• Born Again

    From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Feb 23 21:58:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    The bible says you must be born of the Spirit, but what exactly does
    that mean? For me it meant becoming a Christian and having your life transformed, believing in Paul's description of no longer being
    conformed to the World's standard, but something new struck me a few
    weeks ago, and maybe I was wrong.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Feb 24 05:00:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 23/02/2026 21:58, John wrote:

    The bible says you must be born of the Spirit, but what exactly does
    that mean?-a For me it meant becoming a Christian and having your life transformed, believing in Paul's description of no longer being
    conformed to the World's standard, but something new struck me a few
    weeks ago, and maybe I was wrong.
    I think the main point of the expression is that you cannot remake
    yourself, you have to ask God to do it for you. This takes the emphasis
    away from anything you might consciously do - "works", to use the usual terminology.

    However the second point is that what is involved is not just tinkering
    with a few bad habits. You are starting on a completely new life, just
    as if you were re-born into a new existence.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Timreason@timreason@hotmail.co.uk to uk.religion.christian on Tue Feb 24 07:54:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 23/02/2026 21:58, John wrote:
    The bible says you must be born of the Spirit, but what exactly does
    that mean?-a For me it meant becoming a Christian and having your life transformed, believing in Paul's description of no longer being
    conformed to the World's standard, but something new struck me a few
    weeks ago, and maybe I was wrong.


    My understanding is it is a shift from being self-centred to being God-centred. "Consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus." [Romans 6:11] Also, "rCLIt is no longer I who live, but Christ
    lives in me.rCY [Gal.2:20]

    To me, the whole New Testament message centres around Christ's commands
    to love God, and to love your neighbour. Both of these are about looking
    away from self and out to God and to others.

    This is about selflessness, but I would be careful to point out that it
    does not mean not looking after ourselves. Indeed, we are told to love
    others 'As we love ourselves'. We should remember that we also are made
    in God's Image, and not just those around us.

    So it's looking after ourselves, but avoiding being selfish at the
    expense of others, or centring on self.

    Two things: Putting God rather than self at the centre of our being.
    Also, the central point is always Love God and Neighbour.

    Tim.






    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Feb 25 12:43:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 24/02/2026 07:54, Timreason wrote:
    On 23/02/2026 21:58, John wrote:
    The bible says you must be born of the Spirit, but what exactly does
    that mean?-a For me it meant becoming a Christian and having your life
    transformed, believing in Paul's description of no longer being
    conformed to the World's standard, but something new struck me a few
    weeks ago, and maybe I was wrong.


    My understanding is it is a shift from being self-centred to being God- centred. "Consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ
    Jesus." [Romans 6:11] Also, "rCLIt is no longer I who live, but Christ
    lives in me.rCY [Gal.2:20]

    To me, the whole New Testament message centres around Christ's commands
    to love God, and to love your neighbour. Both of these are about looking away from self and out to God and to others.

    This is about selflessness, but I would be careful to point out that it
    does not mean not looking after ourselves. Indeed, we are told to love others 'As we love ourselves'. We should remember that we also are made
    in God's Image, and not just those around us.

    So it's looking after ourselves, but avoiding being selfish at the
    expense of others, or centring on self.

    Two things: Putting God rather than self at the centre of our being.
    Also, the central point is always Love God and Neighbour.

    Yes I would agree, with the caveat that it is the Holy Spirit who brings
    about that change, although obviously the Christian has to continue
    walking in the light.

    Is it t is this a Christian idea, or was it required of the Jews as
    well, did they need to be born again?

    The reason I ask is because I'm not aware of this happening in the OT.
    Jews took their burn't offerings to the alter once a year to repent, and whilst I'm sure that an habitual sinner would be desecrating that
    offering, it was all that was required for the average Jew.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Feb 25 12:48:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 24/02/2026 05:00, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 23/02/2026 21:58, John wrote:

    The bible says you must be born of the Spirit, but what exactly does
    that mean?-a For me it meant becoming a Christian and having your life
    transformed, believing in Paul's description of no longer being
    conformed to the World's standard, but something new struck me a few
    weeks ago, and maybe I was wrong.
    I think the main point of the expression is that you cannot remake
    yourself, you have to ask God to do it for you. This takes the emphasis
    away from anything you might consciously do - "works", to use the usual terminology.

