• Side hustles and allowable expenses

    From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 09:04:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not
    clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village
    Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From GB@NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 10:23:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:

    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    -a-a of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    -a-a properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    -a-a accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.

    Clearly, you should rely on a bunch of amateurs on Usenet, or better
    still on AI.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roger Hayter@roger@hayter.org to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 10:09:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30 Sep 2026 at 10:23:27 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:

    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.

    Clearly, you should rely on a bunch of amateurs on Usenet, or better
    still on AI.

    Clearly the OP is raising the question as (quasi-) legal problem for the group to discuss rather than for instructions in filling in his company accounts. You are beginning to sound like another poster!
    --

    Roger Hayter

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 10:30:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-09-30, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    -a-a of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    -a-a properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    -a-a accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.

    Clearly, you should rely on a bunch of amateurs on Usenet, or better
    still on AI.

    He's not wrong that accountants are absolutely fucking useless, though.
    Ask 2 accountants the same question and you'll get 3 different answers.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 10:36:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-09-30, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    The rules for sole trader business expenses are pretty much the same
    as if it was an incorporated company I think.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    I guess the absolute safest option is to use the HMRC "scale rates",
    although HMRC seem to think you can get meals for a fiver: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/employment-income-manual/eim05231

    I think you can also get away with "reasonable", and personally I would
    just claim the full cost... bearing in mind I would not be eating steak, travelling by limousine, or staying at the Ritz.

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outside-the-uk

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roger Hayter@roger@hayter.org to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 10:51:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30 Sep 2026 at 11:36:50 BST, "Jon Ribbens" <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:

    On 2026-09-30, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not
    clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    The rules for sole trader business expenses are pretty much the same
    as if it was an incorporated company I think.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village
    Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    I guess the absolute safest option is to use the HMRC "scale rates",
    although HMRC seem to think you can get meals for a fiver: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/employment-income-manual/eim05231

    I think you can also get away with "reasonable", and personally I would
    just claim the full cost... bearing in mind I would not be eating steak, travelling by limousine, or staying at the Ritz.

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outside-the-uk

    I think their might be difficulties if the cost of travel and accommodation
    was a significant fraction of the total turnover of the businesss.
    --

    Roger Hayter

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 11:46:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119ikeg$393t$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:23:27 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> remarked:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:

    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    aa of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    aa properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    aa accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.

    Clearly, you should rely on a bunch of amateurs on Usenet, or better
    still on AI.

    As per the charter of ulm, I'm relying on people who have direct
    personal experience of the same issue.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 11:57:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <slrn11bppi2.7h7.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, at
    10:36:50 on Wed, 30 Sep 2026, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> remarked:
    On 2026-09-30, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not
    clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    The rules for sole trader business expenses are pretty much the same
    as if it was an incorporated company I think.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village
    Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    I guess the absolute safest option is to use the HMRC "scale rates",
    although HMRC seem to think you can get meals for a fiver: >https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/employment-income-manual/eim05231

    Back in the day, just before privatisation, the HMRC rate for a
    breakfast wasn't quite enough to pay for the cheapest offering at the
    Kings Cross Buffet.

    I think you can also get away with "reasonable", and personally I would
    just claim the full cost... bearing in mind I would not be eating steak, >travelling by limousine, or staying at the Ritz.

    Sounds sensible. I'd tend to stay at the equivalent of a 3* Premier
    Inn (~u150/night B&B plus u30 for an evening meal) and in the absence
    of local public transport whatever the local regulated cab fare was
    (typically u3-u4 per mile).

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outs >ide-the-uk

    Many thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for. eg:

    Barcelona, Spain

    Subsistence Type Rate (Euros)

    Over 5 hours 28
    Over 10 hours 76
    24 hour rate 101.50 plus room rate
    Room rate 176
    Breakfast 20
    Lunch 24.50
    Dinner 44.50
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 12:08:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <6551380234.2997bd21@uninhabited.net>, at 10:51:54 on Wed, 30
    Sep 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:
    On 30 Sep 2026 at 11:36:50 BST, "Jon Ribbens" <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> >wrote:

    On 2026-09-30, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not >>> clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    The rules for sole trader business expenses are pretty much the same
    as if it was an incorporated company I think.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village >>> Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    I guess the absolute safest option is to use the HMRC "scale rates",
    although HMRC seem to think you can get meals for a fiver:
    https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/employment-income-manual/eim05231 >>
    I think you can also get away with "reasonable", and personally I would
    just claim the full cost... bearing in mind I would not be eating steak,
    travelling by limousine, or staying at the Ritz.

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?


    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-out >>side-the-uk

    I think their might be difficulties if the cost of travel and accommodation >was a significant fraction of the total turnover of the businesss.

    During the start-up phase, turnover will be low, which is precisely why
    such trips are required to boost it.

    There's a rule of thumb since forever that any new business is unlikely
    to make a net profit in its first year, and trade generally is very
    slack at the moment due to the costa-living crisis.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 11:17:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-09-30, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote:
    On 30 Sep 2026 at 11:36:50 BST, "Jon Ribbens" <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not >>> clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    The rules for sole trader business expenses are pretty much the same
    as if it was an incorporated company I think.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village >>> Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    I guess the absolute safest option is to use the HMRC "scale rates",
    although HMRC seem to think you can get meals for a fiver:
    https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/employment-income-manual/eim05231 >>
    I think you can also get away with "reasonable", and personally I would
    just claim the full cost... bearing in mind I would not be eating steak,
    travelling by limousine, or staying at the Ritz.

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outside-the-uk

    I think their might be difficulties if the cost of travel and
    accommodation was a significant fraction of the total turnover of the businesss.

    Yes I should expect so, especially if it means the "business" is making
    a loss. The word "reasonable" is very important here and what it means
    depends on the context of the business!

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jethro@jethro_UK@hotmailbin.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 10:12:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 09:04:29 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:

    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village
    Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.

    Before you waste time trying to fathom all that, remember that HMRC is
    always right.

    With that in mind, what was the question ?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Handsome Jack@jack@handsome.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 10:46:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 09:04:29 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:

    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village
    Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.

    I can't see any reason why you shouldn't claim any expense that is 'necessarily and wholly' incurred for your trading business , though of
    course HMRC may be able to think of one. AFAIK there is no 'subsistence allowance'; you just deduct what it cost. You will have to register for
    income tax self-assessment and claim the expenses via the tax return.

    However, the difficulty (for both taxpayers and their accountants) is that HMRC is incurably vague in spelling out its 'rules' for such claims. It
    is, of course, in its interests to be vague; and to change the rules from
    time to time to catch people out.

    See
    https://taxhelpforhustles.campaign.gov.uk/buying-or-making-things-to-sell- and-online-selling-tax-rules/
    for some of these vague rules.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 13:18:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    -a-a of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    -a-a properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    -a-a accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.


    You haven't looked very far, most accountants know the rules on
    expenses, including me.

    You can have an income of up to -u1000 a year without the need to declare
    your side hustle to HMRC.

    Mileage at 55p* a mile for the first 10,000 miles, thereafter 25p a
    mile. Yes you can claim for postage of items purchased, I usually just include it in the cost of the item rather than separating the postage
    element. If you've travelled to a village fete, mileage** can be
    claimed both ways.

    There isn't a set allowance for subsistence, if the costs are reasonable
    HMRC will allow. If the event you were travelling to was beyond a days reasonable travel, then yes, a hotel can be claimed for, together with
    the reasonable cost of an evening meal and breakfast. HMRC will even
    allow you a pint of beer or equivalent with your evening meal! If you
    were travelling the other end of the country for a village fete I
    wouldn't allow, but if it was for a trade event to look at new stock, I
    would.

    Overseas expenditure for air fare, accommodation and subsistence is
    allowable, providing the journey was absolutely necessary. For a side
    hustle I would very much doubt it was. Lots of meals? Breakfast lunch
    and dinner during the duration, again reasonable cost, together with
    travel costs to and from the venue.

    If you're just having a jolly at the taxpayers expense, and HMRC picked
    up on it, you would be in deep do dah!!

    * This was increased in April 2026

    ** It's a choice between mileage and actual costs. With actual costs
    (Fuel, maintenance, repairs etc) you would only claim the percentage
    used in the business. Once you've decided on which, you have to stick to
    that method unless you change your vehicle. If actual costs, you can
    also claim capital allowance at 6% of the worth of the car (100% if
    commercial vehicle. For a side hustle, mileage would invariably work
    out better.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 13:31:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 11:36, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not
    clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    The rules for sole trader business expenses are pretty much the same
    as if it was an incorporated company I think.

    Some are, but subsistence is very different.
    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village
    Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    I guess the absolute safest option is to use the HMRC "scale rates",
    although HMRC seem to think you can get meals for a fiver: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/employment-income-manual/eim05231

    Sole traders aren't employed, and you would be absolutely right to claim
    the whole cost of a meal, if reasonable.

    Scale rates only apply to employees, and as you point out, are totally
    dire in this day and age.


    I think you can also get away with "reasonable", and personally I would
    just claim the full cost... bearing in mind I would not be eating steak, travelling by limousine, or staying at the Ritz.

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outside-the-uk

    Again, this is a sole trader, not an employee.

    https://library.croneri.co.uk/cch_uk/btr/216-000 bottom of the page.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 12:34:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-09-30, John <megane.06@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 30/09/2026 11:36, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not >>> clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    The rules for sole trader business expenses are pretty much the same
    as if it was an incorporated company I think.

    Some are, but subsistence is very different.
    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of Village >>> Fete?

    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table, plus
    the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to claim
    for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the
    subsistence allowance?

    I guess the absolute safest option is to use the HMRC "scale rates",
    although HMRC seem to think you can get meals for a fiver:
    https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/employment-income-manual/eim05231

    Sole traders aren't employed, and you would be absolutely right to claim
    the whole cost of a meal, if reasonable.

    Scale rates only apply to employees, and as you point out, are totally
    dire in this day and age.


    I think you can also get away with "reasonable", and personally I would
    just claim the full cost... bearing in mind I would not be eating steak,
    travelling by limousine, or staying at the Ritz.

    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outside-the-uk

    Again, this is a sole trader, not an employee.

    https://library.croneri.co.uk/cch_uk/btr/216-000 bottom of the page.

    That just says "The legislation is almost silent on the treatment of
    this all-important category of business expenditure." before it fades
    out due to the paywall...

