• Re: New track joining the MML - now E*

    From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri May 8 07:10:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <1c3pvkt51lfl1c9um78vr6nk1fpf3g41bn@4ax.com>, at 14:08:38 on
    Thu, 7 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Thu, 7 May 2026 13:37:58 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <ug0pvk1gnpqqmaoull8o1klhdvn5fi6gs2@4ax.com>, at 13:15:03 on >>Thu, 7 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:34:31 +0000, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote: >>>
    In message <10mulm6$nj1q$1@dont-email.me>, at 08:49:10 on Mon, 16 Feb >>>>2026, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:

    Maybe more people will walk from Cambridge South station (if they >>>>>>ever manage to get the darn thing opened). But it's nearly a >>>>>>kilometre to Outpatients, uphill, in all weathers, and crossing at >>>>>>least one busy road (unless an underpass in being constructed). Needs >>>>>>a monorail!

    Whatever happened to the trackless tram demonstrated at the Millenium >>>>>Dome? That was supposed to be the answer for that sort of journey.

    Bled to death (cf: bleeding edge) I presume.

    The robot grocery delivery things in [a very limited bit of, but not far >>>>from the Biocampus] Cambridge have been withdrawn. So many problems with >>>>the concept. aiui they are giving it another go in Milton Keynes, using >>>>the cycleways. But cities with that many cycleways are a bit of a niche >>>>market.

    See also the Amazon drones, which had a big development lab in >>>>Cambridge, but closed down. And don't even get me started on Airlander.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/c0l21992z75o

    Yes, I saw that on the lunchtime news.

    Do they drop the packet on your lawn, or are they requiring customers
    to have a little trampoline deployed as a combined target and >>de-accelerator.

    Anyway, good luck trying to land something on my lawn, as there are
    several rather big trees in the way (not to mention overhead cables >>belonging to Openreach etc).

    There's been a lot of chatter recently about "Balcony solar panels"; I >>wonder if the Amazon drones could reliably land a parcel on someone's
    fifth floor balcony when there isn't a lawn available.

    And how does any of this work during thunderstorm, or heavy snow.

    https://www.amazon.com/Prime-Air-Drone-Delivery/b?ie=UTF8&node=206533607011

    "We do not offer drone delivery at night, during heavy winds, or
    unfavorable weather." So that's a bit of a *fail* for the UK then.

    And if it spots a pet in your garden, it aborts the delivery. So much
    for getting things you need in a hurry.

    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA. When I lived there, the cable-TV/phone was buried about half an inch under the front lawn (which
    had its own issues) and there weren't any overhead power cables.
    Contrast that with the amount of knitting in many UK towns and
    especially villages - ironically the latter more likely to have homes
    with a large lawn.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri May 8 08:42:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <1c3pvkt51lfl1c9um78vr6nk1fpf3g41bn@4ax.com>, at 14:08:38 on
    Thu, 7 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Thu, 7 May 2026 13:37:58 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <ug0pvk1gnpqqmaoull8o1klhdvn5fi6gs2@4ax.com>, at 13:15:03 on
    Thu, 7 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:34:31 +0000, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote: >>>>
    In message <10mulm6$nj1q$1@dont-email.me>, at 08:49:10 on Mon, 16 Feb >>>>> 2026, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:

    Maybe more people will walk from Cambridge South station (if they >>>>>>> ever manage to get the darn thing opened). But it's nearly a
    kilometre to Outpatients, uphill, in all weathers, and crossing at >>>>>>> least one busy road (unless an underpass in being constructed). Needs >>>>>>> a monorail!

    Whatever happened to the trackless tram demonstrated at the Millenium >>>>>> Dome? That was supposed to be the answer for that sort of journey.

    Bled to death (cf: bleeding edge) I presume.

    The robot grocery delivery things in [a very limited bit of, but not far >>>>> from the Biocampus] Cambridge have been withdrawn. So many problems with >>>>> the concept. aiui they are giving it another go in Milton Keynes, using >>>>> the cycleways. But cities with that many cycleways are a bit of a niche >>>>> market.

    See also the Amazon drones, which had a big development lab in
    Cambridge, but closed down. And don't even get me started on Airlander. >>>>
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/c0l21992z75o

    Yes, I saw that on the lunchtime news.

    Do they drop the packet on your lawn, or are they requiring customers
    to have a little trampoline deployed as a combined target and
    de-accelerator.

    Anyway, good luck trying to land something on my lawn, as there are
    several rather big trees in the way (not to mention overhead cables
    belonging to Openreach etc).

    There's been a lot of chatter recently about "Balcony solar panels"; I
    wonder if the Amazon drones could reliably land a parcel on someone's
    fifth floor balcony when there isn't a lawn available.

    And how does any of this work during thunderstorm, or heavy snow.

    https://www.amazon.com/Prime-Air-Drone-Delivery/b?ie=UTF8&node=206533607011

    "We do not offer drone delivery at night, during heavy winds, or
    unfavorable weather." So that's a bit of a *fail* for the UK then.

    And if it spots a pet in your garden, it aborts the delivery. So much
    for getting things you need in a hurry.

    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.railway on Fri May 8 09:13:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Thu, 7 May 2026 10:09:22 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-07 8:29 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    Its silly tech for its own sake. The only viable use case I can see is
    the quick delivery of medical products and even then I can't imagine being >> dropped from 3 metres will do them much good.


    Wasn't that part of a Midsomer Murders' plot on gogglebox years ago?

    Someone killed by soemthing dropped on them by a drone? If it wasn't it probably soon will be!

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Fri May 8 09:22:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <1c3pvkt51lfl1c9um78vr6nk1fpf3g41bn@4ax.com>, at 14:08:38 on
    Thu, 7 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Thu, 7 May 2026 13:37:58 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote: >>>
    In message <ug0pvk1gnpqqmaoull8o1klhdvn5fi6gs2@4ax.com>, at 13:15:03 on >>>> Thu, 7 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:34:31 +0000, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote: >>>>>
    In message <10mulm6$nj1q$1@dont-email.me>, at 08:49:10 on Mon, 16 Feb >>>>>> 2026, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:

    Maybe more people will walk from Cambridge South station (if they >>>>>>>> ever manage to get the darn thing opened). But it's nearly a
    kilometre to Outpatients, uphill, in all weathers, and crossing at >>>>>>>> least one busy road (unless an underpass in being constructed). Needs >>>>>>>> a monorail!

    Whatever happened to the trackless tram demonstrated at the Millenium >>>>>>> Dome? That was supposed to be the answer for that sort of journey. >>>>>>
    Bled to death (cf: bleeding edge) I presume.

    The robot grocery delivery things in [a very limited bit of, but not far >>>>>> from the Biocampus] Cambridge have been withdrawn. So many problems with >>>>>> the concept. aiui they are giving it another go in Milton Keynes, using >>>>>> the cycleways. But cities with that many cycleways are a bit of a niche >>>>>> market.

