• Kisspeptin

    From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sun Jun 28 20:31:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    Reading through an old issue of New Scientist, I came across an article
    about the discovery of kisspeptin, a hormone that appears to start
    puberty or delay it. (The hormone was named after an American brand of chocolate before its link with puberty was known.)

    The discussion was about the use of kisspeptin to delay puberty - in
    other words, to temporarily block puberty - because apparently some
    white American girls are starting to menstruate before they reach 7 (and African-Americans before 6!) which points to a massive disjunction
    between their physical maturity and their mental and psychological maturity.

    However messing around with puberty in this way is worrying.

    ==========
    Perhaps the greatest worry is the potential effect on the brain. It is
    now accepted that adolescence is a dynamic time for brain development
    and that puberty hormones have a strong influence on the process.
    Without them normal behaviours fail to develop. Cheryl Sisk at Michgan
    State University in East Lansing, for example, has found that male
    hamsters not exposed to sex hormones during puberty are much less likely
    as adults to mount females, spread their scen to communicate their
    status or indeed to have a dominant staus worth boasting about. And
    these behaviours are long-lasting: hormone replacement in adulthood does
    not put things right. A handful of studies suggests the same may apply
    to humans. ... Men who were not exposed to sex hormones at the normal
    age for puberty but were treated afterwards, had worse spatial abilities
    than other men.
    New Scientist 22-07-2006 p. 38
    ==========

    This of course, was long before the current craze for men and women
    pretending to belong to the opposite sex (or, worse still, being forced
    by evil adults into thinking that they are the wrong sex). Sadly, there
    are those on this august forum who have swallowed the fashionable lie
    and, without knowing anything about the subject, have argued that
    children should be fed puberty blockers. It is interesting to read the conclusion of the article when dealing with a genuine medical problem.

    ==========
    Perhaps it is no surprise that researchers are generally wary of
    interfering in such an important yet poorly understood process. rCLIrCOm
    very nervous about a medical approach to puberty,rCY says endocrinologist Peter Gluckman of the University of Auckland in New Zealand. He accepts
    that mistimed puberty is a problem that needs to be tackled. rCLBut IrCOm
    very reluctant to solve it medically. IrCOd rather solve it socially.
    Maybe it would be better to help young people face biological maturity.rCY
    New Scientist 22-07-2006 p. 38
    ==========

    Or these days, if he had not been silenced by the trans bigots, he might
    have said, "Maybe it would be better to help young people face
    biological reality."

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Jun 29 10:43:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 28/06/2026 20:31, Kendall K. Down wrote:



    Perhaps the greatest worry is the potential effect on the brain. It is now
    accepted that adolescence is a dynamic time for brain development and
    that puberty hormones have a strong influence on the process. Without
    them normal behaviours fail to develop. Cheryl Sisk at Michgan >
    State University in East Lansing, for example, has found that male
    hamsters not exposed to sex hormones during puberty are much less likely
    as adults to mount females, spread their scen to communicate their
    status or indeed to have a dominant staus worth boasting about. And
    these behaviours are long-lasting: hormone replacement in adulthood does
    not put things right. A handful of studies suggests the same may apply
    to humans. ... Men who were not exposed to sex hormones at the normal
    age for puberty but were treated afterwards, had worse spatial abilities than other men.
    New Scientist 22-07-2006 p. 38

    This of course, was long before the current craze for men and women pretending to belong to the opposite sex (or, worse still, being forced
    by evil adults into thinking that they are the wrong sex). Sadly, there
    are those on this august forum who have swallowed the fashionable lie
    and, without knowing anything about the subject, have argued that
    children should be fed puberty blockers. It is interesting to read the conclusion of the article when dealing with a genuine medical problem.

    Name one person here who has said children should be fed puberty blockers?.....I'll wait.


    ==========
    Perhaps it is no surprise that researchers are generally wary of
    interfering in such an important yet poorly understood process. rCLIrCOm very nervous about a medical approach to puberty,rCY says endocrinologist Peter Gluckman of the University of Auckland in New Zealand. He accepts
    that mistimed puberty is a problem that needs to be tackled. rCLBut IrCOm very reluctant to solve it medically. IrCOd rather solve it socially.
    Maybe it would be better to help young people face biological maturity.rCY New Scientist 22-07-2006 p. 38
    ==========

    Or these days, if he had not been silenced by the trans bigots, he might have said, "Maybe it would be better to help young people face
    biological reality."

