My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by double- and single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather station; the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2
Temperature B
Rainfall B
Wind C
Urban Climate Zone 5
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures, one wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this alleged record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of allZone 5
places, in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects
of airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by double-
and single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather
station; the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2 Temperature B Rainfall B Wind C Urban Climate
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures,
one wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this
alleged record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there weren't
all these buildings/trees/expanses of water/fields/runways/car parks/ roofs/hills/whatever. That is what the whole of the UK is like. You may
as well say the reading is invalid because it's caused by unusual weather.
TW
On 25 Jun 2026 at 14:31:41 BST, "TimW" <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there weren't
all these buildings/trees/expanses of water/fields/runways/car parks/
roofs/hills/whatever. That is what the whole of the UK is like. You may
as well say the reading is invalid because it's caused by unusual weather. >>
TW
To be fair, if the temperature were actually taken inside an oven one might quibble. Short of that, I agree, the temperature is the temperature where actual people are to be found. Subject to the usual screening from direct sunlight, etc.
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there weren't
all these buildings/trees/expanses of water/fields/runways/car parks/ roofs/hills/whatever. That is what the whole of the UK is like. You may
as well say the reading is invalid because it's caused by unusual weather.
TW
Our local metman/oceanographer was suspicious of the Southampton 1976
record and then the new provisional Gosport one got him thinking .
"Looking at how the temperatures peaked at the Coastwatch stations
around the Solent it looks like the cause may indeed be the Isle of
Wight, but not due to a foehn effect (the hills are too low). It seems
to be due to the area of the IoW being enough to modify the sea breeze.
Thus in a case where temperatures would peak along the South coast
rather than inland (presumably due to differential advection from
Europe) but do not because of moderation by the sea breeze, the latter
is suppressed along the mainland coast of the Solent by the IoW. Then
add in the city heat island effect for places like Gosport/Portsmouth
and Southampton and you get a peak temperature."
Seems plausible
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing
readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was
announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the
rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a >> proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by double- and >> single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather station; >> the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2
Temperature B
Rainfall B
Wind C
Urban Climate Zone 5
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO >> until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures, one
wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this alleged
record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
On 25/06/2026 14:37, Roger Hayter wrote:
On 25 Jun 2026 at 14:31:41 BST, "TimW" <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there weren't
all these buildings/trees/expanses of water/fields/runways/car parks/
roofs/hills/whatever. That is what the whole of the UK is like. You may
as well say the reading is invalid because it's caused by unusual weather. >>
TW
To be fair, if the temperature were actually taken inside an oven one might quibble. Short of that, I agree, the temperature is the temperature where actual people are to be found. Subject to the usual screening from direct sunlight, etc.
I think the old British standard was that louvred box, a certain height
off the ground, shaded, ventilated.
TW
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there
weren't all these buildings/trees/expanses of
water/fields/runways/car parks/ roofs/hills/whatever. That is what
the whole of the UK is like. You may as well say the reading is
invalid because it's caused by unusual weather.
TW
On 14:31 25 Jun 2026, TimW said:
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there
weren't all these buildings/trees/expanses of
water/fields/runways/car parks/ roofs/hills/whatever. That is what
the whole of the UK is like. You may as well say the reading is
invalid because it's caused by unusual weather.
TW
It's not quite that simple.
I have an outdoor wireless thermometer whose readings would be affected by its immediate location, even if it gave the temperature accurately.
I live on a hillside, so the back of the house is subject to cold air settling and gets trapped in way which prevents it rolling down the hill.
I want the reading to reflect what I would feel if I walked outdoors (not
the ground temperature) so the device is mounted about 5 feet up, on a
handy washing line pole.
On 14:31 25 Jun 2026, TimW said:
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there
weren't all these buildings/trees/expanses of
water/fields/runways/car parks/ roofs/hills/whatever. That is what
the whole of the UK is like. You may as well say the reading is
invalid because it's caused by unusual weather.
TW
It's not quite that simple.
I have an outdoor wireless thermometer whose readings would be affected by its immediate location, even if it gave the temperature accurately.
I live on a hillside, so the back of the house is subject to cold air settling and gets trapped in way which prevents it rolling down the hill.
I want the reading to reflect what I would feel if I walked outdoors (not
the ground temperature) so the device is mounted about 5 feet up, on a
handy washing line pole.
In article <111jc20$3qj3g$1@dont-email.me>, timw@nomailta.co.uk says...
On 25/06/2026 14:37, Roger Hayter wrote:
On 25 Jun 2026 at 14:31:41 BST, "TimW" <timw@nomailta.co.uk> wrote:I think the old British standard was that louvred box, a certain height
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there weren't >>>> all these buildings/trees/expanses of water/fields/runways/car parks/
roofs/hills/whatever. That is what the whole of the UK is like. You may >>>> as well say the reading is invalid because it's caused by unusual weather. >>>>
TW
To be fair, if the temperature were actually taken inside an oven one might >>> quibble. Short of that, I agree, the temperature is the temperature where >>> actual people are to be found. Subject to the usual screening from direct >>> sunlight, etc.
off the ground, shaded, ventilated.