    See also the Amazon drones, which had a big development lab in
    Cambridge, but closed down. And don't even get me started on Airlander. >>>>>
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/c0l21992z75o

    Yes, I saw that on the lunchtime news.

    Do they drop the packet on your lawn, or are they requiring customers
    to have a little trampoline deployed as a combined target and
    de-accelerator.

    Anyway, good luck trying to land something on my lawn, as there are
    several rather big trees in the way (not to mention overhead cables
    belonging to Openreach etc).

    There's been a lot of chatter recently about "Balcony solar panels"; I >>>> wonder if the Amazon drones could reliably land a parcel on someone's
    fifth floor balcony when there isn't a lawn available.

    And how does any of this work during thunderstorm, or heavy snow.

    https://www.amazon.com/Prime-Air-Drone-Delivery/b?ie=UTF8&node=206533607011 >>
    "We do not offer drone delivery at night, during heavy winds, or
    unfavorable weather." So that's a bit of a *fail* for the UK then.

    And if it spots a pet in your garden, it aborts the delivery. So much
    for getting things you need in a hurry.

    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.



    And there has been a move away from them in some places like this example
    at Holworthy Devon.
    2009 <https://maps.app.goo.gl/KkjH3PZKZ9ASpRto6> 2016<https://maps.app.goo.gl/epiSWhSkZCo33kvaA>

    The steel poles which had been up circa 80 years had likely reached the
    stage where they needed replacing due to corrosion. Fortunately because of
    the bollards that protected the pole on this corner they did not bother to remove the small concrete post seen here between them. <https://maps.app.goo.gl/6Zb9dZgfa44JiHzU8>

    Though you cannot see it in the photo it carries the letters WDESC which
    stands for West Devon Electric Supply Company and is a small surviving Industrial Archaeological artefact from the era when electric supplies
    were still being developed by private companies.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Levine@johnl@taugh.com to uk.railway on Fri May 8 18:01:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and
    recognize them.
    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri May 8 18:07:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the >>> selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe >>> they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and recognize them.


    IrCOm still struggling to understand the economics of the rural delivery. By definition the flight distance will be long and therefore take time. And
    the drone has to fly back. All this to deliver one single lightweight
    parcel. ItrCOs going to amount to 0.001% (carefully calculated figure!) of AmazonrCOs deliveries.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Levine@johnl@taugh.com to uk.railway on Fri May 8 19:17:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    According to Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com>:
    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires >> are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and
    recognize them.

    IrCOm still struggling to understand the economics of the rural delivery. By >definition the flight distance will be long and therefore take time. And
    the drone has to fly back. All this to deliver one single lightweight
    parcel. ItrCOs going to amount to 0.001% (carefully calculated figure!) of >AmazonrCOs deliveries.

    If the alternative is sending out a guy in a truck, the drone is likely
    much cheaper. Remember how big and empty the U.S. is. I live in the
    state of New York which is not particularly large by US standards, but
    is bigger than England.

    In the US, Amazon has sent packages through the USPS (our Post Office)
    for places they don't handle themselves, although there was some sort
    of contract dispute earlier this year and it's not clear how much they
    will continue to do so.
    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bob Martin@bob.martin@excite.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 05:29:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 8 May 2026 at 19:17:32, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
    According to Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com>:
    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and
    recognize them.

    I'm still struggling to understand the economics of the rural delivery. By >>definition the flight distance will be long and therefore take time. And >>the drone has to fly back. All this to deliver one single lightweight >>parcel. It's going to amount to 0.001% (carefully calculated figure!) of >>Amazon's deliveries.

    If the alternative is sending out a guy in a truck, the drone is likely
    much cheaper. Remember how big and empty the U.S. is. I live in the
    state of New York which is not particularly large by US standards, but
    is bigger than England.

    Sure about that?

    In the US, Amazon has sent packages through the USPS (our Post Office)
    for places they don't handle themselves, although there was some sort
    of contract dispute earlier this year and it's not clear how much they
    will continue to do so.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sat May 9 08:30:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the >>> selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires >are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years
    old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before
    agreeing to deliver.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 07:39:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the >>>> selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe >>>> they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires >> are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years
    old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and
    recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that, even assuming that Streetview
    images are available in those semi-rural areas.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sat May 9 08:39:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <n67v24FgtfgU1@mid.individual.net>, at 05:29:40 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> remarked:

    If the alternative is sending out a guy in a truck, the drone is likely
    much cheaper. Remember how big and empty the U.S. is. I live in the
    state of New York which is not particularly large by US standards, but
    is bigger than England.

    Sure about that?

    Apparently it depends how you measure the water.

    England is approx 50,000 square miles, and NY 47,000 to 54,555 varying
    by the methodology.

    Meanwhile there three times as many people living in England as New York State.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sat May 9 08:36:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10tlcsc$22br$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 19:17:32 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:

    In the US, Amazon has sent packages through the USPS (our Post Office)
    for places they don't handle themselves, although there was some sort
    of contract dispute earlier this year and it's not clear how much they
    will continue to do so.

    It always amuses the way the little flag on the postbox isn't in fact
    "You have Mail", but "I'm sending Mail".
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Sat May 9 07:59:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <n67v24FgtfgU1@mid.individual.net>, at 05:29:40 on Sat, 9 May 2026, Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> remarked:

    If the alternative is sending out a guy in a truck, the drone is likely
    much cheaper. Remember how big and empty the U.S. is. I live in the
    state of New York which is not particularly large by US standards, but
    is bigger than England.

    Sure about that?

    Apparently it depends how you measure the water.

    England is approx 50,000 square miles, and NY 47,000 to 54,555 varying
    by the methodology.

    Meanwhile there three times as many people living in England as New York State.

    Who wants to live in
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton_County,_New_York ?
    I guess the lakes are nice.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:New_York_population_density_2020.png
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sat May 9 16:14:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the >>>>> selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe >>>>> they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here. >>>
    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years
    old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and
    recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before
    agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 08:37:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 2026-05-09 12:36 a.m., Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10tlcsc$22br$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 19:17:32 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:

    In the US, Amazon has sent packages through the USPS (our Post Office)
    for places they don't handle themselves, although there was some sort
    of contract dispute earlier this year and it's not clear how much they
    will continue to do so.

    It always amuses the way the little flag on the postbox isn't in fact
    "You have Mail", but "I'm sending Mail".

    It makes more sense, otherwise the driver would have to unnecessarily
    stop at every address even with no mail to be dropped off.

    Canada Post's group boxes in urban areas/apartment buildings have a slot
    for outgoing mail... though no opportunity to Fly The Flag.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 15:38:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the >>>>>> selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe >>>>>> they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here. >>>>
    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years
    old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and
    recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before
    agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural
    areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Try it and see. And how many back gardens are covered on Streetview.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clank@clank75@googlemail.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 20:19:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 09/05/2026 08:29, Bob Martin wrote:
    On 8 May 2026 at 19:17:32, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
    According to Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com>:
    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and
    recognize them.

