• Feast of Saints Peter and Paul

    From David Dalton@dalton@nfld.com to uk.religion.christian on Sun Jun 28 20:24:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    June 29 is Feast of Saints Peter and Paul.

    This is significant to me since though I am no longer Catholic
    my home church/parish is that of Saints Peter and Paul
    and is where I received the four Catholic sacraments
    of baptism, communion, confession/penance, and
    confirmation.
    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) rCLEarly morning, jubilators, up to no good, instigators... Sons of long forgotten races, that the darkest night embracesrCY (Ron Hynes & D.OrCOD)




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Timreason@timreason@hotmail.co.uk to uk.religion.christian on Mon Jun 29 07:36:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 28/06/2026 23:54, David Dalton wrote:
    June 29 is Feast of Saints Peter and Paul.

    This is significant to me since though I am no longer Catholic
    my home church/parish is that of Saints Peter and Paul
    and is where I received the four Catholic sacraments
    of baptism, communion, confession/penance, and
    confirmation.


    We had a sermon yesterday about those two guys. They didn't seem to get
    on well together! It seems they were two very different people. But I
    suppose it shows how God chooses all kinds of people, and therefore some friction is likely from time to time between Christians.

    Tim.




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Jun 29 10:59:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 28/06/2026 23:54, David Dalton wrote:
    June 29 is Feast of Saints Peter and Paul.

    This is significant to me since though I am no longer Catholic
    my home church/parish is that of Saints Peter and Paul
    and is where I received the four Catholic sacraments
    of baptism, communion, confession/penance, and
    confirmation.


    Why do certain sectors of Christianity, Catholicism in particular, have
    an obsession with Saints?

    Paul and Peter were ordinary believers, albeit from a Christian
    perspective greatly used by God. That's it, ordinary people doing God's
    work. All Christians are saints, so why do we place some on a higher
    pedestal?



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Timreason@timreason@hotmail.co.uk to uk.religion.christian on Mon Jun 29 14:38:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 29/06/2026 10:59, John wrote:
    On 28/06/2026 23:54, David Dalton wrote:
    June 29 is Feast of Saints Peter and Paul.

    This is significant to me since though I am no longer Catholic
    my home church/parish is that of Saints Peter and Paul
    and is where I received the four Catholic sacraments
    of baptism, communion, confession/penance, and
    confirmation.


    Why do certain sectors of Christianity, Catholicism in particular, have
    an obsession with Saints?

    Paul and Peter were ordinary believers, albeit from a Christian
    perspective greatly used by God.-a That's it, ordinary people doing God's work. All Christians are saints, so why do we place some on a higher pedestal?


    The thinking behind that is, I think, the notion of "The communion of
    the saints". That is, the idea that all Christians can join together in prayer, including those that have 'Gone before'.

    A lot depends on whether one believes in 'soul sleep' or not. My own
    belief is that the departed are in an 'extra-temporal' realm. That is
    because I believe that we are in what might be thought of as a
    'simulation', and therefore Time-Space is a framework specific to our
    present existence. If they are somehow 'Outside' that framework, then
    there's no reason to think that they might not have access to anywhere
    in both Time and Space.

    So, traditional Christianity holds to the notion that we can ask those Christians that have gone before, to join us in prayer. But of course,
    we really only want to join with those that 'Made It' into that realm!
    So traditionally the church recognised select individuals DID make it,
    an obvious example being St Mary the mother of Christ.

    As for me, my place has already been taken, there is already a St
    Timothy and of course, a St John, come to that. (Yes, I know there can
    be and are several saints sharing the same names, just my little joke!)

    Tim.






    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Dalton@dalton@nfld.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Jun 29 20:53:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On Jun 29, 2026, John wrote
    (in article <111tflt$8fge$2@dont-email.me>):

    On 28/06/2026 23:54, David Dalton wrote:
    June 29 is Feast of Saints Peter and Paul.