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 13:44:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 11:57, Roland Perry wrote:

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outs
    ide-the-uk

    Many thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for. eg:

    Barcelona, Spain

    Subsistence Type-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Rate (Euros)

    Over 5 hours-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a 28
    Over 10 hours-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a 76
    24 hour rate-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a 101.50 plus room rate
    Room rate-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a 176 Breakfast-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a 20 Lunch-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a 24.50 Dinner-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a 44.50

    You would be wrong to claim the employee allowances as a sole trader.
    As I've said in my direct reply, you claim the actual costs. If the
    cost is lower, you claim lower, if the cost is higher but reasonable,
    you claim higher.

    Having said that, those allowances are extremely generous, even by
    today's prices. I'm pretty sure I could feed myself adequately at 101.5
    euros a day. In fact I managed it on less than half that on a recent
    (social) trip to Europe. The dearest hotel I stayed in was 57 euros a
    night (most were basic but this one in Rotterdam was really nice)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 14:04:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 13:18, John wrote:

    If actual costs, you can
    also claim capital allowance at 6% of the worth of the car (100% if commercial vehicle.-a For a side hustle, mileage would invariably work
    out better.
    Sorry, I should have clarified, this is also proportionate to the
    business element.

    Eg, if the cars value was -u3000, and the business element was 25%, you
    would claim 25% of -u180 in year one. In year 2 you would apply the same percentages to -u2820, and so on.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 14:10:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119j07o$7soc$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:44:39 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:
    On 30/09/2026 11:57, Roland Perry wrote:

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outs >>> ide-the-uk
    Many thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for. eg:
    Barcelona, Spain
    Subsistence Typeaaaaaaa Rate (Euros)
    Over 5 hoursaaaaaaaaaaa 28
    Over 10 hoursaaaaaaaaaa 76
    24 hour rateaaaaaaaaaaa 101.50 plus room rate
    Room rateaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 176
    Breakfastaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 20
    Lunchaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 24.50
    Dinneraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 44.50

    You would be wrong to claim the employee allowances as a sole trader.
    As I've said in my direct reply, you claim the actual costs. If the
    cost is lower, you claim lower, if the cost is higher but reasonable,
    you claim higher.

    I would always claim the actual cost, but use the local 'employee
    allowance' as guidance as to what was "reasonable".

    Tapas in Central London can easily cost u100/head!!

    Having said that, those allowances are extremely generous, even by
    today's prices. I'm pretty sure I could feed myself adequately at 101.5 >euros a day. In fact I managed it on less than half that on a recent >(social) trip to Europe. The dearest hotel I stayed in was 57 euros a
    night (most were basic but this one in Rotterdam was really nice)

    I've just come back from a non-business trip in the Channel Islands, and
    room was u120/night with evening meals averaging u40 per head, but I've
    been known to make do with Nachos and a pint of beer. If I'd been at (or
    in transit to) a trade show, then lunch would be a sandwich at best.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 14:18:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119ipaj$4qig$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:46:43 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> remarked:

    However, the difficulty (for both taxpayers and their accountants) is that >HMRC is incurably vague in spelling out its 'rules' for such claims. It
    is, of course, in its interests to be vague; and to change the rules from >time to time to catch people out.

    See >https://taxhelpforhustles.campaign.gov.uk/buying-or-making-things-to-sell- >and-online-selling-tax-rules/

    for some of these vague rules.

    One of my biggest issues is that I tend to buy items in job-lots, either
    at auction or house-clearance when someone is down-sizing. Then sell individually. Which makes estimating the profit margin of any one
    transaction (or valuing the remaining stock) very difficult.

    I don't "make" things, other than expertly repair vintage electronics to
    as close to working condition as possible.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 14:52:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119ium0$77ss$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:18:07 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's
    not clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.
    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something
    bought from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if
    I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of
    Village Fete?
    45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table,
    plus the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK to >>claim for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's the >>subsistence allowance?
    Do the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is >>outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?
    ps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    aa of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    aa properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an
    aa accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.


    You haven't looked very far, most accountants know the rules on
    expenses, including me.

    Sadly, I have to disagree, based on decades of experience. The best most accountants can manage is "do 90% of the work yourself, then I'll type
    the numbers into the form the HMRC requires".

    You can have an income of up to u1000 a year

    I think it's *turnover* rather than *income*. BICBW

    without the need to declare your side hustle to HMRC.

    Mileage at 55p* a mile for the first 10,000 miles, thereafter 25p a
    mile.

    Thanks, I hadn't noticed the rise from 45p. I'd be well below 10k/year.

    Yes you can claim for postage of items purchased, I usually just
    include it in the cost of the item rather than separating the postage >element. If you've travelled to a village fete, mileage** can be
    claimed both ways.

    Of course, the same when going to collect a purchase.

    There isn't a set allowance for subsistence, if the costs are
    reasonable HMRC will allow. If the event you were travelling to was
    beyond a days reasonable travel,

    I can't reasonably travel to an event typically 2hrs away, arriving at
    8am for setup and departing at 6pm. I'd be too tired to drive home
    safely. It does realistically need two nights in a hotel. Premier Inn
    averages about u80.

    then yes, a hotel can be claimed for, together with the reasonable cost
    of an evening meal and breakfast. HMRC will even allow you a pint of
    beer or equivalent with your evening meal! If you were travelling the
    other end of the country for a village fete I wouldn't allow, but if it
    was for a trade event to look at new stock, I would.

    Some buying trips require two visits: one to view the auction items, bid online at home, then collect a few days later.

    Overseas expenditure for air fare, accommodation and subsistence is >allowable, providing the journey was absolutely necessary.

    If the trip doesn't take place, nothing is achieved. So it *is*
    absolutely necessary.

    For a side hustle I would very much doubt it was. Lots of meals?
    Breakfast lunch and dinner during the duration, again reasonable cost, >together with travel costs to and from the venue.

    If you're just having a jolly at the taxpayers expense, and HMRC picked
    up on it, you would be in deep do dah!!

    In a former enterprise 25yrs ago, they demanded all my paperwork in
    order to audit it. Found nothing wrong, but it was quite difficult
    running the business while they had in effect confiscated most of my
    records for a few months.

    * This was increased in April 2026

    ** It's a choice between mileage and actual costs. With actual costs
    (Fuel, maintenance, repairs etc) you would only claim the percentage
    used in the business.

    I'd always use mileage. Otherwise it would be a nightmare to calculate
    the percentage. I have a Range Rover that I use mainly for business (especially given the price of diesel) and last year it had a u3k engine rebuild. But I can't be bothered to log every trip as "Shopping at Tesco
    2 miles up the road" versus "Picking up some stock from 200 miles away".

    In any event I tend to do the shopping in my wife's car, which has done
    less than 10k in the twelve years since she bought it new (Tesco really
    is only 2 miles away, and she's always worked from home since buying it; during COVID it did almost zero miles a year).

    Once you've decided on which, you have to stick to that method unless
    you change your vehicle. If actual costs, you can also claim capital >allowance at 6% of the worth of the car

    As far as I can tell my car's value consistently reduces about 20% from
    last year's value. u35k when new, I bought it for about u15k three years
    ago. Maybe worth u8k now, although hopefully the engine rebuild would
    make it more attractive to a knowledgeable buyer.

    (100% if commercial vehicle. For a side hustle, mileage would
    invariably work out better.

    I agree.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 14:56:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119inad$3jgl6$41@dont-email.me>, at 10:12:29 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, Jethro <jethro_UK@hotmailbin.com> remarked:

    Before you waste time trying to fathom all that, remember that HMRC is
    always right.

    I find that they aren't. When they audited me 25yrs ago they could find nothing wrong, and when my mother died just before COVID they took a
    year or more to reply to any correspondence, which "Isn't right".
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 13:54:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 13:34, Jon Ribbens wrote:

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/expenses-rates-for-employees-travelling-outside-the-uk

    Again, this is a sole trader, not an employee.

    https://library.croneri.co.uk/cch_uk/btr/216-000 bottom of the page.

    That just says "The legislation is almost silent on the treatment of
    this all-important category of business expenditure." before it fades
    out due to the paywall...
    I'm sorry Jon, I didn't realise it was behind a paywall. Just clicked
    the link and it loaded up Microsoft Edge and I got the paywall. In
    Chrome I didn't.

    Here's what it said

    International travel

    Expenses incurred on business travel abroad will be deductible provided
    the business purpose is the sole purpose of the journey (Edwards v
    Warmsley, Henshall & Co (1967) 44 TC 431). This is contrasted with cases
    where the trip has a social purpose in addition (Bowden v Russell &
    Russell (1965) 42 TC 301).

    See also Sargent v Eayrs (1972) 48 TC 573 where it was held that
    travelling expenses incurred by the taxpayer on a visit to Australia to investigate the possibility of buying a farm there and emigrating were
    not deductible as expenditure wholly and exclusively laid out for the
    purposes of the taxpayerrCOs farming trade in the UK.

    For the treatment of certain expenses incurred in connection with
    travelling abroad for the purposes of a foreign trade as having been
    wholly and exclusively incurred for the purposes of the trade, see -|293-150.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 16:10:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 14:52, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119ium0$77ss$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:18:07 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:

    You haven't looked very far, most accountants know the rules on
    expenses, including me.

    Sadly, I have to disagree, based on decades of experience. The best most accountants can manage is "do 90% of the work yourself, then I'll type
    the numbers into the form the HMRC requires".

    I've been doing it for 15-16 years, primarily dealing with sole traders
    and small Ltd Companies. For most clients, they supply the paperwork
    and I work out the turnover and allowable costs. It's changing now with
    MTD, but I would also check their software for mistakes if they were
    using their own software., it's amazing how often things get put in the
    wrong category or claiming for something that isn't allowable, even if
    they thought it was.

    You can have an income of up to -u1000 a year

    I think it's *turnover* rather than *income*. BICBW

    Yes, I should have made that clearer, I look at it as Income - expenses
    = profit.

    There isn't a set allowance for subsistence, if the costs are
    reasonable HMRC will allow. If the event you were travelling to was
    beyond a days reasonable travel,

    I can't reasonably travel to an event typically 2hrs away, arriving at
    8am for setup and departing at 6pm. I'd be too tired to drive home
    safely. It does realistically need two nights in a hotel. Premier Inn averages about -u80.

    It's only 14 hours, what's up with you? :) I would probably allow in
    those circumstances, but if you were setting off at 8 am and setting off
    back at 5 pm probably not.

    then yes, a hotel can be claimed for, together with the reasonable
    cost of an evening meal and breakfast.-a HMRC will even allow you a
    pint of beer or equivalent with your evening meal!-a If you were
    travelling the other end of the country for a village fete I wouldn't
    allow, but if it was for a trade event to look at new stock, I would.