    I would see a psychiatrist if I were you, or better still, have a word
    with God, because you claim to be a Christian and follow Jesus but your
    over obsessive behaviour towards a minute section of society, who
    rightly or wrongly believe they are born in the wrong body, borders on
    the insane. You disobey one of the most important things Jesus said.
    Love your enemies, love your neighbour as yourself. I can only assume
    you have a very, very low opinion of yourself.

    GB was too kind to you the other day when he said "You are anti-trans
    for honestly held religious reasons" I get that a religious person may
    have objections to trans matters, and that's absolutely fine. You go
    way beyond that, bringing it up on a regular basis when it has
    absolutely no impact on your walk with God in any way, shape or form.

    And you're not just attacking the ideology, you're attacking people as
    well. Please show mw where, in that Holy book of yours, it allows you
    to do that?

    Does God care if someone chooses to change their gender? Personally I
    very much doubt it. To over-emphasise a quote from Paul "There is
    neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, *there is no
    male and female*, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. Galations 3:28 ESV.

    God looks at the heart, not the body. Perhaps you should do the same?




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Jun 30 06:19:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 29/06/2026 10:43, John wrote:

    Name one person here who has said children should be fed puberty blockers?.....I'll wait.

    Oh, I doubt anyone has used those exact words (Gareth's favourite ploy
    to evade accountability), but certainly we have been urged to have
    sympathy for these poor kids who are in the "wrong body" and criticisms
    of Tavistock have been condemned.

    I would see a psychiatrist if I were you, or better still, have a word
    with God, because you claim to be a Christian and follow Jesus but your
    over obsessive behaviour towards a minute section of society, who
    rightly or wrongly believe they are born in the wrong body, borders on
    the insane. You disobey one of the most important things Jesus said.
    Love your enemies, love your neighbour as yourself.-a I can only assume
    you have a very, very low opinion of yourself.

    So you cannot argue against the science, you merely attack the messenger.

    GB was too kind to you the other day when he said "You are anti-trans
    for honestly held religious reasons" I get that a religious person may
    have objections to trans matters, and that's absolutely fine.-a You go
    way beyond that, bringing it up on a regular basis when it has
    absolutely no impact on your walk with God in any way, shape or form.

    So far as I know, none of the scientists quoted in the New Scientist
    article about genetics were religious, let alone Christian.

    And you're not just attacking the ideology, you're attacking people as well.-a Please show mw where, in that Holy book of yours, it allows you
    to do that?

    Posting a scientific warning about the dangers of meddling with the
    body's natural process of puberty is "attacking people"? What a
    topsy-turvy world you inhabit!

    Does God care if someone chooses to change their gender?-a Personally I
    very much doubt it. To over-emphasise a quote from Paul "There is
    neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, *there is no
    male and female*, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. Galations 3:28 ESV.

    I think God does care when people muck about with the finely crafted
    physical processes He created. Does God care when women feel pressured
    into having their breasts surgically removed?

    God looks at the heart, not the body. Perhaps you should do the same?
    Your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost, if any man destroy the temple
    of God, him will God destroy.
    Perhaps you ought to read your Bible occasionally instead of acting as spokesman for the trans lobby.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 14:23:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 30/06/2026 06:19, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 29/06/2026 10:43, John wrote:

    Name one person here who has said children should be fed puberty
    blockers?.....I'll wait.

    Oh, I doubt anyone has used those exact words (Gareth's favourite ploy
    to evade accountability), but certainly we have been urged to have
    sympathy for these poor kids who are in the "wrong body" and criticisms
    of Tavistock have been condemned.

    Having sympathy for children who believe they were born in the wrong
    body is not the same as saying they should be fed puberty blockers.

    I'm also not aware of anyone in this forum, past or present, who has
    argued for children to be fed puberty blockers.

    I would see a psychiatrist if I were you, or better still, have a word
    with God, because you claim to be a Christian and follow Jesus but
    your over obsessive behaviour towards a minute section of society, who
    rightly or wrongly believe they are born in the wrong body, borders on
    the insane. You disobey one of the most important things Jesus said.
    Love your enemies, love your neighbour as yourself.-a I can only assume
    you have a very, very low opinion of yourself.

    So you cannot argue against the science, you merely attack the messenger.

    What do my comments above have to do with the study you quoted? They are
    aimed at your over obsessive railing against a minute part of society,
    and the use of emotive language on how you describe them. Is this the
    Jesus way, is this the way He taught His followers to behave?