    This is significant to me since though I am no longer Catholic
    my home church/parish is that of Saints Peter and Paul
    and is where I received the four Catholic sacraments
    of baptism, communion, confession/penance, and
    confirmation.

    Why do certain sectors of Christianity, Catholicism in particular, have
    an obsession with Saints?

    Paul and Peter were ordinary believers, albeit from a Christian
    perspective greatly used by God. That's it, ordinary people doing God's
    work. All Christians are saints, so why do we place some on a higher pedestal?

    June 29 is also known as Day of the Christian Martyr.
    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) rCLEarly morning, jubilators, up to no good, instigators... Sons of long forgotten races, that the darkest night embracesrCY (Ron Hynes & D.OrCOD)




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 06:28:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 29/06/2026 07:36, Timreason wrote:

    We had a sermon yesterday about those two guys. They didn't seem to get
    on well together! It seems they were two very different people. But I suppose it shows how God chooses all kinds of people, and therefore some friction is likely from time to time between Christians.
    There is one single instance where Paul disagreed with something Peter
    was doing - and that becomes "they didn't get on together"? Perhaps your preacher ought to read 2 Peter 3:15 - or hasn't he got that far in
    reading his Bible?

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 06:32:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 29/06/2026 10:59, John wrote:

    Why do certain sectors of Christianity, Catholicism in particular, have
    an obsession with Saints?
    Paul and Peter were ordinary believers, albeit from a Christian
    perspective greatly used by God.-a That's it, ordinary people doing God's work. All Christians are saints, so why do we place some on a higher pedestal?
    It's all down to the mistaken belief that you go to heaven immediately
    you die. That in turn leads to the idea of purgatory for those not quite
    good enough to get in as soon as they die. But there are certain
    individuals whose lives were sufficiently famous that the church is sure
    they went straight in without purgatory, so you're all right praying to
    them, but don't pray to uncle Bob because he may still be suffering in
    the semi-hot place.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 06:41:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 29/06/2026 14:38, Timreason wrote:

    A lot depends on whether one believes in 'soul sleep' or not. My own
    belief is that the departed are in an 'extra-temporal' realm. That is because I believe that we are in what might be thought of as a
    'simulation', and therefore Time-Space is a framework specific to our present existence. If they are somehow 'Outside' that framework, then there's no reason to think that they might not have access to anywhere
    in both Time and Space.

    I like the idea that we are in a simulation, but fail to see why that
    would require belief in this "extra-temporal realm". Or, in particular,
    why this "extra-temporal realm" requires conscious existence.

    Let us suppose that God has some planet which He wishes to fill with trust-worthy humans and so He runs a simulation in which different combinations of genes are tried out - given a certain amount of computer
    time. Once their time is up, the code which defines them is simply
    stored on a hard drive (or other medium) until the right number of satisfactory individuals has been reached.

    At that point the satisfactory definitions are loaded into permanent
    bodies and let loose in this planet.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 06:42:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 30/06/2026 00:23, David Dalton wrote:

    June 29 is also known as Day of the Christian Martyr.

    Which particular martyr would that be?

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Madhu@enometh@meer.net to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 11:38:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    * Timreason <111tsh7$ca50$1@dont-email.me> :
    Wrote on Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:38:47 +0100:

    On 29/06/2026 10:59, John wrote:
    Why do certain sectors of Christianity, Catholicism in particular,
    have an obsession with Saints?
    Paul and Peter were ordinary believers, albeit from a Christian
    perspective greatly used by God.-a That's it, ordinary people doing
    God's work. All Christians are saints, so why do we place some on a
    higher pedestal?

    The thinking behind that is, I think, the notion of "The communion of
    the saints". That is, the idea that all Christians can join together
    in prayer, including those that have 'Gone before'.

    This last sunday I was listening to choral evensong on bbc 3 at 10:30 PM
    after attending the evening sermon at the local church at 7, it wasnt by
    the pastor by a member where he highlighted the life of John the
    Baptist, pretty effectively. The bbc service from Portsmouth was also
    about John the Baptist, which was also powerful, and I assumed it was
    that saint's day but I forgot it was a rebroadcast from Wednesday the
    24th which turned out to be that blessed saint's day.

