• PNN test

    From E.Laureti@user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid to sci.space.policy on Thu Mar 6 21:57:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy


    http://www.asps.it/PNN488.mp4
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From E.Laureti@user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid to sci.space.policy on Sun Nov 30 08:50:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy


    Only by experimentally verifying by oneself
    the violability of Newton's action and reaction principle
    can one change the paradigm in astronautics.
    In this article, you are not asked to buy anything http://www.asps.it/VenditaF432BA.pdf
    but only to experimentally verify by yourself
    the violability of Newton's third law.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rufus@ru@ru.ru to sci.space.policy on Mon Dec 1 15:11:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

    E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Only by experimentally verifying by oneself
    the violability of Newton's action and reaction principle
    can one change the paradigm in astronautics.

    In other words, you can't confirm anything, so it's up to
    the reader to verify that your apparatus doesn't work.

    Pushing against an internal magnet never gives you propulsion.
    You might as well put a spring inside the box.


    In this article, you are not asked to buy anything http://www.asps.it/VenditaF432BA.pdf
    but only to experimentally verify by yourself
    the violability of Newton's third law.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Von Ottone@vonottone@pnn.org to sci.space.policy on Tue Dec 2 09:19:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

    On 12/2/25 12:11 AM, Rufus wrote:
    Pushing against an internal magnet never gives you propulsion.

    WRONG !!!

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rufus@ru@ru.ru to sci.space.policy on Tue Dec 2 19:31:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

    Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
    On 12/2/25 12:11 AM, Rufus wrote:

    In other words, you can't confirm anything, so it's up to
    the reader to verify that your apparatus doesn't work.

    Pushing against an internal magnet never gives you propulsion.
    You might as well put a spring inside the box.

    WRONG !!!

    So you can make your Fiat go by pushing on the dashboard with your feet?

    Amazing! You should patent that.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Von Ottone@vonottone@pnn.org to sci.space.policy on Wed Dec 3 08:59:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

    On 12/3/25 4:31 AM, Rufus wrote:
    Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
    On 12/2/25 12:11 AM, Rufus wrote:

    In other words, you can't confirm anything, so it's up to
    the reader to verify that your apparatus doesn't work.

    Pushing against an internal magnet never gives you propulsion.
    You might as well put a spring inside the box.

    WRONG !!!

    So you can make your Fiat go by pushing on the dashboard with your feet?

    Amazing! You should patent that.

    You don't understand the concept of non-superposition of electromagnetic waves.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rufus@ru@ru.ru to sci.space.policy on Wed Dec 3 09:32:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.space.policy

    Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
    On 12/3/25 4:31 AM, Rufus wrote:
    Von Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> wrote:
    On 12/2/25 12:11 AM, Rufus wrote:

    In other words, you can't confirm anything, so it's up to
    the reader to verify that your apparatus doesn't work.

    Pushing against an internal magnet never gives you propulsion.
    You might as well put a spring inside the box.

    WRONG !!!

    So you can make your Fiat go by pushing on the dashboard with your feet?

    Amazing! You should patent that.

    You don't understand the concept of non-superposition of electromagnetic waves.

    Then perhaps you will explain it?

    No tangents please. Just stick to the relevant facts.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2