• Early death

    From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon May 25 19:56:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    An article in the Independent about Christian discoveries in Turkey, (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/turkey-archaeological-christianity-jesus-image-iznik-b2983066.html)
    makes an interesting comment.

    "Christian growth was also partly driven by potentially lower
    illness-related early death rates than those endured by pagan communities."

    Unfortunately the article does not cite the evidence for that claim
    though it does mention in the next paragraph that female infanticide in
    pagan communities - albeit at a low level - would also have favoured Christianity, as Christians did not practice infanticide in any form.

    Either this lower death rate was the result of direct divine
    intervention, or there was something about the Christian life-style
    which caused it. The most likely reason - in my opinion - would be the Christian refusal to eat meat sacrificed to idols, which in some
    circumstances might have meant that Christians were involuntarily semi-vegetarian, getting their "five a day" and reducing the amount of
    red meat they ate.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue May 26 20:25:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 25/05/2026 19:56, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    An article in the Independent about Christian discoveries in Turkey, (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/turkey- archaeological-christianity-jesus-image-iznik-b2983066.html) makes an interesting comment.

    "Christian growth was also partly driven by potentially lower illness- related early death rates than those endured by pagan communities."

    Unfortunately the article does not cite the evidence for that claim
    though it does mention in the next paragraph that female infanticide in pagan communities - albeit at a low level - would also have favoured Christianity, as Christians did not practice infanticide in any form.

    Either this lower death rate was the result of direct divine
    intervention, or there was something about the Christian life-style
    which caused it. The most likely reason - in my opinion - would be the Christian refusal to eat meat sacrificed to idols, which in some circumstances might have meant that Christians were involuntarily semi- vegetarian, getting their "five a day" and reducing the amount of red
    meat they ate.

    How does not eating meat offered to idols mean that Christians became semi-vegetarian? They could still eat meat not offered to idols. And
    of course you do realise that people eat meat and still live to a rather
    old age don't you. My wife's dad and grandad both lived to the age of
    89, as did my friend's dad. My mum and her mum both died when they were
    79 years old (not connected I hasten to add) The common denominator is
    they were all meat eaters, and red meat at that.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue May 26 23:00:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 26/05/2026 20:25, John wrote:

    How does not eating meat offered to idols mean that Christians became semi-vegetarian?-a They could still eat meat not offered to idols.

    They could - if any was available. If butchers made a selling point out
    of "Our meat is all offered to Apollo" or one of the other gods or
    goddesses, then un-sacrificed meat may have been extremely rare.

    And > of course you do realise that people eat meat and still live to
    a rather
    old age don't you. My wife's dad and grandad both lived to the age of
    89, as did my friend's dad. My mum and her mum both died when they were
    79 years old (not connected I hasten to add) The common denominator is
    they were all meat eaters, and red meat at that.
    I do not doubt what you say, but I would point out that I have heard
    similar arguments advanced by those who wished to defend smoking.
    Government advice is in favour of a largely vegetarian diet.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed May 27 12:06:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 26/05/2026 23:00, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 26/05/2026 20:25, John wrote:

    How does not eating meat offered to idols mean that Christians became
    semi-vegetarian?-a They could still eat meat not offered to idols.

    They could - if any was available. If butchers made a selling point out
    of "Our meat is all offered to Apollo" or one of the other gods or goddesses, then un-sacrificed meat may have been extremely rare.

    Paul said don't worry about it, as long as you avoided it if it gave
    offence to a weeaker brother or sister who ate only vegetables, it
    wasn't an issue.

    And > of course you do realise that people eat meat and still live to
    a rather
    old age don't you. My wife's dad and grandad both lived to the age of
    89, as did my friend's dad. My mum and her mum both died when they
    were 79 years old (not connected I hasten to add) The common
    denominator is they were all meat eaters, and red meat at that.
    I do not doubt what you say, but I would point out that I have heard
    similar arguments advanced by those who wished to defend smoking.
    Government advice is in favour of a largely vegetarian diet.

    That's quite a stretch, as it includes meat, and fish twice a week,
    although I will concede it says eat less red and processed meat.

    Tell me Ken, do you follow the Government guidelines and eat fish twice
    a week? If not, why not?



