From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

Awwww... (said Rufus) the poor babies at PNN can't bear to be questioned. They hate
any technical discussion because they don't know what they are doing.

Keep in mind that the use of the submarine U-995 was conditional on savings.
Compared to what missile systems waste in vain, we shouldn't
exceed $24,674,480.00 to go to Mars. A trifle, I repeat, compared
to what the comical missile programs waste.

So much for being scientists... you're more like common 'net grifters.

Now listen, even though I assume that you have the same mindset as
missile people.
We were thinking of selling the F432BA prototype
http://www.asps.it/bacam8.jpeg

according to this specification illustrated in the patent Patent: WO2022264177 - ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2022264177
Now, since you say that patents donrCOt matter before any sale,
we will do something in which:

a) we will not make any profit

b) we will put you (and others!) in a position to VERIFY YOURSELF
the violation of the action-reaction principle via electrodynamics,
in order to make the hypothetical case of the PNN realistic:
building spaceships that do not lose mass or parts.
And to be able to even take a submarine to Mars!

Do you understand me?
I donrCOt think so; in fact,
I believe you will find excuses to do nothing.

Say, why don't you post at t.o. any more?

Here I repeat https://propulsion-revolution.com
You will find explanations of why with rocketry it is not possible to have
permanent outposts on either the Moon or Mars.
I repeat again the essence of what will be done: we will put you
in the position to VERIFY YOURSELF the violation of the action-reaction principle via electrodynamics.

Will he have understood?

I donrCOt think so.
...............

ROTFL!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2