• Einstein Plus Two by Petr Beckmann

    From amirjf@amirjfnin@aim.com to sci.physics.relativity on Thu Sep 17 03:09:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    https://archive.org/details/einstein-plus-two-by-petr-beckmann
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity on Thu Sep 17 07:59:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 09/17/2026 12:09 AM, amirjf wrote:
    https://archive.org/details/einstein-plus-two-by-petr-beckmann


    "

    Petr Beckmann:
    EINSTEIN PLUS TWO


    In 1912, Leigh Page, professor of
    mathematical physics at Yale, proved
    that the Maxwell equations could be
    derived without any further assumptions
    by applying the Lorentz transformation
    to CoulombrCOs Law. This was regarded as
    a triumph of the Einstein theory; yet it
    also proved that the Einstein theory
    stood'on a single law that has never been
    verified at high velocities without circular
    logic. Little attention has been paid to
    another possibility: that the successes of
    the Einstein theory are merely due to the
    Lorentz transformation compensating
    for an inverse-square law that becomes
    inaccurate at high velocities.

    This book is based on the assumption
    that the velocity that matters, the velo-
    city that will make the Lorentz force and
    the Maxwell equations valid, is not that
    with respect to an observer, but that of
    charges (and masses) with respect to the
    traversed field.

    This results in a theory that satisfies
    the relativity principle without having to
    distort space and time. It derives all the
    experimentally verified phenomena fol-
    lowing from the Einstein theory, plus
    two more: the quantization of electron
    orbits (also the Schr|-dinger equation and
    new insight into the nature of PlanckrCOs
    constant), which hitherto had to be
    postulated, and the Titius series, for
    which no dynamic explanation has
    hitherto been available.


    Einstein Plus Two


    By


    Petr Beckmann
    Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering,
    University of Colorado


    Fellow,
    Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers


    THE GOLEM PRESS
    Boulder, Colorado
    1987


    Library of Congress Catalog Card No.: 85-82516
    ISBN 0-911762-39-6 "




    How about "Theories of Gravitation" by Bergmann.

    Though I found out he was a Marxist in Stachel's remarks from
    some BU scholars' talk on "philosophy" and "physics".


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From HenryWilson@Hgw@home.com to sci.physics.relativity on Wed Sep 30 10:33:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 03:09:25 -0400, amirjf wrote:

    https://archive.org/details/einstein-plus-two-by-petr-beckmann

    Your book is rubbish. You are nothing but yet another indoctrinated fool.
    If you want to refute the ballistic theory you should at least learn what
    it says. Consider Michelson's 1913 experiment. The ballistic theory
    predicts the observed result exactly. Path length difference divided by wavelength is 3.76 fringes. Majorana's experiment is similarly wrongly interpreted. The same number of wavelengths exists in his interferometer
    no matter what the speed is. He detected 0.7 of a wavelength shift and
    claimed that this refuted the ballistic theory which would predict none. That's nonsense. His observed shift was due to the difference in travel
    times between the source and mirror 4 due to c+v and c-v before the beams reach that mirror. When the wheel was rotating, the split beams were
    already out of phase by approximately that amount before they entered the interferometer. You will find similar misinterpretations in all the inferferometer experiments that are claimed to refute the ballistic
    theory.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2