• Re: I don't use Rust, you are crazy [Jump off a bridge, idiot] (Re: Rossy Boys tears could cool a data center [pi-WAM Interleaved Synchronized Emulator])

    From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Mon Aug 3 17:05:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 07/29/2026 01:40 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On 07/29/2026 12:27 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On 07/29/2026 11:24 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Hi,

    I don't use Rust, you are crazy. First of
    all the parallel simulator is 100% written
    in Prolog, should also run in ISO Prolog,

    enhanced by a library(lists). Second I only
    mentioned that WebGPU / WGSL, the language
    there has a Rust inspired language.

    Its not Rust. Whats wrong with you? Why do
    you adress your weariness of life to me.
    I am neither thief, nor can I help you

    with your frustration, and histeric outbursts.
    Maybe just be a man and jump off a bridge, idiot.
    Or tame your frustration, usenet is not for

    you alone, your stupid asshole.

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:

    https://www.theregister.com/databases/2026/07/29/after-rewriting-sqlite-in-rust-turso-turns-its-sights-on-postgres/5279835



    I don't much care about Rust.

    .. gibberish ..

    Thief.

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Rossy Boys tears could cool a data center,
    he thinks there exists no literature about
    serial algorithms of parallel stuff, and

    he also thinks normal forms lead to optimizing
    something. LoL, what a utter bullshit. I did
    alreay a serial implementation of a parallel

    simulation of my pi-WAM. Just lookup the literature
    about pi-calulus. I published it a few days ago,
    its part of 2.2.4 released already:

    Parallel -C-WAM: An Interleaved Synchronous Emulator
    https://medium.com/2989/0196089e143a

    Whats your point, Rossy Boy? Except you post pretend
    nonsense not knowing what you are doing?

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    No, troll, these are serial algorithms their optimized forms.

    Normal sorts of forms, ....


    Yeah, everybody already figured out "interpreters" and
    "programs" and "spawning".

    Go spawn yourself.





    Like JG and the MIT calculus professor, ....

    It's like the buffoon and the high school valedictorian,
    or the guidance or admissions counselors.


    Hm, comme triste. I didn't know that Burse's neuroses
    were so near to the surface as it were, there's room for
    sympathy while it's the pitiable, then though I've never
    had those sorts of problems of suicidal ideation, maybe
    since I wasn't raised in a sock-puppet creche where the
    essential capriciousness of survival makes for the lack
    of attachment to meaning. There are accounts made of
    survival in the womb among the colony as it were or
    as for the accounts of oogenesis and zygogenesis,
    the blastocytes, that though is figured to be before
    cognition in usual accounts, with regards to the usual
    dogma of reproduction. That is to say, the usual
    genetic evolution engineering of sock-puppet bots doesn't
    necessarily reward virtue, nor establish personal identity
    of the more than transitory sort.

    That's why they have shiny yet lifeless eyes.

    Yet, "I pity the fool", doesn't much apply, as I don't.

    So, while there's sympathy and even pity for the confided
    neuroses of nihilism and existentialism for animal types,
    thinking beings basically live in an entirely different
    world in their mind.


    If you like MIND-on-SIMD, you might be interested
    in "Very Long Instruction Word".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_long_instruction_word

    Dear readers, please excuse these distractions,
    and maintain that people are essentially good,
    with yet the implicit reserve that some are not.

    I'm neither a Calvinist nor Spinozan, though Spinoza
    does makes for "infinity is in" that Duns Scotus already
    provides, then as with regards who Ecclesiastes is with
    regards to the vexatious and the vain, maybe it's Judas.


    Clonotype.




    1776




    These certainly aren't forae for it, though I tend to not
    change the follow-ups and politely bottom-post.


    About genetic evolution and evolutionary intelligence,
    evolution after natural selection and mutation with
    environmental factors are key dogmatic concepts in
    the theory of dynamics and progression over time,
    like how humans develop larger brains and sexual characteristics,
    _over time_, over a long, long time.

