• Gordon Ramsay: helmets are crucial

    From Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to uk.rec.cycling on Mon Jun 17 08:15:51 2024
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.cycling


    Gordon Ramsay says helmets are rCLcrucialrCY for cyclists no matter rCLhow short
    the journey isrCY, after accident leaves him with a terrible bruise

    rCLPlease, please please please, wear a helmet because if I didnrCOt, I wouldnrCOt be here now,rCY said the celebrity chef, adding that he was lucky to be alive after his crash

    by ADWITIYA PAL. SUN, JUN 16, 2024 13:58

    British celebrity chef and TV presenter Gordon Ramsay has called for all cyclists to wear a helmet, regardless of how short the journey is or how expensive it might be, after being involved in a crash that left him with trauma and a terrible bruise.

    The 57-year-old culinary sensation, well-known for his brash demeanour and ample usage of the F-word (and erm, his beef wellington recipe too) is a
    keen cyclist and triathlete, having completed the Ironman World
    Championship course in Hawaii through an invitational slot in a time of 14 hours, 4 minutes back in 2013.

    But it seems that one of his recent rides in Connecticut has ended in a
    crash, with Gordon sharing information about the aftermath through his
    social media in a video where he thanks medical professionals for looking
    after him and lifts his chefrCOs jacket to reveal a terrible, purple patch of bruise on the left side of his abdomen. He also shared images of his torn jersey and damaged helmet.

    rCLYou know how much I love cycling and triathlons and Ironman. This week, unfortunately, I had a really bad accident and it really shook me,rCY he says in the video. rCLHonestly, IrCOm lucky to be here. Those incredible trauma surgeons, doctors and nurses in the hospital who looked after me this week, they were amazing.

    rCLBut honestly, yourCOve got to wear a helmet. I donrCOt care how short the journey is, I donrCOt care the fact that these helmets cost money, but theyrCOre crucial. Even with the kids, [on] a short journey, theyrCOve got to wear a helmet.

    rCLNow IrCOm lucky to be standing here. IrCOm in pain, itrCOs been a brutal week.
    IrCOm sort of getting through but I cannot tell you the importance of wearing
    a helmet. This weekend is massive, for new fathers, for old fathers, for middle-aged fathers, I want to wish you all a very happy fatherrCOs day.

    rCLBut please, please please please, wear a helmet because if I didnrCOt, I wouldnrCOt be here now.rCY

    While details about the ride and the subsequent crash are unclear, Gordon
    wrote on Instagram that it happened when he was riding his Specialized
    Roubaix in Connecticut, USA.

    He wrote: rCLIrCOm doing ok and did not break any bones or suffer any major injuries but I am a bit bruised up looking like a purple potato. IrCOm
    thankful for all the doctors, nurses and staff at Lawerence + Memorial
    Hospital in New London who looked after me and checked me out, but most thankful for my helmet that saved my life.rCY

    While wearing a helmet is a mandatory requirement in some parts of the
    world such as Australia, Argentina and Japan, cyclists in the UK, or even
    in the USA where Gordon was riding his bike, donrCOt have to wear one.

    The Highway Code (link is external) says: rCLYou should wear a cycle helmet that conforms to current regulations, is the correct size and securely fastened. Evidence suggests that a correctly fitted helmet will reduce your risk of sustaining a head injury in certain circumstances.rCY

    However, there is a longstanding debate amongst cyclists whether wearing a helmet for commuting should be mandatory or not, with many of the belief
    that in an ideal world, all vulnerable road users, including cyclists and pedestrians, should be free to travel without needing additional equipment.

    Why is Dan WalkerrCOs claim that a bike helmet saved his life so controversial?

    While helmets add a layer of protection for cyclists and reduces odds of a
    head injury (link is external), in 2006, Dr Ian Walker of the University of Bath conducted an experiment where he discovered that cyclists are afforded more space by passing drivers if they are (or at least appear to be) female
    or if theyrCOre not wearing a helmet.

    Another study from 2019, presented at the National Road Safety Conference,
    also suggested rCLa higher accident/injury rate may result from helmet usagerCY and argued that rCLthere is strong evidence that helmeted cyclists suffer a higher rate of upper body limb injuries than non-wearers, suggesting a
    higher rate of falls than non-wearers.rCY

    And then thererCOs the research from Australia that made headlines this time around last year, revealing that an alarming number of people do not see cyclists as human, with those riding bicycles while wearing helmets or
    safety vests seen as less human compared to those without.

    The researchers concluded that dehumanisation related more to visible
    safety gear than obstruction of hair or eyes and the perceptions of dehumanisation also varied based on respondent gender.

