1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. soc.culture.bulgaria

  • The Great Feminization =?UTF-8?B?4oCm?=

    From Nick@ddantgwyn@mail.bg to soc.culture.bulgaria on Sun Oct 26 08:37:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    -c-|-+-|, -e-a-| -e-| -U-| -+-|-| -|-C-e-# -+ -U-+-+-+-+-+ :)

    -y -|-# -+-e-#-|-+-|-|-# -+-# -+-C-+-e-+-|-+-+-# - -#-#-e-+-C-e-e -| -|-|-+-#, -+-+-#-e-#-C-A-+ -+-# -e-|-+-+, -|-+-+-e-+ -c-|-e-#-e
    -#-#-#-+-+ - -|-|-+-#.

    The Great Feminization
    Helen Andrews October 16, 2025

    In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed
    the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym rCLJ. Stone,rCY argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire rCLwokerCY era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers
    was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

    rCa

    The essay argued that it wasnrCOt just that women had cancelled the
    president of Harvard; it was that theyrCOd cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. rCLWhen he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and
    women, I just couldnrCOt breathe because this kind of bias makes me
    physically ill,rCY said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a
    third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to
    declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within
    the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

    This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all
    cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do
    whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That
    is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated
    upon at book length: Everything you think of as rCLwokenessrCY is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

    rCa

    A much more important tipping point is when law schools became majority female, which occurred in 2016, or when law firm associates became
    majority female, which occurred in 2023. When Sandra Day OrCOConnor was appointed to the high court, only 5 percent of judges were female. Today
    women are 33 percent of the judges in America and 63 percent of the judges appointed by President Joe Biden.

    The same trajectory can be seen in many professions: a pioneering
    generation of women in the 1960s and rCO70s; increasing female
    representation through the 1980s and rCO90s; and gender parity finally arriving, at least in the younger cohorts, in the 2010s or 2020s. In 1974, only 10 percent of New York Times reporters were female. The New York
    Times staff became majority female in 2018 and today the female share is
    55 percent.

    rCa

    The substance fits, too. Everything you think of as wokeness involves prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality,
    safety over risk, cohesion over competition. Other writers who have
    proposed their own versions of the Great Feminization thesis, such as Noah Carl or Bo Winegard and Cory Clark, who looked at feminizationrCOs effects
    on academia, offer survey data showing sex differences in political
    values. One survey, for example, found that 71 percent of men said
    protecting free speech was more important than preserving a cohesive
    society, and 59 percent of women said the opposite.

    The most relevant differences are not about individuals but about groups.
    In my experience, individuals are unique and you come across outliers who
    defy stereotypes every day, but groups of men and women display consistent differences. Which makes sense, if you think about it statistically. A
    random woman might be taller than a random man, but a group of ten random women is very unlikely to have an average height greater than that of a
    group of ten men. The larger the group of people, the more likely it is to conform to statistical averages.

    -R-U-e-#-+-#-+-+-e-+ - -+-# -|-+-+-+-+-A -#-|-C-|-U:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/
    --
    -2oL# tEa *-o tof oL? tec o+e tUa o#A uOe rCo Earth is born in the Bull's hour-+
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick@ddantgwyn@mail.bg to soc.culture.bulgaria on Sun Oct 26 08:58:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 08:37:12 -0000 (UTC), Nick wrote:

    -c-|-+-|, -e-a-| -e-| -U-| -+-|-| -|-C-e-# -+ -U-+-+-+-+-+ :)

    -y -|-# -+-e-#-|-+-|-|-# -+-# -+-C-+-e-+-|-+-+-# - -#-#-e-+-C-e-e -| -|-|-+-#, -+-+-#-e-#-C-A-+ -+-# -e-|-+-+, -|-+-+-e-+
    -c-|-e-#-e -#-#-#-+-+ - -|-|-+-#.

    The Great Feminization Helen Andrews October 16, 2025

    In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed
    the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym rCLJ. Stone,rCY argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of
    Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire rCLwokerCY era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling:
    women.

    rCa

    The essay argued that it wasnrCOt just that women had cancelled the
    president of Harvard; it was that theyrCOd cancelled him in a very
    feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. rCLWhen he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between
    men and women, I just couldnrCOt breathe because this kind of bias makes
    me physically ill,rCY said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made
    a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was
    within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect
    on the mob hysteria.

    This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all
    cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do
    whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That
    is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated
    upon at book length: Everything you think of as rCLwokenessrCY is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

    rCa

    A much more important tipping point is when law schools became majority female, which occurred in 2016, or when law firm associates became
    majority female, which occurred in 2023. When Sandra Day OrCOConnor was appointed to the high court, only 5 percent of judges were female. Today women are 33 percent of the judges in America and 63 percent of the
    judges appointed by President Joe Biden.

