• An article about people who listen to The Archers by Kat Brown in The Independent

    From Nick Odell@nickodell49@yahoo.ca to uk.media.radio.archers on Sun Sep 6 00:35:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    I'm not going to say that Reform voters can't be Archers listeners any
    more than I would say that umrats are obliged to listen to the
    programme. But I think that Kat Brown has other ideas.

    You can find the article here: <https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-archers-75th-anniversary-reform-uk-conference-b3044883.html>

    ...or more probably not, unless you have a paid-for subscription to
    the Indie. In which case..

    ...there's an archived version of the article here:

    https://archive.ph/oO9XL

    Nick
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Sun Sep 6 10:12:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 2026/9/6 0:35:26, Nick Odell wrote:
    I'm not going to say that Reform voters can't be Archers listeners any
    more than I would say that umrats are obliged to listen to the
    programme. But I think that Kat Brown has other ideas.

    You can find the article here: <https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-archers-75th-anniversary-reform-uk-conference-b3044883.html>

    ...or more probably not, unless you have a paid-for subscription to
    the Indie. In which case..

    ...there's an archived version of the article here:

    https://archive.ph/oO9XL

    Nick

    Thanks for that - interesting. Note that the links in it lead to more interesting (though ancient) articles - e. g. "glacially slowly" to "60
    things ..." (which, though written when the Beetle ruled, still had a
    few I didn't), "listening" to a hatchet job on the characters (dates
    from when Sammy the cat died). [Note that these link to the paywall
    versions; I just hit the stop button in my browser as soon as they start
    to load, and that usually lets me see them.]
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Just remember, once you're over the hill, you begin to pick up speed
    - Charles Schulz (Peanuts)
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kate B@elvira@nospam.demon.co.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Sun Sep 6 12:46:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 06/09/2026 00:35, Nick Odell wrote:
    I'm not going to say that Reform voters can't be Archers listeners any
    more than I would say that umrats are obliged to listen to the
    programme. But I think that Kat Brown has other ideas.

    You can find the article here: <https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-archers-75th-anniversary-reform-uk-conference-b3044883.html>

    ...or more probably not, unless you have a paid-for subscription to
    the Indie. In which case..

    ...there's an archived version of the article here:

    https://archive.ph/oO9XL

    Nick

    I suspect most of the Reformerati think the Archers is woker than a
    Green Party voter sporting home-knitted tofu socks.

    Apropos, there is one thing that really, really puzzles me. In spite of
    the 'glacial' changes in eg Brian's opinion of Adam, the present colour-blindness rings deeply false to me. Roy's and Piggy's prejudices
    about Usha were not only very long ago but have passed out of everyone's consciousness, and the Malik family have been unquestioningly accepted
    apart from an initial token hiccup from the also otherwise thoroughly
    odious Lawrence. No-one ever mentions that Lottie is black, and we
    learnt from the cast photos that Conrad was, but all anyone actually
    said was that he was very handsome, and I absolutely do not believe that
    the average country pub is so heaving with black men that the only
    defining characteristic is that they are good-looking. I think it would
    be more realistic (who am I kidding?) if that was also part of the conversation. It doesn't have to be prejudiced either way, just noticed.

    Perhaps I just need to eat more tofu.
    --
    Kate B
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Sun Sep 6 14:49:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 2026/9/6 12:46:12, Kate B wrote:
    []
    ... woker than a
    Green Party voter sporting home-knitted tofu socks.

    LOL! Excellent.[]
    colour-blindness rings deeply false to me. Roy's and Piggy's prejudices
    []
    be more realistic (who am I kidding?) if that was also part of the conversation. It doesn't have to be prejudiced either way, just noticed.

    Agreed.


    Perhaps I just need to eat more tofu.


    :-)
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    I'm not an early bird or a night owl, I'm some sort of permanently
    exhausted pigeon
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mrs Nemo@shopping@cedarbank.me.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Sun Sep 6 15:34:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 06/09/2026 12:46, Kate B wrote:
    I absolutely do not believe that the average country pub is so heaving
    with black men that the only defining characteristic is that they are good-looking. I think it would be more realistic (who am I kidding?) if
    that was also part of the conversation. It doesn't have to be prejudiced either way, just noticed.