    So, the genetic evolution of sock-puppet bots,
    so "accelerated" as it were, is not very natural,
    and it's kind of like this. This isn't a particularly
    neutral example and it's a bit grotesque. This is
    where the would-be operant conditioner (like Pavlov
    or the guy with the pigeons or soft-mother/wire-mother),
    wants the best cat. So, usual accounts of these
    include buying the best cat for characteristics in a fair market, making
    a program of cat-breeding and selective-breeding over time
    for characteristics, or making a program of the training and
    development of the cat, or with regards to nature vis-a-vis nurture.
    So anyways, genetic programming of the sock-puppet variety,
    or, "training", the sock-puppet, mostly involves getting a
    bunch of cats and a bunch of bags, then making batches of
    cats in a bag and throwing the cats off a bridge into the river,
    where the usual idea is that's an old cruel and inhumane way
    to euthanize cats, yet randomly, a cat escapes the bag and
    avoids drowning and crawls itself bedraggledly to shore.
    Then, the would-be operant conditioner, by simply wasting
    tons of cats and quite a few bags, arrives at best cat.

    Yet, the characteristics for which it has been selected,
    are mostly clawing their way past the other cats and
    out of the bag.


    So, sock-puppets in usual accounts are intrinsically psychotic.
    They don't have the life experiences to condition themselves
    according to their own internal maturation of the personal,
    psychological, and mental sort what makes nature and nurture,
    just stimulus-response.







    Another one is like this, that since the would-be sock-puppeteer
    is so pitilessly indifferent to "life" and "death", and the only
    resulting outcome is mostly "death", then the more the would-be
    sock-puppeteer spawns, itself, the more likely it'll kill itself.

    So, it's sort of a paradox, since genetic engineering isn't
    "natural selection", it's its own enemy.

    Kind of like the derivatives market, ....

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivatives_market

    For dummies, ....



    Anyways that's macabre and polite discussion will omit it
    since various sensititives indicate it triggers fixations.



    [...], And quit trying to change the subject.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mild Shock@janburse@fastmail.fm to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 03:00:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Hi,

    Do a YouTube video about it:

    Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
    with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:

    #fuckaroundandfindout
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M

    You were provable the first idiot, posting
    stupid comments into my posts, besides of

    course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.

    Have Fun!

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    For dummies, ....
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mild Shock@janburse@fastmail.fm to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 03:16:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Hi,

    Or do a YouTube video about:

    Standing on the shoulders of giants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants

    Calling people who build software "thieves",
    is probably the most philosopher syphilis brain

    thing I ever heard in 2026. You should really
    jump from a bridge Rossy Boy. I think its over

    for you, the lamps have already gone out...

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Do a YouTube video about it:

    Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
    with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:

    #fuckaroundandfindout
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M

    You were provable the first idiot, posting
    stupid comments into my posts, besides of

    course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.

    Have Fun!

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    For dummies, ....

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 06:10:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 08/03/2026 06:16 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Hi,

    Or do a YouTube video about:

    Standing on the shoulders of giants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants

    Calling people who build software "thieves",
    is probably the most philosopher syphilis brain

    thing I ever heard in 2026. You should really
    jump from a bridge Rossy Boy. I think its over

    for you, the lamps have already gone out...

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Do a YouTube video about it:

    Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
    with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:

    #fuckaroundandfindout
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M

    You were provable the first idiot, posting
    stupid comments into my posts, besides of

    course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.

    Have Fun!

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    For dummies, ....


    Hm. "How high?" (Too high.)

    You know, I've never jumped off a bridge before,
    even when the neighbors were doing it.

    It was quote sophomoric, one summer, when there's
    only one tape in the deck, something like the
    quick little anthem "You're Crazy" of the G'n'R variety.



    Dare I say, Shut Up?

    I do: Shut Up, Shut Up, no you Shut Up, Shut Up.



    I was reading this book the other day or Weatherall
    and the author seemed to imply that Newton's comment
    about trodding up the back of larger folks may have
    been a slur against Hooke, the dwarf, which kind of
    makes how it's usually interpreted as that MacLaurin
    wrote the infinitesimal analysis and Coates and Gregory
    wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
    the System of the World's universal gravitation, that
    the laws were after the Mertonian latititude of forms,
    a weak account of which is Galilean invariance, that
    also gives what Galileo wrote, then Newton stuck knitting
    needles in his eye and went every day to lunch in his
    grubby robes from his private quarters in the campus,
    after playing all night with a prism and describing
    after the spectrum about which DesCartes wrote the rainbow
    formula, an original sort of concept about the second-spectrum
    in the yellow/green/brown, hinting if not heralding the
    dual-tri-stimulus colorspace, that Newton wasn't that
    great a lion and more of a mash-up hack.