    The same trajectory can be seen in many professions: a pioneering
    generation of women in the 1960s and rCO70s; increasing female
    representation through the 1980s and rCO90s; and gender parity finally arriving, at least in the younger cohorts, in the 2010s or 2020s. In
    1974,
    only 10 percent of New York Times reporters were female. The New York
    Times staff became majority female in 2018 and today the female share is
    55 percent.

    rCa

    The substance fits, too. Everything you think of as wokeness involves prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition. Other writers who have
    proposed their own versions of the Great Feminization thesis, such as
    Noah Carl or Bo Winegard and Cory Clark, who looked at feminizationrCOs effects on academia, offer survey data showing sex differences in
    political values. One survey, for example, found that 71 percent of men
    said protecting free speech was more important than preserving a
    cohesive society, and 59 percent of women said the opposite.

    The most relevant differences are not about individuals but about
    groups.
    In my experience, individuals are unique and you come across outliers
    who defy stereotypes every day, but groups of men and women display consistent differences. Which makes sense, if you think about it statistically. A random woman might be taller than a random man, but a
    group of ten random women is very unlikely to have an average height
    greater than that of a group of ten men. The larger the group of people,
    the more likely it is to conform to statistical averages.

    -R-U-e-#-+-#-+-+-e-+ - -+-# -|-+-+-+-+-A -#-|-C-|-U:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -y-+-+ -+-# -e-|-+-+, -|-+-+-e-+ -+-#-+-U-e-+-+-# -c-|-e-#-e -#-#-#-+-+ :)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWLbq7PlrIA
    --
    -2oL# tEa *-o tof oL? tec o+e tUa o#A uOe rCo Earth is born in the Bull's hour-+
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Radostina@joyradost@gmail.com to soc.culture.bulgaria on Mon Oct 27 11:41:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On 10/26/2025 1:37 AM, Nick wrote:
    -c-|-+-|, -e-a-| -e-| -U-| -+-|-| -|-C-e-# -+ -U-+-+-+-+-+ :)

    -y -|-# -+-e-#-|-+-|-|-# -+-# -+-C-+-e-+-|-+-+-# - -#-#-e-+-C-e-e -| -|-|-+-#, -+-+-#-e-#-C-A-+ -+-# -e-|-+-+, -|-+-+-e-+ -c-|-e-#-e
    -#-#-#-+-+ - -|-|-+-#.

    The Great Feminization
    Helen Andrews October 16, 2025

    In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed
    the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym rCLJ. Stone,rCY argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire rCLwokerCY era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers
    was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

    rCa

    The essay argued that it wasnrCOt just that women had cancelled the
    president of Harvard; it was that theyrCOd cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. rCLWhen he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and
    women, I just couldnrCOt breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,rCY said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a
    third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within
    the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

    This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all
    cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do
    whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That
    is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated
    upon at book length: Everything you think of as rCLwokenessrCY is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

    rCa

    A much more important tipping point is when law schools became majority female, which occurred in 2016, or when law firm associates became
    majority female, which occurred in 2023. When Sandra Day OrCOConnor was appointed to the high court, only 5 percent of judges were female. Today women are 33 percent of the judges in America and 63 percent of the judges appointed by President Joe Biden.

    The same trajectory can be seen in many professions: a pioneering
    generation of women in the 1960s and rCO70s; increasing female
    representation through the 1980s and rCO90s; and gender parity finally arriving, at least in the younger cohorts, in the 2010s or 2020s. In 1974, only 10 percent of New York Times reporters were female. The New York
    Times staff became majority female in 2018 and today the female share is
    55 percent.

    rCa

    The substance fits, too. Everything you think of as wokeness involves prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition. Other writers who have
    proposed their own versions of the Great Feminization thesis, such as Noah Carl or Bo Winegard and Cory Clark, who looked at feminizationrCOs effects
    on academia, offer survey data showing sex differences in political
    values. One survey, for example, found that 71 percent of men said
    protecting free speech was more important than preserving a cohesive
    society, and 59 percent of women said the opposite.

    The most relevant differences are not about individuals but about groups.
    In my experience, individuals are unique and you come across outliers who defy stereotypes every day, but groups of men and women display consistent differences. Which makes sense, if you think about it statistically. A
    random woman might be taller than a random man, but a group of ten random women is very unlikely to have an average height greater than that of a
    group of ten men. The larger the group of people, the more likely it is to conform to statistical averages.

    -R-U-e-#-+-#-+-+-e-+ - -+-# -|-+-+-+-+-A -#-|-C-|-U:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -U-#-+-+ -e-+-#-# -e-| -|-#-|-# - -#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-A.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick@ddantgwyn@mail.bg to soc.culture.bulgaria on Mon Oct 27 19:23:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:41:25 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    On 10/26/2025 1:37 AM, Nick wrote:

    -c-|-+-|, -e-a-| -e-| -U-| -+-|-| -|-C-e-# -+ -U-+-+-+-+-+ :)

    -y -|-# -+-e-#-|-+-|-|-# -+-# -+-C-+-e-+-|-+-+-# - -#-#-e-+-C-e-e -| -|-|-+-#, -+-+-#-e-#-C-A-+ -+-# -e-|-+-+, -|-+-+-e-+
    -c-|-e-#-e -#-#-#-+-+ - -|-|-+-#.