    I'm still struggling to understand the economics of the rural delivery. By >>> definition the flight distance will be long and therefore take time. And >>> the drone has to fly back. All this to deliver one single lightweight
    parcel. It's going to amount to 0.001% (carefully calculated figure!) of >>> Amazon's deliveries.

    If the alternative is sending out a guy in a truck, the drone is likely
    much cheaper. Remember how big and empty the U.S. is. I live in the
    state of New York which is not particularly large by US standards, but
    is bigger than England.

    Sure about that?
    New York *State* is, yes. A bit less than half the population, but a
    tiny bit larger (141km^2 vs 130km^2.) Actually I think that number
    doesn't include its share of Lake Ontario or Lake Erie either.

    Not entirely clear to me what the point is though; Romania has roughly
    the same population as New York State but about 70% more area, and we
    still manage to deliver parcels somehow...


    The inevitable "but Texas is the biggest place in the whole woooooorld"
    would probably, for once, have made a better case.

    (Don't tell the Yanks Texas is actually roughly the same size as Alberta
    or Manitoba, a third smaller than British Columbia or Ontario, or about
    a third of the size of Mexico, less than half the size of Iran, or about
    a quarter of a Kazakhstan - it's very important for them to believe It's
    The Biggest Place In The World And Nobody Can Understand Just How Big It
    Is.)
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Levine@johnl@taugh.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 18:14:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    According to Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid>:

    Apparently it depends how you measure the water.

    England is approx 50,000 square miles, and NY 47,000 to 54,555 varying
    by the methodology.

    The border between New York and Canada runs through the middle of Lake Ontario, one of the Great Lakes, and the southern half is ours.

    Who wants to live in
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton_County,_New_York ?

    Almost nobody. As the articles says, it's bigger than the US state of
    Delaware and has only 5000 people. It's entirely within the state's
    Adirondack Park, so it's mostly trees, hills, and lakes. I've driven
    through it.
    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Certes@Certes@example.org to uk.railway on Sat May 9 20:59:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 09/05/2026 18:19, Clank wrote:
    On 09/05/2026 08:29, Bob Martin wrote:
    On 8 May 2026 at 19:17:32, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
    According to Tweed-a <usenet.tweed@gmail.com>:
    Depends where you are.-a In new build developments and dense cities >>>>> the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>> recognize them.

    I'm still struggling to understand the economics of the rural
    delivery. By
    definition the flight distance will be long and therefore take time.
    And
    the drone has to fly back. All this to deliver one single lightweight
    parcel. It's going to amount to 0.001% (carefully calculated
    figure!) of
    Amazon's deliveries.

    If the alternative is sending out a guy in a truck, the drone is likely
    much cheaper.-a Remember how big and empty the U.S. is.-a I live in the
    state of New York which is not particularly large by US standards, but
    is bigger than England.

    Sure about that?
    New York *State* is, yes.-a A bit less than half the population, but a
    tiny bit larger (141km^2 vs 130km^2.)-a Actually I think that number
    doesn't include its share of Lake Ontario or Lake Erie either.

    Not entirely clear to me what the point is though; Romania has roughly
    the same population as New York State but about 70% more area, and we
    still manage to deliver parcels somehow...


    The inevitable "but Texas is the biggest place in the whole woooooorld" would probably, for once, have made a better case.

    (Don't tell the Yanks Texas is actually roughly the same size as Alberta
    or Manitoba, a third smaller than British Columbia or Ontario, or about
    a third of the size of Mexico, less than half the size of Iran, or about
    a quarter of a Kazakhstan - it's very important for them to believe It's
    The Biggest Place In The World And Nobody Can Understand Just How Big It Is.)

    An Alaskan friend once reminded me that if you split his state into two,
    Texas would drop to being the third largest US state.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sat May 9 20:58:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <RxILR.30$O2a.9@fx14.ams1>, at 15:38:25 on Sat, 9 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe >>>>>>> they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here. >>>>>
    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities >>>>>the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years
    old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before
    agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural
    areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Try it and see.

    I've got better things to do.

    And how many back gardens are covered on Streetview.

    I'm guessing most customers would want things delivered near their front
    door, not the back door.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sat May 9 20:56:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10tnkb4$3o588$1@dont-email.me>, at 08:37:07 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Nobody <jock@soccer.com> remarked:
    On 2026-05-09 12:36 a.m., Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10tlcsc$22br$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 19:17:32 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:

    In the US, Amazon has sent packages through the USPS (our Post
    Office)
    for places they don't handle themselves, although there was some sort
    of contract dispute earlier this year and it's not clear how much they
    will continue to do so.
    It always amuses the way the little flag on the postbox isn't in
    fact
    "You have Mail", but "I'm sending Mail".

    It makes more sense, otherwise the driver would have to unnecessarily
    stop at every address even with no mail to be dropped off.

    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not "please
    pick up my mail".

    Canada Post's group boxes in urban areas/apartment buildings have a
    slot for outgoing mail... though no opportunity to Fly The Flag.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Certes@Certes@example.org to uk.railway on Sat May 9 21:10:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 09/05/2026 20:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10tnkb4$3o588$1@dont-email.me>, at 08:37:07 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Nobody <jock@soccer.com> remarked:
    On 2026-05-09 12:36 a.m., Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10tlcsc$22br$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 19:17:32 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:

    In the US, Amazon has sent packages through the USPS (our Post Office) >>>> for places they don't handle themselves, although there was some sort
    of contract dispute earlier this year and it's not clear how much they >>>> will continue to do so.
    -aIt always amuses the way the little flag on the postbox isn't in fact
    "You have Mail", but "I'm sending Mail".

    It makes more sense, otherwise the driver would have to unnecessarily
    stop at every address even with no mail to be dropped off.

    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not "please
    pick up my mail".

    Are you sure? Several sources suggest the latter.

    Canada Post's group boxes in urban areas/apartment buildings have a
    slot for outgoing mail... though no opportunity to Fly The Flag.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Sat May 9 22:04:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 09/05/2026 20:58, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <RxILR.30$O2a.9@fx14.ams1>, at 15:38:25 on Sat, 9 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>> 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner-a <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away >>>>>>>> from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority >>>>>>>> of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power
    wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA
    than here.

    Depends where you are.-a In new build developments and dense cities >>>>>> the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles. >>>>>
    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years >>>>> old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense
    enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires
    would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before >>>>> agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>> areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Try it and see.

    I've got better things to do.

    And how many back gardens are covered on Streetview.

    I'm guessing most customers would want things delivered near their front door, not the back door.


    I would suggest that, taking into account the number of parcels being
    stolen, the back door may well be more secure!
    --
    Colin

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 21:09:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <RxILR.30$O2a.9@fx14.ams1>, at 15:38:25 on Sat, 9 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>> 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities >>>>>> the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles. >>>>>
    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years >>>>> old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before >>>>> agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>> areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Try it and see.

    I've got better things to do.

    As usual, you spend more time arguing than verifying facts.


    And how many back gardens are covered on Streetview.

    I'm guessing most customers would want things delivered near their front door, not the back door.

