1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. sci.physics.relativity

  • BEING exists, Nothingness does not.

    From Richard Hachel@r.hachel@tiscali.fr to sci.physics.relativity on Wed Sep 30 01:55:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    The key point to consider is that if BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Relativistic thought introduces a form of "Nothingness" wherein observable time (To)rCoas opposed to proper, real time (Tr) and anisochrony time (re4t)rCois conceptualized merely as the curve traced by the tip of the To vector during the analysis of an accelerated reference frame. Yet, this is incorrect; what actually matters is the magnitude of the vector itself at
    any given moment.
    If one mistakenly adopts the former view, an unsightly "corner" appears in
    the model.
    But that is not the reality. It is this abstract notionrCoconceived by the human mindrCothat creates an artificial and inexplicable singularity.

    This acceleration curve has no real existence; what truly exists
    is proper time, anisochrony, and observable time (whether terrestrial or
    in the laboratory)rCorepresented by the vector OP at any given instant.

    Once this useless abstract concept is banished from the mind, the problem vanishes, and the "corner" disappears. When the engine of an accelerating rocket cuts out, the craft simply continues its journey smoothly, in
    Galilean motion.

    R.H.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Python@python@cccp.invalid to sci.physics.relativity on Wed Sep 30 07:52:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    That's certainly an elegant way to eliminate a discontinuity: declare that
    the thing displaying it doesn't exist. :-)

    Unfortunately, the "corner" isn't in the rocket's trajectory. It's in your equations.

    At the same Vr:

    accelerated:
    dTo/dTr = [1 + Vr^2/(2c^2)] / sqrt[1 + Vr^2/(4c^2)]

    Galilean:
    dTo/dTr = sqrt[1 + Vr^2/c^2]

    For example, at Vr = sqrt(2)c:

    accelerated: 1.63299...
    Galilean: 1.73205...

    Same Vr, two different values.

    You may banish the curve, Nothingness, abstract thought, and half of metaphysics if you like. Those two numbers stubbornly refuse to disappear.

    And your phi = Vrm/Vri was introduced precisely to explain the transition between them.

    So the corner hasn't vanished.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From nospam@nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) to sci.physics.relativity on Wed Sep 30 10:40:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> wrote:

    The key point to consider is that if BEING exists, Nothingness does not.

    You are guilty of empty set denialism,

    Jan
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity on Wed Sep 30 13:38:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Richard Hachel wrote:

    The key point to consider is that if BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Relativistic thought introduces a form of "Nothingness"

    "Nothingness" has nothing to do with Relativistic.


    "Nothingness" is a religion by religious fanatics.

    "Nothingness" is a religion.


    Look at who originated "Nothingness".
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2