    The Great Feminization Helen Andrews October 16, 2025

    In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed
    the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym
    rCLJ.
    Stone,rCY argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of
    Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire
    rCLwokerCY era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of >> how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling:
    women.

    rCa

    The essay argued that it wasnrCOt just that women had cancelled the
    president of Harvard; it was that theyrCOd cancelled him in a very
    feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical
    arguments. rCLWhen he started talking about innate differences in
    aptitude between men and women, I just couldnrCOt breathe because this
    kind of bias makes me physically ill,rCY said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist
    at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and
    then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each
    time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said
    about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These
    rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

    This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all
    cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do
    whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field.
    That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later
    elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as rCLwokenessrCY
    is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

    rCa

    A much more important tipping point is when law schools became majority
    female, which occurred in 2016, or when law firm associates became
    majority female, which occurred in 2023. When Sandra Day OrCOConnor was
    appointed to the high court, only 5 percent of judges were female.
    Today women are 33 percent of the judges in America and 63 percent of
    the judges appointed by President Joe Biden.

    The same trajectory can be seen in many professions: a pioneering
    generation of women in the 1960s and rCO70s; increasing female
    representation through the 1980s and rCO90s; and gender parity finally
    arriving, at least in the younger cohorts, in the 2010s or 2020s. In
    1974,
    only 10 percent of New York Times reporters were female. The New York
    Times staff became majority female in 2018 and today the female share
    is 55 percent.

    rCa

    The substance fits, too. Everything you think of as wokeness involves
    prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality,
    safety over risk, cohesion over competition. Other writers who have
    proposed their own versions of the Great Feminization thesis, such as
    Noah Carl or Bo Winegard and Cory Clark, who looked at feminizationrCOs
    effects on academia, offer survey data showing sex differences in
    political values. One survey, for example, found that 71 percent of men
    said protecting free speech was more important than preserving a
    cohesive society, and 59 percent of women said the opposite.

    The most relevant differences are not about individuals but about
    groups.
    In my experience, individuals are unique and you come across outliers
    who defy stereotypes every day, but groups of men and women display
    consistent differences. Which makes sense, if you think about it
    statistically. A random woman might be taller than a random man, but a
    group of ten random women is very unlikely to have an average height
    greater than that of a group of ten men. The larger the group of
    people, the more likely it is to conform to statistical averages.

    -R-U-e-#-+-#-+-+-e-+ - -+-# -|-+-+-+-+-A -#-|-C-|-U:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -U-#-+-+ -e-+-#-# -e-| -|-#-|-# - -#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-A.

    -f-+-+-|-|-| -+-A-+-# -|-#-|-#-+ -|-C-a-|-+ -|-# -|-#-|-|-e :)

    -y -+-#-#-|-+-|-|-+ - -a-#-#-e-#-e -U-| -+-# -+-+-c-+-+-U-e-e-#, -+-| -+-# -+-#-+-+-U-#-+-+-e-+ -+-e -+-|-A.

    -i-+-+-|-|-+-+-a-+-+ -+-| -c-+-e-#-+, -+-+ -+-U-U-a-|-|-#-A. -a-A-+-#-e-# -e-+ -C-#-#-+-e-# -| -e-#-|-#-#-#.
    --
    -2oL# tEa *-o tof oL? tec o+e tUa o#A uOe rCo Earth is born in the Bull's hour-+
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chorbalan@chorbalan@smap.no to soc.culture.bulgaria on Mon Oct 27 21:17:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:41:25 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -U-#-+-+ -e-+-#-# -e-| -|-#-|-# - -#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-A.

    -y-+-+-+-+-#-e -+-# -y-+-#-|-+-+ -U -|-+-a-+-+-U-e-+-e-|...-Y-| -c-| -| -+-# -a-c-a-|-#-#-+-|.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Radostina@joyradost@gmail.com to soc.culture.bulgaria on Mon Oct 27 21:17:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On 10/27/2025 2:17 PM, Chorbalan wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:41:25 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -U-#-+-+ -e-+-#-# -e-| -|-#-|-# - -#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-A.

    -y-+-+-+-+-#-e -+-# -y-+-#-|-+-+ -U -|-+-a-+-+-U-e-+-e-|...-Y-| -c-| -| -+-# -a-c-a-|-#-#-+-|.