    Which is a pejorative, ....




    Actually I'm looking at doing a Youtube video about
    modern mathematics and infinity and arithmetic progressions,
    and continuity and ultrafilters, and about the independence
    of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
    of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz
    why there are multiple laws of large numbers, and multiple models of
    continuous domains, and multiple strengths of limit theorem, about
    extent, density, completeness, and measure, ..., hmm, I already wrote
    that for some decades, maybe I'll think of something else.


    Also I think that "f around and find out" is stupid
    and something Floridians say. It's basically a threat.


    See, here there's "fool around and fall in love",
    not "I'll kill you if you rat, you dirty rat".
    James Cagney did it better than you ever will.

    Though, I don't have much to rat about.


    Indeed, f around and find, out.


    Looking crazy, out.


    "Fooled around and fell in love, ..."


    How about "Seeds of Joy" or something like
    that, "Fields of Joy" or "Seeds of Joy".





    Shut Up


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mild Shock@janburse@fastmail.fm to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 15:16:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Hi,

    of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
    of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz

    You horrible horrible Person and Thief.
    Balantly stealing from Szemeredi, Aristotle,
    Leibniz, etc..

    wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
    the System of the World's universal gravitation, that

    And poor Newton and Kepler get also exploited,
    from shameless Rossy Boy. Thats not very original,
    shame on you!

    I guess this is the final verdict for you. As a
    person without original thought, you need
    to do as a big favor,

    and jump from a bridge.

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    On 08/03/2026 06:16 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Hi,

    Or do a YouTube video about:

    Standing on the shoulders of giants
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants

    Calling people who build software "thieves",
    is probably the most philosopher syphilis brain

    thing I ever heard in 2026. You should really
    jump from a bridge Rossy Boy. I think its over

    for you, the lamps have already gone out...

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Do a YouTube video about it:

    Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
    with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:

    #fuckaroundandfindout
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M

    You were provable the first idiot, posting
    stupid comments into my posts, besides of

    course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.

    Have Fun!

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    For dummies, ....


    Hm. "How high?" (Too high.)

    You know, I've never jumped off a bridge before,
    even when the neighbors were doing it.

    It was quote sophomoric, one summer, when there's
    only one tape in the deck, something like the
    quick little anthem "You're Crazy" of the G'n'R variety.



    Dare I say, Shut Up?

    I do: Shut Up, Shut Up, no you Shut Up, Shut Up.



    I was reading this book the other day or Weatherall
    and the author seemed to imply that Newton's comment
    about trodding up the back of larger folks may have
    been a slur against Hooke, the dwarf, which kind of
    makes how it's usually interpreted as that MacLaurin
    wrote the infinitesimal analysis and Coates and Gregory
    wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
    the System of the World's universal gravitation, that
    the laws were after the Mertonian latititude of forms,
    a weak account of which is Galilean invariance, that
    also gives what Galileo wrote, then Newton stuck knitting
    needles in his eye and went every day to lunch in his
    grubby robes from his private quarters in the campus,
    after playing all night with a prism and describing
    after the spectrum about which DesCartes wrote the rainbow
    formula, an original sort of concept about the second-spectrum
    in the yellow/green/brown, hinting if not heralding the
    dual-tri-stimulus colorspace, that Newton wasn't that
    great a lion and more of a mash-up hack.

    Which is a pejorative, ....




    Actually I'm looking at doing a Youtube video about
    modern mathematics and infinity and arithmetic progressions,
    and continuity and ultrafilters, and about the independence
    of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
    of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz
    why there are multiple laws of large numbers, and multiple models of continuous domains, and multiple strengths of limit theorem, about
    extent, density, completeness, and measure, ..., hmm, I already wrote
    that for some decades, maybe I'll think of something else.


    Also I think that "f around and find out" is stupid
    and something Floridians say. It's basically a threat.


    See, here there's "fool around and fall in love",
    not "I'll kill you if you rat, you dirty rat".
    James Cagney did it better than you ever will.

