https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15521595/Young-woman-breasts- cut-teenager-live-boy-wins-2million.html
Starmer may care to consider the potential costs of his drive to
mutilate more children here in Britain.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15521595/Young-woman-breasts- cut-teenager-live-boy-wins-2million.html
The Daily Mail reports today that a young woman who was caught up in
this transgender nonsense and had her breasts amputated, has won
$2,000,000 in compensation. It is expected that her win will open the floodgates on others who have been mutilated by all these "woke" and
trendy doctors.
Elon Musk is quoted as saying, "There will be thousands more court cases
of children who were mutilated by evil doctors. The schools,
psychologists, psychiatrists, and state officials who facilitated this
will pay dearly, too."
Starmer may care to consider the potential costs of his drive to
mutilate more children here in Britain. And those on this newsgroup who
have bleated on about all these poor people in the wrong bodies might
care to consider the accurate and thoroughly deserved adjective Musk
applied to doctors.
If a person undergoes surgery, lives happily as the opposite sex andObviously we can only speculate. I suspect that in the kingdom of heaven
then later in life finds Jesus, will He accept them or are they
permanently barred from the Kingdom of Heaven?
You lie, it's a really bad habit you have and totally unchristian.
But just to reassure you, it won't open the floodgates for those whoI am duly grateful for your legal expertise. The woman who brought the
change their mind after surgery, at least not in this country.-a Those choosing to have surgery go through rigorous pyschological analysis
before changing their sex.
On 03/02/2026 14:33, John wrote:
You lie, it's a really bad habit you have and totally unchristian.
People can read the URL for themselves.
But just to reassure you, it won't open the floodgates for those who
change their mind after surgery, at least not in this country.-a Those
choosing to have surgery go through rigorous pyschological analysis
before changing their sex.
I am duly grateful for your legal expertise. The woman who brought the
court case also went through psychological analysis and felt that the
people doing all these assessments were acting in bad faith. It would
seem that the court agreed with her.
Now of course it's an outright lie to say Starmer is driven to mutilate
more children, because children in this country can't undergo surgery
until the age of 18, i.e. when they become a legal adult.
Did your inability to read miss the bit where I said, at least in this country?-a The article you linked to happened in America, not in the UK.I wonder how many of those who *don't* change their minds nevertheless
And as much as *you* like to bleat on about trensgenderism the
percentage of those who do change their mind is an extremely low
percentage of the already small minority who do believe they are trapped
in the wrong body.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15521595/Young-woman-breasts- cut-teenager-live-boy-wins-2million.html
The Daily Mail reports today that a young woman who was caught up in
this transgender nonsense and had her breasts amputated, has won
$2,000,000 in compensation. It is expected that her win will open the floodgates on others who have been mutilated by all these "woke" and
trendy doctors.
On 07/02/2026 15:22, John wrote:
The priciple is the same, bits have been removed for the benefit of
the person.-a However, I'm curious, would you decry a woman for having
surgery to reduce the size of rather large breasts because she has
constant backache, or would you simply tell her to get on with it and
not alter what God had given her?
I wouldn't tell her anything. Only she can judge the severity of
backache or any other disadvantages. But that is a case of medical necessity. If she merely wanted to enlarge or reduce her breasts for cosmetic reasons then I would indeed advise against it.
Do you remember all those woman back in the 1960s who had a toe
amputated so that they could fit in their pointed toe shoes? I've often wondered how they felt when a year or two later open-toed sandals came
back into fashion!
I never claimed it was widespread, but certainly there were a number ofDo you remember all those woman back in the 1960s who had a toe
amputated so that they could fit in their pointed toe shoes? I've
often wondered how they felt when a year or two later open-toed
sandals came back into fashion!
Your evidence this was widespread?
On 08/02/2026 11:00, John wrote:
Do you remember all those woman back in the 1960s who had a toe
amputated so that they could fit in their pointed toe shoes? I've
often wondered how they felt when a year or two later open-toed
sandals came back into fashion!
Your evidence this was widespread?
I never claimed it was widespread, but certainly there were a number of cases reported in the press.
You said *all* these women.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 19:44:22 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (21,017K bytes) |
| Messages: | 194,291 |