    They may have a more suitable drop zone at the back, plus itrCOs a more
    secure location if a parcel is delivered while theyrCOre out (remember, in
    the US, people donrCOt normally have front fences, walls or even hedges). So the back yard is much more likely to be the preferred location.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Levine@johnl@taugh.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 21:27:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    According to Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>:
    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not "please
    pick up my mail".

    The little flag on my physical postbox is definitely a request to the postman to pick up mail I've left in it.

    I realize that there are computer icons that look like that and might be interpreted to mean something else.
    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to uk.railway on Sat May 9 14:41:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 2026-05-09 12:56 p.m., Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10tnkb4$3o588$1@dont-email.me>, at 08:37:07 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Nobody <jock@soccer.com> remarked:
    On 2026-05-09 12:36 a.m., Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10tlcsc$22br$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 19:17:32 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:

    In the US, Amazon has sent packages through the USPS (our Post
    Office)
    for places they don't handle themselves, although there was some sort
    of contract dispute earlier this year and it's not clear how much they >>>> will continue to do so.
    It always amuses the way the little flag on the postbox isn't in
    fact
    "You have Mail", but "I'm sending Mail".

    It makes more sense, otherwise the driver would have to unnecessarily
    stop at every address even with no mail to be dropped off.

    Whoosh!
    A whooshy-wishy reply.... see other responses.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Certes@Certes@example.org to uk.railway on Sat May 9 23:01:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 09/05/2026 22:27, John Levine wrote:
    According to Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>:
    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not "please
    pick up my mail".

    The little flag on my physical postbox is definitely a request to the postman to pick up mail I've left in it.

    I realize that there are computer icons that look like that and might be interpreted to mean something else.

    Yes, I think we can agree that the iconic physical flag on an actual
    tangible US mailbox means "Mailman: please pick up" but a virtual flag
    on a computer icon can mean "User: you have mail". We were discussing
    the USPS (in relation to Amazon) rather than on-screen GUIs.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charles Ellson@charlesellson@btinternet.com to uk.railway on Sun May 10 02:13:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:14:55 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the >>>>>> selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe >>>>>> they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here. >>>>
    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years
    old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and
    recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before
    agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Even in the UK a lot of town images are years out of date or for some
    reason significant bits of road have been missed by the Googlewagen.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charles Ellson@charlesellson@btinternet.com to uk.railway on Sun May 10 02:21:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Fri, 8 May 2026 09:13:35 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe
    wrote:

    On Thu, 7 May 2026 10:09:22 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-07 8:29 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    Its silly tech for its own sake. The only viable use case I can see is
    the quick delivery of medical products and even then I can't imagine being >>> dropped from 3 metres will do them much good.


    Wasn't that part of a Midsomer Murders' plot on gogglebox years ago?

    Someone killed by soemthing dropped on them by a drone? If it wasn't it >probably soon will be!

    "Death by Persuasion"
    "MURDER 2: Ronin calls Polly. He says knows who killed her. A drone
    flying above drops a knife and it falls into Ronin's chest." https://midsomermurders.fandom.com/wiki/Death_by_Persuasion

    An idea nicked from WW1 ?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 10:02:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10to4bi$3srrq$2@dont-email.me>, at 21:10:26 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Certes <Certes@example.org> remarked:
    On 09/05/2026 20:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10tnkb4$3o588$1@dont-email.me>, at 08:37:07 on Sat, 9 May >>2026, Nobody <jock@soccer.com> remarked:
    On 2026-05-09 12:36 a.m., Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10tlcsc$22br$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 19:17:32 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:

    In the US, Amazon has sent packages through the USPS (our Post Office) >>>>> for places they don't handle themselves, although there was some sort >>>>> of contract dispute earlier this year and it's not clear how much they >>>>> will continue to do so.
    aIt always amuses the way the little flag on the postbox isn't in fact >>>> "You have Mail", but "I'm sending Mail".

    It makes more sense, otherwise the driver would have to
    unnecessarily stop at every address even with no mail to be dropped


    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not
    "please pick up my mail".

    Are you sure? Several sources suggest the latter.

    You are clearly not an AOL user.

    Canada Post's group boxes in urban areas/apartment buildings have a >>>slot for outgoing mail... though no opportunity to Fly The Flag.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 10:05:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10to7gq$3u0e0$1@dont-email.me>, at 22:04:23 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, ColinR <rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk> remarked:
    On 09/05/2026 20:58, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <RxILR.30$O2a.9@fx14.ams1>, at 15:38:25 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>>> 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May >>>>>> 2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Reclinera <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:

    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and
    taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet >>>>>>>>>away from the selected delivery point." will completely rule >>>>>>>>>out the majority of UK homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out! >>>>>>>>>
    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power >>>>>>>>>wires. Maybe they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA >>>>>>>>than here.

    Depends where you are.a In new build developments and dense >>>>>>>cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles. >>>>>>
    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I >>>>>> suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years >>>>>> old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense >>>>>>>
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires >>>>>>>would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before >>>>>> agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>>> areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Try it and see.
    I've got better things to do.

    And how many back gardens are covered on Streetview.

    I'm guessing most customers would want things delivered near their
    front door, not the back door.

    I would suggest that, taking into account the number of parcels being >stolen, the back door may well be more secure!

    Even in the remote rural areas being discussed?

    Perhaps you are confused by reports of things being stolen from urban doorsteps, which wouldn't qualify for drone delivery anyway.

    ps There's a suspicion that many of those thefts are by the delivery
    driver.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 10:12:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <moNLR.62$Mk2.40@fx17.ams1>, at 21:09:38 on Sat, 9 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <RxILR.30$O2a.9@fx14.ams1>, at 15:38:25 on Sat, 9 May 2026,
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>>> 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May >>>>>> 2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet >>>>>>>>>away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>>>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power >>>>>>>>>wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA >>>>>>>>than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities >>>>>>> the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles. >>>>>>
    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I >>>>>> suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years >>>>>> old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>>>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>>>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before >>>>>> agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>>> areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Try it and see.

    I've got better things to do.

    As usual,

    Tired, old, discredited playbook.

    you spend more time arguing than verifying facts.

    At least I've thought about whether it was worth doing the exercise. If
    *you* think it is, please produce the results yourself, if you think
    your point has any merit.

    And how many back gardens are covered on Streetview.

    I'm guessing most customers would want things delivered near their front
    door, not the back door.

    They may have a more suitable drop zone at the back, plus itrCOs a more >secure location if a parcel is delivered while theyrCOre out (remember, in >the US, people donrCOt normally have front fences, walls or even hedges). So >the back yard is much more likely to be the preferred location.

    They don't typically have fences round their rear yard either (this was discussed a few days ago, but agrees with my own observations).

    Another problem with delivering to the rear yard is you'd have to go out
    and find the parcel - some distance from the house because of the rules
    - whereas if it was at the front you'd spot it when you got home.