    Some buying trips require two visits: one to view the auction items, bid online at home, then collect a few days later.

    Then both claimable. It does sound though that this is more than a side hustle.

    Overseas expenditure for air fare, accommodation and subsistence is
    allowable, providing the journey was absolutely necessary.

    If the trip doesn't take place, nothing is achieved. So it *is*
    absolutely necessary.

    You'd be surprised at some who will claim a business trip and have a
    holiday at the same time. For overseas this nullifies the whole claim.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jethro@jethro_UK@hotmailbin.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 15:00:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:56:25 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:

    In message <119inad$3jgl6$41@dont-email.me>, at 10:12:29 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, Jethro <jethro_UK@hotmailbin.com> remarked:

    Before you waste time trying to fathom all that, remember that HMRC is >>always right.

    I find that they aren't. When they audited me 25yrs ago they could find nothing wrong, and when my mother died just before COVID they took a
    year or more to reply to any correspondence, which "Isn't right".

    When they audited us back in 1991 (just after the BCCI kerfuffle meant
    all companies had to submit full audits) they spent over 2 years digging.
    It cost use over -u5,000 in additional accountants fees, and was only
    ended when my MP asked why they had written to my friends asking them to confirm that the money I had received from them to book flights was
    indeed that.

    But apparently they had done nothing wrong, so it was a case of suck it
    up.

    I wondered then how many companies had gone under because of the need to supply an expensive full audit

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From GB@NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 15:52:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 14:52, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119ium0$77ss$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:18:07 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's
    not-a clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.
    -aYes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something
    bought-a from me on eBay, and their percentage commission, but what if
    I travel
    a considerable distance to side-hustle in-person at some sort of
    Village-a Fete?
    -a45p/mile for the car, whatever the fee was for the trestle table,
    plus-a the public liability insurance they insisted on, but is it OK
    to claim-a for a hotel for the night before and/or after, and what's
    the subsistence allowance?
    -aDo the amounts change significantly, if the 'village' in question is
    outside the UK (travel by air, rather than car, minimum two nights
    in a hotel, and lots of meals)?
    -aps No, I don't want to get "professional advice", because in 30yrs
    -a-a-a of being in this sort of business, including being sometime a
    -a-a-a properly registered and audited Ltd company, I have yet to find an >>> -a-a-a accountant who had the slightest clue about such matters.


    You haven't looked very far, most accountants know the rules on
    expenses, including me.

    Sadly, I have to disagree, based on decades of experience. The best most accountants can manage is "do 90% of the work yourself, then I'll type
    the numbers into the form the HMRC requires".

    You can have an income of up to -u1000 a year

    I think it's *turnover* rather than *income*. BICBW

    without the need to declare your side hustle to HMRC.

    Mileage at 55p* a mile for the first 10,000 miles, thereafter 25p a mile.

    Thanks, I hadn't noticed the rise from 45p. I'd be well below 10k/year.

    Yes you can claim for postage of items purchased, I usually just
    include it in the cost of the item rather than separating the postage
    element.-a If you've travelled to a village fete, mileage** can be
    claimed both ways.

    Of course, the same when going to collect a purchase.

    There isn't a set allowance for subsistence, if the costs are
    reasonable HMRC will allow. If the event you were travelling to was
    beyond a days reasonable travel,

    I can't reasonably travel to an event typically 2hrs away, arriving at
    8am for setup and departing at 6pm. I'd be too tired to drive home
    safely. It does realistically need two nights in a hotel. Premier Inn averages about -u80.

    Do you expect to sell enough at an event to cover all those costs?






    then yes, a hotel can be claimed for, together with the reasonable
    cost of an evening meal and breakfast.-a HMRC will even allow you a
    pint of beer or equivalent with your evening meal!-a If you were
    travelling the other end of the country for a village fete I wouldn't
    allow, but if it was for a trade event to look at new stock, I would.

    Some buying trips require two visits: one to view the auction items, bid online at home, then collect a few days later.

    Overseas expenditure for air fare, accommodation and subsistence is
    allowable, providing the journey was absolutely necessary.

    If the trip doesn't take place, nothing is achieved. So it *is*
    absolutely necessary.

    The concern is that you might be taking a holiday abroad, thinly
    disguised as a business trip. Bear in mind that you don't have to
    convince anyone on this NG, just the good folk at HMRC. I think they'd
    be looking for you to show in some detail what you did achieve and that
    this could not have been done in some cheaper way.







    For a side hustle I would very much doubt it was.-a Lots of meals?
    Breakfast lunch and dinner during the duration, again reasonable cost,
    together with travel costs to and from the venue.

    If you're just having a jolly at the taxpayers expense, and HMRC
    picked up on it, you would be in deep do dah!!

    In a former enterprise 25yrs ago, they demanded all my paperwork in
    order to audit it. Found nothing wrong, but it was quite difficult
    running the business while they had in effect confiscated most of my
    records for a few months.

    *-a This was increased in April 2026

    **-a It's a choice between mileage and actual costs. With actual costs
    (Fuel, maintenance, repairs etc) you would only claim the percentage
    used in the business.

    I'd always use mileage. Otherwise it would be a nightmare to calculate
    the percentage. I have a Range Rover that I use mainly for business (especially given the price of diesel) and last year it had a -u3k engine rebuild. But I can't be bothered to log every trip as "Shopping at Tesco
    2 miles up the road" versus "Picking up some stock from 200 miles away".

    In any event I tend to do the shopping in my wife's car, which has done
    less than 10k in the twelve years since she bought it new (Tesco really
    is only 2 miles away, and she's always worked from home since buying it; during COVID it did almost zero miles a year).

    Once you've decided on which, you have to stick to that method unless
    you change your vehicle. If actual costs, you can also claim capital
    allowance at 6% of the worth of the car

    As far as I can tell my car's value consistently reduces about 20% from
    last year's value. -u35k when new, I bought it for about -u15k three years ago. Maybe worth -u8k now, although hopefully the engine rebuild would
    make it more attractive to a knowledgeable buyer.

    (100% if commercial vehicle.-a For a side hustle, mileage would
    invariably work out better.

    I agree.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Able@stuck@home.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 15:26:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    No, the side-hustle is solely based on the sale price(s), aka Turnover.

    No expenses, no shipping charges, no mileage, no what you paid for the item(s).

    PA
    --
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 23:01:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not
    clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought
    No, the side-hustle is solely based on the sale price(s), aka Turnover.

    No expenses, no shipping charges, no mileage, no what you paid for the item(s).

    Sorry, what are you talking about?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Able@stuck@home.com to uk.legal.moderated on Wed Sep 30 23:35:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 01/10/2026 00:01, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not >>> clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought

    No, the side-hustle is solely based on the sale price(s), aka Turnover.

    No expenses, no shipping charges, no mileage, no what you paid for the
    item(s).

    Sorry, what are you talking about?

    Responding to the OP's Post. What are YOU ****ing about?
    --
    PA
    --


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 00:31:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 00:01, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not >>>> clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought

    No, the side-hustle is solely based on the sale price(s), aka Turnover.

    No expenses, no shipping charges, no mileage, no what you paid for the
    item(s).

    Sorry, what are you talking about?

    Responding to the OP's Post.

    No, that's what you're *doing*. I asked what you were talking about.

    What are YOU ****ing about?

    Your post makes no sense. What does "the side-hustle is solely based
    on the sale price(s)" even mean? Are you claiming that the HMRC has a
    category of businesses classed as "side-hustles" for which they don't
    allow deductions of expenses? From where did you get this mistaken idea?
    What do you think "side-hustle" means?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 05:16:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119j0p9$83j7$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:54:00 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:

    International travel

    Expenses incurred on business travel abroad will be deductible provided
    the business purpose is the sole purpose of the journey (Edwards v
    Warmsley, Henshall & Co (1967) 44 TC 431). This is contrasted with
    cases where the trip has a social purpose in addition (Bowden v Russell
    & Russell (1965) 42 TC 301).

    A test which could be applied is "would the trip have made without there
    being a business purpose".

    While a domestic trip, I'm not going to Blackpool this coming weekend
    (where there's an event on the Saturday) because I have a growing
    backlog of DIY projects to finish before the winter sets in, and after
    all it's just-a-side-hustle not a fulltime business.

    If I did go, would having a curry in the evening with some of the other stallholders cause the trip not to be "wholly business", because of the
    social aspect? What about having a drink in the bar at lunchtime...

    I return from many of my overseas trips on a Monday, because the flights
    are considerably cheaper** than Sunday ones, and getting up at 5am the
    day after having worked all day Saturday at an event is bad for
    work/life balance. What's the tax position on this kind of thing (one
    would probably sit on the beach on Sunday).

    ** Due to the demand from people with fulltime jobs they need to get
    back to on Monday.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 05:25:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119j7nn$as6k$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:52:38 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> remarked:

    I can't reasonably travel to an event typically 2hrs away, arriving
    at 8am for setup and departing at 6pm. I'd be too tired to drive home >>safely. It does realistically need two nights in a hotel. Premier Inn >>averages about u80.

    Do you expect to sell enough at an event to cover all those costs?

    I didn't realise that the rules said you had to be profitable every
    single day you work. If that's the case, then almost every pub would
    shut all day Monday and Tuesday, and not do lunches Wednesday and
    Thursday.

    then yes, a hotel can be claimed for, together with the reasonable
    cost of an evening meal and breakfast.a HMRC will even allow you a
    pint of beer or equivalent with your evening meal!a If you were >>>travelling the other end of the country for a village fete I wouldn't >>>allow, but if it was for a trade event to look at new stock, I would.

    Some buying trips require two visits: one to view the auction items,
    bid online at home, then collect a few days later.

    Overseas expenditure for air fare, accommodation and subsistence is >>>allowable, providing the journey was absolutely necessary.

    If the trip doesn't take place, nothing is achieved. So it *is* >>absolutely necessary.

    The concern is that you might be taking a holiday abroad, thinly
    disguised as a business trip.

    I have spent much of the last 20yrs travelling abroad on account of a
    fulltime job, and frankly I'd fed up with it. I'd rather stay at home
    than queue up at Stansted for a Ryanair flight.

    Bear in mind that you don't have to convince anyone on this NG, just
    the good folk at HMRC.

    Floating ideas like this here, is what the newsgroup is for!

    I think they'd be looking for you to show in some detail what you did >achieve and that this could not have been done in some cheaper way.

    Cheaper than Ryanair or Premier Inn? That's quite an ask. But on my last
    trip I did decline to pay u15 for the latter's breakfast, and heroically bought a sandwich at the airport instead.