    -+-+-+-|-|-| -U-+ -+-|-C-#-+-+-c-|-+, -e-| -e-+ -+-+-A-U-+-A, -c-| -+-# -|-# -+-C-+-c-|-e-# -+-|-e-+ -+-e -+-A-|-+-|-+
    -e-C-A-#-#-# -U -+-|-e-+ -|-# -+-| -+-#-+-+-e-C-+-|-a-#-#, -+-+-C-|-|-|-+-|-+-+ -+-| -+-U-|-#-+ -|-# -c-|-e-# -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+
    -|-+-+-U-|-C-#-#-e-+-+-+-+, -+-| -| -+-+-|. -Y-+-e-+ -+-e-| -e-| -c-|-e-# -|-+-+-a-+-+-U-e-+-c-|-U-|-+ -#-|-C-|-U-+-#-+-+
    -#-+-#-+-+-+-+. -Y-# -|-+-|-e-+ -+-a -| -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+ -|-# -|-+ -c-|-e-|. -E-|-+ -#-A-a -+-|-C-#-#-# -+ -+-+-#-a -+-|-C-#-+-e-| -+ -e-e-C-+-|-+-+-|-e-+ -|-#-|-e-+ -+-C-|-|-+, -+-+-|-|-e-| -|-# -+-+ -|-#-+
    -e-#-+-U. -Y-# -+-+-+-e-| -|-+-|-+-+-+ -U -+-+-|-e-+ -+-|-C-#-#-| -c-|-e-# -U-#-+-+ -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-|-e-#.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick@ddantgwyn@mail.ru to soc.culture.bulgaria on Tue Oct 28 05:26:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 21:17:50 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    On 10/27/2025 2:17 PM, Chorbalan wrote:

    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:41:25 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -U-#-+-+ -e-+-#-# -e-| -|-#-|-# - -#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-A.

    -y-+-+-+-+-#-e -+-# -y-+-#-|-+-+ -U -|-+-a-+-+-U-e-+-e-|...-Y-| -c-| -| -+-# -a-c-a-|-#-#-+-|.

    -+-+-+-|-|-| -U-+ -+-|-C-#-+-+-c-|-+, -e-| -e-+ -+-+-A-U-+-A, -c-| -+-# -|-# -+-C-+-c-|-e-# -+-|-e-+ -+-e -+-A-|-+-|-+
    -e-C-A-#-#-# -U -+-|-e-+ -|-# -+-| -+-#-+-+-e-C-+-|-a-#-#, -+-+-C-|-|-|-+-|-+-+ -+-| -+-U-|-#-+ -|-# -c-|-e-# -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+
    -|-+-+-U-|-C-#-#-e-+-+-+-+, -+-| -| -+-+-|. -Y-+-e-+ -+-e-| -e-| -c-|-e-# -|-+-+-a-+-+-U-e-+-c-|-U-|-+ -#-|-C-|-U-+-#-+-+
    -#-+-#-+-+-+-+. -Y-# -|-+-|-e-+ -+-a -| -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+ -|-# -|-+ -c-|-e-|.
    -E-|-+ -#-A-a -+-|-C-#-#-# -+ -+-+-#-a -+-|-C-#-+-e-| -+ -e-e-C-+-|-+-+-|-e-+ -|-#-|-e-+ -+-C-|-|-+, -+-+-|-|-e-| -|-# -+-+ -|-#-+
    -e-#-+-U. -Y-# -+-+-+-e-| -|-+-|-+-+-+ -U -+-+-|-e-+ -+-|-C-#-#-| -c-|-e-# -U-#-+-+ -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-|-e-#.

    -y -e-+-#-# -|-#-+-#-+-+ -+-e -c-+-#-|-| -U -+-C-|-e-|-+-a-+-+?!

    -Y-| -| -c-a-|-+-+, -c-| -U-#-|-e-e-e -U-| -| -|-+-|-#-C-#-+ -|-+ -e-+-#-# -|-|-C-|-|-|-|.
    --
    -2oL# tEa *-o tof oL? tec o+e tUa o#A uOe rCo Earth is born in the Bull's hour-+
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chorbalan@chorbalan@smap.no to soc.culture.bulgaria on Tue Oct 28 05:37:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 21:17:50 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    -Y-# -+-+-+-e-| -|-+-|-+-+-+ -U -+-+-|-e-+ -+-|-C-#-#-| -c-|-e-# -U-#-+-+ -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-|-e-#.

    -u-#-#-C-#-#-+ -+ -U -e-#-+-A -#-|-e-+, -# -c-|-e-|-e -U-#-+-+ -|-+-+-U-+-+-C-#-e-+-#-+-+ -e-|-+-C-+-+ -+ -+-+-|-+-#-+-#
    -+-e-| -+-+-C-+-+-|-C-#-a-+-A..
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Radostina@joyradost@gmail.com to soc.culture.bulgaria on Tue Oct 28 19:02:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On 10/27/2025 10:37 PM, Chorbalan wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 21:17:50 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    -Y-# -+-+-+-e-| -|-+-|-+-+-+ -U -+-+-|-e-+ -+-|-C-#-#-| -c-|-e-# -U-#-+-+ -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-|-e-#.

    -u-#-#-C-#-#-+ -+ -U -e-#-+-A -#-|-e-+, -# -c-|-e-|-e -U-#-+-+ -|-+-+-U-+-+-C-#-e-+-#-+-+ -e-|-+-C-+-+ -+ -+-+-|-+-#-+-#
    -+-e-| -+-+-C-+-+-|-C-#-a-+-A..

