From Newsgroup: soc.men

is there a man in here ?

+?+u+L
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: soc.men

cheesetray wrote:

is there a man in here ?

+?+u+L

i told you not to be stupid you moron
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: soc.men

cheesetray wrote:
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage in

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and i
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/or
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovered
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me.
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, many
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online, including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have written letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care that
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics and
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases of
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what the
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus i
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...and
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but such
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i have
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highly
educated partners for discussion.....sadly......

if you're
wondering (not anybody w/superior IQs of course) but just to be
friendly, about how i could *know* it was illogical, as opposed to a
deficiency on MY part in comprehension, i *think* (not 100% sure, but
based on what i know) the best way to describe it is, it wasn't
mathematically sound? i could tear it apart, logically. and it was NOT
an issue of definition, i promise.

you know, cuz you could say, well, sometimes words have two meanings,
(or many more, including opposite), but you'll just have to take my
word for it, that was NOT the issue.


This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#672653206


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: soc.men

cheesetray wrote:
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage in

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and i
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/or
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovered
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me.
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, many
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online, including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have written letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care that
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics and
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases of
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what the
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus i
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...and
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but such
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i have
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highly
educated partners for discussion.....sadly......

although in
one science article, it did actually boil down to, well, what exactly
*is* a stimulant. it was so broken-down, it was mind-blowing. and the
reason i bring it up, is because i am no so confident that a response
letter would have explained it for me.

i *think*, it's like this. for example, a show on tv, about words. and
they were saying, well, if you use a dictionary, and one word leads to
another word, to come to a higher understanding. well, guess what?
it's a wild goose chase. it's a dog chasing its tail.

what it boils down to, according to this illuminatory (that's not a
word? red squiggle) educational show, was, get this: (actually i think
i mentioned this once before) but:

energy=energy

so there! (says the woman who's worse for wear....yikes!!! :-///)


This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#672653206


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: soc.men

are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage in some
private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and i can
contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/or
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovered
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me.
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, many
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online, including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have written letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care that
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics and
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases of
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what the
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus i
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...and
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but such
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i have
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highly
educated partners for discussion.....sadly......

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: soc.men

cheesetray wrote:
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage in

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and i
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/or
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovered
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me.
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, many
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online, including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have written letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care that
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics and
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases of
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what the
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus i
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...and
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but such
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i have
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highly
educated partners for discussion.....sadly......

that was in an
educational science journal based out of MIT


This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#672653206


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: soc.men

cheesetray wrote:
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage in

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and i
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/or
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovered
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me.
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, many
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online, including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have written letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care that
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics and
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases of
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what the
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus i
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...and
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but such
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i have
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highly
educated partners for discussion.....sadly......

not referring
to professors at the university. (intelligence)

btw, this is only my opinion as to destroying them, perhaps they saw
it differently, but i believe in that case then, based on prior
experience, my observations would be considered quite bright. since i
was too lazy or didn't care so much about it, i never wrote, and thus
never had the opportunity to receive responses. perhaps it was unfair
of me to jump the gun and say destroy, but honestly, i have never
really had responses countering my contributions, merely just being
impressed, which often is even lost on me, and i can't understand how
they didn't see what i was saying, it seemed so obvious to me.


This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#672653206


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: soc.men

cheesetray wrote:
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage in

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and i
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/or
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovered
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me.
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, many
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online, including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have written letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care that
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics and
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases of
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what the
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus i
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...and
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but such
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i have
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highly
educated partners for discussion.....sadly......

educational =
cutting edge scientific research (academic)


This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#672653206


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2