    Getting things done cheaper presumably means I could claim the annual
    cost of my Senior Railcard, or would that be jinxed by making one
    leisure trip with it in addition? Locally, I'd catch the free
    concessionary bus in preference to booking a taxi, except on Sundays
    when Stagecoach can't be bothered to run any buses.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 05:55:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119j8pg$bbgo$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:10:39 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:
    On 30/09/2026 14:52, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119ium0$77ss$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:18:07 on Wed, 30 Sep >>2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:

    You haven't looked very far, most accountants know the rules on >>>expenses, including me.
    Sadly, I have to disagree, based on decades of experience. The best
    most accountants can manage is "do 90% of the work yourself, then
    I'll type the numbers into the form the HMRC requires".

    I've been doing it for 15-16 years, primarily dealing with sole traders
    and small Ltd Companies. For most clients, they supply the paperwork
    and I work out the turnover and allowable costs.

    JOOI, how much would you charge for a side-hustle like mine? And if
    that's significantly more than me DIY-ing it, is that an allowable
    expense in its own right.

    It's changing now with MTD, but I would also check their software for >mistakes if they were using their own software., it's amazing how often >things get put in the wrong category or claiming for something that
    isn't allowable, even if they thought it was.

    You can have an income of up to u1000 a year

    I think it's *turnover* rather than *income*. BICBW

    Yes, I should have made that clearer, I look at it as Income -
    expenses = profit.

    Sorry, that's not clearer. Are you saying their rule is more than u1000 profit, and how do you know before the end of the year how much that's
    going to be.

    There isn't a set allowance for subsistence, if the costs are >>>reasonable HMRC will allow. If the event you were travelling to was >>>beyond a days reasonable travel,

    I can't reasonably travel to an event typically 2hrs away, arriving
    at 8am for setup and departing at 6pm. I'd be too tired to drive home >>safely. It does realistically need two nights in a hotel. Premier Inn >>averages about u80.

    It's only 14 hours, what's up with you? :)

    I'm 73yrs old, and prefer not driving in the dark. In any event(sic)
    that's a working day of 5am [to load up the car] to 8pm plus an hour to
    unload the car. So 16hrs. Would I have to opt-out of the Working Time Directive?

    I would probably allow in those circumstances, but if you were setting
    off at 8 am and setting off back at 5 pm probably not.

    I went to the local enormous car-boot sale a couple of weeks ago, to
    look for stock (and did spend about u100). The traders said that to get
    a good pitch they had to queue from 4am, with the public allowed in from perhaps 7am. I got there about 8am and left about 10am.

    then yes, a hotel can be claimed for, together with the reasonable
    cost of an evening meal and breakfast.a HMRC will even allow you a
    pint of beer or equivalent with your evening meal!a If you were >>>travelling the other end of the country for a village fete I wouldn't >>>allow, but if it was for a trade event to look at new stock, I would.

    Some buying trips require two visits: one to view the auction items,
    bid online at home, then collect a few days later.

    Then both claimable. It does sound though that this is more than a side >hustle.

    My day-job is being a pensioner, and I probably go to eight events a
    year, with an average of one buying trip a month. Does that qualify me
    (and my wife) as a "hard working family", apparently much approved of by
    the Labour government; or not?

    Overseas expenditure for air fare, accommodation and subsistence is >>>allowable, providing the journey was absolutely necessary.

    If the trip doesn't take place, nothing is achieved. So it *is* >>absolutely necessary.

    You'd be surprised at some who will claim a business trip and have a
    holiday at the same time. For overseas this nullifies the whole claim.

    I haven't had what one would call a "foreign holiday" since the kids
    were still in primary school 25yrs ago. We would typically have a week
    in The Canaries starting a few days before the end of the summer term
    (and that's a whole other can of worms). Including according to the
    travel insurance, reading one email from work would nullify their cover.

    But again, we had a client (my late wife did their marketing, and my job
    was to set up their wifi) who owned a resort in Eastern Europe, and
    there was only one flight a week. So we took the children (saving on
    hiring childcare back home) and spent much of the time in the pool. In
    real life, work and leisure are not binary.

    Several of the photos we took in the pool area ended up in the brochure.
    Board and lodging was free (as part of the deal), so it didn't end up
    being an issue about claiming expenses.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 05:57:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <slrn11br564.7h7.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, at
    23:01:24 on Wed, 30 Sep 2026, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> remarked:
    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but it's not >>> clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something bought

    No, the side-hustle is solely based on the sale price(s), aka Turnover.

    No expenses, no shipping charges, no mileage, no what you paid for the
    item(s).

    Sorry, what are you talking about?

    I think he's saying that HMRC's definition of "turnover" is sales, and
    not 'cost of sales' (let alone net profit).
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TTman@kraken.sankey@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 09:28:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 01/10/2026 05:16, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119j0p9$83j7$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:54:00 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:

    International travel

    Expenses incurred on business travel abroad will be deductible
    provided the business purpose is the sole purpose of the journey
    (Edwards v Warmsley, Henshall & Co (1967) 44 TC 431). This is
    contrasted with cases where the trip has a social purpose in addition
    (Bowden v Russell & Russell (1965) 42 TC 301).

    A test which could be applied is "would the trip have made without there being a business purpose".

    While a domestic trip, I'm not going to Blackpool this coming weekend
    (where there's an event on the Saturday) because I have a growing
    backlog of DIY projects to finish before the winter sets in, and after
    all it's just-a-side-hustle not a fulltime business.

    If I did go, would having a curry in the evening with some of the other stallholders cause the trip not to be "wholly business", because of the social aspect? What about having a drink in the bar at lunchtime...

    I return from many of my overseas trips on a Monday, because the flights
    are considerably cheaper** than Sunday ones, and getting up at 5am the
    day after having worked all day Saturday at an event is bad for work/
    life balance. What's the tax position on this kind of thing (one would probably sit on the beach on Sunday).

    ** Due to the demand from people with fulltime jobs they need to get
    -a-a back to on Monday.

    Back in the day ( 80's 90's ) I used to do shows/exhibitions ( Commodore
    World Fare/IAAPA etc). A couple of times I/we added on a Caribbean
    holiday tacked on the back. Accountant said fine, so long as you pay personally for the holiday bit, all well and good.Made for some very
    cheap holidays!. IAAPA Las Vegas was always good for a couple of extra
    days layover ( on the company)
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 09:40:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add
    to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    And no, I'm not going to register for VAT, with all the red tape that
    implies, just to get that 20% refunded. Not least because it would mean
    adding 20% to all my sale prices, even for items I've sourced in the UK.

    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently u90k per annum) not least because pursuing folks like me with maybe u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making
    a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using
    and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 11:59:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119l5ip$10cen$1@dont-email.me>, at 09:28:07 on Thu, 1 Oct
    2026, TTman <kraken.sankey@gmail.com> remarked:

    I return from many of my overseas trips on a Monday, because the
    flights are considerably cheaper** than Sunday ones, and getting up
    at 5am the day after having worked all day Saturday at an event is
    bad for work/ life balance. What's the tax position on this kind of
    thing (one would probably sit on the beach on Sunday).
    ** Due to the demand from people with fulltime jobs they need to get
    aa back to on Monday.

    Back in the day ( 80's 90's ) I used to do shows/exhibitions (
    Commodore World Fare/IAAPA etc). A couple of times I/we added on a
    Caribbean holiday tacked on the back. Accountant said fine, so long as
    you pay personally for the holiday bit, all well and good.Made for some
    very cheap holidays!. IAAPA Las Vegas was always good for a couple of
    extra days layover ( on the company)

    I have done many trade shows at Las Vegas, and would always plan to
    arrive at least two days early, in order to get over the jet-lag. But
    the time was spent with colleagues doing set-up, or wandering around
    spying on competitors' stands, not playing in the casinos.

    I'd usually catch a flight home the final day of the show, when footfall
    was typically very light, especially in the afternoon (flights would
    leave late afternoon).
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Johnson@peter@parksidewood.nospam to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 17:14:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a >nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add
    to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    And no, I'm not going to register for VAT, with all the red tape that >implies, just to get that 20% refunded. Not least because it would mean >adding 20% to all my sale prices, even for items I've sourced in the UK.

    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently u90k per annum) not least because >pursuing folks like me with maybe u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making
    a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using
    and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!

    For turnover of less than u15,000 (don't think it's changed) on self
    assessment the only side hustle information needed is turnover and
    expenses.
    (When I first had side hustle income in the 1980s I had to submit my
    accounts with the tax return. Never had any problems.)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 19:04:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <pg1tbll2d14lbv0mkf6rkgc74gu67ajdvc@4ax.com>, at 17:14:57 on
    Thu, 1 Oct 2026, Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> remarked:
    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a >>nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add
    to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    And no, I'm not going to register for VAT, with all the red tape that >>implies, just to get that 20% refunded. Not least because it would mean >>adding 20% to all my sale prices, even for items I've sourced in the UK.

    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently u90k per annum) not least because >>pursuing folks like me with maybe u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making
    a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using
    and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!

    For turnover of less than u15,000 (don't think it's changed) on self >assessment the only side hustle information needed is turnover and
    expenses.

    Being a retired person (albeit now with a start-up side hustle) I
    haven't been required to do self-assessment for several years.

    And surely they want to know the *profit*/loss as well as the turnover
    and expenses.

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about u2k, expenses
    of about u5k, so a loss of u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    (When I first had side hustle income in the 1980s I had to submit my
    accounts with the tax return. Never had any problems.)

    I've never had an official side-hustle before (hence my enquiries here).

    I've been mainly employed by numerous third parties, employed by an
    umbrella company, or self-employed only doing core work. And of course
    retired for several years before I decided to go side-hustling which was originally a hobby, but the government now wants to snoop on.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Handsome Jack@jack@handsome.com to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 14:14:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation,

    Rules that enable authorities to extract more tax from their citizens, and
    to punish them for avoiding it, will never be reduced by any government.
    Only increased.

    but importing and exporting to the EU is a
    nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add
    to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    And no, I'm not going to register for VAT, with all the red tape that implies, just to get that 20% refunded. Not least because it would mean adding 20% to all my sale prices, even for items I've sourced in the UK.

    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently -u90k per annum) not least because pursuing folks like me with maybe -u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!

    The rule that you have to report all trading income above -u1000 to HMRC
    has always been there, well before Brexit. It just wasn't enforced because
    it couldn't be.