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu May 28 06:59:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 27/05/2026 12:06, John wrote:

    Paul said don't worry about it, as long as you avoided it if it gave
    offence to a weeaker brother or sister who ate only vegetables, it
    wasn't an issue.

    Indeed, yet the mention of the "weaker brethren" indicates that not all Christians were comfortable with his viewpoint.

    Some years ago Shirley and I were in China where the itinerary included
    a "banquet". After pointing out that we were vegetarians, the organiser arranged for the "banquet" to be in a buddhist temple. We wondered
    whether any of the food had been "offered to idols", but consciously
    adopted St Paul's advice to "ask no questions for conscience' sake" and enjoyed the most delicious gluten dishes we have ever eaten.

    That's quite a stretch, as it includes meat, and fish twice a week,
    although I will concede it says eat less red and processed meat.

    I am glad you concede that I am right.

    Tell me Ken, do you follow the Government guidelines and eat fish twice
    a week?-a If not, why not?

    No, I go beyond them and eat no meat (or fish) at all. It is the diet
    God gave in Eden and is the diet we will follow in heaven and the New
    Earth where "they shall not kill nor destroy in all My holy mountain"
    and even the lions will "eat straw like the ox".

    It may be silly of me, but I believe that the One Who designed and
    created us probably knows the best diet for us.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu May 28 12:36:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 28/05/2026 06:59, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 27/05/2026 12:06, John wrote:

    Paul said don't worry about it, as long as you avoided it if it gave
    offence to a weeaker brother or sister who ate only vegetables, it
    wasn't an issue.

    Indeed, yet the mention of the "weaker brethren" indicates that not all Christians were comfortable with his viewpoint.

    Indeed not, but Paul's recommedation was that it was ok. Are you
    suggesting this man of God was wrong to call the vegetarians "weaker
    brethren" (presumably because they were avoiding meat on religious grounds.

    Some years ago Shirley and I were in China where the itinerary included
    a "banquet". After pointing out that we were vegetarians, the organiser arranged for the "banquet" to be in a buddhist temple. We wondered
    whether any of the food had been "offered to idols", but consciously
    adopted St Paul's advice to "ask no questions for conscience' sake" and enjoyed the most delicious gluten dishes we have ever eaten.

    There you go then.


    That's quite a stretch, as it includes meat, and fish twice a week,
    although I will concede it says eat less red and processed meat.

    I am glad you concede that I am right.

    That's an amzing leap of logic.

    Ken: "Government advice is in favour of a largely vegetarian diet"

    Me: Government advice says eat meat and fish, but reduce your intake of
    red and processed meat.

    Tell me Ken, do you follow the Government guidelines and eat fish
    twice a week?-a If not, why not?

    No, I go beyond them and eat no meat (or fish) at all. It is the diet
    God gave in Eden and is the diet we will follow in heaven and the New
    Earth where "they shall not kill nor destroy in all My holy mountain"
    and even the lions will "eat straw like the ox".

    It may be silly of me, but I believe that the One Who designed and
    created us probably knows the best diet for us.

    So much so that He fed 12000 people fish and ate fish and red meat
    Himself. And if He knows the best diet for us why did He say it was ok
    to eat meat?





    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Fri May 29 06:45:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 28/05/2026 12:36, John wrote:

    Indeed not, but Paul's recommedation was that it was ok. Are you
    suggesting this man of God was wrong to call the vegetarians "weaker brethren" (presumably because they were avoiding meat on religious grounds.

    I'm not sure whether Paul regarded them as "weaker" or whether he was
    just adopting the viewpoint of others for the same of the argument. I
    would agree that avoiding meat "on religious grounds" is a scruple too
    far. Avoiding it on health grounds is a different matter entirely.

    So much so that He fed 12000 people fish and ate fish and red meat Himself.-a And if He knows the best diet for us why did He say it was ok
    to eat meat?
    You are getting muddled. The diet God gave in Eden was vegetarian -
    possibly even vegan. The diet we will eat in heaven and the New Earth
    will be the same.

    In between, however, we live in an imperfect world. Following the
    successive curses placed on the ground and especially after the Flood,
    God gave permission to eat meat. As you are so keen on looking at
    Biblical examples, you might care to note that as soon as man was
    permitted to eat meat his lifespan decreased from hundreds of years to decades.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2