From Newsgroup: uk.legal.moderated
An interesting legal development
https://danielpocock.com/en/winding-up-petition-leaked-before-service- reform-uk-party-limited/
20:00 Thu, 24 Sep 2026
At about 10:30 BST, I completed the online submission of the winding-up petition against Reform UK Party Limited.
At 10:44 BST, I received an email from the court telling me the filing
had been approved with case number CR-2026-007405. The email asked for somebody to call the court and confirm a deposit for the Official
Receiver, in the case the debtor has no assets at all to cover the cost
of the process.
At 10:56 the payment was processed.
At 11:14 the court sent me a copy of the winding-up petition against
Reform UK Party Limited with the court's seal on it.
A few minutes later, I forwarded the official version of the petition to
a process server.
At 13:02, a post appeared in the social control media account for the MouseInTheCourt web site. Direct link to Twitter/X post.
The social media post includes a "Case View" screenshot from the court management web site.
At 13:30 the documents were formally served at the registered office of Reform.
At 14:03 I received the first communication from a journalist about the winding up of Reform UK Party Limited.
At 17:38 BST, the story went live on Bloomberg.
According to guidance from The Gazette, the debtor normally has a grace
period of seven days before the insolvency procedure becomes public
knowledge. There is good reason for this: once people start talking about
the winding-up, other creditors may join the procedure while donors or customers will stop giving money to the organisation. Like a run on a
bank, the perception the organisation is about to fail can take on a mind
of its own.
I had fully intended to respect the seven day grace period without
mentioning the petition on my blog or anywhere else. My respect for the process has been usurped by the leak obtained by MouseInTheCourt.
In a normal insolvency procedure, creditors are typically looking to
maximise their own return. In many situations, a creditor would be happy
to receive their payment within the seven day grace period. Sometimes the creditor will continue trading with the same debtor after the affair is
put behind them.
In the case of Reform UK, there are significant public interest questions
to be addressed and those questions may be far more significant than the
sum of money I am claiming personally.
Reform UK's failure to respond to my Statutory Demand gave me the
opportunity to ask a High Court judge to focus on Reform UK's solvency at
a time that may be extremely inconvenient for them. If Reform UK pays me
now, the normal thing to do would be to write to the court and withdraw
the petition. Yet there is nothing to stop other creditors, donors or
members of the party from contacting the High Court insolvency list and
asking to be included in the case.
Specifically, a judge may decide the enormous donations from non-resident billionaires need to be kept in a frozen bank account until the
parliament votes on whether or not to backdate the regulations banning
those donations.
Rank-and-file members of Reform UK, the mums and dads who contribute
twenty pounds per month, may be surprised to find their money could be
seized in the future to cover the reimbursement of illegal donations. The
High Court judges presiding over insolvency cases have various remedies
at their disposal to protect the public from such consequences.
BBC journalist Catrin Nye published a compelling account of the
Lighthouse cult. In the report, she explains how once this organisation
came before the courts, the judge decided that it had to be completely
shut down to protect the public. What is the difference between a
political party and a cult anyway?
On 28 March this year, there was a hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice
in London attended by around 20 Lighthouse associates and mentees,
including Paul Waugh.
Government investigators told the court that it was "wholly unclear" what Lighthouse actually does. Despite the claims of pioneering research, they could "only identify significant amounts of money passing to Paul Waugh
as its prime mover".
Judge Cheryl Jones decided it was in the public interest to close down Lighthouse International Group Holdings Trading LLP.
As he left the courtroom, Paul Waugh told us he had wanted to close
Lighthouse down for a while - but that the group would not be stopping
its work. It was now going global.
When asked why so many people think his group is a cult, he said: "They
don't know what a cult is& they're slurring us, they're smearing us." He
added that most of our allegations "were absolute nonsense".
Farage may be planning exactly the same thing: he may spend the foreign
money as quickly as he can and then shut down the Reform UK party
himself, telling everybody to blame the Establishment and join some new post-Reform party.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2