    In that context - commemmorating the memories of the biblical
    personalities focussing on the biblical lessons in their life and the
    teachings doesn't seem idolatrous.

    A lot depends on whether one believes in 'soul sleep' or not. My own
    belief is that the departed are in an 'extra-temporal' realm. That is
    because I believe that we are in what might be thought of as a
    'simulation', and therefore Time-Space is a framework specific to our
    present existence. If they are somehow 'Outside' that framework, then
    there's no reason to think that they might not have access to anywhere
    in both Time and Space.

    So, traditional Christianity holds to the notion that we can ask those Christians that have gone before, to join us in prayer. But of course,
    we really only want to join with those that 'Made It' into that realm!
    So traditionally the church recognised select individuals DID make it,
    an obvious example being St Mary the mother of Christ.

    As for me, my place has already been taken, there is already a St
    Timothy and of course, a St John, come to that. (Yes, I know there can
    be and are several saints sharing the same names, just my little
    joke!)

    My own take, again, as before - a few months ago - and everytime this
    comes up, is that what is celebrated is a roster of identified
    (canonical) demons among the numbered money laundering angels of satan
    who manage, as a part of their duties, all earthly religions, and who
    happened to preside over the miracles or the institutional money
    laundering under the auspices of some particular human who might have
    founded or headed some of their institutions at some time.

    In India it is common enough to the institution of new feast days in the orthdodox and unorthodox sects around the birthdays of the living and
    past pontiffs, over and above the traditional holidays. But, as long as
    the food is healthy...



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Timreason@timreason@hotmail.co.uk to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 08:39:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 30/06/2026 07:08, Madhu wrote:
    * Timreason <111tsh7$ca50$1@dont-email.me> :
    Wrote on Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:38:47 +0100:

    On 29/06/2026 10:59, John wrote:
    Why do certain sectors of Christianity, Catholicism in particular,
    have an obsession with Saints?
    Paul and Peter were ordinary believers, albeit from a Christian
    perspective greatly used by God.-a That's it, ordinary people doing
    God's work. All Christians are saints, so why do we place some on a
    higher pedestal?

    The thinking behind that is, I think, the notion of "The communion of
    the saints". That is, the idea that all Christians can join together
    in prayer, including those that have 'Gone before'.

    This last sunday I was listening to choral evensong on bbc 3 at 10:30 PM after attending the evening sermon at the local church at 7, it wasnt by
    the pastor by a member where he highlighted the life of John the
    Baptist, pretty effectively. The bbc service from Portsmouth was also
    about John the Baptist, which was also powerful, and I assumed it was
    that saint's day but I forgot it was a rebroadcast from Wednesday the
    24th which turned out to be that blessed saint's day.

    In that context - commemmorating the memories of the biblical
    personalities focussing on the biblical lessons in their life and the teachings doesn't seem idolatrous.


    Madhu,

    YourCOre right that thererCOs a real trap of idolatry that Christians need
    to be wary of. At the same time, traditional Christianity does move
    through a calendar that revisits all aspects of the faith over the
    course of the year. That rhythm ensures that the lives of biblical
    figures rCo and the lessons drawn from them rCo are regularly taught, remembered, and reflected upon. In that sense, commemorating them isnrCOt idolatrous; itrCOs part of the ChurchrCOs way of keeping the whole story of salvation before us.

    There are two areas where the idolatry concern becomes important, though.

    First, while we can revere the historic saints rCo the Apostles, Mary,
    John the Baptist, and others rCo we must avoid worshipping them. I believe
    we can ask them to join us in prayer (the rCLCommunion of SaintsrCY), but we should not bow down to them, literally or figuratively. Even within Anglicanism, some very highrCachurch practices can come perilously close
    to crossing that line, especially regarding devotion to Mary.