    Yep, I agree with that, however the reason I'm asking is this seems to
    be a Christian belief, rather than something which has come from the OT.

    However the second point is that what is involved is not just tinkering
    with a few bad habits. You are starting on a completely new life, just
    as if you were re-born into a new existence.

    I agree, which is why I don't believe you can do this by your own efforts.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Timreason@timreason@hotmail.co.uk to uk.religion.christian on Wed Feb 25 14:03:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 25/02/2026 12:43, John wrote:
    On 24/02/2026 07:54, Timreason wrote:
    On 23/02/2026 21:58, John wrote:
    The bible says you must be born of the Spirit, but what exactly does
    that mean?-a For me it meant becoming a Christian and having your life
    transformed, believing in Paul's description of no longer being
    conformed to the World's standard, but something new struck me a few
    weeks ago, and maybe I was wrong.


    My understanding is it is a shift from being self-centred to being
    God- centred. "Consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in
    Christ Jesus." [Romans 6:11] Also, "rCLIt is no longer I who live, but
    Christ lives in me.rCY [Gal.2:20]

    To me, the whole New Testament message centres around Christ's
    commands to love God, and to love your neighbour. Both of these are
    about looking away from self and out to God and to others.

    This is about selflessness, but I would be careful to point out that
    it does not mean not looking after ourselves. Indeed, we are told to
    love others 'As we love ourselves'. We should remember that we also
    are made in God's Image, and not just those around us.

    So it's looking after ourselves, but avoiding being selfish at the
    expense of others, or centring on self.

    Two things: Putting God rather than self at the centre of our being.
    Also, the central point is always Love God and Neighbour.

    Yes I would agree, with the caveat that it is the Holy Spirit who brings about that change, although obviously the Christian has to continue
    walking in the light.


    Indeed. We are told that our bodies are 'Temples of the Holy Spirit'.
    [1 Corinthians 6:19rCo20] That is another way of saying that God, rather
    than self, is at the centre of our being.

    Is it t is this a Christian idea, or was it required of the Jews as
    well, did they need to be born again?

    I'm no expert. But I think the nature of the Covenant was different for
    them, a Covenant specifically for the Jews. Our New Covenant is offered
    to all peoples, and not just the Jews. I won't say any more, on account
    of my lack of knowledge in this area. It's best if I avoid talking from
    an orifice not usually associated with communication...


    The reason I ask is because I'm not aware of this happening in the OT.
    Jews took their burn't offerings to the alter once a year to repent, and whilst I'm sure that an habitual sinner would be desecrating that
    offering, it was all that was required for the average Jew.


    My understanding is that this is a part of the requirements of the Old Covenant, that has been fulfilled by Christ in the New Covenant.

    Tim.




    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Feb 25 21:29:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 25/02/2026 12:48, John wrote:

    Yep, I agree with that, however the reason I'm asking is this seems to
    be a Christian belief, rather than something which has come from the OT.

    The whole thing seems to come from Jesus' conversation with Nicodemus,
    which of course was a New Testament event.

    In Old Testament times you had to join the nation of Israel in order to worship Israel's God, so that would deal with the changed lives bit of
    the concept. In addition, it is in the old Testament that we find the
    promise "I will take away their stony heart and give them a heart of
    flesh" and also "I will write My laws on their hearts". Both seem to me
    to be akin to the Christian "New Birth" requirement.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Feb 25 21:31:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 25/02/2026 12:43, John wrote:

    The reason I ask is because I'm not aware of this happening in the OT.
    Jews took their burn't offerings to the alter once a year to repent, and whilst I'm sure that an habitual sinner would be desecrating that
    offering, it was all that was required for the average Jew.
    I agree that that might seem a somewhat mechanical approach to God:
    offer a goat, get your sins forgiven. Solomon's prayer at the dedication
    of his temple, seems to me to point towards a deeper aspect to the
    worship of God than just sin-sacrifice-repeat

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Wed Feb 25 21:33:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 25/02/2026 14:03, Timreason wrote:

    I'm no expert. But I think the nature of the Covenant was different for them, a Covenant specifically for the Jews. Our New Covenant is offered
    to all peoples, and not just the Jews. I won't say any more, on account
    of my lack of knowledge in this area. It's best if I avoid talking from
    an orifice not usually associated with communication...