TW
The 'Stevenson Screen'. Still the definitive method of recording
weather, AFAIK. If it has been superseded, fair enough, but all compared readings should be from that or it's replacement assuming it has been installed correctly in the first place.
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by double- and single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather station; the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2
Temperature B
Rainfall B
Wind C
Urban Climate Zone 5
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures, one wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this alleged record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing
readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was
announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the
rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a >> proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by double- and >> single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather station; >> the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2
Temperature B
Rainfall B
Wind C
Urban Climate Zone 5
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO >> until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures, one
wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this alleged
record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
Well, the new June record was recorded at the Royal Naval Air Station Merryfield, close to a nice black-tarmac taxi-way that connects the three major runways.
Co-ordinates from the Met Office:
50.96047, -2.93217
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either airfields, airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country locations?
Well, the new June record was recorded at the Royal Naval Air Station
Merryfield, close to a nice black-tarmac taxi-way that connects the three
major runways.
Co-ordinates from the Met Office:
50.96047, -2.93217
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either airfields, >> airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country locations?
On 25 Jun 2026 at 23:27:19 BST, TimW wrote:
Well, the new June record was recorded at the Royal Naval Air Station
Merryfield, close to a nice black-tarmac taxi-way that connects the three >>> major runways.
Co-ordinates from the Met Office:
50.96047, -2.93217
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either airfields, >>> airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country locations?
That one is at a country location - look it up. And if you don't know (did you
miss that class?), why don't you ask the met office? Might be nice to touch base with your fellow climate scientists.
I did ask them when I used to use their data, and got a detailed reply. A couple of weather stations were in quite 'challenging' locations and I wondered how they dealt with it. Can't remember the exact reply but it was something to do with weighting.
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing
readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was
announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the
rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a >> proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by double- and >> single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather station; >> the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2
Temperature B
Rainfall B
Wind C
Urban Climate Zone 5
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO >> until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures, one
wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this alleged
record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
Well, the new June record was recorded at the Royal Naval Air Station Merryfield, close to a nice black-tarmac taxi-way that connects the three major runways.
Co-ordinates from the Met Office:
50.96047, -2.93217
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either airfields, airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country locations?
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing
readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was
announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the
rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a >> proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by double- and >> single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather station; >> the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2
Temperature B
Rainfall B
Wind C
Urban Climate Zone 5
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO >> until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures, one
wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this alleged
record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
Well, the new June record was recorded at the Royal Naval Air Station Merryfield, close to a nice black-tarmac taxi-way that connects the three major runways.
Co-ordinates from the Met Office:
50.96047, -2.93217
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either airfields, airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country locations?
That one is at a country location - look it up. And if you don't know (did you
miss that class?), why don't you ask the met office? Might be nice to touch base with your fellow climate scientists.
On 25/06/2026 22:43, Spike wrote:
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:Actually because that is where most of the weather stations are. Flying needs accurate weather so as far as I know every airbase or airport has
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all
places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing
readings that looked liked-a breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was
announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the >>> rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a >>> proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by
double- and
single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather
station;
the web page ratings say this:
Exposure-a-a-a 2
Temperature-a-a-a B
Rainfall-a-a-a B
Wind-a-a-a C
Urban Climate Zone-a-a-a 5
Reporting Hours-a-a-a-a-a C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO >>> until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures,
one
wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this
alleged
record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
Well, the new June record was recorded at the Royal Naval Air Station
Merryfield, close to a nice black-tarmac taxi-way that connects the three
major runways.
Co-ordinates from the Met Office:
50.96047, -2.93217
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either
airfields,
airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country locations?
a weather station.
Its pointless saying its influenced by the tarmac, its likely every
record from the past was influenced by tarmac, so it might be a little higher than the surroundings, but so were all the previous records....
Dave
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there weren't
all these buildings/trees/expanses of water/fields/runways/car parks/ roofs/hills/whatever. That is what the whole of the UK is like. You may
as well say the reading is invalid because it's caused by unusual weather.
TW
On 25/06/2026 14:31, TimW wrote:
On 25/06/2026 13:38, Spike wrote:
[snipped rubbish]
The temperature is the temperature.
It is what it reads on the thermometer.
It's no good saying the temperature would be different if there weren't
all these buildings/trees/expanses of water/fields/runways/car parks/
roofs/hills/whatever. That is what the whole of the UK is like. You may
as well say the reading is invalid because it's caused by unusual
weather.
TW
I read something a few months ago where a meteorologist explained that
when weather stations were first set up they were placed in open
countryside. Gradually over time urban sprawl had replace countryside
by roads and buildings which absorb and re-radiate previous heat.
He managed to find some weather stations that were still in open
countryside (Green belts have their uses) and compare them with others
not far way but now in urban heat islands, and the difference in maximum temperature reading was considerable.
I read something a few months ago where a meteorologist explained that
when weather stations were first set up they were placed in open countryside. Gradually over time urban sprawl had replace countryside
by roads and buildings which absorb and re-radiate previous heat.
