From Newsgroup: soc.history.what-if
SolomonW <
SolomonW@citi.com> on Sun, 21 Jul 2019 12:15:13 +1000 typed
in soc.history.what-if the following:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 15:20:22 -0500, Byker wrote:
"SolomonW" wrote in message
news:d5x4tuac3udq$.enow9clyqey9.dlg@40tude.net...
On Mon, 03 Jun 2019 18:47:00 -0700, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:57:12 -0700 (PDT), WolfBear <m4josh@gmail.com>
wrote:
Do you think that WWII and the Soviet experience in it was in any way >>>>>crucial or vital to the Soviet Union's downfall several decades later? >>>>>
In other words, in a scenario where WWII would have never occurred (for >>>>>instance, if Britain and France hold firm in 1938 and the SK are able to >>>>>overthrow Hitler and the Nazis before war actually breaks out), do you >>>>>think that the Soviet Union would have still eventually collapsed and >>>>>broken up? Or do you think that the Soviet collapse and break-up could >>>>>have been avoided in this scenario?
Even without losing 20+ milion people Russia had some woeful economic
problems to overcome and Stalin's methods wouldn't accomplish what was >>>> needed.
Indeed but they were overcoming it, the Russian economy was doing okay
till the 1980s
Oh? The Soviet collapse was a foregone conclusion from the get-go. It was
just a matter of when and how:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_of_the_dissolution_of_the_Soviet_Union
People have been predicting the certainity of a nuclear ww3, the end of oil >and global warming ever since I can remember.
"The End Times, like the poor, will be with you always." Sister
Mary Francis
--
pyotr filipivich.
For Sale: Uncirculated Roman Drachmas, feature Julius Ceaser's Portrait, several dated 44 BCE. Comes with Certificate of Authenticity.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2