On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
On 09/13/2026 at 20:47, Luigi Fortunati wrote:ted by the
In the frame https://ibb.co/PsG2JQXK taken from the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbK8T-ZbcZZA there are two bodies:
body A (the satellite of mass m) and body B (the Earth of mass M).
And there are two forces =E2=80=93 gravitational, of course: F1
(exer=
).Earth on the satellite) and F2 (exerted by the satellite on the
Earth=
Those two forces describe the same interaction.
Yes, it is the gravitational interaction of the third law that
provides=20 TWO forces, that of the Earth on the satellite and that of
the satellite=20 on the Earth.
Two forces, not just one.
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
On 09/13/2026 at 20:47, Luigi Fortunati wrote:ted by the
In the frame https://ibb.co/PsG2JQXK taken from the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbK8T-ZbcZZA there are two bodies:
body A (the satellite of mass m) and body B (the Earth of mass M).
And there are two forces =E2=80=93 gravitational, of course: F1
(exer=
).Earth on the satellite) and F2 (exerted by the satellite on the
Earth=
Those two forces describe the same interaction.
Yes, it is the gravitational interaction of the third law that
provides=20 TWO forces, that of the Earth on the satellite and that of
the satellite=20 on the Earth.
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
> On 09/13/2026 at 20:47, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
>> In the frame https://ibb.co/PsG2JQXK taken from the video
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbK8T-ZbcZZA there are two bodies:
>> body A (the satellite of mass m) and body B (the Earth of mass M).
>>
>> And there are two forces =E2=80=93 gravitational, of course: F1
>> (exer=
ted by the
>> Earth on the satellite) and F2 (exerted by the satellite on the
>> Earth=
).
>
> Those two forces describe the same interaction.
Yes, it is the gravitational interaction of the third law that
provides=20 TWO forces, that of the Earth on the satellite and that of
the satellite=20 on the Earth.
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
On 19/09/2026 18:35, Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
-a > On 09/13/2026 at 20:47, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
-a >> In the frame https://ibb.co/PsG2JQXK-a taken from the video
-a >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbK8T-ZbcZZA there are two bodies: >>> -a >> body A (the satellite of mass m) and body B (the Earth of mass M). >>> -a >>
-a >> And there are two forces =E2=80=93 gravitational, of course: F1
-a >> (exer=
ted by the
-a >> Earth on the satellite) and F2 (exerted by the satellite on the
-a >> Earth=
).
-a >
-a > Those two forces describe the same interaction.
Yes, it is the gravitational interaction of the third law that
provides=20 TWO forces, that of the Earth on the satellite and that of
the satellite=20 on the Earth.
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of
a body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the natural
motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed, which
a freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but formulated differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural motion of a
body so there is no force.
6 15:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
an object can be observed to accelerate during free fall. A force is
clearly still acting on it. Only an idiot would claim that curved space
is the cause.
On 19/09/2026 18:35, Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
> Those two forces describe the same interaction.
Yes, it is the gravitational interaction of the third law that
provides=20 TWO forces, that of the Earth on the satellite and that of
the satellite=20 on the Earth.
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of a
body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the natural
motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed, which a
freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but formulated differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural motion of a body
so there is no force.
On 19/09/2026 18:35, Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
> Those two forces describe the same interaction.
Yes, it is the gravitational interaction of the third law that
provides=20 TWO forces, that of the Earth on the satellite and that of
the satellite=20 on the Earth.
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of a
body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the natural
motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed, which a
freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but formulated differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural motion of a body
so there is no force.
HenryWilson wrote:
6 15:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
an object can be observed to accelerate during free fall. A force is
clearly still acting on it. Only an idiot would claim that curved space
is the cause.
imbecile, the acceleration has nothing to do with the force. And how
would you know that, that there is a force, once the mesurement
instruments shows clearly there is nono.
Fucking genius, stop posting the truth
in this science group.
Mikko wrote:
On 19/09/2026 18:35, Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
> Those two forces describe the same interaction.
Yes, it is the gravitational interaction of the third law that
provides=20 TWO forces, that of the Earth on the satellite and that
of the satellite=20 on the Earth.
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of a
body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the natural
motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed, which a
freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but formulated
differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural motion of a
body so there is no force.
idiot, how could freefall not be natural motion; then it has nothing to
do with constant speeds. Incredible, neither this guy knows what the acceleration is.
On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:28:49 -0000 (UTC), Dmitry Rokhmanov wrote:
Mikko wrote:
On 19/09/2026 18:35, Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
> Those two forces describe the same interaction.
Yes, it is the gravitational interaction of the third law that
provides=20 TWO forces, that of the Earth on the satellite and that
of the satellite=20 on the Earth.
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of a
body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the natural
motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed, which a
freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but formulated
differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural motion of a
body so there is no force.
idiot, how could freefall not be natural motion; then it has nothing to
do with constant speeds. Incredible, neither this guy knows what the
acceleration is.
Every star is in the natural state of free fall. Every star is
accelerating towards an indeterminate centre of mass that is also accelerating and continually changing...but I'm sure that is far too hard
for you.