    Second, thererCOs the issue of images: statues, icons, crucifixes, and
    similar objects. The commandment about images is, in my view, a paired instruction rCo the problem is making images AND THEN bowing down to
    worship them. I donrCOt think itrCOs wrong to make or own images; I have several crucifixes myself. The key is that we must not worship them. For
    many people (me included), visual aids like icons, statues, crucifixes,
    or even candles can help focus attention on God in prayer. But the focus
    must always be on God, never on the object.

    Tim.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 11:14:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 30/06/2026 07:08, Madhu wrote:

    In that context - commemmorating the memories of the biblical
    personalities focussing on the biblical lessons in their life and the teachings doesn't seem idolatrous.

    Indeed not. It is when we are urged to pray to or venerate these people
    that my hackles rise.

    In India it is common enough to the institution of new feast days in the orthdodox and unorthodox sects around the birthdays of the living and
    past pontiffs, over and above the traditional holidays. But, as long as
    the food is healthy...
    He he. You don't mind taking darshan of anyone so long as the luddhoos
    are good!

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 11:21:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 30/06/2026 08:39, Timreason wrote:

    Second, thererCOs the issue of images: statues, icons, crucifixes, and similar objects. The commandment about images is, in my view, a paired instruction rCo the problem is making images AND THEN bowing down to
    worship them. I donrCOt think itrCOs wrong to make or own images; I have several crucifixes myself. The key is that we must not worship them. For many people (me included), visual aids like icons, statues, crucifixes,
    or even candles can help focus attention on God in prayer. But the focus must always be on God, never on the object.
    My girl-friend, who used to be Catholic, had a sacred heart picture, and prayed in front of it every day. She asked my opinion and I told her
    that a) a picture is a picture is a picture, but b) if she found herself bowing to it or giving any signs of devotion or reference to it, then it possibly violated the second commandment. After a little thought she
    removed it from her room and hung it out in the hallway.

    Sometime later she remarked that now, without the picture on which to
    focus, she found herself looking up to heaven and praying to God in a
    way she had not experienced before.

    Obviously everyone is different, but I do seriously question this "aids
    to devotion" business. We are better off closing our eyes and praying to
    God and let Him present whatever images He wishes to our imaginations.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Dalton@dalton@nfld.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 18:07:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On Jun 30, 2026, Kendall K. Down wrote
    (in article <111vkvm$rg54$6@dont-email.me>):

    On 30/06/2026 00:23, David Dalton wrote:

    June 29 is also known as Day of the Christian Martyr.

    Which particular martyr would that be?

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down

    All Christian martyrs, though the date coincides
    with the supposed date of the martyrdom of Paul.
    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) rCLEarly morning, jubilators, up to no good, instigators... Sons of long forgotten races, that the darkest night embracesrCY (Ron Hynes & D.OrCOD)




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Madhu@enometh@meer.net to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 14:59:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian


    * "Kendall K. Down" <111vkus$rg54$5@dont-email.me> :
    Wrote on Tue, 30 Jun 2026 06:41:48 +0100:

    I like the idea that we are in a simulation, but fail to see why that
    would require belief in this "extra-temporal realm". Or, in
    particular, why this "extra-temporal realm" requires conscious
    existence.

    Let us suppose that God has some planet which He wishes to fill with trust-worthy humans and so He runs a simulation in which different combinations of genes are tried out - given a certain amount of
    computer time. Once their time is up, the code which defines them is
    simply stored on a hard drive (or other medium) until the right number
    of satisfactory individuals has been reached.

    At that point the satisfactory definitions are loaded into permanent
    bodies and let loose in this planet.