    GB was too kind to you the other day when he said "You are anti-trans
    for honestly held religious reasons" I get that a religious person may
    have objections to trans matters, and that's absolutely fine.-a You go
    way beyond that, bringing it up on a regular basis when it has
    absolutely no impact on your walk with God in any way, shape or form.

    So far as I know, none of the scientists quoted in the New Scientist
    article about genetics were religious, let alone Christian.

    Read what I wrote. You're trying to gaslight me into it being about the
    study. It's about you, Ken Down, who has an obsessive hatred against
    anything trans. As I said above, if, as a Christian, you are against transgenderism, fine. You can make your feelings known without being
    offensive to those in the trans community.

    You go far, far beyond that and it isn't Christ like.

    And you're not just attacking the ideology, you're attacking people as
    well.-a Please show mw where, in that Holy book of yours, it allows you
    to do that?

    Posting a scientific warning about the dangers of meddling with the
    body's natural process of puberty is "attacking people"? What a topsy-
    turvy world you inhabit!

    I quote, with my emphasis added, "Or these days, if he had not been
    silenced by the trans *bigots*, he might have said, "Maybe it would be
    better to help young people face biological reality."

    "it destroyed the safe and productive environment for women in favour of catering to the *sick fantasies* of a single man who claimed to be a woman."


    Does God care if someone chooses to change their gender?-a Personally I
    very much doubt it. To over-emphasise a quote from Paul "There is
    neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, *there is no
    male and female*, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. Galations 3:28
    ESV.

    I think God does care when people muck about with the finely crafted physical processes He created. Does God care when women feel pressured
    into having their breasts surgically removed?

    We've done this before but people are not pressured into undergoing
    trans surgery. There is comprehensive counselling before such a
    decision is made. But hey, you're trying to gaslight again. If someone
    decides they will have their breasts removed or their male genitalia
    removed then I believe God doesn't care. If that person becomes a
    happier person because of it, what does it matter? The human body is a
    shell we need to function in this world, that's all. It's what's inside
    that counts.


    God looks at the heart, not the body. Perhaps you should do the same?

    Your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost, if any man destroy the temple
    of God, him will God destroy.

    Perhaps you ought to read your Bible occasionally instead of acting as spokesman for the trans lobby.

    Oh I have. This is what Jesus had to say about mutilation

    "For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are
    eunuchs *who have been made eunuchs by men*, and there are eunuchs *who
    have made themselves eunuchs* for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let
    the one who is able to receive this receive it." Matthew 19:12 ESV (my emphasis)

    As for being a spokesman for the trans lobby. I will stick up for marginalised people every single time. It's called empathy, something
    you sadly don't possess.





    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Jul 1 20:54:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 14:23, John wrote:

    Having sympathy for children who believe they were born in the wrong
    body is not the same as saying they should be fed puberty blockers.

    So you would join me in urging that they should receive psychiatric
    treatment for their mistaken and foolish belief?

    Read what I wrote. You're trying to gaslight me into it being about the study.-a It's about you, Ken Down, who has an obsessive hatred against anything trans. As I said above, if, as a Christian, you are against transgenderism, fine. You can make your feelings known without being offensive to those in the trans community.

    Reporting on the dangers of medicalising the condition is offensive?

    I quote, with my emphasis added, "Or these days, if he had not been
    silenced by the trans *bigots*, he might have said, "Maybe it would be better to help young people face biological reality."

    I am not surprised that you have failed to notice that others beside
    myself have bewailed the bigotry and intolerance shown by those in the
    trans lobby.

    We've done this before but people are not pressured into undergoing
    trans surgery.

    That is not the testimony of people who have actually undergone surgery
    and then regretted it.

    There is comprehensive counselling before such a decision is made.

    If you believe that, I have a bridge in which you might be interested.
    Going cheap.

    If someone
    decides they will have their breasts removed or their male genitalia
    removed then I believe God doesn't care.-a If that person becomes a
    happier person because of it, what does it matter?-a The human body is a shell we need to function in this world, that's all. It's what's inside
    that counts.

    That is your opinion. God says, "If any man destroy the temple of God,
    him shall God destroy". Sounds to me as if God *does* care what we do
    with our bodies.

    As for being a spokesman for the trans lobby.-a I will stick up for marginalised people every single time.-a It's called empathy, something
    you sadly don't possess.
    How about displaying a bit of that famous empathy for the women who were outraged at being forced to undress in front of a man?