    -|-+-U-|-|-# -+-+-e-+ -|-|-+-# -|-+-+-U-+-+-C-#-e-#-+-# -e-|-+-C-+-A -+-| -U-e-+ -+-a-U-|-#-+-#.
    -A-U-+-c-|-+ -C-#-+-+ -+-+-+ -|-e-U-+-+ -U-| -+-|-#-+-# -+-U-e-+-+-#.
    -Y-+ -e-+ -U-+ -|-+-+ -U -|-#-+-#-a-+, -+-| -+-+-|-|-e -|-+ -C-#-+-#-C-#.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Radostina@joyradost@gmail.com to soc.culture.bulgaria on Sun Nov 9 19:34:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On 10/27/2025 12:23 PM, Nick wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:41:25 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    On 10/26/2025 1:37 AM, Nick wrote:

    -c-|-+-|, -e-a-| -e-| -U-| -+-|-| -|-C-e-# -+ -U-+-+-+-+-+ :)

    -y -|-# -+-e-#-|-+-|-|-# -+-# -+-C-+-e-+-|-+-+-# - -#-#-e-+-C-e-e -| -|-|-+-#, -+-+-#-e-#-C-A-+ -+-# -e-|-+-+, -|-+-+-e-+
    -c-|-e-#-e -#-#-#-+-+ - -|-|-+-#.

    The Great Feminization Helen Andrews October 16, 2025

    In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed
    the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym
    rCLJ.
    Stone,rCY argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of
    Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire
    rCLwokerCY era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of >>> how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling:
    women.

    rCa

    The essay argued that it wasnrCOt just that women had cancelled the
    president of Harvard; it was that theyrCOd cancelled him in a very
    feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical
    arguments. rCLWhen he started talking about innate differences in
    aptitude between men and women, I just couldnrCOt breathe because this
    kind of bias makes me physically ill,rCY said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist >>> at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and
    then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each
    time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said
    about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These
    rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

    This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all
    cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do
    whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field.
    That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later
    elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as rCLwokenessrCY >>> is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

    rCa

    A much more important tipping point is when law schools became majority
    female, which occurred in 2016, or when law firm associates became
    majority female, which occurred in 2023. When Sandra Day OrCOConnor was
    appointed to the high court, only 5 percent of judges were female.
    Today women are 33 percent of the judges in America and 63 percent of
    the judges appointed by President Joe Biden.

    The same trajectory can be seen in many professions: a pioneering
    generation of women in the 1960s and rCO70s; increasing female
    representation through the 1980s and rCO90s; and gender parity finally
    arriving, at least in the younger cohorts, in the 2010s or 2020s. In
    1974,
    only 10 percent of New York Times reporters were female. The New York
    Times staff became majority female in 2018 and today the female share
    is 55 percent.

    rCa

    The substance fits, too. Everything you think of as wokeness involves
    prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality,
    safety over risk, cohesion over competition. Other writers who have
    proposed their own versions of the Great Feminization thesis, such as
    Noah Carl or Bo Winegard and Cory Clark, who looked at feminizationrCOs
    effects on academia, offer survey data showing sex differences in
    political values. One survey, for example, found that 71 percent of men
    said protecting free speech was more important than preserving a
    cohesive society, and 59 percent of women said the opposite.

    The most relevant differences are not about individuals but about
    groups.
    In my experience, individuals are unique and you come across outliers
    who defy stereotypes every day, but groups of men and women display
    consistent differences. Which makes sense, if you think about it
    statistically. A random woman might be taller than a random man, but a
    group of ten random women is very unlikely to have an average height
    greater than that of a group of ten men. The larger the group of
    people, the more likely it is to conform to statistical averages.

    -R-U-e-#-+-#-+-+-e-+ - -+-# -|-+-+-+-+-A -#-|-C-|-U:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -U-#-+-+ -e-+-#-# -e-| -|-#-|-# - -#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-A.

    -f-+-+-|-|-| -+-A-+-# -|-#-|-#-+ -|-C-a-|-+ -|-# -|-#-|-|-e :)

    -y -+-#-#-|-+-|-|-+ - -a-#-#-e-#-e -U-| -+-# -+-+-c-+-+-U-e-e-#, -+-| -+-# -+-#-+-+-U-#-+-+-e-+ -+-e -+-|-A.

    -i-+-+-|-|-+-+-a-+-+ -+-| -c-+-e-#-+, -+-+ -+-U-U-a-|-|-#-A. -a-A-+-#-e-# -e-+ -C-#-#-+-e-# -| -e-#-|-#-#-#.

