• Homo floesiensis may not be Homo?

    From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Fri Jul 3 16:31:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/03/science/homo-floresiensis-scavenged-food

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aeb7219

    The usual overhype of findings about Homo floresiensis. Some
    researchers looked at the fossil bones of a carcass scavenged by H. floresiensis and note that the small elephant like animal (the size of a buffalo) was likely killed by a komodo dragon and scavenged by the
    hobbits. They find stone tools and the meatiest parts of the carcass
    show signs of being eaten by the dragons and stone cut marks are found
    on the parts of the carcass that was not eaten by the big lizards. They
    find no evidence that the hobbits were using fire to prepare the meat
    they got from the carcass, and the news article (possibly based on
    information the got from the researchers) jumps to the conclusion the
    hobbits were small degenerate scavengers instead of hunters. They claim
    the small stature and brain size indicates that they may not be Homo.
    This is pretty stupid since they have the parabolic jaw of all species
    of Homo.

    For some reason they can't seem to understand that H. floresiensis was
    short (about 3 feet high) because they lived on a small island. All you
    need to understand is that the elephants on the island had also become pygmies. In order to survive on an island a species has to maintain a
    large enough population so that inbreeding depression does not lead to
    their extinction, or, at least, delays extinction for a while. There is
    no real reason why H. floresiensis did not come to the island as H.
    erectus, and then evolved into pygmies in order to maintain a large
    enough population to survive. Not understanding this is just stupid
    when you consider the fact that the modern humans that made it to this
    same island also became pygmies although not as small as hobbits they
    were less than 5 feet tall. The reason is that smaller humans could
    maintain a larger population than full sized humans and they were the
    tribes that survived on the island. Hobbits may have been on the island
    for hundreds of thousands of years. Modern humans didn't get there
    until around 40,000 to 50,000 years ago, and they managed to evolve into
    short statured individuals after they got there. As far as I know all
    the taller modern humans on the island are more recent immigrants to the island.

    It may be that H. florensiensis may have evolved from Denisovans. They
    likely need to try the tooth protein sequencing to tell the difference
    between Denisovans and H. erectus.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2