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Jul 2 01:01:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 01/07/2026 20:54, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 01/07/2026 14:23, John wrote:

    Having sympathy for children who believe they were born in the wrong
    body is not the same as saying they should be fed puberty blockers.

    So you would join me in urging that they should receive psychiatric treatment for their mistaken and foolish belief?

    No, because I believe it is a defect in the human body, incurred at
    birth (possibly prior)

    Read what I wrote. You're trying to gaslight me into it being about
    the study.-a It's about you, Ken Down, who has an obsessive hatred
    against anything trans. As I said above, if, as a Christian, you are
    against transgenderism, fine. You can make your feelings known without
    being offensive to those in the trans community.

    Reporting on the dangers of medicalising the condition is offensive?

    No, but your tone and provativeuse of words are. Despite my saying it's
    about *you* the point seems to have missed the target by a country mile.

    I quote, with my emphasis added, "Or these days, if he had not been
    silenced by the trans *bigots*, he might have said, "Maybe it would be
    better to help young people face biological reality."

    I am not surprised that you have failed to notice that others beside
    myself have bewailed the bigotry and intolerance shown by those in the
    trans lobby.

    I have, but you claim to be a Christian and have addressed readers of
    this forum directly. Again, I repeat, it isn't about your objection to
    trans, it's the language you use in doing so.

    We've done this before but people are not pressured into undergoing
    trans surgery.

    That is not the testimony of people who have actually undergone surgery
    and then regretted it.

    Which is a minority. A quick google check says the regret is extremely
    low. A review of 27 studies covering just short of 8000 trans people
    showed a regret rate of between 1% and 2%

    The one trans woman I know of, who transitioned 10 or 11 years ago, is
    living her life to the full. Previous to having full surgery, she contemplated suicide regularly. I have read of similar stories.

    There is comprehensive counselling before such a decision is made.

    If you believe that, I have a bridge in which you might be interested.
    Going cheap.

    You last claimed it was a 30 minute therapy session, which was disproved
    by the very report you linked to.

    If someone decides they will have their breasts removed or their male
    genitalia removed then I believe God doesn't care.-a If that person
    becomes a happier person because of it, what does it matter?-a The
    human body is a shell we need to function in this world, that's all.
    It's what's inside that counts.

    That is your opinion. God says, "If any man destroy the temple of God,
    him shall God destroy". Sounds to me as if God *does* care what we do
    with our bodies.

    Not just my opinion, Jesus agreed with me (I notice you snipped that bit)

    I take it God is equally disgusted if a woman has to have her breasts
    removed for medical reasons, or with the man who recently had 4 inches
    of his penis chopped off because of penile cancer.

    As for being a spokesman for the trans lobby.-a I will stick up for
    marginalised people every single time.-a It's called empathy, something
    you sadly don't possess.

    How about displaying a bit of that famous empathy for the women who were outraged at being forced to undress in front of a man?

    I have made no comment on the case you highlighted in your other thread,
    but thanks for pre-judging me there (another sin to add to your total).

    For what it's worth I think the situation could have been handled better
    by all involved, but in particular the Health Authority for not coming
    up with a solution for all concerned. The nurses should have been
    listened to certainly, but they could have engaged with Rose and a
    mutual understanding could have been reached. However, if they simply
    adopted your stance, it's a wonder the poor woman wasn't tarred and
    feathered!





    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Jul 2 05:37:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/07/2026 01:01, John wrote:

    No, because I believe it is a defect in the human body, incurred at
    birth (possibly prior)

    And you have identified this transgender gene? Or is it some sort of
    trauma - oxygen starvation, perhaps? - which leads to this putative
    defect? Perhaps you can quote some scientific papers to support your contention?

    Which is a minority. A quick google check says the regret is extremely low.-a A review of 27 studies covering just short of 8000 trans people showed a regret rate of between 1% and 2%

    Do a search for "pressured into changing sex"; there are some
    interesting accounts. You will probably be as surprised as I was to
    learn that Iran, that bastion of liberal ideals, has performed more sex-change operations than nearly any other country.


    I take it God is equally disgusted if a woman has to have her breasts removed for medical reasons, or with the man who recently had 4 inches
    of his penis chopped off because of penile cancer.

    I am sure that God is saddened by such cases, just as He is saddened if someone has to go amputation of a limb due to disease or accident. But
    when there is no medical need, it would not surprise me if He was
    disgusted by any "body modification".

