From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy



https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-origin- esplode-durante-i-test-sulla-rampa-di- lancio_f841faf0-05d5-4432-93ff-0d760056fc17.html

no colonization with rocketry
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-origin- esplode-durante-i-test-sulla-rampa-di- lancio_f841faf0-05d5-4432-93ff-0d760056fc17.html

no colonization with rocketry

Don't you mean "without"? And one failure isn't the end of rocketry.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy


Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-origin- esplode-durante-i-test-sulla-rampa-di- lancio_f841faf0-05d5-4432-93ff-0d760056fc17.html

no colonization with rocketry

Don't you mean "without"? And one failure isn't the end of rocketry.

since 1969 :-)
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On 5/29/2026 9:57 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-origin- >>> esplode-durante-i-test-sulla-rampa-di-
lancio_f841faf0-05d5-4432-93ff-0d760056fc17.html

no colonization with rocketry

Don't you mean "without"? And one failure isn't the end of rocketry.

since 1969 :-)

Go to YouTube and look up videos on rocket failures. Still launching
rockets.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On Fri, 29 May 2026 11:43:28 -0400, Michael Gallagher wrote:

On 5/29/2026 9:57 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue- origin-
esplode-durante-i-test-sulla-rampa-di-
lancio_f841faf0-05d5-4432-93ff-0d760056fc17.html

no colonization with rocketry

Don't you mean "without"? And one failure isn't the end of rocketry.

since 1969 :-)

Go to YouTube and look up videos on rocket failures. Still launching rockets.

And still colonizing nothing !
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On 5/29/2026 12:32 PM, Lord Ottone wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2026 11:43:28 -0400, Michael Gallagher wrote:

On 5/29/2026 9:57 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-

origin-

... Go to YouTube and look up videos on rocket failures. Still launching
rockets.

And still colonizing nothing !

We've had the ISS for decades. That's a start.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On 5/29/2026 12:32 PM, Lord Ottone wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2026 11:43:28 -0400, Michael Gallagher wrote:

On 5/29/2026 9:57 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-

origin-

Or page that doesn't have a "page not found" message.



--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

In article <fkKdnW-XLZ8QRIT3nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@supernews.com>,
Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 5/29/2026 12:32 PM, Lord Ottone wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2026 11:43:28 -0400, Michael Gallagher wrote:

On 5/29/2026 9:57 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-

origin-

... Go to YouTube and look up videos on rocket failures. Still launching >> rockets.

And still colonizing nothing !

We've had the ISS for decades. That's a start.

Rocket failures are nothing new but a setback to Blue Origin means that
unless SpaceX finally gets Starship together we're looking at a
significant delay to Artemis 3... Which means a significant delay to
Artemis 4... Which means, and I'm sad to say, without a quick turnaround
this accident could have just lost America the race to the Lunar South
Pole.

I'm calling a red moon by 2028.

Who knows, though, maybe that's just what the space program needs - a
good kick in the pants.
--
*~~a blonde may be fair~~*
*~and a brunette upscale~*
*~~but as my name hints~~*
*~~~I prefer a red ale~~~*
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On 5/29/2026 11:31 PM, Smithwicks wrote:

Rocket failures are nothing new but a setback to Blue Origin means that unless SpaceX finally gets Starship together we're looking at a
significant delay to Artemis 3... Which means a significant delay to
Artemis 4... Which means, and I'm sad to say, without a quick turnaround
this accident could have just lost America the race to the Lunar South
Pole.

I'm calling a red moon by 2028.

Possibly. Time will tell. But that doesn't mean no colonization at all.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy


Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 12:32 PM, Lord Ottone wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2026 11:43:28 -0400, Michael Gallagher wrote:

On 5/29/2026 9:57 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-

origin-

Or page that doesn't have a "page not found" message.

continue the farsa about bezos failure :-)

newtonian spaceships that lose pieces, will colonize nothing

https://propulsion-revolution.com/
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

Smithwicks <enjoyasmithwicks@myplace.com> wrote:

In article <fkKdnW-XLZ8QRIT3nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@supernews.com>,
Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 5/29/2026 12:32 PM, Lord Ottone wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2026 11:43:28 -0400, Michael Gallagher wrote:

On 5/29/2026 9:57 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

Michael Gallagher <mikejoe7g@yahoo.com> posted:

On 5/29/2026 7:53 AM, E.Laureti wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-

origin-

... Go to YouTube and look up videos on rocket failures. Still launching >> rockets.

And still colonizing nothing !

We've had the ISS for decades. That's a start.

Rocket failures are nothing new but a setback to Blue Origin means that unless SpaceX finally gets Starship together we're looking at a
significant delay to Artemis 3... Which means a significant delay to
Artemis 4... Which means, and I'm sad to say, without a quick turnaround this accident could have just lost America the race to the Lunar South
Pole.

I'm calling a red moon by 2028.

I hate to break it to you, but the Italian Navy has already
beaten everyone. They have the Laurenti Bros. Magic Flying
Submarine and no rocket will ever beat it.

It will be there on the moon before you know it.

As soon as it gets off Laurenti's mother's dining room
table...

Any minute now. Then you'll be sorry you laughed!!!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On 29/05/2026 13:53 E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-origin- esplode-durante-i-test-sulla-rampa-di- lancio_f841faf0-05d5-4432-93ff-0d760056fc17.html

no colonization with rocketry

Maybe it would be a good idea to not fill-up the rocket to the brim with flammable and explosive fuel during a static test? Maybe just enough to
light the engines for a few seconds?

And how about performing the static test away from the launch tower?
Would this be feasible?

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On 6/10/2026 9:20 AM, Nomen Nescio wrote:

On 29/05/2026 13:53 E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2026/05/29/il-razzo-di-blue-origin- >> esplode-durante-i-test-sulla-rampa-di-
lancio_f841faf0-05d5-4432-93ff-0d760056fc17.html

no colonization with rocketry

Maybe it would be a good idea to not fill-up the rocket to the brim with flammable and explosive fuel during a static test? Maybe just enough to
light the engines for a few seconds?

And how about performing the static test away from the launch tower?
Would this be feasible?

If Bezos sprung for a static test stand, yes.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2