    I don't know how "normal" I am but I realise that if I was to tell
    someone about the lady I have met and chatted to at the bus stop a
    couple of times recently I would automatically say "I met this black
    lady ..." without any further mention of her skin colour. Similarly, if
    I was aware that someone was not British I would almost certainly say
    "The American I was talking to ..." or "There's a French person ..."
    even though their nationality was of no relevance.
    --
    Jenny M Benson
    Wrexham, UK
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BrritSki@rtilbury@gmail.com to uk.media.radio.archers on Sun Sep 6 15:55:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 06/09/2026 15:34, Mrs Nemo wrote:
    On 06/09/2026 12:46, Kate B wrote:
    I absolutely do not believe that the average country pub is so heaving
    with black men that the only defining characteristic is that they are
    good-looking. I think it would be more realistic (who am I kidding?)
    if that was also part of the conversation. It doesn't have to be
    prejudiced either way, just noticed.

    I don't know how "normal" I am but I realise that if I was to tell
    someone about the lady I have met and chatted to at the bus stop a
    couple of times recently I would automatically say "I met this black
    lady ..." without any further mention of her skin colour.-a Similarly, if
    I was aware that someone was not British I would almost certainly say
    "The American I was talking to ..." or "There's a French person ..."
    even though their nationality was of no relevance.

    YANotMiriamMargolyesAICM5racistrants
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jane Vernon@jane@clothandclay.co.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Mon Sep 7 10:23:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 06/09/2026 12:46, Kate B wrote:


    Apropos, there is one thing that really, really puzzles me. In spite of
    the 'glacial' changes in eg Brian's opinion of Adam, the present colour- blindness rings deeply false to me. Roy's and Piggy's prejudices about
    Usha were not only very long ago but have passed out of everyone's consciousness, and the Malik family have been unquestioningly accepted
    apart from an initial token hiccup from the also otherwise thoroughly
    odious Lawrence. No-one ever mentions that Lottie is black, and we
    learnt from the cast photos that Conrad was, but all anyone actually
    said was that he was very handsome, and I absolutely do not believe that
    the average country pub is so heaving with black men that the only
    defining characteristic is that they are good-looking. I think it would
    be more realistic (who am I kidding?) if that was also part of the conversation. It doesn't have to be prejudiced either way, just noticed.


    My future stepson-in-law is black and it's never ever been stated by
    anybody, not even stepdaughter when they first met.

    By the same token, I didn't know that Lottie is black and can't remember
    who Conrad is, even.

    Future stepson-in-law was described as good-looking and that was the
    only information I had about what he looked like until I saw the first
    photo she posted of them together.
    --
    Jane
    The Amethyst Artist
    BTME

    http://www.clothandclay.co.uk/umra/cookbook.htm - Umrats' recipes








    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john ashby@johnashby20@yahoo.com to uk.media.radio.archers on Mon Sep 7 10:51:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 06/09/2026 12:46, Kate B wrote:
    On 06/09/2026 00:35, Nick Odell wrote:
    I'm not going to say that Reform voters can't be Archers listeners any
    more than I would say that umrats are obliged to listen to the
    programme. But I think that Kat Brown has other ideas.

    You can find the article here:
    <https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-archers-75th-anniversary-
    reform-uk-conference-b3044883.html>

    ...or more probably not, unless you have a paid-for subscription to
    the Indie. In which case..

    ...there's an archived version of the article here:

    https://archive.ph/oO9XL

    Nick

    I suspect most of the Reformerati think the Archers is woker than a
    Green Party voter sporting home-knitted tofu socks.

    Apropos, there is one thing that really, really puzzles me. In spite of
    the 'glacial' changes in eg Brian's opinion of Adam, the present colour- blindness rings deeply false to me. Roy's and Piggy's prejudices about
    Usha were not only very long ago but have passed out of everyone's consciousness, and the Malik family have been unquestioningly accepted
    apart from an initial token hiccup from the also otherwise thoroughly
    odious Lawrence. No-one ever mentions that Lottie is black, and we
    learnt from the cast photos that Conrad was, but all anyone actually
    said was that he was very handsome, and I absolutely do not believe that
    the average country pub is so heaving with black men that the only
    defining characteristic is that they are good-looking. I think it would
    be more realistic (who am I kidding?) if that was also part of the conversation. It doesn't have to be prejudiced either way, just noticed.