    Despite having a large rear yard, the house I lived in had lots of very
    big trees in the back, and to get to the lawn (huh! scrubby patch of
    grass) meant going down into the basement and opening the back door. Of course, the dogs might have got to it first (but see Amazon's rules
    about pets).
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 10:16:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10to8rl$1lbm$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 21:27:17 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>:
    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not "please
    pick up my mail".

    The little flag on my physical postbox is definitely a request to the >postman to pick up mail I've left in it.

    Indeed, but that's not an icon.

    I realize that there are computer icons that look like that

    Hurrah!

    and might be interpreted to mean something else.

    They'll invariably mean "you have mail", because few clients have any notification to the user that there's something awaiting to be sent to
    their ISP.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 10:16:59 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10toase$3uvec$1@dont-email.me>, at 23:01:50 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Certes <Certes@example.org> remarked:
    On 09/05/2026 22:27, John Levine wrote:
    According to Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>:

    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not "please
    pick up my mail".

    The little flag on my physical postbox is definitely a request to
    the postman to pick up mail I've left in it.
    I realize that there are computer icons that look like that and
    might be interpreted to mean something else.

    Yes, I think we can agree that the iconic physical flag on an actual
    tangible US mailbox means "Mailman: please pick up" but a virtual flag
    on a computer icon can mean "User: you have mail". We were discussing
    the USPS (in relation to Amazon) rather than on-screen GUIs.

    Apart from when I introduced the topic of on-screen GUIs, that is.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sun May 10 14:57:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 10:12:15 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <moNLR.62$Mk2.40@fx17.ams1>, at 21:09:38 on Sat, 9 May 2026, >Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <RxILR.30$O2a.9@fx14.ams1>, at 15:38:25 on Sat, 9 May 2026,
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>>>> 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May >>>>>>> 2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet >>>>>>>>>>away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK
    homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power >>>>>>>>>>wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA >>>>>>>>>than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities >>>>>>>> the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles. >>>>>>>
    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I >>>>>>> suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years >>>>>>> old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>>>>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>>>>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before >>>>>>> agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>>>> areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Try it and see.

    I've got better things to do.

    As usual,

    Tired, old, discredited playbook.

    you spend more time arguing than verifying facts.

    At least I've thought about whether it was worth doing the exercise. If >*you* think it is, please produce the results yourself, if you think
    your point has any merit.

    Obviously, I did confirm what I already knew from previous use of Streetview. Unlike you, I'm not allergic to facts.


    And how many back gardens are covered on Streetview.

    I'm guessing most customers would want things delivered near their front >>> door, not the back door.

    They may have a more suitable drop zone at the back, plus itrCOs a more >>secure location if a parcel is delivered while theyrCOre out (remember, in >>the US, people donrCOt normally have front fences, walls or even hedges). So >>the back yard is much more likely to be the preferred location.

    They don't typically have fences round their rear yard either (this was >discussed a few days ago, but agrees with my own observations).

    Another problem with delivering to the rear yard is you'd have to go out
    and find the parcel - some distance from the house because of the rules
    - whereas if it was at the front you'd spot it when you got home.

    Despite having a large rear yard, the house I lived in had lots of very
    big trees in the back, and to get to the lawn (huh! scrubby patch of
    grass) meant going down into the basement and opening the back door. Of >course, the dogs might have got to it first (but see Amazon's rules
    about pets).

    As always, you confuse anecdata with data. The simple truth is that in semi-rural areas, Streetview doesn't have images
    from all the roads, and few back yards are covered. For many, perhaps a majority, of such possibly customers, Streetview
    simply won't have the coverage.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sun May 10 14:57:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 02:13:48 +0100, Charles Ellson <charlesellson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:14:55 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe >>>>>>> they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here. >>>>>
    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles.

    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years
    old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before
    agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Even in the UK a lot of town images are years out of date or for some
    reason significant bits of road have been missed by the Googlewagen.

    Private roads and estates are also not normally covered.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sun May 10 14:25:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 02:13:48 +0100, Charles Ellson <charlesellson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:14:55 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>> 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles. >>>>>
    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I
    suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years >>>>> old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before >>>>> agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>> areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Even in the UK a lot of town images are years out of date or for some
    reason significant bits of road have been missed by the Googlewagen.

    Private roads and estates are also not normally covered.


    IrCOm still really struggling to understand the economics of this. WhatrCOs going to be the average there and back flying time to the rural remote location? How many trips can the drone make per day? ItrCOs going to tie up a relatively expensive piece of equipment, and the supervising operator to deliver a low value purchase.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sun May 10 16:03:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 14:25:19 -0000 (UTC), Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 02:13:48 +0100, Charles Ellson <charlesellson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:14:55 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>>> 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May >>>>>> 2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and objects >>>>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet away from the
    selected delivery point." will completely rule out the majority of UK >>>>>>>>> homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out!

    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power wires. Maybe
    they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense cities the wires
    are generally underground, but everywhere else they're up on poles. >>>>>>
    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I >>>>>> suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years >>>>>> old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough >>>>>>> to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would >>>>>>> be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before >>>>>> agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>>> areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Even in the UK a lot of town images are years out of date or for some
    reason significant bits of road have been missed by the Googlewagen.

    Private roads and estates are also not normally covered.


    IrCOm still really struggling to understand the economics of this.

    With Amazon, we know it has the resources to experiment with lots of offbeat ideas, such as the shops with no checkouts.
    It know some will fail, as the shops did, but others do better than expected. For example, I was very sceptical when
    Amazon started its own delivery services, rather than using the many existing services that, on the whole did a fairly
    good job. And, initially, Amazon Logistics was indeed terrible, much worse than the external services it used to use.
    But it fixed the problems, and I now reckon it's one of the best.

    WhatrCOs
    going to be the average there and back flying time to the rural remote >location? How many trips can the drone make per day? ItrCOs going to tie up a >relatively expensive piece of equipment, and the supervising operator to >deliver a low value purchase.

    I assume the customer pays a premium for this priority service, though it's highly likely that Amazon is still heavily
    subsidising the service at this early stage.

    Amazon says it can cover distances within a range of 7.5 miles from its fulfillment centre, which will rise to 10, at
    speeds of up to 50 mph. In the US, where the service operates in five states (Texas, Michigan, Arizona, Florida,
    Kansas), deliveries take an average of 36 minutes from order.

    Will it make money for Amazon? Almost certainly not any time soon, but it may still think the early stage losses are
    worth it if the service leads to something more significant in the future.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to uk.railway on Sun May 10 08:38:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 2026-05-10 2:16 a.m., Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10toase$3uvec$1@dont-email.me>, at 23:01:50 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Certes <Certes@example.org> remarked:
    On 09/05/2026 22:27, John Levine wrote:
    According to Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>:

    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not "please
    pick up my mail".

    The little flag on my physical postbox is definitely a request to
    the postman to pick up mail I've left in it.
    I realize that there are computer icons that look like that and
    might be interpreted to mean something else.

    Yes, I think we can agree that the iconic physical flag on an actual
    tangible US mailbox means "Mailman: please pick up" but a virtual flag
    on a computer icon can mean "User: you have mail". We were discussing
    the USPS (in relation to Amazon) rather than on-screen GUIs.

