Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 26 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 51:44:13 |
Calls: | 632 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
22 files (18,511K bytes) |
Messages: | 178,045 |
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about erraticly, wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL. Always will be.
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being >aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the
feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney <p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against >> the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL. >>> Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being >aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the >feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney <p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against >> the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they >>> don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He >>> was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL. >>> Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being >aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the >feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying >> suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti,
evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-)
Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'* una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera
a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney <p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they >>> don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He >>> was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being >aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the >feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr. >> Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Who is Dr. E. Laureti?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti,
evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-)
Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'|? una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera
a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
I see you ran away from me and t.o. to console yourself and convince
yourself again that you have invented something useful.
It's not necessary for anyone to do your experiments for you. Do your
own work. It looks like you can't. All you've done is bark and yap on Usenet about what a wonderful invention PNN will be... if only you can
ever make it work.
But you can not make it work, for the reasons I explained to you, and
which you apparently couldn't understand. So instead, you howl at the
moon. I guess that's the next best thing to going there.
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney
<p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they >> > >>> don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He >> > >>> was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being
aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the
feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr. >> > >> Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying >> > >> suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten. >> >
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Who is Dr. E. Laureti?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti,
evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-)
Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'* una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera
a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
I see you ran away from me and t.o. to console yourself and convince
yourself again that you have invented something useful.
It's not necessary for anyone to do your experiments for you. Do your
own work. It looks like you can't. All you've done is bark and yap on >Usenet about what a wonderful invention PNN will be... if only you can
ever make it work.
But you can not make it work, for the reasons I explained to you, and
which you apparently couldn't understand. So instead, you howl at the
moon. I guess that's the next best thing to going there.
Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney <p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent >> Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT >> THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being >aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the >feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Who is Dr. E. Laureti?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti, evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-)
Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'* una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera
a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
I see you ran away from me and t.o. to console yourself and convince yourself again that you have invented something useful.
It's not necessary for anyone to do your experiments for you. Do your
own work. It looks like you can't. All you've done is bark and yap on Usenet about what a wonderful invention PNN will be... if only you can
ever make it work.
But you can not make it work, for the reasons I explained to you, and
which you apparently couldn't understand. So instead, you howl at the moon. I guess that's the next best thing to going there.
Aliena PNN is already working, just come and see it. http://www.asps.it/vol45.htm
But I don't like wasting
time with those who can't buy it.
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney
<p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing >> > > > >> missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that >> > > > >> properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent >> > > > >> Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT >> > > > >> THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being
aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the
feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a >> > > > >> fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Who is Dr. E. Laureti?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti,
evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-)
Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'* una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera
a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
I see you ran away from me and t.o. to console yourself and convince
yourself again that you have invented something useful.
It's not necessary for anyone to do your experiments for you. Do your
own work. It looks like you can't. All you've done is bark and yap on
Usenet about what a wonderful invention PNN will be... if only you can
ever make it work.
But you can not make it work, for the reasons I explained to you, and
which you apparently couldn't understand. So instead, you howl at the
moon. I guess that's the next best thing to going there.
Aliena PNN is already working, just come and see it.
http://www.asps.it/vol45.htm
But I don't like wasting
time with those who can't buy it.
Have you figured out how to use a balun yet?
Or do you continue to ground 1 element of the dipole?
Your rocket science is a comedy of errors.
Maybe your spaceship will work better if you pray for it.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 23:13:55 -0700, Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney
<p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing >> > > > >> missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that >> > > > >> properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being
aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the
feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a >> > > > >> fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully >> > > > >> reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Who is Dr. E. Laureti?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti,
evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-) >> > > Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'* una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera
a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
I see you ran away from me and t.o. to console yourself and convince
yourself again that you have invented something useful.
It's not necessary for anyone to do your experiments for you. Do your >> > own work. It looks like you can't. All you've done is bark and yap on >> > Usenet about what a wonderful invention PNN will be... if only you can >> > ever make it work.
But you can not make it work, for the reasons I explained to you, and
which you apparently couldn't understand. So instead, you howl at the >> > moon. I guess that's the next best thing to going there.
Aliena PNN is already working, just come and see it.
http://www.asps.it/vol45.htm
But I don't like wasting
time with those who can't buy it.
Have you figured out how to use a balun yet?
We are not Radio Amateurs
Or do you continue to ground 1 element of the dipole?
You just don't understand PNN.
Your rocket science is a comedy of errors.
Maybe your spaceship will work better if you pray for it.
I will pray for you!
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 23:13:55 -0700, Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney
<p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about >> > > > >>> erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being
aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the
feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Who is Dr. E. Laureti?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti, >> > > evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-)
Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'|? una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera >> > > a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
I see you ran away from me and t.o. to console yourself and convince >> > yourself again that you have invented something useful.
It's not necessary for anyone to do your experiments for you. Do your >> > own work. It looks like you can't. All you've done is bark and yap on
Usenet about what a wonderful invention PNN will be... if only you can >> > ever make it work.
But you can not make it work, for the reasons I explained to you, and >> > which you apparently couldn't understand. So instead, you howl at the >> > moon. I guess that's the next best thing to going there.
Aliena PNN is already working, just come and see it.
http://www.asps.it/vol45.htm
But I don't like wasting
time with those who can't buy it.
