From Newsgroup: soc.culture.irish
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--8323329-422223336-1732548120=:868599
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Content-ID: <
a6b10ffe-7d74-e6c4-593b-f4d254d3c7be@insomnia247.nl>
Dear useapen <
yourdime@outlook.com>:
(Alpine refuses to post to sac.politics via Eternal September - perhaps it=
=20
is a misspelling of soc.politics.)
I had written to the Institute of Strategic Dialogue because Aoife=20
Gallagher thereof publishes lies on behalves of disinformations on=20
behalves of murders. I have not gotten an answer from the Institute of=20 Strategic Dialogue.
However I do believe what she says in
news:
XnsB235CC178273BX@135.181.20.170
On
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:43:06 +0000
I emailed an ISDGlobal.org email address with
Subject: faoi Uisce Faoi Thalamh agus br=C3=A9aga nuacht=C3=A1n
=2E . .
"A Aoife n=C3=AD n=C3=B3 u=C3=AD Gallch=C3=B3ir agus a Chiar=C3=A1in u=C3=
=AD Conch=C3=BAir agus a dhaoine=20
uaisle ag Funda=C3=A7=C3=A3o Calouste Gulbenkian agus a dhaoine uaisle ag a=
n Aontas=20
Eorpach, a chairde,
Thosaigh mise iarratais sonra=C3=AD oraibh ar an 28/11/2023. Fanaim le gach= =20
freagra dtaobhanna f=C3=B3s.
T=C3=A1 an mhoill Shasanach seo in aghaidh dl=C3=AD, dar leis an Acuity Law=
Limited.
"You can complain to the ICO about the way an organisation has handled=20 personal information.
In most cases, before you complain to us you need to have:
complained directly to the organisation;
[. . .] and
followed up with the organisation if you have not received a response=20
after 30 days."
arsa
HTTPS://ICO.org.uk/make-a-complaint/data-protection-complaints/what-to-expe= ct/
D=C3=A9anaig=C3=AD freagra=C3=AD agus ceart=C3=BAch=C3=A1in!
Is mise le f=C3=ADrinn=C3=ADbh,
Niocl=C3=A1s P=C3=B3l Caile=C3=A1n de Ghloucester"
On
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:32:41 +0100
I emailed an ICO.org.UK email address with
Subject: Re: ICO Case Reference: IC-282358-B2L2
=2E . .
"Dear Mister [Stuart] Brierley,
[. . .]
Mistranslations are certainly lethal.
Is the Institute for Strategic Dialogue exempt de laws? E.g. complicity=20
in murders and torture? E.g. I still do not have a response de it."
On
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 20:42:40 +0100
I emailed an ICO.org.UK email address:
"Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:"Thank you for the=20
complaint that you submitted to the Information
Commissioner=E2=80=99s Office in relation to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue regarding concerns that you have about how the organisation has processed your personal data."
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thanks for responding and for asking for more informations. I am sorry=20
that I failed to make this complaint clear enough at the start. I=20
attempt to make progress towards clarity via this email.
Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:
"Please note that it is also ICO procedure that we do not
handle complaints which concern issues that the organisation has not
themselves first been given the opportunity to resolve.
[. . .]
As such, if you have not taken your concerns to the organisation we ask
that you do so before returning this matter to the ICO. If you have done
so, we ask that you provide evidence of this correspondence and any
response that you received."
I never get an answer from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, so in=20 response to a question which you had asked when I had started this=20
complaint ("What are the details of your complaint?"), I had ticked:
"I've not received a response from the organisation."
I had emailed [. . .]@ISDGlobal.org without an answer on 28/11/2023. Cf. 2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt
The return receipt that is named
2023-11-28h_cruthu_seachadta.txt
proves that the Institute for Strategic Dialogue got 2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt
Similarly 2024-01-03a_followed_up_with_the_organisation_if_you_have_not_received_a_re= sponse_after_30_days.txt
and
2024-01-04a_focal_ar_iarraidh.txt
and
2024-01-04f_cruthu_seachadta.txt
Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:
"After considering all aspects of your complaint, and examining all
evidence that you have provided, the ICO is writing to you today to
request further information from you before we process your complaint
further.