    Apart from when I introduced the topic of on-screen GUIs, that is.

    And why? It has no relevance to the hard-delivery sub-thread.

    Another example of your insistence to create mayhem... after arguably a
    number of days of peace recently.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.railway on Sun May 10 15:46:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 02:21:00 +0100
    Charles Ellson <charlesellson@btinternet.com> gabbled:
    On Fri, 8 May 2026 09:13:35 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe
    wrote:

    On Thu, 7 May 2026 10:09:22 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-07 8:29 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    Its silly tech for its own sake. The only viable use case I can see is >>>> the quick delivery of medical products and even then I can't imagine being >>>> dropped from 3 metres will do them much good.


    Wasn't that part of a Midsomer Murders' plot on gogglebox years ago?

    Someone killed by soemthing dropped on them by a drone? If it wasn't it >>probably soon will be!

    "Death by Persuasion"
    "MURDER 2: Ronin calls Polly. He says knows who killed her. A drone
    flying above drops a knife and it falls into Ronin's chest." >https://midsomermurders.fandom.com/wiki/Death_by_Persuasion

    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to uk.railway on Sun May 10 11:08:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 02:21:00 +0100
    Charles Ellson <charlesellson@btinternet.com> gabbled:
    On Fri, 8 May 2026 09:13:35 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe
    wrote:

    On Thu, 7 May 2026 10:09:22 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-07 8:29 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    Its silly tech for its own sake. The only viable use case I can see is >>>>> the quick delivery of medical products and even then I can't imagine being
    dropped from 3 metres will do them much good.


    Wasn't that part of a Midsomer Murders' plot on gogglebox years ago?

    Someone killed by soemthing dropped on them by a drone? If it wasn't it
    probably soon will be!

    "Death by Persuasion"
    "MURDER 2: Ronin calls Polly. He says knows who killed her. A drone
    flying above drops a knife and it falls into Ronin's chest."
    https://midsomermurders.fandom.com/wiki/Death_by_Persuasion

    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the
    problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to
    stop flowering.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 19:30:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10tq8pc$fq8t$1@dont-email.me>, at 08:38:19 on Sun, 10 May
    2026, Nobody <jock@soccer.com> remarked:
    On 2026-05-10 2:16 a.m., Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <10toase$3uvec$1@dont-email.me>, at 23:01:50 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, Certes <Certes@example.org> remarked:
    On 09/05/2026 22:27, John Levine wrote:
    According to Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>:

    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not >>>>>"please
    pick up my mail".

    The little flag on my physical postbox is definitely a request to
    the postman to pick up mail I've left in it.

    I realize that there are computer icons that look like that and
    might be interpreted to mean something else.

    Yes, I think we can agree that the iconic physical flag on an actual
    tangible US mailbox means "Mailman: please pick up" but a virtual flag
    on a computer icon can mean "User: you have mail". We were discussing
    the USPS (in relation to Amazon) rather than on-screen GUIs.

    Apart from when I introduced the topic of on-screen GUIs, that is.

    And why?

    Light-hearted thread drift.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 20:38:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <tf310lhemk2onu6k20tq712thvijr9ebe1@4ax.com>, at 14:57:01 on
    Sun, 10 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 10:12:15 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <moNLR.62$Mk2.40@fx17.ams1>, at 21:09:38 on Sat, 9 May 2026, >>Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <RxILR.30$O2a.9@fx14.ams1>, at 15:38:25 on Sat, 9 May 2026, >>>> Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <4xBLR.14814$P5we.11224@fx05.ams1>, at 07:39:44 on Sat, 9 May >>>>>> 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10tl8ct$1abj$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 18:01:01 on Fri, 8 May >>>>>>>> 2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:

    Meanwhile: "Please ensure that people, pets, vehicles, and >>>>>>>>>>> taller than 5 feet (including plants) are at least 10 feet >>>>>>>>>>>away from the selected delivery point." will completely rule >>>>>>>>>>>out the majority of UK homes. I'm glad we got that sorted out! >>>>>>>>>>>
    Interestingly, it doesn't mention overhead phone and power >>>>>>>>>>>wires. Maybe they don't have as much of that in the USA.

    Actually, such overhead wires are much more common in the USA >>>>>>>>>>than here.

    Depends where you are. In new build developments and dense >>>>>>>>> the wires are generally underground, but everywhere else >>>>>>>>>they're up on poles.

    I was living in a gated community on the edge of the City, which I >>>>>>>> suppose counts as "new build". Although the house was about ten years >>>>>>>> old when we moved in 25yrs ago.

    Drone deliveries sort of make sense in places that aren't dense enough
    to send out a truck with a driver, and I suppose there the wires would
    be relatively easy to dodge, assuming the drone's cameras can see and >>>>>>>>> recognize them.

    Perhaps they'd map them, from Streetview images, for example, before >>>>>>>> agreeing to deliver.

    Amazon would have to pay Google for that,

    They will have umbrella contracts which include things like that.

    even assuming that Streetview images are available in those semi-rural >>>>>>> areas.

    Why wouldn't they be?

    Try it and see.

    I've got better things to do.

    As usual,

    Tired, old, discredited playbook.

    you spend more time arguing than verifying facts.

    At least I've thought about whether it was worth doing the exercise. If >>*you* think it is, please produce the results yourself, if you think
    your point has any merit.

    Obviously, I did confirm what I already knew from previous use of >Streetview.

    So you've done a straw poll. USA's a big place, how many hundred
    locations did you look at?

    Unlike you, I'm not allergic to facts.

    Tired, old, discredited playbook.

    And how many back gardens are covered on Streetview.

    I'm guessing most customers would want things delivered near their front >>>> door, not the back door.

    They may have a more suitable drop zone at the back, plus itrCOs a more >>>secure location if a parcel is delivered while theyrCOre out (remember, in >>>the US, people donrCOt normally have front fences, walls or even hedges). So >>>the back yard is much more likely to be the preferred location.

    They don't typically have fences round their rear yard either (this was >>discussed a few days ago, but agrees with my own observations).

    Another problem with delivering to the rear yard is you'd have to go out >>and find the parcel - some distance from the house because of the rules
    - whereas if it was at the front you'd spot it when you got home.

    Despite having a large rear yard, the house I lived in had lots of very
    big trees in the back, and to get to the lawn (huh! scrubby patch of
    grass) meant going down into the basement and opening the back door. Of >>course, the dogs might have got to it first (but see Amazon's rules
    about pets).

    As always, you confuse anecdata with data.

    Tired, old, discredited playbook.

    The simple truth is that in semi-rural areas, Streetview doesn't have
    images
    from all the roads,

    As this is Usenet, nothing is ever worthy of the description "all".

    and few back yards are covered.

    I've explained why that's not a silver bullet.

    For many, perhaps a majority, of such possibly customers, Streetview
    simply won't have the coverage.

    Maybe we should ask some more people who actually live there. Although
    we'd also need a map of all their fulfilment centres, and hence restrict ourselves to places closer than 10miles.