    The covenant God made with the Jews was to give them statehood in the
    land of Canaaan. (Exodus 19) I believe that in order to be saved, they
    would have to relyon some form of the promise given in Genesis 3:15

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Madhu@enometh@meer.net to uk.religion.christian on Thu Feb 26 09:20:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    * "Kendall K. Down" <10nnpnc$14fo3$2@dont-email.me> :
    Wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2026 21:31:26 +0000:
    I agree that that might seem a somewhat mechanical approach to God:
    offer a goat, get your sins forgiven. Solomon's prayer at the
    dedication of his temple, seems to me to point towards a deeper aspect
    to the worship of God than just sin-sacrifice-repeat

    I'm not sure, I think he was more instrumental in establishing the
    instituion of ritual sacrifice. Parts of his prayer (e.g. the direction
    to face Jerusalem) seem to me to foreshadow the idolatry into which he
    would slip in falling away from God. Solomon built the temple with much iniquity, the blood of forced labour, etc. all of which point to the
    building of the jerusalem temple as a financial institution, which
    sustained itself rather than a place of worship of God



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Feb 26 05:30:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 26/02/2026 03:50, Madhu wrote:

    I'm not sure, I think he was more instrumental in establishing the
    instituion of ritual sacrifice. Parts of his prayer (e.g. the direction
    to face Jerusalem) seem to me to foreshadow the idolatry into which he
    would slip in falling away from God. Solomon built the temple with much iniquity, the blood of forced labour, etc. all of which point to the
    building of the jerusalem temple as a financial institution, which
    sustained itself rather than a place of worship of God

    Certainly Solomon built his palace with forced labour; I'm not so sure
    about the temple. Labour was organised, but was it forced or offered
    freely as a service to God?

    The institution of sacrifice was already in existence when Solomon built
    his temple, so I don't think he could be said to have "established" it.
    As for facing the temple while praying, Daniel seems to have done this
    and been delivered from the lions in consequence, so it seems to have
    been approved by God.

    Certainly the temple required financial support - any organisation does
    sooner or later - but I am not sure how it could be said to be a
    "financial institution". It did not lend money nor was it a safe-deposit
    for people's savings.

    I suspect your obsession to interpret everything as a conspiracy by the
    banks has coloured your view of the past.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Feb 26 11:22:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 25/02/2026 14:03, Timreason wrote:
    On 25/02/2026 12:43, John wrote:
    On 24/02/2026 07:54, Timreason wrote:

    Two things: Putting God rather than self at the centre of our being.
    Also, the central point is always Love God and Neighbour.

    Yes I would agree, with the caveat that it is the Holy Spirit who
    brings about that change, although obviously the Christian has to
    continue walking in the light.


    Indeed. We are told that our bodies are 'Temples of the Holy Spirit'.
    [1 Corinthians 6:19rCo20] That is another way of saying that God, rather than self, is at the centre of our being.

    Now that is a very interesting observation. I have been musing recently
    about where the Holy Spirit fits in the trinity belief, and you've
    highlighted something I hadn't thought about.


    Is it t is this a Christian idea, or was it required of the Jews as
    well, did they need to be born again?

    I'm no expert. But I think the nature of the Covenant was different for them, a Covenant specifically for the Jews. Our New Covenant is offered
    to all peoples, and not just the Jews. I won't say any more, on account
    of my lack of knowledge in this area. It's best if I avoid talking from
    an orifice not usually associated with communication...


    Your input is as much valued as anyone elses Tim. I'm merely following a hypothesis, see my reply to Ken.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Feb 26 11:27:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 25/02/2026 21:31, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 25/02/2026 12:43, John wrote:

    The reason I ask is because I'm not aware of this happening in the OT.
    Jews took their burn't offerings to the alter once a year to repent,
    and whilst I'm sure that an habitual sinner would be desecrating that
    offering, it was all that was required for the average Jew.
    I agree that that might seem a somewhat mechanical approach to God:
    offer a goat, get your sins forgiven. Solomon's prayer at the dedication
    of his temple, seems to me to point towards a deeper aspect to the
    worship of God than just sin-sacrifice-repeat

    Yes, that is what I clumsily meant when I mentioned desecrating the
    offering.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Thu Feb 26 12:33:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 25/02/2026 21:29, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 25/02/2026 12:48, John wrote:

    Yep, I agree with that, however the reason I'm asking is this seems to
    be a Christian belief, rather than something which has come from the OT.