We note that you complaint concerns =E2=80=9Cfront page libels: malicious falsehoods, misuses of private and confidential informations=E2=80=9D and w=
e
have examined the supporting evidence that you have attached to your
complaint form.
We note that as stated above, your complaint relates to the Institute of Strategic Dialogue, a non-profit think tank, however none of the
evidence you have provided appears to relate to such.
Instead, the evidence you have provided consists of an e-mail to a
company based in Portugal and documents pertaining to two court cases,
both of which relate to different organisations and neither to the
Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
As such, we are writing to ask that you respond to this e-mail
clarifying as to how this matter relates to the organisation in
question."
I apparently failed to convey the role of the ISD to you when I uploaded 2023-10-21_particulars_of_claim.pdf
when I uploaded to you on 16/01/2024:
"In the British Isles there are front-page libels; malicious falsehoods;=20 misuses of private and confidential informations; breaches against=20 confidence and datum-protection legislation & the Communications Act=20
2003; harassments by publications; & intentional inflictions of mental=20
harm coverings up this torture and other Portuguese crimes against me=20
and other migrants. They contradict final unappealable judgments &=20
proofs. A London organisation perpetrates disinformations on behalves de=20 these presstitutes and torturers. It is funded by a Portuguese=20
organisation. It dishonestly pretends that it is against disinformation.=20
It publishes false reports on a website. It appears on TV and radio.=20
Illegal disinformations (which caused 3 murders and torture and=20 persecutions) which are libels and malicious falsehoods against me exist=20 because of this Portuguese organisation and are essential to the=20
cover-up by this London organisation that I am complaining to you about.=20
[. . .]"
I regret to remark that you have responded in English even though I had=20 uploaded
2023-09-24a_HC54_Foirm_1_Bileog_Faisneise_Retraction_Watch.pdf
and
2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt
in Gaelic to you.
2023-10-21_particulars_of_claim.pdf
and
2023-09-24a_HC54_Foirm_1_Bileog_Faisneise_Retraction_Watch.pdf
are pleadings against newspaper libels and malicious falsehoods etc.=20
about me. The Institute for Strategic Dialogue dishonestly pretends that=20 these lies are neither lies nor illegal. The Institute for Strategic=20 Dialogue does so via e.g.
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-1-s= ummary.pdf
and
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-2-p= latform-analysis.pdf
and
HTTPS://WWW.ISDGlobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-3-t= opic-analysis.pdf
Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:
"an e-mail to a company based in Portugal".
The Portuguese Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation paid the Institute for=20 Strategic Dialogue out of taxes. The Institute for Strategic Dialogue=20 obscures crimes by Portugal for money. They could had countered such=20
crimes so I asked them concerning them. I do not get an answer.=20
Connivance is complicity. Cf. Article 1 of the United Nations'=20
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading=20
Treatment or Punishment of 1984.
Cf.
[. . .]
Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:
"the evidence you have provided consists of [. . .] and documents=20
pertaining to two court cases, both of which relate to different=20 organisations and neither to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue."
Actually I provided you with documents pertaining to many more than 3=20
court cases including pleadings of 2 court cases and a ruling of a court=20 case before such 2 court cases. Such 3 court cases are consequences of=20
many early court cases. Journalists and the Institute for Strategic=20
Dialogue lie about all of my court cases. Indeed journalists are=20
defendants of many of my anti-malicious-falsehood court cases."
I did not get another response from this ICO. This ICO's professionalism=20
is doubtful.
Cf.
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Sharon_Tolan_and_Helen_McEntee/Reminding_H= elen_McEntee_yet_AGAIN_about_crimes_against_humanity.odt
HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Fine_Gael/Fine_Gael.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Fianna_Fail/Fianna_Fail.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Comhaontas_Glas/Comhaontas_Glas.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Eilish_Balfe/Lucht_Oibre.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.insomnia247.NL/Daonlathaithe_Soisialta/Daonlathaithe_Sois= ialta.HTM
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Fergal_Landy/Fergal_Landy.HTM --8323329-422223336-1732548120=:868599--
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2