    We know that Denise's best friend is Black, though the ethnicity of
    Denise herself has (AFAIK) been established but with a West Indian
    paternal Grandmother Paul can be presumed to be mixed race. NTTAWWT,
    just filling out the DEI quota for TA. Also Amy. Borsetshire is a hotbed
    of multiculturality.

    Perhaps I just need to eat more tofu.



    Doesn't everybody[1]?

    john

    [1]No.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick Odell@nickodell49@yahoo.ca to uk.media.radio.archers on Mon Sep 7 11:24:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On Sun, 6 Sep 2026 15:34:07 +0100, Mrs Nemo <shopping@cedarbank.me.uk>
    wrote:

    On 06/09/2026 12:46, Kate B wrote:
    I absolutely do not believe that the average country pub is so heaving
    with black men that the only defining characteristic is that they are
    good-looking. I think it would be more realistic (who am I kidding?) if
    that was also part of the conversation. It doesn't have to be prejudiced
    either way, just noticed.

    I don't know how "normal" I am but I realise that if I was to tell
    someone about the lady I have met and chatted to at the bus stop a
    couple of times recently I would automatically say "I met this black
    lady ..." without any further mention of her skin colour. Similarly, if
    I was aware that someone was not British I would almost certainly say
    "The American I was talking to ..." or "There's a French person ..."
    even though their nationality was of no relevance.

    I'm aware that I only seem to mention physical characteristics if they
    are relevant. Sometimes they are relevant because they are the point
    of the conversation. I might say, "Both The Red Queen and David
    Crosby[1] got on my bus today," because we have a kind of shorthand,
    and now you already know what they looked like and what they looked
    like is central to the topic.

    Nick
    [1]I'd really like to do a photo series of people who look like other
    people and there are so many people who look like other people to
    choose from. But I think it would be vaguely insulting to tell a
    stranger that I'd like to photograph them - but only because they look
    like somebody else.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joe Kerr@joe_kerr@cheerful.com to uk.media.radio.archers on Mon Sep 7 13:43:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 07/09/2026 11:24, Nick Odell wrote:
    [1]I'd really like to do a photo series of people who look like other
    people and there are so many people who look like other people to
    choose from. But I think it would be vaguely insulting to tell a
    stranger that I'd like to photograph them - but only because they look
    like somebody else.

    I think that very much depends on who you think they look like (and
    assumes that they aren't actually whoever you think they resemble).
    --
    Ric
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick Odell@nickodell49@yahoo.ca to uk.media.radio.archers on Mon Sep 7 14:02:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On Mon, 7 Sep 2026 13:43:25 +0100, Joe Kerr <joe_kerr@cheerful.com>
    wrote:

    On 07/09/2026 11:24, Nick Odell wrote:
    [1]I'd really like to do a photo series of people who look like other
    people and there are so many people who look like other people to
    choose from. But I think it would be vaguely insulting to tell a
    stranger that I'd like to photograph them - but only because they look
    like somebody else.

    I think that very much depends on who you think they look like (and
    assumes that they aren't actually whoever you think they resemble).

    https://youtube.com/shorts/u3FR1k2cLlU

    N.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kosmo@krw@whitnet.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Wed Sep 9 10:38:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 6.9.26 12:46, Kate B wrote:
    It doesn't have to be prejudiced either way, just noticed.

    Meghan, bless her, would opine otherwise. She made it clear that
    Princess Anne was not allowed to note that the impending baby might have
    a colour.
    --
    Kosmo Richard W
    www.travelswmw.whitnet.uk
    https://tinyurl.com/KRWpics
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kosmo@krw@whitnet.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Wed Sep 9 10:42:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 7.9.26 10:23, Jane Vernon wrote:
    By the same token, I didn't know that Lottie is black and can't remember
    who Conrad is, even.

