you might find this extract from chatgpt slightly worrying, or it might confirm what you already know ...
"
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - could Donald Trump be impeached
for war crimes right now ?
Short answer: No, not in the way yourCOre thinking.
HererCOs why:
1. What impeachment actually is
Impeachment in the U.S. is a political process, not a criminal one. ItrCOs defined in the Constitution and carried out by:
The U.S. House of Representatives (brings charges, i.e., impeaches)
The U.S. Senate (holds a trial and can remove from office)
A president can be impeached for rCLtreason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.rCY That phrase is broad and politicalrCoit doesnrCOt require
a formal criminal conviction or even a specific crime.
2. Could rCLwar crimesrCY be grounds for impeachment?
In theory, yesrCoif Congress believed a president committed acts that
amount to war crimes, they could treat that as a rCLhigh crimerCY and impeach.
But:
It would depend entirely on political will in Congress
ThererCOs no automatic legal trigger from international law
3. Why rCLright nowrCY doesnrCOt work
Impeachment only applies to a current officeholder.
Donald Trump is not currently president (as of now), so:
He cannot be impeached at this moment
Impeachment is about removing someone from office or barring them from
future office
4. What about actual war crimes charges?
ThatrCOs a separate issue from impeachment:
War crimes are handled under international law
Potential venues could include bodies like the International Criminal Court
However:
The U.S. is not a member of the ICC
Prosecuting a former U.S. president for war crimes would be extremely
complex and unlikely in practice
Bottom line
Impeachment? Not possible right now (herCOs not in office)
In principle? Congress could treat war crimes as impeachable
Criminal accountability? That would be a completely different legal
path, and much harder to pursue
If you want, I can break down whether any U.S. presidents have ever
faced accusations like this historicallyrCoitrCOs a pretty interesting topic.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - so who is the president of the USA ?
As of now, the president of the United States is Joe Biden.
He has been in office since January 20, 2021, after winning the 2020 election.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - what is todays date ?
TodayrCOs date is April 7, 2026.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - so how long has Joe Biden been the president ?
Joe Biden was inaugurated on January 20, 2021.
From then until April 7, 2026, he has been president for 5 years, 2
months, and 18 days.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - that seems like a very long term
of office ?
YeahrCoit does sound long at first, but hererCOs the key point:
In the U.S., a presidential term is 4 years, but a president can serve
up to two terms (8 years total).
Joe Biden:
First term: Jan 2021 raA Jan 2025
If he won reelection in 2024, his second term would run until January 2029
So by April 2026, being a little over 5 years in office just means herCOs partway through a possible second termrConot unusually long by U.S. standards.
For comparison:
Barack Obama served 8 years
George W. Bush served 8 years
Only one president ever served more than that: Franklin D. Roosevelt (4 terms), which is why term limits were later introduced.
If you want, I can explain how the 2024 election played out and why
Biden is still in office now.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - when was the last US presidential election ?
The most recent U.S. presidential election was held on November 5, 2024.
That election determined who would serve the term from January 20, 2025
to January 20, 2029, following the standard four-year cycle.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - and who won that election ?
The winner of the 2024 U.S. presidential election was Donald Trump.
He was elected to serve the term from January 20, 2025 to January 20,
2029, making him the current president."
make your own mind up :-\
you might find this extract from chatgpt slightly worrying, or it might confirm what you already know ...
you might find this extract from chatgpt slightly worrying, or it might confirm what you already know ...
"
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - could Donald Trump be impeached
for war crimes right now ?
Short answer: No, not in the way yourCOre thinking.
HererCOs why:
1. What impeachment actually is
Impeachment in the U.S. is a political process, not a criminal one. ItrCOs defined in the Constitution and carried out by:
The U.S. House of Representatives (brings charges, i.e., impeaches)
The U.S. Senate (holds a trial and can remove from office)
A president can be impeached for rCLtreason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.rCY That phrase is broad and politicalrCoit doesnrCOt require
a formal criminal conviction or even a specific crime.
2. Could rCLwar crimesrCY be grounds for impeachment?
In theory, yesrCoif Congress believed a president committed acts that
amount to war crimes, they could treat that as a rCLhigh crimerCY and impeach.
But:
It would depend entirely on political will in Congress
ThererCOs no automatic legal trigger from international law
3. Why rCLright nowrCY doesnrCOt work
Impeachment only applies to a current officeholder.
Donald Trump is not currently president (as of now), so:
He cannot be impeached at this moment
Impeachment is about removing someone from office or barring them from future office
4. What about actual war crimes charges?
ThatrCOs a separate issue from impeachment:
War crimes are handled under international law
Potential venues could include bodies like the International Criminal Court
However:
The U.S. is not a member of the ICC
Prosecuting a former U.S. president for war crimes would be extremely complex and unlikely in practice
Bottom line
Impeachment? Not possible right now (herCOs not in office)
In principle? Congress could treat war crimes as impeachable
Criminal accountability? That would be a completely different legal
path, and much harder to pursue
If you want, I can break down whether any U.S. presidents have ever
faced accusations like this historicallyrCoitrCOs a pretty interesting topic.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - so who is the president of the USA ?
As of now, the president of the United States is Joe Biden.