Have you figured out how to use a balun yet?
We are not Radio Amateurs
I know. You could learn a lot from amateur radio operators.
<https://www.amazon.com/dp/0764559877>
Or do you continue to ground 1 element of the dipole?
You just don't understand PNN.
You don't understand basic electricity.
Your rocket science is a comedy of errors.
Maybe your spaceship will work better if you pray for it.
I will pray for you!
Thanks! <crosses self>
I feel better already!
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 01:19:23 -0700, Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney
<p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they >> > >>> don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about
erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being >> > >aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the >> > >feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr. >> > >> Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully
reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten. >> >
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Who is Dr. E. Laureti?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti,
evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-)
Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'|? una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera
a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
I see you ran away from me and t.o. to console yourself and convince >yourself again that you have invented something useful.
It's not necessary for anyone to do your experiments for you. Do your
own work. It looks like you can't. All you've done is bark and yap on >Usenet about what a wonderful invention PNN will be... if only you can
ever make it work.
But you can not make it work, for the reasons I explained to you, and
which you apparently couldn't understand. So instead, you howl at the >moon. I guess that's the next best thing to going there.
You are an incompetent who thinks he his Leonardo da Vinci and can
give advice to everbody whoo works hard to invent new thinfs.
Just hexilarant.
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 23:13:55 -0700, Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> posted:
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> posted:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:18:27 -0000 (UTC), Peter Stickney
<p_stickney@verizon.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:12:27 GMT, E.Laureti wrote:
Against those who do not want to experiment to change the failing
missile astronautics that cannot even colonize the Moon.
From talk.origins (August 20, 2025) anonymous Rufus Ruffian says against
the PNN.
It seems everyone here knows enough about Laureti's claims that they
don't believe him. That's more than Laureti knows about it.
Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He
was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about >> >> > > > >>> erraticly,
wondering why his machine doesn't work.
The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.
Always will be.
Laureti reply:
In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that
properly
filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent
Office)
who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT
THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS
You are aware, of course, that a patent isn't proof that what's being
aptented actually works - just that you filed the paperwork, paid the
feed, and nobody else has patented the same thing already.
You laugh and you will be destroyed by yourselves, believers in a
fake astronautics that won't even colonize the Moon.
Astronautics led by the top of the idiots found in NASA, ESA, and Mr.
Musk,
the rich donkey in physics. A genius of bluster with his comical flying
suppositories. After all, you give credit to a maxim that fully >> >> > > > >> reflects
Ah! "Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"
Admit it, you are Dr. Emilio Lizardo, trying to get home to Planet Ten.
Who is Dr. Emilio Lizardo?
Who is Dr. E. Laureti?
noterai che tutta la ciarla evolve indipendentemente dai brevetti, >> >> > > evolve per evitare qualunque dimostrazione sperimentale della PNN :-) >> >> > > Del resto neppure vedono che da oltre mezzo secolo (Apollo 11) non c'* una base
terrestre sulla Luna fatta usando i missili.
Neppure vedono di non avere alcuna astronave che sopravviva intera
a un viaggio attorno alla luna http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm
I see you ran away from me and t.o. to console yourself and convince
yourself again that you have invented something useful.
It's not necessary for anyone to do your experiments for you. Do your >> >> > own work. It looks like you can't. All you've done is bark and yap on >> >> > Usenet about what a wonderful invention PNN will be... if only you can >> >> > ever make it work.
But you can not make it work, for the reasons I explained to you, and >> >> > which you apparently couldn't understand. So instead, you howl at the >> >> > moon. I guess that's the next best thing to going there.
Aliena PNN is already working, just come and see it.
http://www.asps.it/vol45.htm
But I don't like wasting
time with those who can't buy it.
Have you figured out how to use a balun yet?
We are not Radio Amateurs
I know. You could learn a lot from amateur radio operators.
<https://www.amazon.com/dp/0764559877>
Or do you continue to ground 1 element of the dipole?
You just don't understand PNN.
You don't understand basic electricity.
Your rocket science is a comedy of errors.
Maybe your spaceship will work better if you pray for it.
I will pray for you!
Thanks! <crosses self>
I feel better already!
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 14:34:36 -0700, Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 23:13:55 -0700, Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
Have you figured out how to use a balun yet?
We are not Radio Amateurs
I know. You could learn a lot from amateur radio operators.
Wrong!
<https://www.amazon.com/dp/0764559877>
Or do you continue to ground 1 element of the dipole?
You just don't understand PNN.
You don't understand basic electricity.
Wrong!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2Your rocket science is a comedy of errors.
Maybe your spaceship will work better if you pray for it.
I will pray for you!
Thanks! <crosses self>
I feel better already!
Amen!
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 14:34:36 -0700, Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 23:13:55 -0700, Rufus Ruffian <ru@ru.ru> wrote:
Have you figured out how to use a balun yet?
We are not Radio Amateurs
I know. You could learn a lot from amateur radio operators.
Wrong!
Don't be so pessimistic. At least try to learn something.
Start here:
<https://www.amazon.com/dp/0764559877>
Or do you continue to ground 1 element of the dipole?
You just don't understand PNN.
You don't understand basic electricity.
Wrong!
What are your magnets pushing on?
Your rocket science is a comedy of errors.
Maybe your spaceship will work better if you pray for it.
I will pray for you!
Thanks! <crosses self>
I feel better already!
Amen!