    The whole thing seems to come from Jesus' conversation with Nicodemus,
    which of course was a New Testament event.

    Which is exactly what I was aiming towards.

    Jesus didn't come for the Christians, He came for the Jews (I'm aware He
    also said about the other fold, but that wasn't His primary reason. It recently dawned on me that it was an odd thing to say to a teacher of
    the Law, when it wasn't a requisite for the Jews, and the majority of Christians applying it to the new birth.

    In Old Testament times you had to join the nation of Israel in order to worship Israel's God, so that would deal with the changed lives bit of
    the concept. In addition, it is in the old Testament that we find the promise "I will take away their stony heart and give them a heart of
    flesh" and also "I will write My laws on their hearts". Both seem to me
    to be akin to the Christian "New Birth" requirement.

    Most Christians believe this was after Pentecost.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Fri Feb 27 03:37:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 26/02/2026 12:33, John wrote:

    Jesus didn't come for the Christians, He came for the Jews (I'm aware He also said about the other fold, but that wasn't His primary reason. It recently dawned on me that it was an odd thing to say to a teacher of
    the Law, when it wasn't a requisite for the Jews, and the majority of Christians applying it to the new birth.

    On the contrary, Jesus expressed surprise that Nicodemus needed to be
    told about the new birth (John 3:10), which indicates to me that new
    birth was indeed an Old Testament requirement - it was just phrased differently. See below:

    Most Christians believe this was after Pentecost.

    The promise to give a new heart is from Jeremiah 31. Certainly that is
    what happened to those who were baptised at Pentecost, but it was on
    offer well before Pentecost.

    Jews might wish you to believe that they are or were saved simply
    because they are descended from Abraham. St Paul, himself a Jew,
    dismissed that idea in Galatians, pointing out that the true descendents
    of Abraham are those who act like him and believe God as he did.
    Physical descent may give you right to the earthly Canaan, it does not guarantee you a place in the heavenly Canaan.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Fri Feb 27 03:40:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 26/02/2026 11:22, John wrote:

    Your input is as much valued as anyone elses Tim. I'm merely following a hypothesis, see my reply to Ken.
    Spiritual wisdom is not doled out with your degree from Oxford. It comes
    from personal experience of God - and in that respect the most unlearned
    of Christians may have more knowledge than a university professor with a
    whole alphabet of qualifications in theology.

    I disagree radically with many of the things Tim says, but he is always
    worth listening to.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Sat Feb 28 13:26:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 27/02/2026 03:37, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 26/02/2026 12:33, John wrote:

    Jesus didn't come for the Christians, He came for the Jews (I'm aware
    He also said about the other fold, but that wasn't His primary reason.
    It recently dawned on me that it was an odd thing to say to a teacher
    of the Law, when it wasn't a requisite for the Jews, and the majority
    of Christians applying it to the new birth.

    On the contrary, Jesus expressed surprise that Nicodemus needed to be
    told about the new birth (John 3:10), which indicates to me that new
    birth was indeed an Old Testament requirement - it was just phrased differently. See below:

    Most Christians believe this was after Pentecost.

    The promise to give a new heart is from Jeremiah 31. Certainly that is
    what happened to those who were baptised at Pentecost, but it was on
    offer well before Pentecost.

    Really? I understand Jeremiah was born roughly BC650, so well after the
    rules God laid down to Moses. It wasn't until AD28 ish when this became
    a reality for those not Jewish. For the Jews the laws remain in place,
    yet God here states "This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel
    after that time,rCY declares the Lord.
    rCLI will put my law in their minds
    and write it on their hearts.
    I will be their God,
    and they will be my people.
    34 No longer will they teach their neighbor,
    or say to one another, rCyKnow the Lord,rCO
    because they will all know me,
    from the least of them to the greatest,rCY
    declares the Lord.
    rCLFor I will forgive their wickedness
    and will remember their sins no more"

    When would you say that actually came about, for the Jews?

    I understand that the Prophets and great men of old would have the
    Spirit of God in some way, but was every righteous Jew born of the Spirit?