    I'm pretty sure this whole line of reasoning is false, though I may not
    be able to express why. I used to subscribe to this sort of thing
    myself, and would make statements like "this world is a beta release,
    the real thing is will be the new creation", but it is based on a computation-evolution hypothesis which I now realise is fundamentally
    wrong. In college I used to think everything would be explained under
    an "optimization" framework (which includes deliberate "pessimisation"),
    but all this sort of theorising only serves to ultimately undermine the
    glory and the power and perfection of god.

    the world in the present dispensation exists to serve the purpose, not
    of god, but of the prince of the world, for whom the mechanisms and
    corruption are created. and this line of reasoning somehow serves the
    purpose of corruption, rather than expressing a biblical truth



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 14:27:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 30/06/2026 06:28, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 29/06/2026 07:36, Timreason wrote:

    We had a sermon yesterday about those two guys. They didn't seem to
    get on well together! It seems they were two very different people.
    But I suppose it shows how God chooses all kinds of people, and
    therefore some friction is likely from time to time between Christians.


    There is one single instance where Paul disagreed with something Peter
    was doing - and that becomes "they didn't get on together"? Perhaps your preacher ought to read 2 Peter 3:15 - or hasn't he got that far in
    reading his Bible?

    So who was in the right, Paul or Peter?



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 14:34:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 29/06/2026 14:38, Timreason wrote:
    On 29/06/2026 10:59, John wrote:
    On 28/06/2026 23:54, David Dalton wrote:
    June 29 is Feast of Saints Peter and Paul.

    This is significant to me since though I am no longer Catholic
    my home church/parish is that of Saints Peter and Paul
    and is where I received the four Catholic sacraments
    of baptism, communion, confession/penance, and
    confirmation.


    Why do certain sectors of Christianity, Catholicism in particular,
    have an obsession with Saints?

    Paul and Peter were ordinary believers, albeit from a Christian
    perspective greatly used by God.-a That's it, ordinary people doing
    God's work. All Christians are saints, so why do we place some on a
    higher pedestal?


    The thinking behind that is, I think, the notion of "The communion of
    the saints". That is, the idea that all Christians can join together in prayer, including those that have 'Gone before'.

    A lot depends on whether one believes in 'soul sleep' or not. My own
    belief is that the departed are in an 'extra-temporal' realm. That is because I believe that we are in what might be thought of as a
    'simulation', and therefore Time-Space is a framework specific to our present existence. If they are somehow 'Outside' that framework, then there's no reason to think that they might not have access to anywhere
    in both Time and Space.

    So, traditional Christianity holds to the notion that we can ask those Christians that have gone before, to join us in prayer. But of course,
    we really only want to join with those that 'Made It' into that realm!
    So traditionally the church recognised select individuals DID make it,
    an obvious example being St Mary the mother of Christ.

    As for me, my place has already been taken, there is already a St
    Timothy and of course, a St John, come to that. (Yes, I know there can
    be and are several saints sharing the same names, just my little joke!)

    My poiunt wasn't so much asking those who have passed, certain they are
    in the Kingdom, but the fact they are given special status. Out of
    interest, would it be right to ask Billy Graham to join a believer in
    prayer, or is it just those who have been given special Saint status?

    My opinion, a Christian doesn't need to ask those who have passed to
    join them in their petitions to God. If my understanding of the bible is correct, you can pray directly to God.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Timreason@timreason@hotmail.co.uk to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 16:21:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 14:34, John wrote:
    On 29/06/2026 14:38, Timreason wrote:
    On 29/06/2026 10:59, John wrote:
    On 28/06/2026 23:54, David Dalton wrote:
    June 29 is Feast of Saints Peter and Paul.

    This is significant to me since though I am no longer Catholic
    my home church/parish is that of Saints Peter and Paul
    and is where I received the four Catholic sacraments
    of baptism, communion, confession/penance, and
    confirmation.


    Why do certain sectors of Christianity, Catholicism in particular,
    have an obsession with Saints?

    Paul and Peter were ordinary believers, albeit from a Christian
    perspective greatly used by God.-a That's it, ordinary people doing
    God's work. All Christians are saints, so why do we place some on a
    higher pedestal?


    The thinking behind that is, I think, the notion of "The communion of
    the saints". That is, the idea that all Christians can join together
    in prayer, including those that have 'Gone before'.

