• 1Password -> Passwords

    From Mark@captain.black@gmail.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sun Feb 15 20:52:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    What's the deal with 1P these days? I have the older, free version on my Intel MBA (and iPhone), and while I mainly use Passwords now, I do access 1P every
    so often.

    Moving everything to Sequoia/Silicon now... Looks like there's no more free
    1P? Is my only option to migrate to Passwords completely (looks like I can export the data in there to Passwords) without paying for 1P? I have no
    problem with that - Passwords seems to be fit-for-use!
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Patrick@fakefake89@madeup.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Sun Feb 15 17:58:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 2/15/26 2:52 PM, Mark wrote:
    What's the deal with 1P these days? I have the older, free version on my Intel
    MBA (and iPhone), and while I mainly use Passwords now, I do access 1P every so often.

    Moving everything to Sequoia/Silicon now... Looks like there's no more free 1P? Is my only option to migrate to Passwords completely (looks like I can export the data in there to Passwords) without paying for 1P? I have no problem with that - Passwords seems to be fit-for-use!
    I was a heavy user of 1Password for years. I switched to Passwords back
    in 2022 and haven't looked back. The browser integration is superior,
    the auto-fill is far less annoying, and saves a few bucks. My experience
    has been that 1Password will keep your data but adding/editing is
    limited if you don't pay. Unless there are things in 1P that are not compatible with Passwords like documents you don't have another place
    for. I would migrate out.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ian McCall@ian@eruvia.org to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Feb 16 00:05:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 15 Feb 2026, Patrick wrote
    (in article <10mtmig$eu1s$1@dont-email.me>):

    I was a heavy user of 1Password for years. I switched to Passwords back
    in 2022 and haven't looked back. The browser integration is superior,
    the auto-fill is far less annoying, and saves a few bucks. My experience
    has been that 1Password will keep your data but adding/editing is
    limited if you don't pay. Unless there are things in 1P that are not compatible with Passwords like documents you don't have another place
    for. I would migrate out.

    IrCOm a heavy user of 1Password and while IrCOve looked at Passwords, itrCOs not close for me at the moment. I pay for the family subscription.

    I donrCOt think Passwords will ever be close, because I donrCOt think itrCOs aiming to be close. Passwords is for, well...passwords. 1Password can do a
    lot more than that - editable fields, extra sections, notes, different forms of generations, IDs...

    For a pure username/password thing Passwords is mosty fine (unless you use Linux, which I do). If you use things more heavily then 1Passwords still has it soundly beaten...but at a cost, and yes the browser plugin is a bit more slick on Passwords.

    Cheers,
    Ian


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@captain.black@gmail.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Feb 16 09:30:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> wrote:
    On 15 Feb 2026, Patrick wrote
    (in article <10mtmig$eu1s$1@dont-email.me>):

    I was a heavy user of 1Password for years. I switched to Passwords back
    in 2022 and haven't looked back. The browser integration is superior,
    the auto-fill is far less annoying, and saves a few bucks. My experience
    has been that 1Password will keep your data but adding/editing is
    limited if you don't pay. Unless there are things in 1P that are not
    compatible with Passwords like documents you don't have another place
    for. I would migrate out.

    IrCOm a heavy user of 1Password and while IrCOve looked at Passwords, itrCOs not close for me at the moment. I pay for the family subscription.

    I donrCOt think Passwords will ever be close, because I donrCOt think itrCOs aiming to be close. Passwords is for, well...passwords. 1Password can do a lot more than that - editable fields, extra sections, notes, different forms of generations, IDs...

    For a pure username/password thing Passwords is mosty fine (unless you use Linux, which I do). If you use things more heavily then 1Passwords still has it soundly beaten...but at a cost, and yes the browser plugin is a bit more slick on Passwords.

    Cheers,
    Ian




    I think I should be good just with Passwords - Mac/iOS only, no other data besides passwordsrCa IrCOll migrate it over anyway for now (if that works!) and wean myself off 1P. Thanks.
    --
    Cheers rCa Mark
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@captain.black@gmail.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Feb 16 09:29:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Patrick <fakefake89@madeup.com> wrote:
    On 2/15/26 2:52 PM, Mark wrote:
    What's the deal with 1P these days? I have the older, free version on my Intel
    MBA (and iPhone), and while I mainly use Passwords now, I do access 1P every >> so often.

