From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Temporal rate (the internal chronotropy of clocks) is a local property of
the clock, determined by the relative speeds of the clocks; whereas
assigning a common "present" to spatially separated events (the relativity
of simultaneity) is a positional relationship between the observer and
those events.
"Chronotropy is kinematic; anisochrony is positional."

R.H.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Le 24/09/2026 |a 15:50, Richard Hachel a |-crit :

Temporal rate (the internal chronotropy of clocks) is a local property of the
clock, determined by the relative speeds of the clocks; whereas assigning a common
"present" to spatially separated events (the relativity of simultaneity) is a
positional relationship between the observer and those events.
"Chronotropy is kinematic; anisochrony is positional."

R.H.

"Hachel propose une d|-composition conceptuelle de la transformation relativiste
en un effet cin|-matique sur les rythmes temporels et un effet positionnel sur la
simultan|-it|-."
TchatGPT septembre 2026

Elle parle bien, cette AI. :))

R.H.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Richard Hachel wrote:

Temporal rate (the internal chronotropy of clocks) is a local property of
the clock, determined by the relative speeds of the clocks; whereas
assigning a common "present" to spatially separated events (the relativity
of simultaneity) is a positional relationship between the observer and
those events.
"Chronotropy is kinematic; anisochrony is positional."

R.H.

If you cannot explain it in 'plain English' without technical terms or 'definitions'...
it is not science, it's only abstract definition of words.

I'm tired of you definitions meaning nothing.

It's all French to me.

Don't you have nay real world experiences what is actually happening in
the real world???

i doubt you even understand what you are sayin yourself...


How about some physics or science without all the giberish? I'm tired of
your English lessons of definitions and
technical terms containg no science at all.

You cannot trust definitions from textbooks or so-called experts.

"> Temporal rate (the internal chronotropy of clocks) is a local
property of

the clock, determined by the relative speeds of the clocks; whereas
assigning a common "present" to spatially separated events (the relativity
of simultaneity) is a positional relationship between the observer and
those events.
"Chronotropy is kinematic; anisochrony is positional."

IT FUCKING DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING!@!!!

Is this a joke or something?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Richard Hachel wrote:

Temporal rate (the internal chronotropy of clocks) is a local property of the clock, determined by the relative speeds of the clocks; whereas assigning a common "present" to spatially separated events (the relativity of simultaneity) is a positional relationship between the observer and those events.
"Chronotropy is kinematic; anisochrony is positional."

R.H.

If you cannot explain it in 'plain English' without technical terms or 'definitions'...
it is not science, it's only abstract definition of words.

I'm tired of you definitions meaning nothing.

It's all French to me.

Don't you have nay real world experiences what is actually happening in
the real world???

i doubt you even understand what you are sayin yourself...

How about some physics or science without all the giberish? I'm tired of
your English lessons of definitions and
technical terms containg no science at all.

You cannot trust definitions from textbooks or so-called experts.

"> Temporal rate (the internal chronotropy of clocks) is a local
property of

the clock, determined by the relative speeds of the clocks; whereas assigning a common "present" to spatially separated events (the relativity of simultaneity) is a positional relationship between the observer and those events.
"Chronotropy is kinematic; anisochrony is positional."

IT FUCKING DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING!@!!!

Is this a joke or something?

Have you ever done anything scientific in your whole life because it
doesn't show at all.

You sound like a guy who has a lot of textbooks but never proformed an experiment, or even an observation!

Learning the meaning of scientific words and ideas is not science.

You shouda been a professor...


dat how dey talk.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2