    -U-e-|-| -#-+-|-A -|-# -A -+-U-e-|-|-#-+?!
    -u-#-#-+-a-|-|-#-#-#-e -U-|.
    -Y-|, -+-C-+-U-e-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-+-c-+-+ -+-| -U-+ -+-#-U-+-a-|-#-#-# -|-# -U-| -c-|-e-|. -o-a-#-A -+-+-e-|-C-|-U
    -+-+-+-|-+-e-#-+-+-+. -Y-+-|-#-| -+-| -A -+-U-e-|-|-#-+ -|-#-|-|. -f-C-+-U-e-+ -+-A-+-#-+ -|-|-+-#-+-+-| -|-# -c-|-e-#
    -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+ -|-+-+-U-|-C-#-#-e-+-C-+. ---| -+-| -+-C-+-U-+-A-e.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick@ddantgwyn@mail.ru to soc.culture.bulgaria on Mon Nov 10 05:42:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 19:34:43 -0800, Radostina wrote:

    On 10/27/2025 12:23 PM, Nick wrote:

    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:41:25 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    On 10/26/2025 1:37 AM, Nick wrote:

    -c-|-+-|, -e-a-| -e-| -U-| -+-|-| -|-C-e-# -+ -U-+-+-+-+-+ :)

    -y -|-# -+-e-#-|-+-|-|-# -+-# -+-C-+-e-+-|-+-+-# - -#-#-e-+-C-e-e -| -|-|-+-#, -+-+-#-e-#-C-A-+ -+-# -e-|-+-+, -|-+-+-e-+
    -c-|-e-#-e -#-#-#-+-+ - -|-|-+-#.

    The Great Feminization Helen Andrews October 16, 2025

    In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that
    changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the
    pseudonym rCLJ.
    Stone,rCY argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of
    Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire
    rCLwokerCY era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details >>>> of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the
    cancelling:
    women.

    rCa

    The essay argued that it wasnrCOt just that women had cancelled the
    president of Harvard; it was that theyrCOd cancelled him in a very
    feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical
    arguments. rCLWhen he started talking about innate differences in
    aptitude between men and women, I just couldnrCOt breathe because this >>>> kind of bias makes me physically ill,rCY said Nancy Hopkins, a
    biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his
    remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more
    insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything
    Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific
    mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

    This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all
    cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do
    whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field.
    That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later
    elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as rCLwokenessrCY >>>> is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

    rCa

    A much more important tipping point is when law schools became
    majority female, which occurred in 2016, or when law firm associates
    became majority female, which occurred in 2023. When Sandra Day
    OrCOConnor was appointed to the high court, only 5 percent of judges
    were female.
    Today women are 33 percent of the judges in America and 63 percent of
    the judges appointed by President Joe Biden.

    The same trajectory can be seen in many professions: a pioneering
    generation of women in the 1960s and rCO70s; increasing female
    representation through the 1980s and rCO90s; and gender parity finally >>>> arriving, at least in the younger cohorts, in the 2010s or 2020s. In
    1974,
    only 10 percent of New York Times reporters were female. The New York
    Times staff became majority female in 2018 and today the female share
    is 55 percent.

    rCa

    The substance fits, too. Everything you think of as wokeness involves
    prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over
    rationality,
    safety over risk, cohesion over competition. Other writers who have
    proposed their own versions of the Great Feminization thesis, such as
    Noah Carl or Bo Winegard and Cory Clark, who looked at feminizationrCOs >>>> effects on academia, offer survey data showing sex differences in
    political values. One survey, for example, found that 71 percent of
    men said protecting free speech was more important than preserving a
    cohesive society, and 59 percent of women said the opposite.

    The most relevant differences are not about individuals but about
    groups.
    In my experience, individuals are unique and you come across outliers
    who defy stereotypes every day, but groups of men and women display
    consistent differences. Which makes sense, if you think about it
    statistically. A random woman might be taller than a random man, but
    a group of ten random women is very unlikely to have an average
    height greater than that of a group of ten men. The larger the group
    of people, the more likely it is to conform to statistical averages.

    -R-U-e-#-+-#-+-+-e-+ - -+-# -|-+-+-+-+-A -#-|-C-|-U:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -U-#-+-+ -e-+-#-# -e-| -|-#-|-# - -#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-A.

    -f-+-+-|-|-| -+-A-+-# -|-#-|-#-+ -|-C-a-|-+ -|-# -|-#-|-|-e :)

    -y -+-#-#-|-+-|-|-+ - -a-#-#-e-#-e -U-| -+-# -+-+-c-+-+-U-e-e-#, -+-| -+-# -+-#-+-+-U-#-+-+-e-+ -+-e -+-|-A.

    -i-+-+-|-|-+-+-a-+-+ -+-| -c-+-e-#-+, -+-+ -+-U-U-a-|-|-#-A. -a-A-+-#-e-# -e-+ -C-#-#-+-e-# -| -e-#-|-#-#-#.

    -U-e-|-| -#-+-|-A -|-# -A -+-U-e-|-|-#-+?!

    -u-#-#-+-a-|-|-#-#-#-e -U-|.