    Moving everything to Sequoia/Silicon now... Looks like there's no more free >> 1P? Is my only option to migrate to Passwords completely (looks like I can >> export the data in there to Passwords) without paying for 1P? I have no
    problem with that - Passwords seems to be fit-for-use!
    I was a heavy user of 1Password for years. I switched to Passwords back
    in 2022 and haven't looked back. The browser integration is superior,
    the auto-fill is far less annoying, and saves a few bucks. My experience
    has been that 1Password will keep your data but adding/editing is
    limited if you don't pay. Unless there are things in 1P that are not compatible with Passwords like documents you don't have another place
    for. I would migrate out.


    As far as I remember I donrCOt have anything else besides actual passwords in 1P. Besides everything else going on, I may migrate 1P over -for now- and
    then work on moving anything I donrCOt already have in Passwords over.
    Thanks.
    --
    Cheers rCa Mark
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy H@thewildrover@icloud.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Feb 16 11:47:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Mark <captain.black@gmail.com> wrote:
    What's the deal with 1P these days? I have the older, free version on my Intel
    MBA (and iPhone), and while I mainly use Passwords now, I do access 1P every so often.

    Moving everything to Sequoia/Silicon now... Looks like there's no more free 1P? Is my only option to migrate to Passwords completely (looks like I can export the data in there to Passwords) without paying for 1P? I have no problem with that - Passwords seems to be fit-for-use!

    I mainly use Passwords now, and it seems to do all I need. ItrCOs very
    seamless across Apple devices, and does work in third party apps now too.

    I was using Bitwarden for a while before that, and still keep it running alongside, but mostly for keeping my banks cards and software licences
    easily available. I havenrCOt bothered cancelling the paid service yet, itrCOs less than -u20 per year, as IrCOm still hedging my bets a little, in case I ever did decide to ditch Apple (unlikely, if circumstances ever dictated
    itrCa. Who knows).

    For me Passwords, and even the old Keychain before it, just seem to work
    better when logging into stuff. Especially if you have started using
    Passkeys. It does generally rCyjust workrCO, and even simplifies entering OTPs.

    Of course if yourCOre multi-platform, then that does change things.

    However, if you did want a less costly alternative to 1P, then you could do
    a lot worse than Bitwarden, which also works with Linux, and can be used reasonably well for free.
    --
    Andy H
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Feb 16 12:23:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 2026-02-16, Mark <captain.black@gmail.com> wrote:
    Patrick <fakefake89@madeup.com> wrote:
    On 2/15/26 2:52 PM, Mark wrote:
    What's the deal with 1P these days? I have the older, free version on my Intel
    MBA (and iPhone), and while I mainly use Passwords now, I do access 1P every
    so often.

    Moving everything to Sequoia/Silicon now... Looks like there's no more free >>> 1P? Is my only option to migrate to Passwords completely (looks like I can >>> export the data in there to Passwords) without paying for 1P? I have no
    problem with that - Passwords seems to be fit-for-use!
    I was a heavy user of 1Password for years. I switched to Passwords back
    in 2022 and haven't looked back. The browser integration is superior,
    the auto-fill is far less annoying, and saves a few bucks. My experience
    has been that 1Password will keep your data but adding/editing is
    limited if you don't pay. Unless there are things in 1P that are not
    compatible with Passwords like documents you don't have another place
    for. I would migrate out.


    As far as I remember I donrCOt have anything else besides actual passwords in 1P. Besides everything else going on, I may migrate 1P over -for now- and then work on moving anything I donrCOt already have in Passwords over. Thanks.

    I've been using the Passwords app ever since it was introduced
    and have had no major problems.
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TimH@thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Mon Feb 16 20:58:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 16 Feb 2026 at 11:47:20rC>am GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    However, if you did want a less costly alternative to 1P, then you could do
    a lot worse than Bitwarden, which also works with Linux, and can be used reasonably well for free.

    +1 for BitWarden. Certainly not as slick as either Passwords or 1Password, but I'm very happy with it.
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to uk.comp.sys.mac on Tue Feb 17 08:18:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 16.02.26 21:58, TimH wrote:
    On 16 Feb 2026 at 11:47:20rC>am GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    However, if you did want a less costly alternative to 1P, then you could do >> a lot worse than Bitwarden, which also works with Linux, and can be used
    reasonably well for free.

    +1 for BitWarden. Certainly not as slick as either Passwords or 1Password, but
    I'm very happy with it.

    The Zurich Institute of Technogy discovered severe security issues with Bitvarden and 1Password.

    https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2026/02/password-managers-less-secure-than-promised.html

    I clearly prefer the PW-manager of Thunderbird, Firefox and Passwords.