On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:28:49 -0000 (UTC), Dmitry Rokhmanov wrote:
Mikko wrote:
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of a
body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the natural
motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed, which a
freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but formulated
differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural motion of a
body so there is no force.
idiot, how could freefall not be natural motion; then it has nothing to
do with constant speeds. Incredible, neither this guy knows what the
acceleration is.
Every star is in the natural state of free fall. Every star is
accelerating towards an indeterminate centre of mass that is also accelerating and continually changing...but I'm sure that is far too
hard for you.
HenryWilson wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:28:49 -0000 (UTC), Dmitry Rokhmanov wrote:Since you're smarter than that guy, you shouldn't have to sit around and
Mikko wrote:
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of
a body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the
natural motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed,
which a freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but
formulated differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural
motion of a body so there is no force.
idiot, how could freefall not be natural motion; then it has nothing
to do with constant speeds. Incredible, neither this guy knows what
the acceleration is.
Every star is in the natural state of free fall. Every star is
accelerating towards an indeterminate centre of mass that is also
accelerating and continually changing...but I'm sure that is far too
hard for you.
call him stupid, right? Isn't it enough to prove him devastatingly
wrong?
On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:12:24 -0000 (UTC), Webster Abalmasov wrote:
HenryWilson wrote:
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
an object can be observed to accelerate during free fall. A force is
clearly still acting on it. Only an idiot would claim that curved
space is the cause.
imbecile, the acceleration has nothing to do with the force. And how
would you know that, that there is a force, once the mesurement
instruments shows clearly there is nono.
HAHHAAAHAHAHAH! This idiot can't think beyond a spring accelerometer!
What a moron! A girl in free fall can monitor her ABSOLUTE acceleration
with radar. A distant observer can monitor it with a telescope...and a =
F/m.
Lane W wrote:
HenryWilson wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:28:49 -0000 (UTC), Dmitry Rokhmanov wrote:Since you're smarter than that guy, you shouldn't have to sit around and
Mikko wrote:
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of >>>>> a body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the
natural motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed, >>>>> which a freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but
formulated differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural
motion of a body so there is no force.
idiot, how could freefall not be natural motion; then it has nothing
to do with constant speeds. Incredible, neither this guy knows what
the acceleration is.
Every star is in the natural state of free fall. Every star is
accelerating towards an indeterminate centre of mass that is also
accelerating and continually changing...but I'm sure that is far too
hard for you.
call him stupid, right? Isn't it enough to prove him devastatingly
wrong?
proven cretin, get lost
HenryWilson wrote:
6 15:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
an object can be observed to accelerate during free fall. A force is
clearly still acting on it. Only an idiot would claim that curved space
is the cause.
imbecile, the acceleration has nothing to do with the force. And how would you know that, that there is a force, once the mesurement instruments
shows clearly there is nono. Fucking imbecile, stop posting in science groups.
On 20/09/2026 17:12, Webster Abalmasov wrote:
HenryWilson wrote:
6 15:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Parker Zholudev wrote:
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
On 09/15/2026 at 04:08, Mikko wrote:
Two forces, not just one.
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it; idiots.
an object can be observed to accelerate during free fall. A force is
clearly still acting on it. Only an idiot would claim that curved
space is the cause.
imbecile, the acceleration has nothing to do with the force. And how
would you know that, that there is a force, once the mesurement
instruments shows clearly there is nono. Fucking imbecile, stop posting
in science groups.
The motivation for sci.physics.relativity was made clear in the
discussion before it was created, and that motivation was not
scientific.
But sci.math is a real scientific group.
HenryWilson wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:12:24 -0000 (UTC), Webster Abalmasov wrote:
HenryWilson wrote:
there are no forces applied in freefall, only by opposing it;
idiots.
an object can be observed to accelerate during free fall. A force is
clearly still acting on it. Only an idiot would claim that curved
space is the cause.
imbecile, the acceleration has nothing to do with the force. And how
would you know that, that there is a force, once the mesurement
instruments shows clearly there is nono.
HAHHAAAHAHAHAH! This idiot can't think beyond a spring accelerometer!
What a moron! A girl in free fall can monitor her ABSOLUTE acceleration
with radar. A distant observer can monitor it with a telescope...and a
=
F/m.
what has the springs with acceleration, fuckin imbecile. Amazing the
level of imbecility in this almost science forum
HenryWilson wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:28:49 -0000 (UTC), Dmitry Rokhmanov wrote:
Mikko wrote:
That depends on the theory. There is always a force if the motion of
a body differs from its natural motion. In Newton's theory the
natural motion of a body is along a stright line with constant speed,
which a freefal usually isn't. Cartan's theory is equivalent but
formulated differently. In Cartan's theory freefall is the natural
motion of a body so there is no force.
idiot, how could freefall not be natural motion; then it has nothing
to do with constant speeds. Incredible, neither this guy knows what
the acceleration is.
Every star is in the natural state of free fall. Every star is
accelerating towards an indeterminate centre of mass that is also
accelerating and continually changing...but I'm sure that is far too
hard for you.
that has nothing to do with your force, you inbreed imbecile. Write down
the expression for acceleration, to see what it is. I bet you dont know
what that is.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 121:09:47 |
| Calls: | 1,194 |
| Files: | 1,352 |
| Messages: | 290,208 |