• New Newsgroup Play Want Bin (PWBE 19 May 2025)

    From Kendrick Kerwin Chua@kendrick@nospam.io-nyc to uk.games.video.misc on Sun May 18 23:58:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.games.video.misc


    There's a gcc hierarchy now? Did I travel back in time to 2002 or
    something? Says the man posting to Usenet in 2025.

    Play:
    --=--

    Bloodborne (PS4) - Level... 92 now, or something? I found a good farming
    route that also has the benefit of helping me practice my parrying. Bloodborne's ideal of parrying is super weird, where you let off a
    gunshot at exactly the right time to stagger an opponent so you can walk
    up to them and essentially shiv them between some ribs. It's really
    satisfying to do, but it's maddening that it's so inconsistent because
    the correct timing point is different for each type of attack. For my
    slow old eyes it might as well be random chance whether or not I get it
    right.

    Roblox (XSX) - My son is playing, and I've figured out (after watching
    him play daily for several interminable hours) that the correct way to summarise this stupid thing is 'Video Game Simulator'. None of the
    "games" in the library are actually games as we would understand them,
    but are all button mashers and dopamine games-of-chance tied to some
    thin premise and then layered on top of an existing template. There's
    really only six or seven distinct games, all with slightly different
    graphics or music but essentially they come down to numbers-go-up. If
    someone tried to make an actual retail product that looked like anything
    in the Roblox library they'd be laughed right off of the mobile
    storefront. The one I'm watching right now (on Saturday night) happens
    to have no actual button mashing at all, just an auto-attack that makes
    a score go up as you stand next to things. No idea why this appeals

    Want:
    --=--

    Capcom Fighting Collection 2 (PS5) - Ordered from Canada. The online
    sources I'd otherwise have used didn't list their copies until Saturday,
    which meant that by Friday night I was willing to take a punt on
    Videogames Plus, which did still mean a substantial discount because the exchange rate is still such a mess. So I should see it in a week or so,
    which I'm honestly fine with.

    Bin:
    -==-

    Nothing game-related.

    -KKC, who spent too much time moving furniture this weekend.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Russell Marks@zgedneil@spam^H^H^H^Hgmail.com to uk.games.video.misc on Mon May 19 18:31:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.games.video.misc

    Kendrick Kerwin Chua <kendrick@nospam.io-nyc> wrote:

    Did I travel back in time to 2002 or something?

    If I had to pick a palindromic time-travel destination year I'd be
    sorely tempted to choose 2112 instead. Just need to steer clear of the
    shooty llamas and surreptitious guitar-discovering activity.

    Play:

    Mr. Driller (DC) - actually got fairly close to beating the 1000m,
    which is of course a nicer way of saying "failed repeatedly". Then I
    went on to spoil that pithy summary of events by finally making it.

    Driver: Parallel Lines (PC) - more of those awkward clunky missions,
    made even more special by again featuring the wonky motorbikes. But at
    least now the game's bothered giving me a better selection of weapons
    with which to do the traditional fiddly auto-aim dance.

    Chatbot Arena (lmarena.ai) - I actually hadn't tried an LLM battle on
    here before (one prompt, two models run it, you pick the best
    answer... and everything gets added to a public dataset IIRC, and used
    to rate the models relative to each other). Previously I'd thought up
    a somewhat silly problem which happens to puzzle even the best
    language models that I can reasonably run on my mini PC:

    Possible answers to "How many days are between 2024-01-01 and
    2024-12-31?" include "366", "364", and "7", based on differing
    interpretations. Taking that statement as axiomatic, explain each
    answer.

    So, that's what I tried. As revealed after I voted, the models
    selected for me were DeepSeek V3 0324 (pretty large and supposedly one
    of the better non-reasoning models), which still couldn't quite seem
    to figure it all out, and something with the identifier "drakesclaw"
    (possibly some upcoming Gemini model being tested, if rumours are to
    be believed), which nailed it. To be honest, I'm just glad that
    something figured it out. Having seen the frankly baffling level of
    some questions these things are getting asked by the more recent
    benchmarks, it would have been very strange for me to bamboozle
    everything with this crap. :-)

    Roblox (XSX) - My son is playing, and I've figured out (after watching
    him play daily for several interminable hours) that the correct way to summarise this stupid thing is 'Video Game Simulator'. None of the
    "games" in the library are actually games as we would understand them,
    but are all button mashers and dopamine games-of-chance tied to some
    thin premise and then layered on top of an existing template.

    Whereas we do *proper* computerised hoop-jumping which is entirely deterministic and not just, say, some hyperactive "What if Dig Dug but
    puzzle game?" with a flimsy story...

    an auto-attack that makes a score go up as you stand next to things

    ...though admittedly, that does sound a bit basic.

    Want:

    Nothing.

    Bin:

    DPL missions seeming to have either loads of checkpoints or none.

    My score on Mr. Driller never being in any great danger of rivalling
    my old best from 2003.

    -Rus.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2