    Though, I don't have much to rat about.


    Indeed, f around and find, out.


    Looking crazy, out.


    "Fooled around and fell in love, ..."


    How about "Seeds of Joy" or something like
    that, "Fields of Joy" or "Seeds of Joy".





    Shut Up



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 06:32:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Hi,

    of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
    of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz

    You horrible horrible Person and Thief.
    Balantly stealing from Szemeredi, Aristotle,
    Leibniz, etc..

    wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
    the System of the World's universal gravitation, that

    And poor Newton and Kepler get also exploited,
    from shameless Rossy Boy. Thats not very original,
    shame on you!

    I guess this is the final verdict for you. As a
    person without original thought, you need
    to do as a big favor,

    and jump from a bridge.

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    On 08/03/2026 06:16 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Hi,

    Or do a YouTube video about:

    Standing on the shoulders of giants
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants

    Calling people who build software "thieves",
    is probably the most philosopher syphilis brain

    thing I ever heard in 2026. You should really
    jump from a bridge Rossy Boy. I think its over

    for you, the lamps have already gone out...

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Do a YouTube video about it:

    Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
    with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:

    #fuckaroundandfindout
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M

    You were provable the first idiot, posting
    stupid comments into my posts, besides of

    course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.

    Have Fun!

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    For dummies, ....


    Hm. "How high?" (Too high.)

    You know, I've never jumped off a bridge before,
    even when the neighbors were doing it.

    It was quote sophomoric, one summer, when there's
    only one tape in the deck, something like the
    quick little anthem "You're Crazy" of the G'n'R variety.



    Dare I say, Shut Up?

    I do: Shut Up, Shut Up, no you Shut Up, Shut Up.



    I was reading this book the other day or Weatherall
    and the author seemed to imply that Newton's comment
    about trodding up the back of larger folks may have
    been a slur against Hooke, the dwarf, which kind of
    makes how it's usually interpreted as that MacLaurin
    wrote the infinitesimal analysis and Coates and Gregory
    wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
    the System of the World's universal gravitation, that
    the laws were after the Mertonian latititude of forms,
    a weak account of which is Galilean invariance, that
    also gives what Galileo wrote, then Newton stuck knitting
    needles in his eye and went every day to lunch in his
    grubby robes from his private quarters in the campus,
    after playing all night with a prism and describing
    after the spectrum about which DesCartes wrote the rainbow
    formula, an original sort of concept about the second-spectrum
    in the yellow/green/brown, hinting if not heralding the
    dual-tri-stimulus colorspace, that Newton wasn't that
    great a lion and more of a mash-up hack.

    Which is a pejorative, ....




    Actually I'm looking at doing a Youtube video about
    modern mathematics and infinity and arithmetic progressions,
    and continuity and ultrafilters, and about the independence
    of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
    of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz
    why there are multiple laws of large numbers, and multiple models of
    continuous domains, and multiple strengths of limit theorem, about
    extent, density, completeness, and measure, ..., hmm, I already wrote
    that for some decades, maybe I'll think of something else.


    Also I think that "f around and find out" is stupid
    and something Floridians say. It's basically a threat.


    See, here there's "fool around and fall in love",
    not "I'll kill you if you rat, you dirty rat".
    James Cagney did it better than you ever will.

    Though, I don't have much to rat about.


    Indeed, f around and find, out.


    Looking crazy, out.


    "Fooled around and fell in love, ..."


    How about "Seeds of Joy" or something like
    that, "Fields of Joy" or "Seeds of Joy".





    Shut Up





    Perhaps some "Level 42 - Something About You".

    "... And I Know This Much is True, ...."

    "Set adrift on memory bliss, ...."


    Love Come Through / Hold On - sounds nice.


    You got your accreditation/attribution backward.
    Also confiscation's a bit different.


    Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
    when writing something "new", to provide
    the paths to all the sources.

    This ain't Searles' Chinese room,
    the tickets come with return addresses.


    Petty sticky-fingered sock-puppet, ....



    "Now that we found love,
    what are we going to do, with it?"







    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mild Shock@janburse@fastmail.fm to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 17:54:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Hi,

    Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
    the term existed. All his postes are huge
    piles of copy pasta slop.

