From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

another thing i notice about this newsgroup...

yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

What consititutes an observer?

Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
if you don't even know what the word
'observer' means???

If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 8/9/2026 7:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

another thing i notice about this newsgroup...

yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

Of course they don't. They're physicists -
they're complete idiots. Or they are minions
of physicists, even stupider than their masters.

What consititutes an observer?

The ability of speaking in human
language.

Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

No, without an observer the phrase
"Earth exists" wouldn't have either sense
or logical value.

How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
if you don't even know what the word
'observer' means???

Simply. By training - a neural network
acquire such ability.

If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?

Wherever.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

another thing i notice about this newsgroup...

yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

What consititutes an observer?

Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
if you don't even know what the word
'observer' means???

If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?

Reality does not exist without an observable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

another thing i notice about this newsgroup...

yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

What consititutes an observer?

Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
if you don't even know what the word
'observer' means???

If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?

Reality does not exist without an observable.

That might be a little above yours understanding...
since reality would be just a blur without an observable.

But, now..I'm going to take it to a whole new level beyond ANYONES understading..

You already know, 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the
earth'.

So, it is simple for God to create the reality of a heavens and an earth
by being
The Observer...and making the heavens and the earth a reality..

But, but..
and this is beyond anyones level of understanding here..

There is another observer in this statement

'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.

and it isn't God.

The Observer is the one who observed God creating the heavens and the
earth.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Am Montag000010, 10.08.2026 um 04:04 schrieb The Starmaker:

The Starmaker wrote:

another thing i notice about this newsgroup...

yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

What consititutes an observer?

Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
if you don't even know what the word
'observer' means???

If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?

Reality does not exist without an observable.No

'Reality' denotes things that exist.

So lets assume 'a HUGE black void' as thing.

Would you reject it's existence, because you cannot see it.





--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Montag000010, 10.08.2026 um 04:04 schrieb The Starmaker:

The Starmaker wrote:

another thing i notice about this newsgroup...

yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

What consititutes an observer?

Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements
if you don't even know what the word
'observer' means???

If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?

Reality does not exist without an observable.No

'Reality' denotes things that exist.

So lets assume 'a HUGE black void' as thing.

Would you reject it's existence, because you cannot see it.

It appears to me you 'also' don't understand the word...observer.

It has NOTHING to with see or seeing.

Observer means to 'look', 'watch'..not see things.


The act of looking creates reality.

If you are not watching or looking, there is no reality to develop.

Is the cat alive or dead?

Take a look...
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Montag000010, 10.08.2026 um 04:04 schrieb The Starmaker:

The Starmaker wrote:

another thing i notice about this newsgroup...

yous don't even know what an OBSERVER...IS!

What consititutes an observer?

Does the universe...and the earth exist without an observer????

How in God's Heaven can you use the word "observer" in your statements >> if you don't even know what the word
'observer' means???

If you mention 2 observers...where is the third one?

Reality does not exist without an observable.No

'Reality' denotes things that exist.

So lets assume 'a HUGE black void' as thing.

Would you reject it's existence, because you cannot see it.

It appears to me you 'also' don't understand the word...observer.

It has NOTHING to with see or seeing.

Observer means to 'look', 'watch'..not see things.

The act of looking creates reality.

If you are not watching or looking, there is no reality to develop.

Is the cat alive or dead?

Take a look...

Hell, a blind person can ...observe.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2