    The rules for international exchange of on-line trading information were thought up by the OECD. https://www.att.org.uk/technical/news/hmrc-receive-more-information- online-sales


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 12:15:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add
    to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    And no, I'm not going to register for VAT, with all the red tape that implies, just to get that 20% refunded. Not least because it would mean adding 20% to all my sale prices, even for items I've sourced in the UK.

    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently -u90k per annum) not least because pursuing folks like me with maybe -u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making
    a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using
    and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!

    With the above in mind, it seems appropriate to recall Jean-Claude
    JunckerrCOs promise, shown on BBC TV (of course), that rCYIf you leave, we will hurt yourCY.

    That it has apparently come to pass, is a reflection of the operational
    style of the bunch of shysters that recent suggestions say we should
    rejoin.

    If you are unhappy with the way things worked out, you know who to blame.

    BTW, do the recent suggestions of a possible future referendum on rejoining include the RemainerrCOs post-result demand that there should be a supermajority one way or the other?
    --
    Spike

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 18:42:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-10-01, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 01:31, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 00:01, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but
    it's not clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses.

    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something
    bought

    No, the side-hustle is solely based on the sale price(s), aka Turnover. >>>>>
    No expenses, no shipping charges, no mileage, no what you paid for the >>>>> item(s).

    Sorry, what are you talking about?

    Responding to the OP's Post.

    No, that's what you're *doing*. I asked what you were talking about.

    What are YOU ****ing about?

    Your post makes no sense. What does "the side-hustle is solely based
    on the sale price(s)" even mean? Are you claiming that the HMRC has a
    category of businesses classed as "side-hustles" for which they don't
    allow deductions of expenses?

    Exactly.

    From where did you get this ... idea?

    From my experience as an Accountant

    So you have no reference you can point to which backs up your
    remarkable claim?

    I shall thank you anyway for ably demonstrating my point that for any particular question, different accountants will have wildly differing
    opinions.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 18:53:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-10-01, Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a
    nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add
    to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    And no, I'm not going to register for VAT, with all the red tape that
    implies, just to get that 20% refunded. Not least because it would mean
    adding 20% to all my sale prices, even for items I've sourced in the UK.

    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently -u90k per annum) not least because
    pursuing folks like me with maybe -u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making
    a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using
    and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!

    With the above in mind, it seems appropriate to recall Jean-Claude JunckerrCOs promise, shown on BBC TV (of course), that rCYIf you leave,
    we will hurt yourCY.

    It is difficult to "recall" things that never happened.

    That it has apparently come to pass, is a reflection of the operational
    style of the bunch of shysters that recent suggestions say we should
    rejoin.

    If you are unhappy with the way things worked out, you know who to blame.

    The Tories? Farage? Putin?

    BTW, do the recent suggestions of a possible future referendum on
    rejoining include the RemainerrCOs post-result demand that there should
    be a supermajority one way or the other?

    I don't think the suggestions are anywhere that detailed presently.
    But I have observed previously that a win for Rejoin as narrow as the
    win for Leave was would be unlikely to be sufficient to persuade the
    EU to allow us to rejoin.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roger Hayter@roger@hayter.org to uk.legal.moderated on Thu Oct 1 20:04:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 1 Oct 2026 at 19:04:21 BST, "Roland Perry" <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <pg1tbll2d14lbv0mkf6rkgc74gu67ajdvc@4ax.com>, at 17:14:57 on
    Thu, 1 Oct 2026, Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> remarked:
    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a
    nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add
    to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    And no, I'm not going to register for VAT, with all the red tape that
    implies, just to get that 20% refunded. Not least because it would mean
    adding 20% to all my sale prices, even for items I've sourced in the UK. >>>
    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently -u90k per annum) not least because >>> pursuing folks like me with maybe -u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making
    a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using
    and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!

    For turnover of less than -u15,000 (don't think it's changed) on self
    assessment the only side hustle information needed is turnover and
    expenses.

    Being a retired person (albeit now with a start-up side hustle) I
    haven't been required to do self-assessment for several years.

    And surely they want to know the *profit*/loss as well as the turnover
    and expenses.

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about -u2k, expenses
    of about -u5k, so a loss of -u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the -u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your
    pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a couple of expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as businesses that I'd like to fund that way!



    (When I first had side hustle income in the 1980s I had to submit my
    accounts with the tax return. Never had any problems.)

    I've never had an official side-hustle before (hence my enquiries here).

    I've been mainly employed by numerous third parties, employed by an
    umbrella company, or self-employed only doing core work. And of course retired for several years before I decided to go side-hustling which was originally a hobby, but the government now wants to snoop on.
    --
    Roger Hayter

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 06:22:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119mj6b$1ievm$1@dont-email.me>, at 22:26:35 on Thu, 1 Oct
    2026, TTman <kraken.sankey@gmail.com> remarked:

    I have done many trade shows at Las Vegas, and would always plan to >>arrive at least two days early, in order to get over the jet-lag. But
    the time was spent with colleagues doing set-up, or wandering around >>spying on competitors' stands, not playing in the casinos.

    I'd usually catch a flight home the final day of the show, when
    footfall was typically very light, especially in the afternoon
    (flights would leave late afternoon).

    Did you ever do IAPPA ?

    Hmm, an unfamiliar acronym. But looking it up, No.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 06:20:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <8506849591.6ea7e338@uninhabited.net>, at 20:04:28 on Thu, 1
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about u2k, expenses
    of about u5k, so a loss of u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your >pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a couple of >expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as businesses that I'd like >to fund that way!

    The guvverment can't have it both ways. If they want to tax me on
    side-hustle profits, they MUST allow me to make side-hustle losses.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Layman@Jeff@invalid.invalid to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 08:34:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 06:22, Roland Perry wrote:
    (flights would leave late afternoon).

    Did you ever do IAPPA ?

    Hmm, an unfamiliar acronym. But looking it up, No.

    Another one of those damn acronyms which should be explained up front on
    the home, "about", or "who we are" pages but aren't. It's almost as
    though they don't want you to know what it stands for.
    --
    Jeff

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roger Hayter@roger@hayter.org to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 09:04:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2 Oct 2026 at 06:20:47 BST, "Roland Perry" <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <8506849591.6ea7e338@uninhabited.net>, at 20:04:28 on Thu, 1
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about -u2k, expenses
    of about -u5k, so a loss of -u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the -u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your
    pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a couple of
    expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as businesses that I'd like
    to fund that way!

    The guvverment can't have it both ways. If they want to tax me on
    side-hustle profits, they MUST allow me to make side-hustle losses.

    My knowledge is out of date by decades and from HMRC guidance rather than legislation but when I looked this up you absolutely couldn't offset business losses against other income for tax purposes. There were some limited ways of offsetting business losses against profits from the same business in future years but I don't know the details.
    --

    Roger Hayter

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 10:21:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <3186670035.139987a0@uninhabited.net>, at 09:04:26 on Fri, 2
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:
    On 2 Oct 2026 at 06:20:47 BST, "Roland Perry" <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <8506849591.6ea7e338@uninhabited.net>, at 20:04:28 on Thu, 1
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about u2k, expenses >>>> of about u5k, so a loss of u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your
    pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a >>>couple of
    expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as businesses
    that I'd like
    to fund that way!

    The guvverment can't have it both ways. If they want to tax me on
    side-hustle profits, they MUST allow me to make side-hustle losses.

    My knowledge is out of date by decades and from HMRC guidance rather than >legislation but when I looked this up you absolutely couldn't offset business >losses against other income for tax purposes. There were some limited ways of >offsetting business losses against profits from the same business in future >years but I don't know the details.

    It's not a business loss, it's a self-employment side-hustle loss. If
    they can tax your extra if you make a profit, the surely they can tax
    you less if you make a loss.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick Finnigan@nix@genie.co.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 10:36:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 01/10/2026 21:04, Roger Hayter wrote:
    On 1 Oct 2026 at 19:04:21 BST, "Roland Perry" <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about -u2k, expenses
    of about -u5k, so a loss of -u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the -u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a couple of
    expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as businesses that I'd like
    to fund that way!

    Seems to be allowed, especially in early years. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/losses-hs227-self-assessment-helpsheet/hs227-losses-2026

    If, hypothetically, someone were involved in reviving a community Inn
    some distance from home, and received some gift or payments in kind, they should be able to register as a sole trader for self assessment, declare
    the value of the gift as income, claim travel expenses, offset the expenses against the 40% income tax on their pension from successful previous employments.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spike@aero.spike@mail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 09:56:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:
    On 2026-10-01, Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    [rCa]

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a
    nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add >>> to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    [rCa]

    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently -u90k per annum) not least because >>> pursuing folks like me with maybe -u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making
    a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using
    and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!

    With the above in mind, it seems appropriate to recall Jean-Claude
    JunckerrCOs promise, shown on BBC TV (of course), that rCYIf you leave,
    we will hurt yourCY.

    It is difficult to "recall" things that never happened.

    ItrCOs hardly my fault if Remainers and the like either never followed the
    news in the lead-up to the referendum vote, or in good 1984 style
    immediately forgot the parts they didnrCOt like, but it is a fact that I saw Jean-Claude Juncker make a promise, shown on BBC TV (of course), that rCYIf
    you leave, we will hurt yourCY.

    That it has apparently come to pass, is a reflection of the operational
    style of the bunch of shysters that recent suggestions say we should
    rejoin.

    If you are unhappy with the way things worked out, you know who to blame.

    The Tories? Farage? Putin?

    Everyone but the culprit, it would seem.

    BTW, do the recent suggestions of a possible future referendum on
    rejoining include the RemainerrCOs post-result demand that there should
    be a supermajority one way or the other?

    I don't think the suggestions are anywhere that detailed presently.

    ThatrCOs true, IrCOm merely getting in early with the reminder thatrCOs whatrCOs
    good enough post-facto for the Remainers is good enough for the third rCOonce in a generationrCO referendum.

    But I have observed previously that a win for Rejoin as narrow as the
    win for Leave was would be unlikely to be sufficient to persuade the
    EU to allow us to rejoin.

    An interesting observation. One wonders what the criterion for a majority
    vote might be, that would satisfy most people in the lead-up to any vote.
    --
    Spike

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Norman Wells@hex@unseen.ac.am to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 11:22:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 10:36, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 21:04, Roger Hayter wrote:
    On 1 Oct 2026 at 19:04:21 BST, "Roland Perry" <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about -u2k, expenses
    of about -u5k, so a loss of -u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the -u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your
    pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a
    couple of
    expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as businesses that
    I'd like
    to fund that way!

