From Newsgroup: sci.physics.research
In article <10qjun8$hrl8$
1@dont-email.me>, Luigi Fortunati asks about
a Newtonian-mechanics elastic collision of two bodies
A: mass 2m, initial velocity +1 (moving to the right in the lab frame)
B: mass 1m, initial velocity -1 (moving to the left in the lab frame)
with a spring in between them.
Let's take the lab frame to be an inertial reference frame, and assume
that A and B are each rigid with uniform density. Luigi's figure
https://www.geogebra.org/classic/p5dmxcae
shows that at the moment A and B first contact the spring (which extends
from x=-1 to x=+1), A extends from x=-5 to x=-1 (so its center of mass
is at x=-3), and B extends from x=+1 to x=+3 (so its center of mass is
at x=+2) [all measurements taken in the lab reference frame].
It will make the analysis simpler if we switch over to the center-of-mass
(COM) inertial reference frame, so let's do that.
And, it's simplest if we assume that the mass of the spring is much less
than the mass of A and B (so that we can neglect the spring's own linear momentum).
For convenience, let's take the mass unit to be 1 kg (so that A has mass
m_A = 2kg and B mass m_B = 1kg). Let's take the length scale to be in
meters (so that A's center of mass is at x_A = -3 m when the front (right
side) of A first contacts the spring, and B's center of mass is at x_B =
+2 m when the front (left side) of B first contacts the spring. Let's
take the initial velocities in the lab frame to be +/- 1 m/s.
Then the total linear momentum in the lab frame is +1 kg m/s. Since
the total mass is m_total = m_A + m_B = 3kg, that means that the COM is
moving to the right at +0.333333 m/s with respect to the lab reference
frame. So, in the COM frame,
A is initially moving to the right: v_A(initial) = +0.666667 m/s
B is initially moving to the left: v_B(initial) = -1.333333 m/s
so that the total linear momentum is zero (as it must be in the COM frame).
The COM position in the lab frame at the time the fronts of A and B
first contact the spring is
x_COM(first contact) = (m_A*x_A + m_B*x_B)/m_total
where x_A and x_B are the positions of A's and B's center of mass at
that time. This works out to
x_COM(first contact) = (2kg*-3m + 1kg*+2m)/3kg = -1.333333 m.
The COM is (by definition) *stationary* in the COM frame, i.e., it is
always at the same position x_COM = -1.333333 m. In order for the COM
to stay stationary in the COM frame as the spring is compressed, A and
B's motions in the COM frame must be in a +1:-2 ratio at all times.
That is, at any time when the spring is compressed, in the COM frame
B must have moved twice as far left since first contacting the spring
as A has moved to the right since first contacting the spring.
Since this is true *throughout* the spring compression, this means that
at any time when the spring is compressed, B's COM velocity must be
-2 * A's COM velocity.
Since this is true *throughout* the spring compression, B's acceleration
must be -2 * A's acceleration. (Note that acceleration doesn't need a
"COM" or "lab" qualifier, because acceleration is the same in any inertial reference frame.)
By Newton's 2nd law, this ratio of accelerations combined with the 2:1
A:B mass ratio means the force the spring applies to B at any time must
be -1 * the force the spring applies to A at that same time. (Note that
this means the sum of these two forces = 0, which is what it must be for
the total linear momentum to remain constant.)
So, the answers to Luigi's two questions are:
- Should I slow them down with the same deceleration?
No, B has twice the deceleration as A.
- Do they stop at the same instant or at different times?
In the COM frame they both stop at the same time.
The COM frame is moving to the right at +0.333333 m/s with respect to
the lab frame, so at the moment when A and B both stop in the COM frame,
A is still moving right at +0.333333 m/s in the lab frame and B has
already stopped and reversed direction and is now moving right at
+0.333333 m/s in the lab frame. So, we conclude that in the lab frame,
B stops before A.
If we assume that the spring obey's Hooke's law, it's actually quite
easy to solve the motion exactly. I'll leave the details for a later
post.
--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]" <
dr.j.thornburg@gmail-pink.com>
(he/him; on the west coast of Canada)
"Totalitarianism in power invariably replaces all first-rate talents,
regardless of their sympathies, with those crackpots and fools whose
lack of intelligence and creativity is still the best guarantee of
their loyalty." -- Hannah Arendt, "The Origins of Totalitarianism"
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2