    A lot depends on whether one believes in 'soul sleep' or not. My own
    belief is that the departed are in an 'extra-temporal' realm. That is
    because I believe that we are in what might be thought of as a
    'simulation', and therefore Time-Space is a framework specific to our
    present existence. If they are somehow 'Outside' that framework, then
    there's no reason to think that they might not have access to anywhere
    in both Time and Space.

    So, traditional Christianity holds to the notion that we can ask those
    Christians that have gone before, to join us in prayer. But of course,
    we really only want to join with those that 'Made It' into that realm!
    So traditionally the church recognised select individuals DID make it,
    an obvious example being St Mary the mother of Christ.

    As for me, my place has already been taken, there is already a St
    Timothy and of course, a St John, come to that. (Yes, I know there can
    be and are several saints sharing the same names, just my little joke!)

    My poiunt wasn't so much asking those who have passed, certain they are
    in the Kingdom, but the fact they are given special status.-a Out of interest, would it be right to ask Billy Graham to join a believer in prayer, or is it just those who have been given special Saint status?

    My opinion, a Christian doesn't need to ask those who have passed to
    join them in their petitions to God. If my understanding of the bible is correct, you can pray directly to God.


    My understanding of it is that you may ask ANY departed saint to join
    with you in prayer. You could ask Billy Graham. I doubt whether being an 'evangelical Christian' actually prevents someone from being saved - but
    I think most evangelicals do not interpret 'Communion of the saints' the
    same way as those of traditional 'catholic' or 'orthodox' beliefs do,
    though. But maybe when Billy got there, he got a surprise...

    You could ask your Aunt Bertha, or anyone who's gone before. But the
    church recommends some people. Based really on the way they lived their
    lives, the things they did or perhaps because they died for the Faith (martyrdom). I don't personally see it as 'Special status', but rather,
    a list of people whom the church has recommended on the basis that they
    feel these are people who 'Made It'.

    I totally agree with you (1) that you don't NEED to ask them, or anyone
    else, to pray with you. (2) that you can pray directly to God without
    any 'intercessors'. That's called the 'priesthood of all believers', and
    is AFAIK a position also held by Anglicans, including those at the
    'High' end of the candle.

    Tim.




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 20:37:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 10:29, Madhu wrote:

    the world in the present dispensation exists to serve the purpose, not
    of god, but of the prince of the world, for whom the mechanisms and corruption are created. and this line of reasoning somehow serves the purpose of corruption, rather than expressing a biblical truth
    To a certain extent you are correct: the present dispensation is ruled
    by the devil. However against that is the fact that you have a protected
    rebel group who reject the devil's authority and works and, in the end,
    they will be successful and the devil will be overthrown.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 20:34:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 14:27, John wrote:

    So who was in the right, Paul or Peter?
    In my opinion, Paul. On the other hand, we only have one side of the
    argument, so perhaps there were mitigating circumstanes.

    However the point is that although they disagreed on one occasion, that
    is no justification for claim that they "didn't get on together".

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 20:43:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 16:21, Timreason wrote:

    My understanding of it is that you may ask ANY departed saint to join
    with you in prayer. You could ask Billy Graham. I doubt whether being an 'evangelical Christian' actually prevents someone from being saved - but
    I think most evangelicals do not interpret 'Communion of the saints' the same way as those of traditional 'catholic' or 'orthodox' beliefs do, though. But maybe when Billy got there, he got a surprise...

    *If* there is conscious life immediately after death and if the dead are
    aware of what happens on earth (both of which are denied by the Bible)
    then yes, Billy Graham will indeed have had a surprise. He will also
    find himself busier than ever rather than relaxing in the peace of heaven!

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 20:40:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 14:34, John wrote:

    My poiunt wasn't so much asking those who have passed, certain they are
    in the Kingdom, but the fact they are given special status.-a Out of interest, would it be right to ask Billy Graham to join a believer in prayer, or is it just those who have been given special Saint status?

    Quite so. Needless to say, I do not subscribe to the "praying to saints"
    idea.