    -aSeems to be allowed, especially in early years. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/losses-hs227-self-assessment- helpsheet/hs227-losses-2026

    -aIf, hypothetically, someone were involved in reviving a community Inn some distance from home, and received some gift or payments in kind,
    they should be able to register as a sole trader

    Not if there's no business or trade involved. The clue's in the name.

    for self assessment,

    So, no.
    declare the value of the gift as income,

    Ad hoc gifts are not 'income'.
    claim travel expenses, offset
    the expenses against the 40% income tax on their pension from successful previous employments.

    No, they can only be offset against profits of the business, not to
    reduce personal tax liability.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Norman Wells@hex@unseen.ac.am to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 08:35:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 06:20, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <8506849591.6ea7e338@uninhabited.net>, at 20:04:28 on Thu, 1
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about -u2k, expenses
    of about -u5k, so a loss of -u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the -u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your
    pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a
    couple of
    expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as businesses that
    I'd like
    to fund that way!

    The guvverment can't have it both ways. If they want to tax me on side- hustle profits, they MUST allow me to make side-hustle losses.

    The government can have it both ways, and does.

    You can make whatever losses you like, that's perfectly allowed. What
    it won't and doesn't do is give you personal tax relief on them.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Todal@the_todal@icloud.com to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 12:41:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 10:56, Spike wrote:
    Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:
    On 2026-10-01, Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    [rCa]

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount >>>> of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a
    nightmare.

    Not just the extra form-filling, but anything I buy from the EU (to add >>>> to my stock) takes about a fortnight extra to arrive, *and* I have to
    pay 20% VAT on it.

    [rCa]

    It seems to me that the side-hustle threshold should be more like the
    VAT registration threshold (currently -u90k per annum) not least because >>>> pursuing folks like me with maybe -u5-10k a year turnover is going to
    cost far more than any income tax generated - assuming I'm even making >>>> a profit, rather than performing a public service re-cycling/re-using
    and preserving for posterity, the vintage tech.

    Whoever thought up this scheme, really didn't think it through!

    With the above in mind, it seems appropriate to recall Jean-Claude
    JunckerrCOs promise, shown on BBC TV (of course), that rCYIf you leave,
    we will hurt yourCY.

    It is difficult to "recall" things that never happened.

    ItrCOs hardly my fault if Remainers and the like either never followed the news in the lead-up to the referendum vote, or in good 1984 style
    immediately forgot the parts they didnrCOt like, but it is a fact that I saw Jean-Claude Juncker make a promise, shown on BBC TV (of course), that rCYIf you leave, we will hurt yourCY.


    It's hardly Mr Juncker's fault if fervent Leave supporters are convinced
    that they hear something in his words that he never said. Or put their
    own spin on his words. Or believe a tabloid journalist who puts his/her
    own spin on Juncker's words.

    "If you leave the union you are, of course, not part of our single
    market and certainly not only in parts of it," he said to a round of
    applause from MEPs in Strasbourg.


    That it has apparently come to pass, is a reflection of the operational
    style of the bunch of shysters that recent suggestions say we should
    rejoin.

    If you are unhappy with the way things worked out, you know who to blame.

    The Tories? Farage? Putin?

    Everyone but the culprit, it would seem.

    Two culprits - David Cameron, for sabotaging the UK in a futile attempt
    to silence the Eurosceptics. And Boris Johnson for choosing to support
    Leave because he reckoned that the outcome would be Remain but that his
    path to power would be much easier for being a rebel.


    BTW, do the recent suggestions of a possible future referendum on
    rejoining include the RemainerrCOs post-result demand that there should
    be a supermajority one way or the other?

    I don't think the suggestions are anywhere that detailed presently.

    ThatrCOs true, IrCOm merely getting in early with the reminder thatrCOs whatrCOs
    good enough post-facto for the Remainers is good enough for the third rCOonce in a generationrCO referendum.

    But I have observed previously that a win for Rejoin as narrow as the
    win for Leave was would be unlikely to be sufficient to persuade the
    EU to allow us to rejoin.

    An interesting observation. One wonders what the criterion for a majority vote might be, that would satisfy most people in the lead-up to any vote.
    Why should the EU trust the UK to keep its word about anything at all?
    Looks as if we're going to resile from the Chagos deal just to please
    Donald Trump.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick Finnigan@nix@genie.co.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 12:43:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 11:22, Norman Wells wrote:
    On 02/10/2026 10:36, Nick Finnigan wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 21:04, Roger Hayter wrote:
    On 1 Oct 2026 at 19:04:21 BST, "Roland Perry" <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about -u2k, expenses >>>> of about -u5k, so a loss of -u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the -u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your
    pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a
    couple of
    expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as businesses that
    I'd like
    to fund that way!

    -a-aSeems to be allowed, especially in early years.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/losses-hs227-self-assessment-
    helpsheet/hs227-losses-2026

    -a-aIf, hypothetically, someone were involved in reviving a community Inn >> some distance from home, and received some gift or payments in kind, they >> should be able to register as a sole trader

    Not if there's no business or trade involved.-a The clue's in the name.

    https://www.tax.service.gov.uk/guidance/check-non-paye-income/start/how-did-you-receive-additional-income

    Additional income from providing a service
    2025/2026
    Gifts.
    No.
    Someone else.
    No.
    No.

    What you should do next ... register for Self Assessment as a sole trader.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 13:21:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 01/10/2026 05:25, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119j7nn$as6k$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:52:38 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> remarked:

    -aI can't reasonably travel to an event typically 2hrs away, arriving
    at-a 8am for setup and departing at 6pm. I'd be too tired to drive
    home safely. It does realistically need two nights in a hotel.
    Premier Inn averages about -u80.

    Do you expect to sell enough at an event to cover all those costs?

    I didn't realise that the rules said you had to be profitable every
    single day you work. If that's the case, then almost every pub would
    shut all day Monday and Tuesday, and not do lunches Wednesday and Thursday.

    HMRC would expect you to make profit over time. Obviously a new venture
    would take time to realise a profit, but if you were consistently
    putting in loss making tax returns over several years, then HMRC might consider you're not really in business, and the trade is really a hobby.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 13:39:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 01/10/2026 05:55, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119j8pg$bbgo$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:10:39 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:
    On 30/09/2026 14:52, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119ium0$77ss$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:18:07 on Wed, 30 Sep
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:

    You haven't looked very far, most accountants know the rules on
    expenses, including me.
    -aSadly, I have to disagree, based on decades of experience. The best
    most-a accountants can manage is "do 90% of the work yourself, then
    I'll type-a the numbers into the form the HMRC requires".

    I've been doing it for 15-16 years, primarily dealing with sole
    traders and small Ltd Companies.-a For most clients, they supply the
    paperwork and I work out the turnover and allowable costs.

    JOOI, how much would you charge for a side-hustle like mine? And if
    that's significantly more than me DIY-ing it, is that an allowable
    expense in its own right.

    My basic fee is -u240 and unless it was over 20k turnover wouldn't as yet
    come under quarterly updates (currently 50k turnover, 30k from next
    year, and 20k the year after) for which my basic starts at -u360. If
    there more than a bit of bookkeeping involved it could be more eg, the
    dearest one on my books is -u900 but theres 2 hours a month bookkeeping involved. Whatever the fee, the full cost is an allowable expense.


    You can have an income of up to -u1000 a year

    -aI think it's *turnover* rather than *income*. BICBW

    Yes, I should have made that clearer, I look at it as-a Income -
    expenses = profit.

    Sorry, that's not clearer. Are you saying their rule is more than -u1000 profit, and how do you know before the end of the year how much that's
    going to be.

    It's turnover.

    Then both claimable. It does sound though that this is more than a
    side hustle.

    My day-job is being a pensioner, and I probably go to eight events a
    year, with an average of one buying trip a month. Does that qualify me
    (and my wife) as a "hard working family", apparently much approved of by
    the Labour government; or not?

    Fair enough, it came across as being more complex, sorry.




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 13:47:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 01/10/2026 10:48, Peter Able wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 01:31, Jon Ribbens wrote:

    Your post makes no sense. What does "the side-hustle is solely based
    on the sale price(s)" even mean? Are you claiming that the HMRC has a
    category of businesses classed as "side-hustles" for which they don't
    allow deductions of expenses?

    Exactly.

    -aFrom where did you get this ... idea?

    From my experience as an Accountant

    What do you think "side-hustle" means?

    You are remarkably ill-informed.

    I suggest that you do some research. The first port of call might be:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/say-i-do-to-getting-your-side-hustle- tax-right.

    Note that HMRC uses the same term that the OP and I use.: side-hustle.

    The link is saying that if your turnover (they say earnings but thats technically incorrect) from your side hustle is more than -u1000 a year
    you need to do a self assessment. Theres no rule that says you can't
    claim expenses.

    eg I buy some goods from Ebay for -u500 over the year, and I sell them
    for -u1500. Is my profit -u500 or -u1500 and how much tax do I pay?


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John@megane.06@gmail.com to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 13:54:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 10:16, GB wrote:

    Further back in this thread, somebody mentioned the word 'income', and I think that Peter Able was just clarifying that the correct term is
    turnover. That was so obvious to some people that they couldn't see any difference, and then, this being Usenet, an argument ensued.
    Peter didn't answer the question Roland asked, and I have mistakenly
    answered based on Roland's question, which was about claiming expenses. luckily I think I've cancelled it.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 13:18:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-10-02, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 19:42, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-10-01, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 01:31, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 00:01, Jon Ribbens wrote:
    On 2026-09-30, Peter Able <stuck@home.com> wrote:
    On 30/09/2026 09:04, Roland Perry wrote:
    We are a year or two into HMRC wanting to tax side-hustles, but >>>>>>>> it's not clear to me what the rules are on allowable expenses. >>>>>>>>
    Yes, I can obviously claim for the postage on shipping something >>>>>>>> bought

    No, the side-hustle is solely based on the sale price(s), aka
    Turnover.

    No expenses, no shipping charges, no mileage, no what you paid
    for the item(s).

    Sorry, what are you talking about?

    Responding to the OP's Post.

    No, that's what you're *doing*. I asked what you were talking about.

    What are YOU ****ing about?

    Your post makes no sense. What does "the side-hustle is solely based
    on the sale price(s)" even mean? Are you claiming that the HMRC has a
    category of businesses classed as "side-hustles" for which they don't
    allow deductions of expenses?

    Exactly.

    From where did you get this ... idea?

    From my experience as an Accountant

    So you have no reference you can point to which backs up your
    remarkable claim?

    I shall thank you anyway for ably demonstrating my point that for any
    particular question, different accountants will have wildly differing
    opinions.