    J||rg
    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita" (Augustinus)
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TimH@thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Tue Feb 17 11:05:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 17 Feb 2026 at 7:18:24rC>am GMT, "J||rg Lorenz" <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:

    The Zurich Institute of Technogy discovered severe security issues with Bitvarden and 1Password.

    https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2026/02/password-managers-less-secure-than-promised.html

    Actually it doesn't mention 1Password.

    I'm rather confused by this from the article:

    "The researchers demonstrated 12 attacks on Bitwarden, 7 on LastPass and 6 on Dashlane.
    To do this, they set up their own servers that behave like a hacked password manager server."

    So they attacked a server which they'd intentionally misconfigured?
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From richard@richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) to uk.comp.sys.mac on Tue Feb 17 11:12:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    In article <mvj0bcFp7hmU1@mid.individual.net>,
    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    So they attacked a server which they'd intentionally misconfigured?

    The point is that the supposed strength of the password managers is
    that they don't have access to your plaintext passwords, so that it
    shouldn't be possible to find passwords even by taking over the
    company's servers.

    -- Richard
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TimH@thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Tue Feb 17 11:29:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 17 Feb 2026 at 11:12:12rC>am GMT, "Richard Tobin" <Richard Tobin> wrote:

    In article <mvj0bcFp7hmU1@mid.individual.net>,
    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    So they attacked a server which they'd intentionally misconfigured?

    The point is that the supposed strength of the password managers is
    that they don't have access to your plaintext passwords, so that it
    shouldn't be possible to find passwords even by taking over the
    company's servers.

    Ah! Thanks.
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy H@thewildrover@icloud.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Tue Feb 17 21:03:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 17 Feb 2026 at 11:12:12rC>am GMT, "Richard Tobin" <Richard Tobin> wrote:

    In article <mvj0bcFp7hmU1@mid.individual.net>,
    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    So they attacked a server which they'd intentionally misconfigured?

    The point is that the supposed strength of the password managers is
    that they don't have access to your plaintext passwords, so that it
    shouldn't be possible to find passwords even by taking over the
    company's servers.

    Ah! Thanks.

    Hmm, yes, certainly of interest. Perhaps a better real world test would be
    more useful. Say, work with each company to see if they can actually breach
    the real servers. Of course, I am no expert here, but these are all well regarded password systems, if theyrCOre really not that secure, then what
    hope do we have.

    All said, I have always been if theyrCOre really not opinion that if a
    criminal really wants something, they *will* get it eventually.

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).
    --
    Andy H
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy H@thewildrover@icloud.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Tue Feb 17 21:05:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Andy H <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:
    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 17 Feb 2026 at 11:12:12rC>am GMT, "Richard Tobin" <Richard Tobin> wrote: >>
    In article <mvj0bcFp7hmU1@mid.individual.net>,
    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:

    So they attacked a server which they'd intentionally misconfigured?

    The point is that the supposed strength of the password managers is
    that they don't have access to your plaintext passwords, so that it
    shouldn't be possible to find passwords even by taking over the
    company's servers.

    Ah! Thanks.

    Hmm, yes, certainly of interest. Perhaps a better real world test would be more useful. Say, work with each company to see if they can actually breach the real servers. Of course, I am no expert here, but these are all well regarded password systems, if theyrCOre really not that secure, then what hope do we have.

    All said, I have always been if theyrCOre really not opinion that if a criminal really wants something, they *will* get it eventually.

    Flipping auto-fill! That should be rCyI have always been of the opinionrCO. :-/ --
    Andy H
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Wed Feb 18 10:03:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 2026-02-17, Andy H <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).

    .... or on a note under a cushion on an armchair. The trouble was that Mrs B found it, didn't know what it was and threw into the bin.
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy H@thewildrover@icloud.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Wed Feb 18 12:44:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    Alan B <alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 2026-02-17, Andy H <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or >> post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).

    .... or on a note under a cushion on an armchair. The trouble was that Mrs B found it, didn't know what it was and threw into the bin.

    What, you didnrCOt have a photocopy backup? :-O
    --
    Andy H
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TimH@thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Wed Feb 18 13:06:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 17 Feb 2026 at 9:03:43rC>pm GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).

    That's funny - I saw this the other day:

    "security advice, 1996: writing your passwords down in a notebook is a very
    bad idea and nobody should do it
    security advice, 2026: writing your passwords down in a notebook is one of the most secure storage methods for most users

    (fun how threat models change over time, eh?)"
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy H@thewildrover@icloud.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Wed Feb 18 14:49:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 17 Feb 2026 at 9:03:43rC>pm GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or >> post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).