He managed to find some weather stations that were still in open
countryside (Green belts have their uses) and compare them with others
not far way but now in urban heat islands, and the difference in maximum temperature reading was considerable.
On 25/06/2026 22:43, Spike wrote:
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:Merryfield, deep in the Somerset countryside, miles from any urban concentration of tarmac and steel roofs, well off to the side of an
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all
places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing
readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was
announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the >>> rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a >>> proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by
double- and
single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather
station;
the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2
Temperature B
Rainfall B
Wind C
Urban Climate Zone 5
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO >>> until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures,
one
wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this
alleged
record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
Well, the new June record was recorded at the Royal Naval Air Station
Merryfield, close to a nice black-tarmac taxi-way that connects the three
major runways.
Co-ordinates from the Met Office:
50.96047, -2.93217
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either
airfields,
airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country locations?
airfield which is 95% grass...
...you are a right wing Farage loving moron
TW
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either
airfields, airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country
locations?
Wisley and Kew , gardens not the PRO, often appear in such lesser record citings, hardly tarmac deserts. But on the other hand close to a major
urban heat island, the way Gravesend and Tilbury often get cited , being
down wind of the same major urban heat island
On 25 Jun 2026 21:43:00 GMT
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Pilots need accurate temperature, pressure and wind data. They can't
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either
airfields, airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country
locations?
get it throughout the flight, but they can get it at both ends. Small
planes don't have fancy radar altimeters, so they need to adjust their aneroid ones between takeoff and landing to keep them accurate.
Few other people apart from the Met Office itself have a need to
maintain an accurate weather site, so there are virtually none. There
are a few amateur sites e.g. https://chelmervillage-weather.co.uk but
they will not usually be accredited.
On 25 Jun 2026 21:43:00 GMT
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either
airfields, airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country
locations?
Pilots need accurate temperature, pressure and wind data. They can't
get it throughout the flight, but they can get it at both ends. Small
planes don't have fancy radar altimeters, so they need to adjust their aneroid ones between takeoff and landing to keep them accurate.
Few other people apart from the Met Office itself have a need to
maintain an accurate weather site, so there are virtually none. There
are a few amateur sites e.g. https://chelmervillage-weather.co.uk but
they will not usually be accredited.
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
My curiosity was raised by the new temperature record set, of all places,
in Gosport, Hampshire. I had been monitoring the usual suspects of
airfields and airports throughout the afternoon, and none was showing
readings that looked liked breaking records.
Colour me surprised when the new record (provisional, of course) was
announced, at Gosport.
I went on the Met OfficerCOs WOW web site, and found that details on the
rCyEnthusiastrCO Gosport weather station were very sparse indeed.
Using the sketch map of the siterCOs location, and marrying that up with a >> proper Maps app, I located the weather station to an urban site.
It appears to be located in a back garden, mostly surrounded by double- and >> single-storey buildings, together with solid fencing.
I have my suspicions that this is not an ideal site for a weather station; >> the web page ratings say this:
Exposure 2
Temperature B
Rainfall B
Wind C
Urban Climate Zone 5
Reporting Hours C
I understand that the temperature reading is regarded as rCyprovisionalrCO >> until the Met Office carries out checks.
Given the amount of climate hype concerning the current temperatures, one
wonders if the Met Office could garner the nous to downgrade this alleged
record, if this B-rated site is found to fail its review?
Well, the new June record was recorded at the Royal Naval Air Station Merryfield, close to a nice black-tarmac taxi-way that connects the three major runways.
Co-ordinates from the Met Office:
50.96047, -2.93217
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either airfields, airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country locations?
He managed to find some weather stations that were still in open
countryside (Green belts have their uses) and compare them with others
not far way but now in urban heat islands, and the difference in maximum temperature reading was considerable.
Indy Jess John <bathwatchdog@OMITTHISgooglemail.com> wrote:
I read something a few months ago where a meteorologist explained that
when weather stations were first set up they were placed in open
countryside. Gradually over time urban sprawl had replace countryside
by roads and buildings which absorb and re-radiate previous heat.
He managed to find some weather stations that were still in open
countryside (Green belts have their uses) and compare them with others
not far way but now in urban heat islands, and the difference in maximum
temperature reading was considerable.
Down in the South West, the local TV weather forecasts regularly show two areas that greatly exceed the forecast temperatures for the region in general, generally 6 to 8 degrees hotter.
Where are these two areas?
Yes! Exeter airport and Yeovilton Naval Air Station.
On 25 Jun 2026 21:43:00 GMT
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
Pilots need accurate temperature, pressure and wind data. They can't
Can someone explain why all temperature records occur in either
airfields, airports, or urban heat islands? And none at country
locations?
get it throughout the flight, but they can get it at both ends. Small
planes don't have fancy radar altimeters, so they need to adjust their aneroid ones between takeoff and landing to keep them accurate.
Few other people apart from the Met Office itself have a need to
maintain an accurate weather site, so there are virtually none. There
are a few amateur sites e.g. https://chelmervillage-weather.co.uk but
they will not usually be accredited.
because nobody lives in the country,Fuck you
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 70 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 39:32:22 |
| Calls: | 948 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,325 |
| Messages: | 280,644 |