    While most of the replies on his social media posts are positive and
    thankful that he came out of the crash without any serious injuries, it didnrCOt take much time for cyclists and campaigners to familiarise Gordon Ramsay with the eternal helmet debate.

    Gordon Ramsay isnrCOt the first public figure to dip his feet into these
    murky territories. Last year, Channel 5 presenter Dan Walker was hit by a
    car driver while cycling in Sheffield, leaving him unconscious for 25
    minutes. Sharing pictures of his bloodied face from the hospital, he wrote: rCLThe helmet I was wearing saved my life today so - if yourCOre on a bike - get one on your head.rCY

    The comment proved to be highly controversial, launching one of the great episodes in the well-trodden helmet safety debate path as many cyclists expressed their disapproval and challenged the evidence behind the slogan rCLDonrCOt be a helmet, wear a helmetrCY, that was shared by the former BBC Breakfast host.

    In February this year, Walker mused on the aftermath, saying: rCLWithin 24 hours I'd had drivers tell me that if it had been them, they'd have
    finished the job,rCY Walker recalled. rCLI had cyclists telling me I was a disgrace for saying that my helmet saved my life. rCyYourCOre the reason people wear helmetsrCO. ThererCOs a lobby, apparently, that says if you wear a helmet drivers think you're safer than you are, therefore they hit you.rCY

    rCLSo I got people angry on all sides and I thought, rCyI donrCOt want to enter this. IrCOm very happy that I'm still aroundrCO. There's a part of me that genuinely thought that was it.rCY

    <https://road.cc/content/news/gordon-ramsay-says-helmets-are-crucial-cyclists-308911>
    --
    Spike
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From colwyn@guddiesx@btinternet.invalid to uk.rec.cycling on Mon Jun 17 20:10:01 2024
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.cycling

    On 17/06/2024 09:15, Spike wrote:
    And then thererCOs the research from Australia that made headlines this time around last year, revealing that an alarming number of people do not see cyclists as human, with those riding bicycles while wearing helmets or
    safety vests seen as less human compared to those without.
    They could just have read this news group to come to the same conclusion!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to uk.rec.cycling on Tue Jun 18 08:26:37 2024
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.cycling

    colwyn <guddiesx@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/06/2024 09:15, Spike wrote:

    And then thererCOs the research from Australia that made headlines this time >> around last year, revealing that an alarming number of people do not see
    cyclists as human, with those riding bicycles while wearing helmets or
    safety vests seen as less human compared to those without.

    They could just have read this news group to come to the same conclusion!

    How can one possibly come to a conclusion concerning the contents of a paragraph that carries a logical inconsistency?

    This is road.cc we are talking about. Think of rCyover-egging the cakerCO.
    --
    Spike
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JNugent@JNugent73@mail.com to uk.rec.cycling on Tue Jun 18 15:16:08 2024
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.cycling

    On 18/06/2024 09:26 am, Spike wrote:

    colwyn <guddiesx@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/06/2024 09:15, Spike wrote:

    And then thererCOs the research from Australia that made headlines this time
    around last year, revealing that an alarming number of people do not see >>> cyclists as human, with those riding bicycles while wearing helmets or
    safety vests seen as less human compared to those without.

    They could just have read this news group to come to the same conclusion!

    How can one possibly come to a conclusion concerning the contents of a paragraph that carries a logical inconsistency?
    This is road.cc we are talking about. Think of rCyover-egging the cakerCO.

    Australians obviously regard chav-cyclists as not human at all.

    And equally obviously, chav-cyclists wearing helmets and "safety vets"
    [sic] as not human at all at all.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to uk.rec.cycling on Tue Jun 18 15:34:23 2024
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.cycling

    JNugent <JNugent73@mail.com> wrote:
    On 18/06/2024 09:26 am, Spike wrote:

    colwyn <guddiesx@btinternet.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/06/2024 09:15, Spike wrote:

    And then thererCOs the research from Australia that made headlines this time
    around last year, revealing that an alarming number of people do not see >>>> cyclists as human, with those riding bicycles while wearing helmets or >>>> safety vests seen as less human compared to those without.

    They could just have read this news group to come to the same conclusion!

    How can one possibly come to a conclusion concerning the contents of a
    paragraph that carries a logical inconsistency?
    This is road.cc we are talking about. Think of rCyover-egging the cakerCO.

    Australians obviously regard chav-cyclists as not human at all.

    And equally obviously, chav-cyclists wearing helmets and "safety vets"
    [sic] as not human at all at all.

    ;-)
    --
    Spike
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2