    My opinion, a Christian doesn't need to ask those who have passed to
    join them in their petitions to God. If my understanding of the bible is correct, you can pray directly to God.
    Exactly. On the other hand, Christians praying for one another is a
    well-known phenomenon and I can see the point of those who (mistakenly) believe that the dead are conscious, requesting dead friends, family or
    saints to pray for them. It is a reasonable extension of asking the
    living to pray with and for you.

    It is a waste of breathe if we will only accept what the Bible so
    plainly teaches: the dead know nothing.

    God bless,
    KendalL K. D
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Jul 2 01:31:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 20:43, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 01/07/2026 16:21, Timreason wrote:

    My understanding of it is that you may ask ANY departed saint to join
    with you in prayer. You could ask Billy Graham. I doubt whether being
    an 'evangelical Christian' actually prevents someone from being saved
    - but I think most evangelicals do not interpret 'Communion of the
    saints' the same way as those of traditional 'catholic' or 'orthodox'
    beliefs do, though. But maybe when Billy got there, he got a surprise...

    *If* there is conscious life immediately after death and if the dead are aware of what happens on earth (both of which are denied by the Bible)
    then yes, Billy Graham will indeed have had a surprise. He will also
    find himself busier than ever rather than relaxing in the peace of heaven!

    The bible is more or less silent in what happens after death, so we
    can't take it as Gospel (pun intended) that the saved dead are
    unconscious souls. Jesus mentions the bosom of Abraham, and Paul
    believed that when he died he would be with the Lord, which you dismiss
    as that would be his first conscious

    I'm intriqued by your last sentence, why would he be busier than ever?



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Jul 2 01:33:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 16:21, Timreason wrote:

    My understanding of it is that you may ask ANY departed saint to join
    with you in prayer. You could ask Billy Graham. I doubt whether being an 'evangelical Christian' actually prevents someone from being saved - but
    I think most evangelicals do not interpret 'Communion of the saints' the same way as those of traditional 'catholic' or 'orthodox' beliefs do, though. But maybe when Billy got there, he got a surprise...

    You could ask your Aunt Bertha, or anyone who's gone before. But the
    church recommends some people. Based really on the way they lived their lives, the things they did or perhaps because they died for the Faith (martyrdom). I don't personally see it as 'Special status', but rather,
    a list of people whom the church has recommended on the basis that they
    feel these are people who 'Made It'.

    I totally agree with you (1) that you don't NEED to ask them, or anyone else, to pray with you. (2) that you can pray directly to God without
    any 'intercessors'. That's called the 'priesthood of all believers', and
    is AFAIK a position also held by Anglicans, including those at the
    'High' end of the candle.

    Thanks Tim.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Jul 2 05:22:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/07/2026 01:31, John wrote:

    The bible is more or less silent in what happens after death, so we
    can't take it as Gospel (pun intended) that the saved dead are
    unconscious souls.

    That is because nothing happens after death! You are dead - unconscious,
    in limbo - until the bodily resurrection, concerning which the Bible
    does have a certain amount to say.

    Jesus mentions the bosom of Abraham, and Paul
    believed that when he died he would be with the Lord, which you dismiss
    as that would be his first conscious

    The parable of Dives and Lazarus was intended as a rebuke to the
    pharisees who "would not believe, even if one came back from the dead"
    (which, of course, happened a short time later when Lazarus came back
    from the dead). It was not intended as teaching concerning the state of
    the dead and no Christian church believes the details given in the parable.

    Paul's statement can be taken as you desccribe - his next conscious
    thought is seeing Jesus returning in glory - but it is also a statement
    of fact. The spirit returns to God and is preserved by Him, it's just
    that without a body, the spirit is necessarily unconscious.

    I'm intriqued by your last sentence, why would he be busier than ever?
    Passing on all the requests from those who pray to him. Just think how
    many requests for safety poor St Christopher has to handle every day,
    enough to make him regret being quite so virtuous during his lifetime.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2