| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 50:11:26 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,138 |
| Messages: | 111,312 |
https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/vaughan-calls- substitution-rule-change-rishabh-pant-injury-10146033/
rCyFour days of 10 vs 11 isnrCOt right,rCO rCyIndia should be allowed a subrCO:
Vaughan calls for change in substitution rule after Rishabh PantrCOs injury
After Indian wicket-keeper batter Rishabh Pant met with another injury
and was forced out of the ground, this time during the fourth Test of
the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy between India and England at Old Trafford
in Manchester, former England captain Michael Vaughan has voiced support
for a slight adjustment in the substitution rule.
rCLI donrCOt like the fact that werCOve got four days left in the game, four days of action in what has been an incredible series where we are going
to have 10 versus 11,rCY Vaughan said to BBC Sports.
rCLI prefer that yourCOd have a sub. You know, once they brought in concussion subs, I was crying out, saying, rCyWell, just have
substitutions then in the first innings of a game.rCO That would be my stepping point. If it happens in the second innings, I feel that team
might kind of break the rules or indulge in a bit of skullduggery.
On 24/07/2025 08:21, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/vaughan-calls-
substitution-rule-change-rishabh-pant-injury-10146033/
rCyFour days of 10 vs 11 isnrCOt right,rCO rCyIndia should be allowed a subrCO:
Vaughan calls for change in substitution rule after Rishabh PantrCOs injury
At least Archie's dad was talking about cricket, unlike yesterday
afternoon, when, for some time, he was more interested in a Michael van Gerwen lookalike in the stands and the song that the crowd was singing
at him. It seemed like he would rather have been down there singing with
the crowd than commentating.
After Indian wicket-keeper batter Rishabh Pant met with another injury
and was forced out of the ground, this time during the fourth Test of
the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy between India and England at Old
Trafford in Manchester, former England captain Michael Vaughan has
voiced support for a slight adjustment in the substitution rule.
rCLI donrCOt like the fact that werCOve got four days left in the game, four
days of action in what has been an incredible series where we are
going to have 10 versus 11,rCY Vaughan said to BBC Sports.
rCLI prefer that yourCOd have a sub. You know, once they brought in
concussion subs, I was crying out, saying, rCyWell, just have
substitutions then in the first innings of a game.rCO That would be my
stepping point. If it happens in the second innings, I feel that team
might kind of break the rules or indulge in a bit of skullduggery.
I don't think that would work. E.g. Under that rule, if Stokes had been injured just before he was out yesterday, England would have been
allowed to replace him with a fresh player to bowl in India's second
innings in the knowledge that, with a huge lead, the replacement was unlikely to be needed much for batting. However, if Rahul or Gill had
been injured by the first ball they faced in the second innings, India wouldn't have been allowed to replace them. That hardly seems fair.
On 7/26/2025 10:35 PM, David North wrote:
On 24/07/2025 08:21, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/vaughan-calls-
substitution-rule-change-rishabh-pant-injury-10146033/
rCyFour days of 10 vs 11 isnrCOt right,rCO rCyIndia should be allowed a subrCO:
Vaughan calls for change in substitution rule after Rishabh PantrCOs
injury
At least Archie's dad was talking about cricket, unlike yesterday
afternoon, when, for some time, he was more interested in a Michael
van Gerwen lookalike in the stands and the song that the crowd was
singing at him. It seemed like he would rather have been down there
singing with the crowd than commentating.
After Indian wicket-keeper batter Rishabh Pant met with another
injury and was forced out of the ground, this time during the fourth
Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy between India and England at
Old Trafford in Manchester, former England captain Michael Vaughan
has voiced support for a slight adjustment in the substitution rule.
rCLI donrCOt like the fact that werCOve got four days left in the game, >>> four days of action in what has been an incredible series where we
are going to have 10 versus 11,rCY Vaughan said to BBC Sports.
rCLI prefer that yourCOd have a sub. You know, once they brought in
concussion subs, I was crying out, saying, rCyWell, just have
substitutions then in the first innings of a game.rCO That would be my
stepping point. If it happens in the second innings, I feel that team
might kind of break the rules or indulge in a bit of skullduggery.
I don't think that would work. E.g. Under that rule, if Stokes had
been injured just before he was out yesterday, England would have been
allowed to replace him with a fresh player to bowl in India's second
innings in the knowledge that, with a huge lead, the replacement was
unlikely to be needed much for batting. However, if Rahul or Gill had
been injured by the first ball they faced in the second innings, India
wouldn't have been allowed to replace them. That hardly seems fair.
Match referee should be able to FAIRLY decide whether an injured player
can be REPLACED or NOT depending on the game situation.
Stokes shouldn't be replaced in the scenario you mentioned.
Even though it's subjective, some cases like Rishabh Pant is quite--
obvious and hence can be replaced.
On 29/07/2025 11:44, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
On 7/26/2025 10:35 PM, David North wrote:
On 24/07/2025 08:21, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/vaughan-calls-
substitution-rule-change-rishabh-pant-injury-10146033/
rCyFour days of 10 vs 11 isnrCOt right,rCO rCyIndia should be allowed a >>>> subrCO: Vaughan calls for change in substitution rule after Rishabh
PantrCOs injury
At least Archie's dad was talking about cricket, unlike yesterday
afternoon, when, for some time, he was more interested in a Michael
van Gerwen lookalike in the stands and the song that the crowd was
singing at him. It seemed like he would rather have been down there
singing with the crowd than commentating.
After Indian wicket-keeper batter Rishabh Pant met with anotherI don't think that would work. E.g. Under that rule, if Stokes had
injury and was forced out of the ground, this time during the fourth
Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy between India and England at
Old Trafford in Manchester, former England captain Michael Vaughan
has voiced support for a slight adjustment in the substitution rule.
rCLI donrCOt like the fact that werCOve got four days left in the game, >>>> four days of action in what has been an incredible series where we
are going to have 10 versus 11,rCY Vaughan said to BBC Sports.
rCLI prefer that yourCOd have a sub. You know, once they brought in
concussion subs, I was crying out, saying, rCyWell, just have
substitutions then in the first innings of a game.rCO That would be my >>>> stepping point. If it happens in the second innings, I feel that
team might kind of break the rules or indulge in a bit of skullduggery. >>>
been injured just before he was out yesterday, England would have
been allowed to replace him with a fresh player to bowl in India's
second innings in the knowledge that, with a huge lead, the
replacement was unlikely to be needed much for batting. However, if
Rahul or Gill had been injured by the first ball they faced in the
second innings, India wouldn't have been allowed to replace them.
That hardly seems fair.
Match referee should be able to FAIRLY decide whether an injured
player can be REPLACED or NOT depending on the game situation.
Stokes shouldn't be replaced in the scenario you mentioned.
Why not, assuming that the injury was similar to Pant's?
Even though it's subjective, some cases like Rishabh Pant is quite
obvious and hence can be replaced.