    Lottie is or perhaps was Chris's latest squeeze but they had a falling
    out over him suggesting that one day they might move in together and we
    were never told if the surgery receptionist had accepted the
    misunderstanding.

    Conrad is allegedly a smooth talking car salesman who has taught George
    all he knows at Bill's car showroom. He also fancies Fallon but not
    Lily. Fallon thought he was A) far too young and B) far too soon. He
    made it clear he prefers an older partner as has Lily (I think).
    --
    Kosmo Richard W
    www.travelswmw.whitnet.uk
    https://tinyurl.com/KRWpics
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick Odell@nickodell49@yahoo.ca to uk.media.radio.archers on Wed Sep 9 11:41:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 10:38:06 +0100, Kosmo <krw@whitnet.uk> wrote:

    On 6.9.26 12:46, Kate B wrote:
    It doesn't have to be prejudiced either way, just noticed.

    Meghan, bless her, would opine otherwise. She made it clear that
    Princess Anne was not allowed to note that the impending baby might have
    a colour.

    Given the wide range of skin, hair and eye colour, texture and tone
    amongst people we would normally think of as of white European stock,
    would anybody be surprised to learn that I actually had to be told
    that Megan considers herself to be black? Rachel Dolezal anybody?

    Nick
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jane Vernon@jane@clothandclay.co.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Wed Sep 9 11:42:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 09/09/2026 10:42, Kosmo wrote:
    On 7.9.26 10:23, Jane Vernon wrote:
    By the same token, I didn't know that Lottie is black and can't
    remember who Conrad is, even.

    Lottie is or perhaps was Chris's latest squeeze but they had a falling
    out over him suggesting that one day they might move in together and we
    were never told if the surgery receptionist had accepted the misunderstanding.

    Conrad is allegedly a smooth talking car salesman who has taught George
    all he knows at Bill's car showroom.-a He also fancies Fallon but not Lily.-a Fallon thought he was A) far too young and B) far too soon.-a He made it clear he prefers an older partner as has Lily (I think).

    Ah yes, that's who he is. Thank you.
    --
    Jane
    The Amethyst Artist
    BTME

    http://www.clothandclay.co.uk/umra/cookbook.htm - Umrats' recipes








    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Wed Sep 9 13:09:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 2026/9/9 11:41:8, Nick Odell wrote:
    On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 10:38:06 +0100, Kosmo <krw@whitnet.uk> wrote:

    On 6.9.26 12:46, Kate B wrote:
    It doesn't have to be prejudiced either way, just noticed.

    Meghan, bless her, would opine otherwise. She made it clear that
    Princess Anne was not allowed to note that the impending baby might have
    a colour.

    It wouldn't be colourless!

    I've long resented - though that's putting it too strongly - having to
    pick "white" on forms; as far as I'm concerned, I'm pink.


    Given the wide range of skin, hair and eye colour, texture and tone
    amongst people we would normally think of as of white European stock,
    would anybody be surprised to learn that I actually had to be told
    that Megan considers herself to be black? Rachel Dolezal anybody?

    Nick

    YANA; I was most puzzled by the hoo-hah on that subject: looking at her,
    it never occurred to me that she was anything other than "white", until
    much was made of it. And I have the feeling that a lot of that (not all
    - there _are_ Brits who worry about such matters) came from USA.

    I think of more concern to many Brits (this was _before_ the
    falling-out) was that she was American! (That didn't bother _me_; I
    thought she was young attractive, and perhaps likely to insert some fun
    into the institution.)
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    There is no character, howsoever good and fine, but it can be destroyed
    by ridicule, howsoever poor and witless.
    -Mark Twain, author and humorist (1835-1910)
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kosmo@krw@whitnet.uk to uk.media.radio.archers on Wed Sep 9 14:48:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.media.radio.archers

    On 9.9.26 11:41, Nick Odell wrote:
    I actually had to be told
    that Megan considers herself to be black?

    Does she? I am not sure I thought she was allowed to consider herself anything as such comments may be out of bounds these days. Or were you referring to Megan thee stallion perhaps?
    --
    Kosmo Richard W
    www.travelswmw.whitnet.uk
    https://tinyurl.com/KRWpics
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2