    For what it's worth I think the situation could have been handled better
    by all involved, but in particular the Health Authority for not coming
    up with a solution for all concerned.-a The nurses should have been
    listened to certainly, but they could have engaged with Rose and a
    mutual understanding could have been reached. However, if they simply adopted your stance, it's a wonder the poor woman wasn't tarred and feathered!

    Oh? Who is this "poor woman"? If you mean the man pretending to be a
    woman, my impression is that he was deliberately flaunting himself in
    the women's facilities to make a point. The only "understanding" he was interested in was forcing people to do what he wanted.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Jul 2 05:44:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/07/2026 01:01, John wrote:

    No, because I believe it is a defect in the human body, incurred at
    birth (possibly prior)

    Lowbridge wrote that "there has been little research" on lesbians
    experiencing "pressure" to "accept the idea that a penis can be a female
    sex organ". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22We%27re_being_pressured_into_sex_by_some_trans_women%22

    Now there's a quote for you! I presume you would agree that "a penis can
    be a female sex organ"?

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Jul 2 11:16:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/07/2026 05:37, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 02/07/2026 01:01, John wrote:

    No, because I believe it is a defect in the human body, incurred at
    birth (possibly prior)

    And you have identified this transgender gene? Or is it some sort of
    trauma - oxygen starvation, perhaps? - which leads to this putative
    defect? Perhaps you can quote some scientific papers to support your contention?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_gender_incongruence

    I take it God is equally disgusted if a woman has to have her breasts
    removed for medical reasons, or with the man who recently had 4 inches
    of his penis chopped off because of penile cancer.

    I am sure that God is saddened by such cases, just as He is saddened if someone has to go amputation of a limb due to disease or accident. But
    when there is no medical need, it would not surprise me if He was
    disgusted by any "body modification".

    Is Matthew 19:11-12 not in your bible?


    For what it's worth I think the situation could have been handled
    better by all involved, but in particular the Health Authority for not
    coming up with a solution for all concerned.-a The nurses should have
    been listened to certainly, but they could have engaged with Rose and
    a mutual understanding could have been reached. However, if they
    simply adopted your stance, it's a wonder the poor woman wasn't tarred
    and feathered!

    Oh? Who is this "poor woman"? If you mean the man pretending to be a
    woman, my impression is that he was deliberately flaunting himself in
    the women's facilities to make a point. The only "understanding" he was interested in was forcing people to do what he wanted.

    You were there were you, you have an insight into Rose Henderson's
    intentions?

    Isn't judging someone based on your hatred of them a sin or is that
    something else missing from your bible?








    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Jul 2 12:08:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/07/2026 05:44, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 02/07/2026 01:01, John wrote:

    No, because I believe it is a defect in the human body, incurred at
    birth (possibly prior)

    Lowbridge wrote that "there has been little research" on lesbians experiencing "pressure" to "accept the idea that a penis can be a female
    sex organ". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ %22We%27re_being_pressured_into_sex_by_some_trans_women%22

    Perhaps if you'd read that Wikipedia article instead of wetting yourself
    over the headline you wouldn't have been so quick to post the link. It
    wasn't exactly complimentary and was just an opinion piece published on
    a BBC website 5 years ago.

    From the original article "Several people got in touch with me to say
    there was a "huge problem" for lesbians, who were being pressured to
    "accept the idea that a penis can be a female sex organ".

    I knew this would be a hugely divisive subject, but I wanted to find out
    how widespread the issue was.

    Ultimately, it has been difficult to determine the true scale of the
    problem because there has been little research on this topic - only one
    survey to my knowledge. However, those affected have told me the
    pressure comes from a minority of trans women, as well as activists who
    are not necessarily trans themselves.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-57853385

    So yes, this woman wrote her article based on a small number of lesbians
    who felt pressured into having sex with transgender womwn. Not quite the gotcha you thought it would be, is it?

    So if your idea was to gaslight me into thinking there it couldn't be a
    birth defect then you failed - miserably.

    When I say birth defect, I don't mean that as a negative. It can range
    from two toes fused together (as in the case of my son), to tetra-amelia syndrome.

    Some people are born with learning difficulties, but physically able. My
    wife has mild learning difficulties, her IQ is 66. Do I tell her she
    perfectly normal and to stop pretending she's a bit slower than the rest
    of us?



    > Now there's a quote for you! I presume you would agree that "a penis
    can
    be a female sex organ"?

    Oh absolutely, have you not heard of strap ons or dildo's





    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2