    Further back in this thread, somebody mentioned the word 'income', and I think that Peter Able was just clarifying that the correct term is
    turnover. That was so obvious to some people that they couldn't see any difference, and then, this being Usenet, an argument ensued.

    "An argument" ensued because Peter made a very opaque post with no clear meaning, and I simply asked him what he meant, and his immediate and
    subsequent responses were for some reason extremely rude and very light
    on explanation.

    Later I asked Peter to explain "Are you claiming that the HMRC has a
    category of businesses classed as "side-hustles" for which they don't
    allow deductions of expenses?" and he replied "Exactly.", which was
    at least clear, even though as far as I'm aware it's entirely false.

    I *guess* that *maybe* what he originally meant was that the -u1,000
    exemption applies to turnover not profit. That would have been an
    interesting and helpful comment if he simply stated it clearly,
    especially given that HMRC themselves state it so unclearly that
    you'd almost think they were deliberately trying to mislead:

    "Made more than -u1,000 from your side hustles?
    Then ... you'll need to tell HMRC"

    https://taxhelpforhustles.campaign.gov.uk/

    If I buy something for -u800 and sell it for -u1,200 then no normal person would describe that as having "made -u1,200". I haven't made -u1,200, I've
    made -u400. But apparently HMRC are not normal: they've hidden a secret
    caveat further down the page that's not even visible until you toggle it
    open:

    "This is the amount you earn before factoring in expenses. It is
    not the same as profit."

    ... although this is still not at all clear. What do HMRC mean by
    "expenses"? Peter above said "no what you paid for the item(s)",
    but in accounting "what you paid for the item(s)" is usually called
    "cost of sales" and is not part of "expenses". HMRC's first sentence
    in their explanation implies that the -u1,000 limit applies to gross
    profit (as opposed to operating profit), but their second sentence
    immediately contradicts their first sentence by saying they don't mean
    either kind of "profit", they mean some other unspecified thing - maybe turnover, but if so why don't they just bloody well say so?

    Basically, whoever wrote and approved that HMRC advice page should be
    prevented from publishing any more web pages and replaced with someone
    who actually understands at least one of English and accountancy, and
    Peter should try and be clearer about what he means - and less rude.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 13:19:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-10-02, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote:
    On 2 Oct 2026 at 06:20:47 BST, "Roland Perry" <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <8506849591.6ea7e338@uninhabited.net>, at 20:04:28 on Thu, 1
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about -u2k, expenses >>>> of about -u5k, so a loss of -u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the -u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on
    your pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I
    have a couple of expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed
    as businesses that I'd like to fund that way!

    The guvverment can't have it both ways. If they want to tax me on
    side-hustle profits, they MUST allow me to make side-hustle losses.

    My knowledge is out of date by decades and from HMRC guidance rather
    than legislation but when I looked this up you absolutely couldn't
    offset business losses against other income for tax purposes. There
    were some limited ways of offsetting business losses against profits
    from the same business in future years but I don't know the details.

    Entirely true. If you make a profit, HMRC are your loyal business
    partner standing by you ready and eager to take their percentage.
    But if you make a loss and need help making up the shortfall, they
    are nowhere to be found.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 13:24:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-10-02, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <8506849591.6ea7e338@uninhabited.net>, at 20:04:28 on Thu, 1
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:

    Very roughly, in my first year I'd expect sales of about -u2k, expenses
    of about -u5k, so a loss of -u3K; which I would expect to set against
    any tax payable-at-source on my pensions: State plus my possibly
    three occupational (two of which are so small I've not even claimed
    yet), and the -u150/month survivor's pension from my late wife's
    occupational pension.

    The idea that you could offset your business losses against tax on your >>pension seems, shall we say, optimistic. If t'were possible I have a
    couple of expensive hobbies that could conceivably be framed as
    businesses that I'd like to fund that way!

    The guvverment can't have it both ways. If they want to tax me on side-hustle profits, they MUST allow me to make side-hustle losses.

    I'm surprised you don't already know this, but the governmnet absolutely
    can - and does - "have it both ways", because they get to make the rules.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 14:28:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119o7kt$238hk$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:21:48 on Fri, 2 Oct
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:
    On 01/10/2026 05:25, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119j7nn$as6k$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:52:38 on Wed, 30 Sep >>2026, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> remarked:

    aI can't reasonably travel to an event typically 2hrs away,
    arriving ata 8am for setup and departing at 6pm. I'd be too tired
    to drive home safely. It does realistically need two nights in a >>>>hotel. Premier Inn averages about u80.

    Do you expect to sell enough at an event to cover all those costs?

    I didn't realise that the rules said you had to be profitable every >>single day you work. If that's the case, then almost every pub would
    shut all day Monday and Tuesday, and not do lunches Wednesday and >>Thursday.

    HMRC would expect you to make profit over time. Obviously a new venture >would take time to realise a profit, but if you were consistently
    putting in loss making tax returns over several years, then HMRC might >consider you're not really in business, and the trade is really a hobby.

    I can see why they say that, but surely most side-hustles *are* a hobby?
    (And if you had to pay yourself minimum wage, would almost always be
    running at a loss).

    eg If I go to the monthly auction to buy things, I'm there perhaps five
    hours, plus an hour each way travelling, so that's u90, and if I buy
    something for u50, tidy it up and list it on eBay, that process will
    take around another hour. What if it then sells for u40 - that's a loss
    of at least u100?

    It's HMRC who have decided to poke their nose in, if your turnover is
    more than u1k a year. They made that bed, so have to lay in it.

    Which is why I've suggested it's a ludicrously low threshold, and should
    be at least u50k, maybe u90k.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Norman Wells@hex@unseen.ac.am to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 14:24:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 12:41, The Todal wrote:
    On 02/10/2026 10:56, Spike wrote:
    Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> wrote:
    On 2026-10-01, Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:

    That it has apparently come to pass, is a reflection of the operational >>>> style of the bunch of shysters that recent suggestions say we should
    rejoin.

    If you are unhappy with the way things worked out, you know who to
    blame.

    The Tories? Farage? Putin?

    Everyone but the culprit, it would seem.

    Two culprits - David Cameron, for sabotaging the UK in a futile attempt
    to silence the Eurosceptics.

    All he did, in a remarkable demonstration of democracy, was to put a
    binary, unbiassed question to the British people.

    Are you dissing him for being democratic?

    And Boris Johnson for choosing to support
    Leave because he reckoned that the outcome would be Remain but that his
    path to power would be much easier for being a rebel.

    Who nevertheless won a landslide general election victory in 2019.

    Democracy, eh? It's awful, isn't it?

    An interesting observation. One wonders what the criterion for a majority
    vote might be, that would satisfy most people in the lead-up to any vote.

    Why should the EU trust the UK to keep its word about anything at all?
    Looks as if we're going to resile from the Chagos deal just to please
    Donald Trump.

    What has that got to do with the EU?

    Besides, no agreement with Mauritius has been ratified, without which
    there is no actual 'deal' as yet that can possibly be resiled from.
    It's still all up for negotiation.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 15:28:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119ob25$24kj4$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:20:04 on Fri, 2 Oct
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:

    It would need to be a genuine trade with the intention of making a
    profit, even if that profit doesn't materialise in the first x amount
    of years.

    The guvverment can't have it both ways. If they want to tax me on
    side-hustle profits, they MUST allow me to make side-hustle losses.

    My knowledge is out of date by decades and from HMRC guidance rather than
    legislation but when I looked this up you absolutely couldn't offset business
    losses against other income for tax purposes. There were some limited ways of
    offsetting business losses against profits from the same business in future >> years but I don't know the details.

    Yes, you can carry a loss forward for up to 4 years. There's also side
    loss relief if it's a genuine trade, which it does appear to be in
    Roland's case, which means he could offset the tax paid on pension
    income in the same or previous year.

    I'd rather they just excluded what I'm doing from their field of
    interest. Especially as so much of what I'm doing is extremely
    difficult to define. But in the terms they express it, *is* trade,
    because I buy things mainly (but not exclusively) with the intention
    of selling them, rather than simply de-cluttering my attic.

    One recent example, although the project not yet complete, was buying
    for pennies an almost pristine copy of a famous 1984 home computer User Manual, then hiking it around getting all the listed authors to
    autograph the first page (everyone still alive, but some only-just).

    When complete, this will be a unique artefact, whose value I couldn't
    possibly estimate until sold at a suitable auction.

    Or I might loan it to a museum (one has expressed interest), or auction
    it for charity. So until it's all done and dusted, even *I* don't know
    if this is a for-profit hustle, a hobby, or something else.

    Another example was an original 1960's oil painting, which I picked up
    from an auctioneer wanting rid of it (which he was entitled to do under
    his T&C), for u100, because the original buyer had failed to collect it
    after six months**.

    Oops, I had it authenticated by the artist (which wasn't trivial, but I
    got there in the end, as he answers some emails), and it also turns out
    that earlier in its career it had sold second-hand retail in a gallery
    (which doesn't answer emails) for u5,000. I've failed to determine what
    the artist originally sold it for, because that would probably involve a
    trip to Italy.

    Where I wouldn't also spend a few days on holiday, Honestly Guv.

    Presumably turned up at that auction as part of a larger house-clearance
    by careless executors. The auctioneer knows who they are, but can't tell
    me "Because of Data Protection".

    However, I've decided to keep it, for now, rather than put it on eBay.

    ** Very generous, some auction houses want things collected within days.
    For example I was at Mathewsons a couple of weeks ago (Bangers and
    Cash) and they require paying within 48hrs and collecting within a
    week. Some other car auctions want paying on the day and collecting
    the next.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 15:30:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119ob8l$24n32$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:23:32 on Fri, 2 Oct
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:
    On 02/10/2026 10:21, Roland Perry wrote:

    It's not a business loss, it's a self-employment side-hustle loss. If >>they can tax your extra if you make a profit, the surely they can tax
    you less if you make a loss.

    As I've mentioned to someone above, you can either offset your losses >against future tax (can be carried forward for up to 4 years) , or
    thererCOs something called Sideways Loss Relief, which you can offset >against tax paid on your pensions.

    Thanks. That's much the same as AI told me earlier today. I have, co-incidentally, until 5th October to register for this.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 15:38:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <QD+$UaPs$7vqFAJc@perry.uk>, at 15:30:04 on Fri, 2 Oct 2026,
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> remarked:

    I have, co-incidentally, until 5th October to register for this.

    So that's my weekend trashed.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 15:35:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <119o79b$2345g$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:15:37 on Fri, 2 Oct
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:

    While a domestic trip, I'm not going to Blackpool this coming weekend >>(where there's an event on the Saturday) because I have a growing
    backlog of DIY projects to finish before the winter sets in, and after
    all it's just-a-side-hustle not a fulltime business.

