From Newsgroup: uk.rec.waterways

<div>As you all know, it is the constitutional duty of the President to report to the Congress annually on the state of the union. That regular report will be made to the Congress soon after it reconvenes.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>The Shirk Report Volume 504</div><div></div><div>Download File: https://t.co/Oxirxr7Qya </div><div></div><div></div><div>In other words, our primary aim was to bring about an expanded production and steady, well-paid jobs and purchasing power for all who wanted to work--we had to maintain high farm income--and good profits based on big volume.</div><div></div><div></div><div>I proposed that in the few nationwide industries where a stoppage of work would vitally affect the national public interest, after all other efforts had failed, the Government should step in to obtain all the facts and report its findings to the country.</div><div></div><div></div><div>In the setting up of fact-finding boards, there is nothing harmful to labor. There is no reason why a strike cannot be postponed for 30 days. Nor is there any intention of taking away labor's right to strike. That right remains inviolate. There is no effort to shackle labor. There is only an effort to find the truth, and to report it.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>The inflationary pressures now at work can bring an inflation and a crash that will be much more serious than 1920. That is why it is so important to get a high volume of production and a large supply of marketable goods right away. Production is the greatest weapon against inflation.</div><div></div><div></div><div>It was my fervent hope, and I am sure that it was the hope of all progressive Americans, that before the recess of the Congress for the Christmas holidays the conferees would have reported a satisfactory full employment bill for adoption by both Houses. No such bill has been reported. It is most important that the conferees report a satisfactory bill immediately upon the reconvening of the Congress.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The Senate has passed an acceptable measure along these lines. But in the House of Representatives the bill is now locked up in the Ways and Means Committee. It will remain locked up in that committee unless you the people of the United States insist that it be reported out and passed.</div><div></div><div></div><div>And let me make it very clear that when I speak of bills not getting any action, it is not the Congress as a whole which is responsible. All these measures--and many others--have been referred to various committees of the Congress. That is the regular procedure. There they await action. Generally speaking, unless the committees act to report the bills, the members of Congress as a whole never get a chance to vote for or against them.</div><div></div><div></div><div>It is the committees which hold up action on bills. Indeed, it is usually not even the whole committee. On many of these subjects, I personally know that there are individual members of the respective committees who are trying to induce their colleagues to report the bills. But often a bare majority of a committee--a handful of men--can prevent a vote by the whole Congress on those measures of majority policy.</div><div></div><div></div><div>An irrepressibly active desire to do something to elevate the South to an honorable and powerful position among the enlightened quarters of the globe, has been the great leading principle that has actuated me in the preparation of the present volume; and so well convinced am I that the plan which I have proposed is the only really practical one for achieving the desired end, that I earnestly hope to see it prosecuted with energy and zeal, until the Flag of Freedom shall wave triumphantly alike over the valleys of Virginia and the mounds of Mississippi.</div><div></div><div></div><div>What a towering monument to the beauty and glory of Free Labor! What irrefragable evidence of the unequaled efficacy and grandeur of free institutions! These figures are, indeed, too full of meaning to be passed by without comment. The two tables from which they are borrowed are at least a volume within themselves; and, after all the pains we have taken to compile them, we shall, perhaps, feel somewhat disappointed if the reader fails to avail himself of the important information they impart.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Either directly or indirectly, are slave-driving demagogues, who have ostentatiously set up pretensions to statesmanship, responsible for every dishonorable weakness and inequality that exists between the North and the South. Let them shirk the responsibility if they can; but it is morally impossible for them to do so. We know how ready they have always been to cite the numerical strength of the North, as a valid excuse for their inability to procure appropriations from the General Government, for purposes of internal improvement, for the establishment of lines of ocean steamers to South American and European ports, and for the accomplishment of other objects. Before that apology ever escapes from their lips again, let them remember that the numerical weakness of the South is wholly attributable to their own villainous statism. Had the Southern States, in accordance with the principles enunciated in the Declaration of Independence, abolished slavery at the same time the Northern States abolished it, there would have been, long since, and most assuredly at this moment, a larger, wealthier, wiser, and more powerful population, south of Mason and Dixon's line, than there now is north of it. This fact being so well established that no reasonable man denies it, it is evident that the oligarchy will have to devise another subterfuge for even temporary relief.