From Scott@newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Jul 7 09:49:29 2026
From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast
I was listening to R4 this morning - a piece about student loans. One
comment that struck me was that a lot of the students were 17 at the
time they took out the loan. I thought you had to be 18 to enter into
a loan agreement. Is there any scope for a challenge to the loan
agreement?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Jul 7 09:07:34 2026
I was listening to R4 this morning - a piece about student loans. One
comment that struck me was that a lot of the students were 17 at the
time they took out the loan. I thought you had to be 18 to enter into
a loan agreement. Is there any scope for a challenge to the loan
agreement?
I was listening to R4 this morning - a piece about student loans. One
comment that struck me was that a lot of the students were 17 at the
time they took out the loan. I thought you had to be 18 to enter into
a loan agreement. Is there any scope for a challenge to the loan
agreement?
From Max Demian@max_demian@bigfoot.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Jul 7 11:06:24 2026
From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast
On 07/07/2026 09:49, Scott wrote:
I was listening to R4 this morning - a piece about student loans. One
comment that struck me was that a lot of the students were 17 at the
time they took out the loan. I thought you had to be 18 to enter into
a loan agreement. Is there any scope for a challenge to the loan
agreement?
I blame Tony Blair. <g>
--
Max Demian
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2