    That's funny - I saw this the other day:

    "security advice, 1996: writing your passwords down in a notebook is a very bad idea and nobody should do it
    security advice, 2026: writing your passwords down in a notebook is one of the
    most secure storage methods for most users

    (fun how threat models change over time, eh?)"

    ROFLOL, yup.

    Not only that, IrCOm currently listening to a 48 year old Rick Wakeman album
    on a 49 year old Technics turntable, with its similarly aged cartridge,
    through a 44 year old amplifier.

    And yes, it does sound better! (Or at least I find the listening experience more enjoyable).
    --
    Andy H
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TimH@thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid to uk.comp.sys.mac on Wed Feb 18 15:27:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 18 Feb 2026 at 2:49:27rC>pm GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 17 Feb 2026 at 9:03:43rC>pm GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or >>> post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).

    That's funny - I saw this the other day:

    "security advice, 1996: writing your passwords down in a notebook is a very >> bad idea and nobody should do it
    security advice, 2026: writing your passwords down in a notebook is one of the
    most secure storage methods for most users

    (fun how threat models change over time, eh?)"

    ROFLOL, yup.

    Not only that, IrCOm currently listening to a 48 year old Rick Wakeman album on a 49 year old Technics turntable, with its similarly aged cartridge, through a 44 year old amplifier.

    And yes, it does sound better! (Or at least I find the listening experience more enjoyable).

    Oh I do miss LP sleeves (no space for a turntable at the moment, though the records are stashed away). Still streaming through 50-year old speakers
    though! Well, 50 in a ship-of-Theseus way: I think all the cones have been replaced at some point.
    --
    TimH
    pull tooth to reply by email
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to uk.comp.sys.mac on Wed Feb 18 20:47:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 18.02.26 11:03, Alan B wrote:
    On 2026-02-17, Andy H <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or >> post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).

    .... or on a note under a cushion on an armchair. The trouble was that Mrs B found it, didn't know what it was and threw into the bin.

    The digital equivalent to a nuclear melt down ...
    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita" (Augustinus)
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to uk.comp.sys.mac on Wed Feb 18 20:51:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    On 18.02.26 14:06, TimH wrote:
    On 17 Feb 2026 at 9:03:43rC>pm GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or >> post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).

    That's funny - I saw this the other day:

    "security advice, 1996: writing your passwords down in a notebook is a very bad idea and nobody should do it
    security advice, 2026: writing your passwords down in a notebook is one of the
    most secure storage methods for most users

    (fun how threat models change over time, eh?)"

    96: Full of enthusiasm about technology and the future!
    26: Acceptance of the fallacies of human beings and total resignation!
    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita" (Augustinus)
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy H@thewildrover@icloud.com to uk.comp.sys.mac on Wed Feb 18 21:03:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: uk.comp.sys.mac

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 18 Feb 2026 at 2:49:27rC>pm GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    TimH <thnews@poboxmolar.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 17 Feb 2026 at 9:03:43rC>pm GMT, "Andy H" <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote:

    Perhaps itrCOs back to the old passwords in a notebook under the desk - or >>>> post-its around the monitor - kind of thing ;-).

    That's funny - I saw this the other day:

    "security advice, 1996: writing your passwords down in a notebook is a very >>> bad idea and nobody should do it
    security advice, 2026: writing your passwords down in a notebook is one of the
    most secure storage methods for most users

    (fun how threat models change over time, eh?)"

    ROFLOL, yup.

    Not only that, IrCOm currently listening to a 48 year old Rick Wakeman album >> on a 49 year old Technics turntable, with its similarly aged cartridge,
    through a 44 year old amplifier.

    And yes, it does sound better! (Or at least I find the listening experience >> more enjoyable).

    Oh I do miss LP sleeves (no space for a turntable at the moment, though the records are stashed away). Still streaming through 50-year old speakers though! Well, 50 in a ship-of-Theseus way: I think all the cones have been replaced at some point.

    Or less high-brow, TriggerrCOs broom!

    I do streaming too, through a pair of HomePod Minis, and have Apple One Premium. They sound good, and I love rooting out old albums on the Music
    store, but it doesnrCOt come close to the experience I get from the old analogue setup - I always argue that music is created analogue (mostly),
    and we hear in analogue, so for me it just feels rCyrightrCO keeping the entire signal path that way.

    And, getting back towards the topic, if the internet goes down, I can still play music. Although, almost regrettably, I no longer have any CDs.
    --
    Andy H
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2