• Japanese A-Bomb (Was Af/Pak & Other News (8/6/2019))

    From Byker@byker@do~rag.net to sci.military.naval,alt.history.what-if,soc.history.what-if,alt.war.world-war-two on Wed Aug 7 17:20:38 2019
    From Newsgroup: soc.history.what-if

    On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 4:22:20 PM UTC-4, dump...@hotmail.com wrote:
    What If, in World War II, Japan Got the Atomic Bomb First? A
    controversial book
    about JapanrCOs race to build an atomic weapon in 1945 is published there for the
    first time. It also raises questions about how North Korea finally got a bomb.:

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-world-war-ii-what-if-japan-got-the-atomic-bomb-first?ref=home




    Quote:

    "After the war ended, intelligence officials learned that the Japanese military,
    just prior to their surrender, had actually developed and successfully
    test-
    fired an atomic device. The project had been housed in or near Konan (the Japanese name for Hungnam), on the coast in the northern part of the peninsula.

    To make matters worse, by the end of 1945 the SovietsrCowho did not yet have an
    atomic bombrCohad occupied much of Korea north of the 38th parallel and the plant
    where the Japanese atom bomb had been developed was under their control."


    Sounds like BS, anyone out there know more about the Japanese A-Bomb
    program?

    From all I've heard, it never got far beyond the drawing board:

    https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-japan-bomb-20150805-story.html

    https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/new-documents-found-pointing-to-japanese-atomic-bomb-pr-1722338915



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From SolomonW@SolomonW@citi.com to sci.military.naval,alt.history.what-if,soc.history.what-if,alt.war.world-war-two on Thu Aug 8 20:55:59 2019
    From Newsgroup: soc.history.what-if

    On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 17:20:38 -0500, Byker wrote:

    On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 4:22:20 PM UTC-4, dump...@hotmail.com wrote:
    What If, in World War II, Japan Got the Atomic Bomb First? A
    controversial book
    about Japanias race to build an atomic weapon in 1945 is published there >>> for the
    first time. It also raises questions about how North Korea finally got a >>> bomb.:

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-world-war-ii-what-if-japan-got-the-atomic-bomb-first?ref=home




    Quote:

    "After the war ended, intelligence officials learned that the Japanese
    military,
    just prior to their surrender, had actually developed and successfully
    test-
    fired an atomic device. The project had been housed in or near Konan (the
    Japanese name for Hungnam), on the coast in the northern part of the
    peninsula.

    To make matters worse, by the end of 1945 the SovietsiXwho did not yet have >> an
    atomic bombiXhad occupied much of Korea north of the 38th parallel and the >> plant
    where the Japanese atom bomb had been developed was under their control."


    Sounds like BS, anyone out there know more about the Japanese A-Bomb
    program?

    From all I've heard, it never got far beyond the drawing board:

    https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-japan-bomb-20150805-story.html

    https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/new-documents-found-pointing-to-japanese-atomic-bomb-pr-1722338915

    There is nothing new here.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From a425couple@a425couple@hotmail.com to sci.military.naval,alt.history.what-if,soc.history.what-if,alt.war.world-war-two on Thu Aug 8 14:21:11 2019
    From Newsgroup: soc.history.what-if

    On 8/7/2019 3:20 PM, Byker wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 4:22:20 PM UTC-4, dump...@hotmail.com wrote:
    What If, in World War II, Japan Got the Atomic Bomb First?-a A
    controversial book
    about JapanrCOs race to build an atomic weapon in 1945 is published there >> > for the
    first time. It also raises questions about how North Korea finally
    got a
    bomb.:


    https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-world-war-ii-what-if-japan-got-the-atomic-bomb-first?ref=home





    Quote:

    "After the war ended, intelligence officials learned that the Japanese
    military,
    just prior to their surrender, had actually developed and successfully
    test-
    fired an atomic device. The project had been housed in or near Konan (the
    Japanese name for Hungnam), on the coast in the northern part of the
    peninsula.

    To make matters worse, by the end of 1945 the SovietsrCowho did not yet
    have
    an
    atomic bombrCohad occupied much of Korea north of the 38th parallel and the >> plant
    where the Japanese atom bomb had been developed was under their control."

    Sounds like BS, anyone out there know more about the Japanese A-Bomb
    program?

    From all I've heard, it never got far beyond the drawing board:

    https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-japan-bomb-20150805-story.html

    https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/new-documents-found-pointing-to-japanese-atomic-bomb-pr-1722338915

    There is NO evidence of any test firing of a device.
    All that is sensationalized distortions.

