).
    --
    Spike
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Java Jive@java@evij.com.invalid to uk.tech.digital-tv on Mon Sep 28 21:18:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 2026-09-25 15:55, Java Jive wrote:

    Despairing on local installers ever coming back to me, I've started my
    own TV aerial installation.-a It's going fine, but I have a technical question which I am not qualified to answer, and while searches on the internet suggest that I don't have a problem, the results don't seem
    quite definitive enough to satisfy me, so I would like some advice from experienced installers.

    My question is, can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of
    the chimney pot, which will be almost at right-angles to the left side
    of the aerial, or will the pot itself affect the received signal so I
    should make it higher?-a I need some sort of advice on this to decide the length of the pole.-a If I need to mount it above the level of the pot completely, I will have to use the full length of the pole, but, mindful
    of the wind loading, I'm wondering if I can get away with putting it
    about the level of the middle of the pot?-a A rough calculation leads me
    to think that the surface of the pot will end up being about 450mm from
    the centre of the mast, which will also be the nearest point of the axis
    of the aerial.

    I followed Tony's advice and installed the aerial to a height about 1/2
    way up the chimney pot. I haven't finished tacking the lead to the side
    of the house yet, but temporarily have brought the cable in through a
    window and connected up. 100% signal strength & quality.

    I count that as a win.

    Thanks to Andy & Tony for their contributions.
    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website: www.macfh.co.uk

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to uk.tech.digital-tv on Tue Sep 29 11:51:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
    Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:

    My question is, can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of
    the chimney pot, which will be almost at right-angles to the left side
    of the aerial, or will the pot itself affect the received signal so I
    should make it higher?

    Although dependent on the exact design of the antenna, reasonably
    significant sidelobes can be expected at 60 to 90 degrees to the main lobe.

    So mounting the antenna at the same height as the chimney pot and at right angles to its sounds to be a very bad idea, unless the pot itself is made
    out of radar absorbing materials.

    Mount the aerial so that it is higher up, on two grounds.

    Firstly, it will take the antenna side lobes away from the the chimney pot, thus reducing its effect.

    Secondly, it will put the antenna further into the transmitterrCOs own vertical lobe thus increasing the received direct signal (think of the technique of rCOpecking the lobesrCO used by aircraft that want to minimise the
    risk of being detected by radar).

    A further factor, which I forgot to mention, is that the chimney pot being closer to one side of the aerial will detune some or all of the elements on that side by the extra capacitance to rCOearthrCO caused by the presence of the pot, and also probably to some extent by the presence of the chimney
    itself.

    The elements on the side that is away from the chimney and pot will also be detuned but by a lesser extent, meaning the whole aerial array will not be operating as designed.

    There are good reasons why aerials are erected rCOin the clearrCO, and not close to objects, and one of them is to avoid unwittingly detuning the
    aerial in some unknown way. If any channels are close to the design
    operating range, their signal strength as received may be sub-optimal.

    None of this precludes the aerial supplying sufficient signal, but like a
    car with a wheel missing, it can still work, but in an unknown regime due
    to the radiation patterns being distorted.
    --
    Spike
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From tony sayer@tony@bancom.co.uk to uk.tech.digital-tv on Wed Sep 30 19:07:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    In article <119ei3k$2m91j$1@dont-email.me>, Java Jive
    <java@evij.com.invalid> scribeth thus
    On 2026-09-25 15:55, Java Jive wrote:

    Despairing on local installers ever coming back to me, I've started my
    own TV aerial installation.a It's going fine, but I have a technical
    question which I am not qualified to answer, and while searches on the
    internet suggest that I don't have a problem, the results don't seem
    quite definitive enough to satisfy me, so I would like some advice from
    experienced installers.

    My question is, can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of
    the chimney pot, which will be almost at right-angles to the left side
    of the aerial, or will the pot itself affect the received signal so I
    should make it higher?a I need some sort of advice on this to decide the
    length of the pole.a If I need to mount it above the level of the pot
    completely, I will have to use the full length of the pole, but, mindful
    of the wind loading, I'm wondering if I can get away with putting it
    about the level of the middle of the pot?a A rough calculation leads me
    to think that the surface of the pot will end up being about 450mm from
    the centre of the mast, which will also be the nearest point of the axis
    of the aerial.

    I followed Tony's advice and installed the aerial to a height about 1/2
    way up the chimney pot. I haven't finished tacking the lead to the side
    of the house yet, but temporarily have brought the cable in through a
    window and connected up. 100% signal strength & quality.

    I count that as a win.

    Thanks to Andy & Tony for their contributions.


    Good! what aerial did you use in the end the one with the built in
    pre-amp?

    Not exactly overpopulated in that area is it;!..
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From tony sayer@tony@bancom.co.uk to uk.tech.digital-tv on Wed Sep 30 19:10:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    In article <ni1n24F1u87U1@mid.individual.net>, Spike
    <aero.spike@mail.com> scribeth thus
    Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
    Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:

    My question is, can I mount the aerial around the level of the middle of >>> the chimney pot, which will be almost at right-angles to the left side
    of the aerial, or will the pot itself affect the received signal so I
    should make it higher?

    Although dependent on the exact design of the antenna, reasonably
    significant sidelobes can be expected at 60 to 90 degrees to the main lobe.

    So mounting the antenna at the same height as the chimney pot and at right >> angles to its sounds to be a very bad idea, unless the pot itself is made
    out of radar absorbing materials.

    Mount the aerial so that it is higher up, on two grounds.

    Firstly, it will take the antenna side lobes away from the the chimney pot, >> thus reducing its effect.

    Secondly, it will put the antenna further into the transmitterrCOs own
    vertical lobe thus increasing the received direct signal (think of the
    technique of rCOpecking the lobesrCO used by aircraft that want to minimise the
    risk of being detected by radar).

    A further factor, which I forgot to mention, is that the chimney pot being >closer to one side of the aerial will detune some or all of the elements on >that side by the extra capacitance to rCOearthrCO caused by the presence of the
    pot, and also probably to some extent by the presence of the chimney
    itself.

    The elements on the side that is away from the chimney and pot will also be >detuned but by a lesser extent, meaning the whole aerial array will not be >operating as designed.

    There are good reasons why aerials are erected rCOin the clearrCO, and not >close to objects, and one of them is to avoid unwittingly detuning the
    aerial in some unknown way. If any channels are close to the design
    operating range, their signal strength as received may be sub-optimal.

    None of this precludes the aerial supplying sufficient signal, but like a
    car with a wheel missing, it can still work, but in an unknown regime due
    to the radiation patterns being distorted.


    Generally thats around right but what does cause the damage is anything
    close by that that is resonant on the frequency of interest
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Java Jive@java@evij.com.invalid to uk.tech.digital-tv on Wed Sep 30 20:13:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 2026-09-30 19:07, tony sayer wrote:

    In article <119ei3k$2m91j$1@dont-email.me>, Java Jive

    I followed Tony's advice and installed the aerial to a height about 1/2
    way up the chimney pot. I haven't finished tacking the lead to the side
    of the house yet, but temporarily have brought the cable in through a
    window and connected up. 100% signal strength & quality.

    I count that as a win.

    Thanks to Andy & Tony for their contributions.

    Good! what aerial did you use in the end the one with the built in
    pre-amp?

    Yes, the one I linked earlier. I've now done the cable tacking as well.
    There are a couple of light finishing off jobs to do mainly sealing
    the hole where the cable comes in, but basically within reason the
    weather can do what it likes now.

    Not exactly overpopulated in that area is it;!..

    No, nice and quiet, barking dogs are too often something of a problem
    though.
    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website: www.macfh.co.uk

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2