    -Y-|, -+-C-+-U-e-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-+-c-+-+ -+-| -U-+ -+-#-U-+-a-|-#-#-# -|-# -U-| -c-|-e-|. -o-a-#-A -+-+-e-|-C-|-U
    -+-+-+-|-+-e-#-+-+-+. -Y-+-|-#-| -+-| -A -+-U-e-|-|-#-+ -|-#-|-|. -f-C-+-U-e-+ -+-A-+-#-+ -|-|-+-#-+-+-| -|-# -c-|-e-#
    -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+ -|-+-+-U-|-C-#-#-e-+-C-+. ---| -+-| -+-C-+-U-+-A-e.

    -o-# -#-| - rCR-#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-ArCL -|-#-|-#-+ -|? -o-+ -|-#-|-|
    -+-| -+-U-e-+-+-#-#-#-e -U-+-+-U-e-+-# -+-# -e-+-#-#, -|-+-|-e-+ -U-+ -+-#-+-+-U-#-+-#.

    -Y-+ -+-+-#-e -|-|-+-#-+-+-| -|-# -c-|-e-|-e -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+ -+-|-+-+-+-#-|-C-#-+-+.
    --
    -2oL# tEa *-o tof oL? tec o+e tUa o#A uOe rCo Earth is born in the Bull's hour-+
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Radostina@joyradost@gmail.com to soc.culture.bulgaria on Thu Nov 13 10:48:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On 11/9/2025 9:42 PM, Nick wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 19:34:43 -0800, Radostina wrote:


    -Y-|, -+-C-+-U-e-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-+-c-+-+ -+-| -U-+ -+-#-U-+-a-|-#-#-# -|-# -U-| -c-|-e-|. -o-a-#-A -+-+-e-|-C-|-U
    -+-+-+-|-+-e-#-+-+-+. -Y-+-|-#-| -+-| -A -+-U-e-|-|-#-+ -|-#-|-|. -f-C-+-U-e-+ -+-A-+-#-+ -|-|-+-#-+-+-| -|-# -c-|-e-#
    -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+ -|-+-+-U-|-C-#-#-e-+-C-+. ---| -+-| -+-C-+-U-+-A-e.

    -o-# -#-| - rCR-#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-ArCL -|-#-|-#-+ -|? -o-+ -|-#-|-|
    -+-| -+-U-e-+-+-#-#-#-e -U-+-+-U-e-+-# -+-# -e-+-#-#, -|-+-|-e-+ -U-+ -+-#-+-+-U-#-+-#.

    -n-#-|-e.
    -Y-+ -+-+-#-e -|-|-+-#-+-+-| -|-# -c-|-e-|-e -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+ -+-|-+-+-+-#-|-C-#-+-+.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick@ddantgwyn@mail.bg to soc.culture.bulgaria on Fri Nov 14 17:36:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:48:20 -0800, Radostina wrote:

    On 11/9/2025 9:42 PM, Nick wrote:

    On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 19:34:43 -0800, Radostina wrote:

    -Y-|, -+-C-+-U-e-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-+-c-+-+ -+-| -U-+ -+-#-U-+-a-|-#-#-# -|-# -U-| -c-|-e-|. -o-a-#-A -+-+-e-|-C-|-U
    -+-+-+-|-+-e-#-+-+-+. -Y-+-|-#-| -+-| -A -+-U-e-|-|-#-+ -|-#-|-|. -f-C-+-U-e-+ -+-A-+-#-+ -|-|-+-#-+-+-| -|-# -c-|-e-#
    -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+ -|-+-+-U-|-C-#-#-e-+-C-+. ---| -+-| -+-C-+-U-+-A-e.

    -o-# -#-| - rCR-#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-ArCL -|-#-|-#-+ -|? -o-+
    -|-#-|-| -+-| -+-U-e-+-+-#-#-#-e -U-+-+-U-e-+-# -+-# -e-+-#-#, -|-+-|-e-+ -U-+ -+-#-+-+-U-#-+-#.

    -n-#-|-e.

    -E-a-#, -e-A -+ -+-C-+-U-e-|-#-e-# -| -a-#-|-e.
    --
    -2oL# tEa *-o tof oL? tec o+e tUa o#A uOe rCo Earth is born in the Bull's hour-+
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Radostina@joyradost@gmail.com to soc.culture.bulgaria on Mon Nov 24 09:33:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: soc.culture.bulgaria

    On 10/27/2025 10:26 PM, Nick wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 21:17:50 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    On 10/27/2025 2:17 PM, Chorbalan wrote:

    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:41:25 -0700, Radostina wrote:

    https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

    -U-#-+-+ -e-+-#-# -e-| -|-#-|-# - -#-#-|-#-+-#-#-e-C -+-+ -C-|-+-+-|-+-A -+ -|-C-#-|-+-+ -|-|-U-+-+ -C-#-+-#-+-C-#-+-+-A.

    -y-+-+-+-+-#-e -+-# -y-+-#-|-+-+ -U -|-+-a-+-+-U-e-+-e-|...-Y-| -c-| -| -+-# -a-c-a-|-#-#-+-|.