    Japan did have a fairly serious effort, but in terms of
    what was needed to succeed, very tiny project.
    This wiki seems fair and accurate.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_nuclear_weapon_program
    I will cut & past one section,
    " Lieutenant-General Takeo Yasuda on a train. Yasuda was at the
    time director of the Army Aeronautical Department's Technical
    Research Institute. Nishina told Yasuda about the possibility
    of building nuclear weapons.[10] However, the Japanese fission
    project did not formally begin until April 1941 when Yasuda acted
    on Army Minister Hideki T+ij+i's order to investigate the possibilities
    of nuclear weapons. Yasuda passed the order down the chain of command
    to Viscount Masatoshi +ik+ichi, director of the RIKEN Institute, who
    in turn passed it to Nishina, whose Nuclear Research Laboratory by
    1941 had over 100 researchers.[11]
    Meanwhile, the Imperial Japanese Navy's Technology Research
    Institute had been pursuing its own separate investigations,
    and had engaged professors from the Imperial University, Tokyo,
    for advice on nuclear weapons. This resulted in the formation of
    the Committee on Research in the Application of Nuclear Physics,
    chaired by Nishina, that met ten times between July 1942 and March
    1943. It concluded in a report that while an atomic bomb was, in
    principle, feasible, "it would probably be difficult even for the
    United States to realize the application of atomic power during
    the war". This caused the Navy to lose interest and to concentrate
    instead on research into radar.[11]"

    It was really very far beyond their industrial capacity.
    But they, the Army, pushed on with a small project, but
    that was destroyed in March 1945 Tokyo firebombing.
    But it was because of their own research, they were quick
    to understand what had happened at Hiroshima, and Nagasaki.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rich Rostrom@rrostrom@comcast.net to sci.military.naval,alt.history.what-if,soc.history.what-if,alt.war.world-war-two on Thu Aug 8 16:37:18 2019
    From Newsgroup: soc.history.what-if

    "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

    "After the war ended, intelligence officials learned that the Japanese military, just prior to their surrender, had actually developed and successfully
    test-fired an atomic device."

    Sounds like BS, anyone out there know more about the Japanese A-Bomb program?

    From all I've heard, it never got far beyond the drawing board:

    Quite so. The US built the Bomb, but it took enormous industrial
    resources which Japan didn't have, plus an array of geniuses in
    the field: Fermi, Szilard, von Neumann, many others. We had the
    best in the US, plus a large contingent from Britain. _And_ experts
    who had defected from Axis countries: notably Fermi, of course,
    but also for instance Klaus Fuchs. (Fuchs was a Communist spy, but
    it was later noted that "compartmentalization" would not have kept
    him from the most important secrets, because he would have been in
    the most important "compartment" due to his brilliance.) Japan had
    a few bright chaps, but nothing like this.

    The article suggests that the Japanese facility was looted by the
    Soviets, which is nonsense. If the Soviets captured a plant where
    Japan had built a working Bomb, why did it take them three years to
    build another Bomb? Why was there _nothing_ in the records of the
    Soviet Bomb project, or in the recollections of those who worked
    on it, about information gained from Japan? (And a great deal of
    information about the Soviet project has been disclosed.)

    No, it's just lurid "fake history".
    --
    Nous sommes dans une pot de chambre, et nous y serons emmerdos.
    --- General Auguste-Alexandre Ducrot at Sedan, 1870.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Horny Goat@lcraver@home.ca to soc.history.what-if on Wed Sep 11 10:46:25 2019
    From Newsgroup: soc.history.what-if

    On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 17:20:38 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

    Sounds like BS, anyone out there know more about the Japanese A-Bomb
    program?

    From all I've heard, it never got far beyond the drawing board:

    https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-japan-bomb-20150805-story.html

    https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/new-documents-found-pointing-to-japanese-atomic-bomb-pr-1722338915


    Several countries had worked out the science of an atomic bomb by 1945
    (Just for starters for the Allies: USA, UK, Canada - yes!, USSR and
    Germany and Italy for the Axis so Japan wouldn't particularly surprise
    me as Japanese physicists knew immediately what had been dropped on
    Hiroshima and Nagaski) but the actual engineering of a manufacturing
    base was something nobody but the US was able to achieve during the
    war which is why the US Manhattan project included plenty of Brits and Canadians - including the first ever person to die of the radiation of
    a near critical mass. His apologists claim his sacrifice of his life
    prevented either a nuclear explosion or meltdown. Myself I'm not so
    sure but what seems clear is the near chain reaction he prevented
    generated lethal amounts of radiation.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Slotin
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rich Rostrom@rrostrom@comcast.net to soc.history.what-if on Wed Sep 11 17:05:00 2019
    From Newsgroup: soc.history.what-if

    The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:

    ... the US Manhattan project included plenty of Brits and Canadians ...

    And an Italian, several Hungarians, and even some Germans.

    Klaus Fuchs, later exposed as a Soviet agent, was a German
    Communist. He was cleared as having no possible loyalty to
    Nazi Germany, and was sent to the US by Britain, where he
    had been interned as an enemy alien. He was a significant
    contributor: it was said that better "compartmentalization"
    would not have limited the success of his spying for the USSR,
    because he would have been _in_ the most secret and important
    "compartment", due to his technical brilliance.
    --
    Nous sommes dans une pot de chambre, et nous y serons emmerdos.
    --- General Auguste-Alexandre Ducrot at Sedan, 1870.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2