    I akin them very much the same as Muslims, who follow the religion in
    most cases is because they are born into it.


    Jews might wish you to believe that they are or were saved simply
    because they are descended from Abraham. St Paul, himself a Jew,
    dismissed that idea in Galatians, pointing out that the true descendents
    of Abraham are those who act like him and believe God as he did.
    Physical descent may give you right to the earthly Canaan, it does not guarantee you a place in the heavenly Canaan.

    For sure, but you have to remember that this is Paul writing as a
    believer of Christ, he wouldn't have believed that as a God fearing Jew.
    Are you suggesting that the yearly sacrifices were worthless and it was
    only those with faith in God who go on to eternal life.



    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kendall K. Down@kendallkdown@googlemail.com to uk.religion.christian on Mon Mar 2 19:37:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 28/02/2026 13:26, John wrote:

    Really?-a I understand Jeremiah was born roughly BC650, so well after the rules God laid down to Moses.

    Correct.

    It wasn't until AD28 ish when this became a reality for those not Jewish.

    No, I believe that salvation has always been on the same basis of faith
    in God and the indwelling of His Spirit.

    When would you say that actually came about, for the Jews?

    It has always been the case, for Jews and non-Jews.

    I akin them very much the same as Muslims, who follow the religion in
    most cases is because they are born into it.

    I don't doubt that that is true - but it is also true of Christians. Particularly years ago people automatically put "C of E" under
    "Religion?" simply because they were born into it.

    For sure, but you have to remember that this is Paul writing as a
    believer of Christ, he wouldn't have believed that as a God fearing Jew.

    No, I agree that Paul's thinking developed after his conversion.

    Are you suggesting that the yearly sacrifices were worthless and it was
    only those with faith in God who go on to eternal life.

    Only those with faith are saved. See Amos 5:21-24 for God's opinion of sacrifices and other religious observances without faith.

    But no, they were not worthless. God had ordained them and offering a sacrifice accompanied by faith made it acceptable and pleasing as
    obedience to God always is when motivated by love and faith. Without
    those, killing an animal was no more salvific (to use a horrible term)
    than butchering any animal for food.

    God bless,
    Kendall K. Down
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com



    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.religion.christian on Tue Mar 3 09:39:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    On 02/03/2026 19:37, Kendall K. Down wrote:
    On 28/02/2026 13:26, John wrote:

    Really?-a I understand Jeremiah was born roughly BC650, so well after
    the rules God laid down to Moses.

    Correct.

    It wasn't until AD28 ish when this became a reality for those not Jewish.

    No, I believe that salvation has always been on the same basis of faith
    in God and the indwelling of His Spirit.

    When would you say that actually came about, for the Jews?

    It has always been the case, for Jews and non-Jews.

    No it wasn't. Jews had to follow a rigid rulebook of 613 laws, subject
    to varying degrees of punishment, including the death penalty for
    disobedient children (now theres a thought for the unruly youth of today!!)

    God says there will come a day etc, which has never happened for the Jews.



    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Madhu@enometh@meer.net to uk.religion.christian on Tue Mar 3 15:37:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.religion.christian

    * "Kendall K. Down" <10o4ou8$1e63e$1@dont-email.me> :
    Wrote on Mon, 2 Mar 2026 19:37:45 +0000:
    On 28/02/2026 13:26, John wrote:
    Are you suggesting that the yearly sacrifices were worthless and it
    was only those with faith in God who go on to eternal life.

    Ken's excellent answer didn't cover this but the in the OT salvation is
    never adverted to sacrifice. (sacrifices for the sake of heaven exists
    as a concept in vedic sacrifice, and possibly in the emperor cults).

    Despite Paul's and the 1st century christians' representation of Jewish
    belief, salvation for the Jews was always a matter of faith in the grace
    of God and never of works.

    (For saducees salvation may have just meant a full span of life which is
    not cut off, for oneself and one's children.)

    Only those with faith are saved. See Amos 5:21-24 for God's opinion of sacrifices and other religious observances without faith.

    But no, they were not worthless. God had ordained them and offering a sacrifice accompanied by faith made it acceptable and pleasing as
    obedience to God always is when motivated by love and faith. Without
    those, killing an animal was no more salvific (to use a horrible term)
    than butchering any animal for food.



    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2