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Thus have we presented a comprehensive summary of the most unequivocal and irrefragable testimony of the South against the iniquitous institution of human slavery. What more can we say? What more can we do? We might fill a folio volume with similar extracts; but we must forego the task; the remainder of our space must be occupied with other arguments. In the foregoing excerpts is revealed to us, in language too plain to be misunderstood, the important fact that every truly great and good man the South has ever produced, has, with hopeful confidence, looked forward to the time when this entire continent shall be redeemed from the crime and the curse of slavery. Our noble self-sacrificing forefathers have performed their part, and performed it well. They have laid us a foundation as enduring as the earth itself; in their dying moments theyadmonished us to carry out their designs in the upbuilding and completion of the superstructure. Let us obey their patriotic injunctions.</div><div></div><div></div><div>THE REPORTS of the Comptrollers of the States of New York and North Carolina, for the year 1856, are now before us. From each report we have gleaned a single item, which, when compared, the one with the other, speaks volumes in favor of freedom and against slavery. We refer to the average value per acre of lands in the two States; let slavocrats read, reflect, and repent.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The last annual report of the Comptroller, together with acommunication of the Mayor to the Common Council, made on the 5th of Jan., 1857, have been transmitted by mail to your address, and from them you may be able to obtain any further information you may desire.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Yours of 25th is this moment received. You will receive with this a communication from the Chairman of the Board of Assessors, giving the requisite information from that department. I send you this day a census report, taken 1855, which will give you the information asked. Our population at this time is between 50 and 60,000.</div><div></div><div></div><div>This report provides an overview of Mexico's historic 2008 judicial reforms and an assessment of how those reforms have been implemented thus far. It then analyzes U.S. support for judicial reform efforts in Mexico and raises issues for Congress to consider as it oversees current U.S. justice sector programs and considers future support to Mexico. Also see CRS Report R41349, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The M|-rida Initiative and Beyond, by [author name scrubbed] and Kristin M. Finklea.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Under the traditional system, prosecutors have wide latitude during the investigatory stage of a case to gather evidence however they deem appropriate that is then submitted to judges in a written dossier that is rarely challenged. Dossiers often center on the confession of the accused, with potentially coerced confessions frequently occurring8, or on unverified eyewitness identifications. Judges then render their decisions behind closed doors. Although 85-90% of crimes brought to trial result in a conviction, in fact, less than 25% of crimes in Mexico are reported and, of those, only a small number are investigated and prosecuted, implying that only a small portion of the country's crimes are seriously addressed (see Figure 1).9 The likelihood of a guilty verdict is particularly high for cases involving poor people who have committed minor offenses.10</div><div></div><div></div><div>The general public survey also revealed that 74% of those polled had little or no faith in the criminal justice system and that a similar percentage did not cooperate with law enforcement by reporting crime or participating in crime prevention programs. Some 89% of those surveyed knew nothing about the 2008 judicial reforms, much less how they seek to rectify problems in the old system. In Chihuahua and Morelos, two states that have already implemented the NCJS, the percentage of respondents who did not know their states had implemented a new justice system stood at 30% and 60% respectively, still rather high. When people are told about some of the key elements of the reforms (such as oral trials), 80% of those surveyed said they think the new system will function better than the old. However, there is still a perception that the new system favors the rights of the accused over those of the victims. Some 64% of victims surveyed who had been through the NCJS said that they did not feel treated in an impartial way as compared to 54% who had experienced the old system. Victims also expressed concern that the NCJS moved slower at the beginning than the old system, another challenge that needs to be addressed. Ensuring that people know how to access the justice system and that those whom they encounter when they do so are professional and courteous is another issue that merits attention.</div><div></div><div> dd2b598166</div>
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2