    Anyway I just checked the residential street in a smallish town, where
    my in-laws were living when I got married. Probably built in the 60's.
    No overhead utility cables to individual properties, however the road is crossed by the USA equivalent of 33kV three phase at one point. But you
    can see where those lines would also be crossing people's back yards.

    Looking at the open-plan front gardens (and rear gardens have only
    chain-link fences), about a third of them wouldn't qualify under the
    10ft-rule because of mature trees growing typically in the middle of
    the front lawn.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 20:41:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10tqhid$ihu6$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:08:13 on Sun, 10 May
    2026, Nobody <jock@soccer.com> remarked:

    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere >details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems
    to stop flowering.

    And then you have series like CSI Las Vegas, where a murder is
    committed, the police gather and examine evidence, get DNA results
    back from the lab, and find and arrest a suspect, all in the space
    of one single night-shift.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 20:46:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <ml610ldfsjjlok2narfclu1oku6fb5stg6@4ax.com>, at 16:03:18 on
    Sun, 10 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:

    Amazon says it can cover distances within a range of 7.5 miles from its >fulfillment centre, which will rise to 10, at speeds of up to 50 mph.
    In the US, where the service operates in five states (Texas, Michigan, >Arizona, Florida, Kansas),

    Even in urban areas, I'm sceptical they have fulfilment centres within
    ten miles of the majority of the qualifying (ie have unencumbered large
    lawns) customers.

    deliveries take an average of 36 minutes from order.

    Including the time taken to pick and pack the order??

    Fastest service round here is Amazon supermarket groceries, which is
    fulfilled by Morrisons (about 20 mins drive) by a chap in a saloon car
    with just one order aboard, in two hours. No delivery charge if you have
    Prime and order u50 worth.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Wilson@ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk to uk.railway on Sun May 10 20:02:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <10to8rl$1lbm$1@gal.iecc.com>, at 21:27:17 on Sat, 9 May
    2026, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> remarked:
    According to Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>:
    Whoosh! The flag-up thing is an icon for "You have mail", not "please
    pick up my mail".

    The little flag on my physical postbox is definitely a request to the
    postman to pick up mail I've left in it.

    Indeed, but that's not an icon.

    It may not be an icon in either of the two main senses of the word, but
    itrCOs certainly an iconic scene.

    Sam
    --
    The entity formerly known as Sam.Wilson@ed.ac.uk
    Spit the dummy to reply
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.railway on Mon May 11 08:33:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere >details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to >stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas,
    oh dear....

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Mon May 11 14:25:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 20:46:54 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <ml610ldfsjjlok2narfclu1oku6fb5stg6@4ax.com>, at 16:03:18 on
    Sun, 10 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:

    Amazon says it can cover distances within a range of 7.5 miles from its >>fulfillment centre, which will rise to 10, at speeds of up to 50 mph.
    In the US, where the service operates in five states (Texas, Michigan, >>Arizona, Florida, Kansas),

    Even in urban areas, I'm sceptical they have fulfilment centres within
    ten miles of the majority of the qualifying (ie have unencumbered large >lawns) customers.

    Nobody said this service is universally available!
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Mon May 11 14:26:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large >>> rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere >>details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to >>stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history >with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large >proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas,
    oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics, re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.railway on Mon May 11 15:14:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given >>>> the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large >>>> rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere >>>details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>>problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to >>>stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history >>with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large >>proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas,
    oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics, >re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also
    its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a
    white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Mon May 11 16:05:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given >>>>> the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large >>>>> rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere >>>> details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>>> problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to >>>> stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history
    with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large
    proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas, >>> oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics, >> re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    It used to happen a lot in the past, with even Othello normally being
    played by a white actor. Not any more, of course.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Mon May 11 21:54:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 11/05/2026 17:05, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote: >>>
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given >>>>>> the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large >>>>>> rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere >>>>> details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>>>> problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to >>>>> stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history
    with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large >>>> proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas, >>>> oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics, >>> re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also >> its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black >> person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a
    white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    It used to happen a lot in the past, with even Othello normally being
    played by a white actor. Not any more, of course.


    The joke is the modern insistence that Othello is played by a black
    actor when the original model for the part was a Moroccan Arab.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Mon May 11 21:19:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 11/05/2026 17:05, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote: >>>>
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given >>>>>>> the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere >>>>>> details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>>>>> problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to >>>>>> stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history
    with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large >>>>> proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas, >>>>> oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics, >>>> re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also >>> its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black
    person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a >>> white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    It used to happen a lot in the past, with even Othello normally being
    played by a white actor. Not any more, of course.


    The joke is the modern insistence that Othello is played by a black
    actor when the original model for the part was a Moroccan Arab.

    Yup, though of course Moroccans are not actually Arabs. TheyrCOre what we
    call Berbers, but should more accurately be called Imazighen.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Tue May 12 07:36:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 11/05/2026 22:19, Recliner wrote:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 11/05/2026 17:05, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote: >>>>>
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere >>>>>>> details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>>>>>> problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to
    stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history
    with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large >>>>>> proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas, >>>>>> oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics,
    re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also
    its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black
    person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a >>>> white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    It used to happen a lot in the past, with even Othello normally being
    played by a white actor. Not any more, of course.


    The joke is the modern insistence that Othello is played by a black
    actor when the original model for the part was a Moroccan Arab.

    Yup, though of course Moroccans are not actually Arabs. TheyrCOre what we call Berbers, but should more accurately be called Imazighen.


    Depends, there are both Arabs and Berbers in Morocco, though the ruling
    class in Shakespeare's day were definitely Arab.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Tue May 12 08:02:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> posted:

    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 11/05/2026 17:05, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote: >>>>
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere
    details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>>>>> problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to
    stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history
    with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large >>>>> proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas, >>>>> oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics,
    re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also
    its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black
    person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a >>> white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    It used to happen a lot in the past, with even Othello normally being
    played by a white actor. Not any more, of course.


    The joke is the modern insistence that Othello is played by a black
    actor when the original model for the part was a Moroccan Arab.

    Yup, though of course Moroccans are not actually Arabs. TheyrCOre what we call Berbers, but should more accurately be called Imazighen.

    What about adding Gnawa, and slave women brought from Ethiopia?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Tue May 12 08:04:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> posted:

    On 11/05/2026 22:19, Recliner wrote:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 11/05/2026 17:05, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere
    details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>>>>>> problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to
    stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history
    with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large >>>>>> proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas,
    oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics,
    re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also
    its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black
    person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a >>>> white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    It used to happen a lot in the past, with even Othello normally being
    played by a white actor. Not any more, of course.


    The joke is the modern insistence that Othello is played by a black
    actor when the original model for the part was a Moroccan Arab.

    Yup, though of course Moroccans are not actually Arabs. TheyrCOre what we call Berbers, but should more accurately be called Imazighen.