    If I did go, would having a curry in the evening with some of the
    other stallholders cause the trip not to be "wholly business",
    because of the social aspect? What about having a drink in the bar at >>lunchtime...

    Not at all, as long as the expenses only related to the business
    element that's fine, you can claim the evening meal but if you were
    also paying for a business contact's meal it becomes entertainment, and >disallowable.

    All the events I go to are "Dutch", in other words people each pay their
    fair share.

    Although sometimes there are quibbles, for example if the group ordered
    four bottles of wine and most was drunk by 6/10 of the attendees.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Johnson@peter@parksidewood.nospam to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 16:34:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a >nightmare.


    It's a consequence of HMRC trying to clamp down on eBay traders with considerable turnovers, and profits, who, up to now, think they are
    untraceable and don't declare their eBay income/profit. From last year
    eBay have required any trader with a specified turnover/number of
    sales to submit their National Insurance No so that HMRC can be
    informed. I qualified last year but I don't expect to this year.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 16:43:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-10-02, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <d9jvbl9iph94juoj7p494qtm1981ustgtl@4ax.com>, at 16:34:27 on
    Fri, 2 Oct 2026, Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> remarked:
    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a >>>nightmare.

    It's a consequence of HMRC trying to clamp down on eBay traders with >>considerable turnovers,

    I don't think -u1k a year (that's -u2.74/day) is "considerable".

    and profits,

    No, they are only triggered by turnover.

    I think that is probably true, inasmuch as the whole point of the
    updated rules is that HMRC can just tell big companies like eBay
    to give them a report like:

    SELECT users.national_insurance_no,SUM(sales.price) AS total_sales
    FROM users
    INNER JOIN sales ON sales.seller_id=users.id
    GROUP BY users.national_insurance_no
    HAVING total_sales >= 1000.00

    and then telling all those people to file self-assessment forms.
    And eBay of course don't know how much you bought things for, or
    what your overheads are, all they can see is your (eBay) turnover.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roger Hayter@roger@hayter.org to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 17:07:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2 Oct 2026 at 17:43:13 BST, "Jon Ribbens" <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu>
    wrote:

    On 2026-10-02, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <d9jvbl9iph94juoj7p494qtm1981ustgtl@4ax.com>, at 16:34:27 on
    Fri, 2 Oct 2026, Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> remarked:
    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount >>>> of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a
    nightmare.

    It's a consequence of HMRC trying to clamp down on eBay traders with
    considerable turnovers,

    I don't think -u1k a year (that's -u2.74/day) is "considerable".

    and profits,

    No, they are only triggered by turnover.

    I think that is probably true, inasmuch as the whole point of the
    updated rules is that HMRC can just tell big companies like eBay
    to give them a report like:

    SELECT users.national_insurance_no,SUM(sales.price) AS total_sales
    FROM users
    INNER JOIN sales ON sales.seller_id=users.id
    GROUP BY users.national_insurance_no
    HAVING total_sales >= 1000.00

    and then telling all those people to file self-assessment forms.
    And eBay of course don't know how much you bought things for, or
    what your overheads are, all they can see is your (eBay) turnover.

    I presume, that although this does not apply to Roland, you could claim that you are merely selling excess possessions/hoards and household junk/toys you're bored with and have bought no stock in to sell. And therefore are not involved in business?
    --

    Roger Hayter

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 18:15:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    In message <6084054292.08ae5ef0@uninhabited.net>, at 17:07:20 on Fri, 2
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:

    I presume, that although this does not apply to Roland,

    It does, because I also sell things like that too.

    you could claim that you are merely selling excess possessions/hoards
    and household junk/toys you're bored with and have bought no stock in
    to sell. And therefore are not involved in business?

    Business as a side hustle, is selling things you bought to re-sell.
    --
    Roland Perry

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roger Hayter@roger@hayter.org to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 17:31:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2 Oct 2026 at 18:15:30 BST, "Roland Perry" <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <6084054292.08ae5ef0@uninhabited.net>, at 17:07:20 on Fri, 2
    Oct 2026, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> remarked:

    I presume, that although this does not apply to Roland,

    It does, because I also sell things like that too.

    you could claim that you are merely selling excess possessions/hoards
    and household junk/toys you're bored with and have bought no stock in
    to sell. And therefore are not involved in business?

    Business as a side hustle, is selling things you bought to re-sell.

    Quite so. But Ebay does not know that when they report a customer. Perhaps
    they can write to HMRC and tell them why they don't need to do a self assessment form.
    --

    Roger Hayter

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Goodge@usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 21:08:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:34:27 +0100, Peter Johnson
    <peter@parksidewood.nospam> wrote:

    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:

    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount
    of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like
    the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a >>nightmare.


    It's a consequence of HMRC trying to clamp down on eBay traders with >considerable turnovers, and profits, who, up to now, think they are >untraceable and don't declare their eBay income/profit. From last year
    eBay have required any trader with a specified turnover/number of
    sales to submit their National Insurance No so that HMRC can be
    informed. I qualified last year but I don't expect to this year.

    How much do you have to succesfully flog for that to becom a requirement?

    Mark

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 20:30:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-10-02, Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:34:27 +0100, Peter Johnson
    <peter@parksidewood.nospam> wrote:
    On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:40:56 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk>
    wrote:
    Meanwhile...

    I thought we were promised that leaving the EU would reduce the amount >>>of red tape. But not only are we now saddled with extra red tape like >>>the side-hustle taxation, but importing and exporting to the EU is a >>>nightmare.

    It's a consequence of HMRC trying to clamp down on eBay traders with >>considerable turnovers, and profits, who, up to now, think they are >>untraceable and don't declare their eBay income/profit. From last year
    eBay have required any trader with a specified turnover/number of
    sales to submit their National Insurance No so that HMRC can be
    informed. I qualified last year but I don't expect to this year.

    How much do you have to succesfully flog for that to becom a requirement?

    30 sales or -u1,707 total sales income (not counting things like shipping
    costs and eBay fees).

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/help/account/regulatory/sales-reporting/uk-digital-sales-reporting?id=5454

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From GB@NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 18:07:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 13:47, John wrote:

    eg I buy some goods from Ebay for -u500 over the year, and I sell them
    for -u1500. Is my profit -u500 or -u1500 and how much tax do I pay?
    I'm very much hoping that your gross profit is -u1000, but of course you
    might have other expenses to offset. Tax payable depends on other income.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Norman Wells@hex@unseen.ac.am to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 17:23:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 02/10/2026 14:28, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <119o7kt$238hk$1@dont-email.me>, at 13:21:48 on Fri, 2 Oct
    2026, John <megane.06@gmail.com> remarked:

    HMRC would expect you to make profit over time. Obviously a new
    venture would take time to realise a profit, but if you were
    consistently putting in loss making tax returns over several years,
    then HMRC might consider you're not really in business, and the trade
    is really a hobby.

    I can see why they say that, but surely most side-hustles *are* a hobby? (And if you had to pay yourself minimum wage, would almost always be
    running at a loss).

    eg If I go to the monthly auction to buy things, I'm there perhaps five hours, plus an hour each way travelling, so that's -u90, and if I buy something for -u50, tidy it up and list it on eBay, that process will
    take around another hour. What if it then sells for -u40 - that's a loss
    of at least -u100?

    No, it's a loss of -u10 plus any out-of-pocket travel and sale expenses
    you may have incurred. Your time spent on your own side-hustles is not chargeable to anyone and does not figure in any profit/loss account.

    It's down to your business acumen to decide if it's all worthwhile or
    not. If it makes less than you bought it for, however, I would venture
    to suggest that it certainly wasn't.
    It's HMRC who have decided to poke their nose in, if your turnover is
    more than -u1k a year. They made that bed, so have to lay in it.

    I haven't heard them objecting. Have they been?
    Which is why I've suggested it's a ludicrously low threshold, and should
    be at least -u50k, maybe -u90k.

    It is what it is. You can always lobby for change. But why you think
    it's acceptable to have a turnover of -u90k, or even -u50k, and not have
    to declare any profits or pay tax on them (which is what the -u1k
    threshold is all about) is quite beyond me.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Handsome Jack@jack@handsome.com to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 16:16:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On Fri, 2 Oct 2026 15:01:55 -0000 (UTC), Jethro wrote:

    On Fri, 02 Oct 2026 13:21:48 +0100, John wrote:

    On 01/10/2026 05:25, Roland Perry wrote:
    [quoted text muted]

    HMRC would expect you to make profit over time.

    That doesn't make it law. I expect lots of things too.


    It is the law. Section 66 ITA 2007 is required to be satisfied for a loss
    made in a trade to be available to set against wider
    income.

    " 66 Restriction on relief unless trade is commercial
    (1) Trade loss relief against general income for a loss made in a trade in
    a tax year is not available unless the trade is commercial.
    (2) The trade is commercial if it is carried on throughout the tax yearrCo
    (a) on a commercial basis, and
    (b) with a view to the realisation of profits of the trade.
    (3) If at any time a trade is carried on so as to afford a reasonable expectation of profit, it is treated as carried on at that time with a
    view to the realisation of profits.
    (4) If the trade forms part of a larger undertaking, references to profits
    of the trade are to be read as references to profits of the undertaking as
    a whole.. ."

    If either, or both, of the conditions under s 66(2) are not met, then s 66 acts to restrict loss relief under s 64.

    Many businesses manage to just "tick over" by judicious investing and
    writing off.

    My Dads business once rather carelessly made a small profit. However our accountant was quite relaxed and said it would be offset by a small loss
    the next year.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jon Ribbens@jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu to uk.legal.moderated on Fri Oct 2 15:30:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated

    On 2026-10-02, John <megane.06@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 01/10/2026 19:53, Jon Ribbens wrote:

    If you are unhappy with the way things worked out, you know who to blame. >>
    The Tories? Farage? Putin?

    The gullible public, myself included (although I was on holiday at the
    time and forgot to do a postal vote).

    The "gullible public" was massively lied to - not least that what
    was being proposed and what they were voting for was some sort of
    Norway-style halfway house with membership of the single market etc,
    but as soon as the referendum was over history was suddenly rewritten
    such that anything less than the total removal of the letters E and U
    from the English alphabet would somehow be a "betrayal of Brexit".

    I think in hindsight it was a mistake (Roland makes an excellent point
    on importing goods) and I can't see how Britain has benefited from it.

    It appears that a considerable majority of people in the country agree
    now that it was a huge mistake.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2