    -+-+-+-|-|-| -U-+ -+-|-C-#-+-+-c-|-+, -e-| -e-+ -+-+-A-U-+-A, -c-| -+-# -|-# -+-C-+-c-|-e-# -+-|-e-+ -+-e -+-A-|-+-|-+
    -e-C-A-#-#-# -U -+-|-e-+ -|-# -+-| -+-#-+-+-e-C-+-|-a-#-#, -+-+-C-|-|-|-+-|-+-+ -+-| -+-U-|-#-+ -|-# -c-|-e-# -C-|-+-+-|-+-+-+-+-+
    -|-+-+-U-|-C-#-#-e-+-+-+-+, -+-| -| -+-+-|. -Y-+-e-+ -+-e-| -e-| -c-|-e-# -|-+-+-a-+-+-U-e-+-c-|-U-|-+ -#-|-C-|-U-+-#-+-+
    -#-+-#-+-+-+-+. -Y-# -|-+-|-e-+ -+-a -| -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+ -|-# -|-+ -c-|-e-|.
    -E-|-+ -#-A-a -+-|-C-#-#-# -+ -+-+-#-a -+-|-C-#-+-e-| -+ -e-e-C-+-|-+-+-|-e-+ -|-#-|-e-+ -+-C-|-|-+, -+-+-|-|-e-| -|-# -+-+ -|-#-+
    -e-#-+-U. -Y-# -+-+-+-e-| -|-+-|-+-+-+ -U -+-+-|-e-+ -+-|-C-#-#-| -c-|-e-# -U-#-+-+ -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+ -+-# -+-|-+ -+-|-e-#.

    -y -e-+-#-# -|-#-+-#-+-+ -+-e -c-+-#-|-| -U -+-C-|-e-|-+-a-+-+?!

    -U-#-|-#-+ -+-C-|-e-|-+-a-+-+?! :-)))
    -U-#-+-#-a -U -+-+-|-e-+ -+-|-C-#-#-| -+-# -+-+-+-e-| -|-+-|-+-+-+.
    -Y-| -#-+-|-|-#-+, -+-| -c-a-#-#-+, 24/7 -# -#-+-+-|-+.
    -o-e-+ -+-#-+-C-+-+-|-C -+-+-U-+-|-|-+-#-e-# -U-|-|-+-+-a-# -U -#-#-|-|-+-|-e-+ -+-# -+-e-#-+-e-|, -+-A-|-+-+ -e-C-A-#-#-#-e-| -|-#
    -|-+ -#-#-|-A-e -U -|-+-|-e-+, -U-c-a-+-+-a-# -U-|, -#-e-+-+-#-+-|-+-+-A, -e-|-#-+-#-|... -+ -e-+ -+-U-|-#-e -|-# -U-|
    -+-#-U-+-+-#-#-+ -|-# -c-|-e-# -+-|-e-+, -|-+-|-e-+ -+-| -+-+ -| -+-+-e-|-C-|-U-+-+.
    -A-|-c-| -U-| "-e-#-|-A", -o-+-|-|-#-+ -A-#-#-e -A-#-#-e, -+-|-|-# -+-+-+-|-|-#.
    -U-a-c-|-e-+ -| -+-C-+ -+-|-+, -a-+-C-e-a-#-#-+-| -U-+ -U -+-|-A, -U-|-|-+-+ -+-# -+-#-e-+-+-e-+ -+ -|-+-|-|-#-+-| -|-C-a-|-+
    -|-a-c-|-e-# -+ -a-+-C-#. -L-#-+-|-+ -| -+-+-#-e, -+-+ -+-+-+-|-+ -|-+-#-C-+-c-|-# -+ -U-| -C-#-|-#-# -+-# -#-U-+-c-|-+
    -|-+-#-+, -+-#-+-c-# -|-+-|-# -+-e -C-+-#-# (-+-+-U-a-e-|-+-#) -+ -|-#-e-+ -+-| -| -+-#-C-e-e-#-+ -#-+-+-+-#-+-+-| -U-+-+, -+-|
    -|-+-U-#-|-|-#. -n-C-|-+-U-|-+ -#-a-+-|-+-|, -+-e-+-+-c-|-#, -+-+ -| -+-+-+-|-+ -U-+-+-+-#. -y -a-+-+-#, -+-+-#-|, -c-| -+-|
    -+-+-|-# -|-# -|-#-c-#-#-+ -U-e-e-+-#-+, -+-+-# -U-#-+-+ 3 -U-e-e-+-#-+-# -+-# -|-|-+-+ -+-A-U-e-+, -+-+ -#-+ -e-C-|-A-#-#-#
    -|-# -U-+-#-|-#-+ -|-#-#-e-# -|-C-#-|-# -+-# -#-U-A-|-+ -U-e-e-+-#-+-+, -e-A -|-+ -|-#-c-#-# -+ -+-| -c-#-|-# :-).
    -Y-| -| -c-a-|-+-+, -c-| -U-#-|-e-e-e -U-| -| -|-+-|-#-C-#-+ -|-+ -e-+-#-# -|-|-C-|-|-|-|.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2