    Depends, there are both Arabs and Berbers in Morocco, though the ruling class in Shakespeare's day were definitely Arab.

    For Othello:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Othello_(character)#Ethnicity
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Tue May 12 09:04:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:

    The joke is the modern insistence that Othello is played by a black
    actor when the original model for the part was a Moroccan Arab.

    Yup, though of course Moroccans are not actually Arabs. TheyrCOre what we
    call Berbers, but should more accurately be called Imazighen.


    Depends, there are both Arabs and Berbers in Morocco, though the ruling class in Shakespeare's day were definitely Arab.

    When I visited Morocco the accommodation we stayed in was owned by a
    wealthy French Doctor who had spent a lot of money rebuilding it from a
    ruin. He had a policy of only employing Berber staff as it seemed they are
    a discriminated section of society there and find it hard to get the better paid jobs. Though some were in staff accommodation others commuted in
    from the foothills of the Atlas Mountains some doing 40 miles on small
    motor bikes where their family homes were.
    Struck lucky with the place, picked it at random and it turned out to a be
    Gem.
    Featured in one of those rCLcelebsrCY on tour programmes recently but I cannot recall if it was one of the Rail ones.
    If any one intends visiting Marrakesh I can recommend it.

    <https://www.palaissebban.com/en#google_vignette>

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Tue May 12 10:22:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> posted:

    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 11/05/2026 17:05, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote: >>>>>>
    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere
    details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the >>>>>>>> problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to
    stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history
    with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large >>>>>>> proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas, >>>>>>> oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics,
    re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also
    its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black
    person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a >>>>> white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    It used to happen a lot in the past, with even Othello normally being
    played by a white actor. Not any more, of course.


    The joke is the modern insistence that Othello is played by a black
    actor when the original model for the part was a Moroccan Arab.

    Yup, though of course Moroccans are not actually Arabs. TheyrCOre what we
    call Berbers, but should more accurately be called Imazighen.

    What about adding Gnawa, and slave women brought from Ethiopia?


    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants
    of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Tue May 12 10:39:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> posted:

    Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> posted:

    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 11/05/2026 17:05, Recliner wrote:
    <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:26:24 +0100
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    On Mon, 11 May 2026 08:33:18 -0000 (UTC), boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    On Sun, 10 May 2026 11:08:13 -0700
    Nobody <jock@soccer.com> gabbled:
    On 2026-05-10 8:46 a.m., boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
    A knife seems to be pushing credibility even for a midsommer plot given
    the chances of it hitting at just the right angle is pretty low. A large
    rock on the head would do a much better job.



    As I mutter at the TV (to my other half's constant annoyance) with mere
    details such as that, "It's only a story."

    There's another crime/mystery series in which, no matter how long the
    problem takes to be resolved, the wisteria over a doorway never seems to
    stop flowering.

    The thing that most gets up my nose is the tacit rewriting of social history
    with even dramas set in the 40s and 50s seemingly populated by a large
    proportion of BAME even in the countryside. And as for medieval dramas,
    oh dear....

    What actually works better is when they do all-black versions of classics,
    re-written for an African context. Any whites
    are foreign visitors.

    Yes, somehow I doubt there are token white people in such productions. Also
    its amusing how it seems any famous white character can be played by a black
    person, eg Henry V, but I can just imagine the foaming at the mouth if a
    white person were chosen to play Mandela or Luther King.

    It used to happen a lot in the past, with even Othello normally being >>>> played by a white actor. Not any more, of course.


    The joke is the modern insistence that Othello is played by a black
    actor when the original model for the part was a Moroccan Arab.

    Yup, though of course Moroccans are not actually Arabs. TheyrCOre what we >> call Berbers, but should more accurately be called Imazighen.

    What about adding Gnawa, and slave women brought from Ethiopia?


    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants
    of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    For what is now Algeria, add Vandals. Still a walk
    into Morocco but if you compare with the distances
    for peninsular Arabs...
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.railway on Tue May 12 15:15:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Tue, 12 May 2026 10:22:16 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
    What about adding Gnawa, and slave women brought from Ethiopia?


    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants
    of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    Ssshhhh! You have to remember that only Africans have ever been victims of slavery and that it was only done to them by white people, not other
    africans, chinese etc. Also their descendents still feel the pain 200 years later perhaps by inherited DNA changes. Or something. And thats why they
    do so badly compared to other immigrant races such as south and east asians
    who have made it to the top of the white collar tree in only 2 generations.
    Its nothing to do with a broken culture that celebrates violence, drugs, feckless fathers and stupidity. No, not at all.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Levine@johnl@taugh.com to uk.railway on Tue May 12 20:00:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants
    of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    Considering its colonial history, more likely of French colonists and their local, ah, girlfriends.
    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Wilson@ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk to uk.railway on Tue May 12 20:37:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants >> of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    Considering its colonial history, more likely of French colonists and their local, ah, girlfriends.

    Slaves were taken from as far afield as Iceland - see Sally MagnussonrCOs rCLThe Seal WomanrCOs GiftrCY for a well researched novel with that background.

    Sam
    --
    The entity formerly known as Sam.Wilson@ed.ac.uk
    Spit the dummy to reply
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Wed May 13 08:19:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 12/05/2026 21:00, John Levine wrote:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants >> of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    Considering its colonial history, more likely of French colonists and their local, ah, girlfriends.


    The Berbers are thought to be descendants of the Carthaginians, who, in
    turn, were descended from the Phoenicians.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Wed May 13 08:17:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    boltar@caprica.universe posted:

    On Tue, 12 May 2026 10:22:16 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
    What about adding Gnawa, and slave women brought from Ethiopia?


    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants >of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    Ssshhhh! You have to remember that only Africans have ever been victims of slavery

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Britain#History
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Wed May 13 08:31:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> posted:

    On 12/05/2026 21:00, John Levine wrote:
    According to Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>:
    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants >> of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    Considering its colonial history, more likely of French colonists and their local, ah, girlfriends.


    The Berbers are thought to be descendants of the Carthaginians, who, in turn, were descended from the Phoenicians.

    For genetics see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berbers#Ancestry_and_DNA .
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@caprica.universe to uk.railway on Wed May 13 09:16:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Wed, 13 May 2026 08:17:30 GMT
    Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> gabbled: >boltar@caprica.universe posted:

    On Tue, 12 May 2026 10:22:16 GMT
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> gabbled:
    Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
    What about adding Gnawa, and slave women brought from Ethiopia?


    You also come across some very fair Moroccans, who are perhaps descendants >> >of European women kidnapped by the pirates.

    Ssshhhh! You have to remember that only Africans have ever been victims of >> slavery

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Britain#History

    Yes I know, I was being sarcastic. In the UK various sections of the black "community" never stop bleating on about slavery, as if they personally suffered it rather than it being 200 years and 10 generations ago.

    Its as ridiculous as someone still blaming france for what their ancestors suffered on the battlefield in the napoleonic wars but it seems no one in
    the ruling class or media has the balls to tell them to STFU and stop blaming the distant past for you current situation.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2