From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

Darn it.


Alain Fournier

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy


Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> posted:

Darn it.

Alain Fournier

http://www.asps.it/pnn%20su%20Marte.png


e svolazziamo sulla city di musk :-))))

http://www.asps.it/ale555.png


e bbuhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

and

and and...

continue to believe in comic rockets :-)))))
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

On 22/05/2026 01:40 Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> wrote:

Darn it.

More than 1 million viewers at the time it was supposed to launch!

Disappointing that there were still snafus at zero time even though
they had test fueled and test fired both stages.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy


The Running Man <running_man@writeable.com> posted:

On 22/05/2026 01:40 Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> wrote:

Darn it.

More than 1 million viewers at the time it was supposed to launch!

Disappointing that there were still snafus at zero time even though
they had test fueled and test fired both stages.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy


The Running Man <running_man@writeable.com> posted:

On 22/05/2026 01:40 Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> wrote:

Darn it.

More than 1 million viewers at the time it was supposed to launch!

Disappointing that there were still snafus at zero time even though
they had test fueled and test fired both stages.

http://www.asps.it/pnn%20su%20Marte.png

and rotfl
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

Remember Friday, when The Running Man asked plaintively:

On 22/05/2026 01:40 Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> wrote:

Darn it.

More than 1 million viewers at the time it was supposed to launch!

Disappointing that there were still snafus at zero time even though
they had test fueled and test fired both stages.

Ah, well, it lived to fly another day. Booster C+, Ship A-.

The booster had flip problems staging. It's too early to say whether
the calculations of thrust assymetry for Ship startup were wrong, or
the startup didn't go as planned, or something else caused it to go
sideways.

Unfortunately, views of the booster on it's return were limited because
it failed the boost back burn and was out of range of most assets. And
was that failure due to the wrong flip or some other problem?

/dps
--
"That's a good sort of hectic, innit?"

" Very much so, and I'd recommend the haggis wontons."
-njm
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy


Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> posted:

Remember Friday, when The Running Man asked plaintively:

On 22/05/2026 01:40 Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> wrote:

Darn it.

More than 1 million viewers at the time it was supposed to launch!

Disappointing that there were still snafus at zero time even though
they had test fueled and test fired both stages.

Ah, well, it lived to fly another day. Booster C+, Ship A-.

The booster had flip problems staging. It's too early to say whether
the calculations of thrust assymetry for Ship startup were wrong, or
the startup didn't go as planned, or something else caused it to go sideways.

Unfortunately, views of the booster on it's return were limited because
it failed the boost back burn and was out of range of most assets. And
was that failure due to the wrong flip or some other problem?

/dps

http://www.asps.it/PNN90.PNG
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2