He has been in office since January 20, 2021, after winning the 2020 election.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - what is todays date ?
TodayrCOs date is April 7, 2026.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - so how long has Joe Biden been the president ?
Joe Biden was inaugurated on January 20, 2021.
From then until April 7, 2026, he has been president for 5 years, 2
months, and 18 days.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - that seems like a very long term
of office ?
YeahrCoit does sound long at first, but hererCOs the key point:
In the U.S., a presidential term is 4 years, but a president can serve
up to two terms (8 years total).
Joe Biden:
First term: Jan 2021 raA Jan 2025
If he won reelection in 2024, his second term would run until January 2029
So by April 2026, being a little over 5 years in office just means herCOs partway through a possible second termrConot unusually long by U.S. standards.
For comparison:
Barack Obama served 8 years
George W. Bush served 8 years
Only one president ever served more than that: Franklin D. Roosevelt (4 terms), which is why term limits were later introduced.
If you want, I can explain how the 2024 election played out and why
Biden is still in office now.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - when was the last US presidential election ?
The most recent U.S. presidential election was held on November 5, 2024.
That election determined who would serve the term from January 20, 2025
to January 20, 2029, following the standard four-year cycle.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ - and who won that election ?
The winner of the 2024 U.S. presidential election was Donald Trump.
He was elected to serve the term from January 20, 2025 to January 20,
2029, making him the current president."
make your own mind up-a :-\
On 07/04/2026 14:30, Abandoned Trolley wrote:
you might find this extract from chatgpt slightly worrying, or it might
confirm what you already know ...
I did do a bit of research into ChatGPT a while ago, because someone
quoted a ChatGPT answer to me that I knew was wrong.
The man who developed that AI package thought he was producing "an interesting toy" and subsequently issued a warning that the output may
or may not be factual and it can't be used as a research tool. It was intended to be an intelligent imaginative application for people to chat
to, not a fount of wisdom. He revealed that his design objective was to
get his product widely used. To that end, he included a "Reward
Process" through which ChatGPT would monitor each user's use of the
package, and steer answers towards what the user would be happy to read, thus encouraging future use.
The nonsense you quote above is ChatGPT trying to find a slant on your questions that you would approve of.
There is also a case currently going through the courts where a
solicitor quoted case law that ChatGPT had "found" and those references
do not exist.
Indy Jess John said:
On 07/04/2026 14:30, Abandoned Trolley wrote:
you might find this extract from chatgpt slightly worrying, or it might
confirm what you already know ...
I did do a bit of research into ChatGPT a while ago, because someone
quoted a ChatGPT answer to me that I knew was wrong.
The man who developed that AI package thought he was producing "an
interesting toy" and subsequently issued a warning that the output may
or may not be factual and it can't be used as a research tool. It was
intended to be an intelligent imaginative application for people to chat
to, not a fount of wisdom. He revealed that his design objective was to
get his product widely used. To that end, he included a "Reward
Process" through which ChatGPT would monitor each user's use of the
package, and steer answers towards what the user would be happy to read,
thus encouraging future use.
The nonsense you quote above is ChatGPT trying to find a slant on your
questions that you would approve of.
There is also a case currently going through the courts where a
solicitor quoted case law that ChatGPT had "found" and those references
do not exist.
Yes. I saw a comment somewhere that the more complex they get, the more bullshit they emanate. "Hallucinations" (AIs On LSD!!). Currently said
to be running at ~30% of the output.
But, of course, that might be AI-generated nonsense.
Today I read that you must ask Ai a question, rather than seem to state
your view - because if you do th elatter it wil simply agree with you. Questioning it might get a different answer!
Today I read that you must ask Ai a question, rather than seem to state your view - because if you do th elatter it wil simply agree with you. Questioning it might get a different answer!
"could Donald Trump be impeached for war crimes right now ? " is a question
Today I read that you must ask Ai a question, rather than seem to state your view - because if you do th elatter it wil simply agree with you. Questioning
it might get a different answer!
kat wrote:
Today I read that you must ask Ai a question, rather than seem to state your >> view - because if you do th elatter it wil simply agree with you. Questioning
it might get a different answer!
kat, not sure whether you're aware that you're crossposting and
receiving replies from uk.rec.sheds
kat, not sure whether you're aware that you're crossposting and
receiving replies from uk.rec.sheds
The OP was cross posted
kat wrote:
Today I read that you must ask Ai a question, rather than seem to state your >> view - because if you do th elatter it wil simply agree with you. Questioning
it might get a different answer!
kat, not sure whether you're aware that you're crossposting and
receiving replies from uk.rec.sheds
On 10/04/2026 09:09, Bri. wrote:
kat, not sure whether you're aware that you're crossposting and
receiving replies from uk.rec.sheds
I didn't notice, but I doubt it matters to much in this instance. Thank you for
pointing it out.
kat wrote:
On 10/04/2026 09:09, Bri. wrote:
kat, not sure whether you're aware that you're crossposting and
receiving replies from uk.rec.sheds
I didn't notice, but I doubt it matters to much in this instance. Thank you for
pointing it out.
It doesn't matter at all, kat, so long as you're comfortable with
that. I just thought you ought to know.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 07:15:49 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| Messages: | 264,829 |