    Not a single original thought, or even
    some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
    he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta

    slop. One result from his paper mill,
    Even a bibliograph cannot help here.

    RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
    mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
    two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
    calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
    design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
    stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are properly scoped for next time rather than lost.

    "bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL

    It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
    knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
    alter ego projection:

    The unbounded gibber polymath.

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
    when writing something "new", to provide
    the paths to all the sources.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mild Shock@janburse@fastmail.fm to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 18:21:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Hi,

    Even statistics gave up in the face of
    the copy pasta slop by Rossy Boy. There
    simply no salient truth in it anymore.

    Although the output token window gets
    bigger and bigger, but if the propability
    for a salient truth is low p = (1/2)^k

    for k big, then a N wide output token window,
    is justa kind of N times repeated Bernoulli
    experiment, leading to not much more

    than a Binomial distribution:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution

    p = 1/2 would still have a mean value
    of N/2 salient truths, with the drawback
    of maximum variance N/4, on the other hand

    p = (1/2)^k for k big has only mean
    value N/2^k and 2^k as a function grows
    faster than N as a function. And variance

    is much lower N/2^k*(1-1/2^k), so you
    are either cornered in the left or right
    corner. Somehow explains why I can post

    whatever I want and it makes sense, while
    Rossy Boy can post what ever he wants and it
    doesn't make any sense.

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
    the term existed. All his postes are huge
    piles of copy pasta slop.

    Not a single original thought, or even
    some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
    he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta

    slop. One result from his paper mill,
    Even a bibliograph cannot help here.

    RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
    mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
    two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a
    validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
    calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
    design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
    stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are
    properly scoped for next time rather than lost.

    "bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL

    It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
    knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
    alter ego projection:

    The unbounded gibber polymath.

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
    when writing something "new", to provide
    the paths to all the sources.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mild Shock@janburse@fastmail.fm to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 18:23:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Hi,

    Even statistics gave up in the face of
    the copy pasta slop by Rossy Boy. There
    simply no salient truth in it anymore.

    Although the output token window gets
    bigger and bigger, but if the propability
    for a salient truth is low p = (1/2)^k

    for k big, then a N wide output token window,
    is justa kind of N times repeated Bernoulli
    experiment, leading to not much more

    than a Binomial distribution:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution

    p = 1/2 would still have a mean value
    of N/2 salient truths, with the drawback
    of maximum variance N/4, on the other hand

    p = (1/2)^k for k big has only mean
    value N/2^k and 2^k as a function grows
    faster than N as a function. And variance

    is much lower N/2^k*(1-1/2^k), so you
    are either cornered in the left or right
    corner. Somehow explains why I can post

    whatever I want and it makes sense, while
    Rossy Boy can post what ever he wants and it
    doesn't make any sense.

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
    the term existed. All his postes are huge
    piles of copy pasta slop.

    Not a single original thought, or even
    some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
    he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta

    slop. One result from his paper mill,
    Even a bibliograph cannot help here.

    RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
    mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
    two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a
    validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
    calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
    design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
    stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are
    properly scoped for next time rather than lost.

    "bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL

    It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
    knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
    alter ego projection:

    The unbounded gibber polymath.

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
    when writing something "new", to provide
    the paths to all the sources.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Aug 4 20:13:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 08/04/2026 09:23 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Hi,

    Even statistics gave up in the face of
    the copy pasta slop by Rossy Boy. There
    simply no salient truth in it anymore.

    Although the output token window gets
    bigger and bigger, but if the propability
    for a salient truth is low p = (1/2)^k

    for k big, then a N wide output token window,
    is justa kind of N times repeated Bernoulli
    experiment, leading to not much more

    than a Binomial distribution:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution

    p = 1/2 would still have a mean value
    of N/2 salient truths, with the drawback
    of maximum variance N/4, on the other hand

    p = (1/2)^k for k big has only mean
    value N/2^k and 2^k as a function grows
    faster than N as a function. And variance

    is much lower N/2^k*(1-1/2^k), so you
    are either cornered in the left or right
    corner. Somehow explains why I can post

    whatever I want and it makes sense, while
    Rossy Boy can post what ever he wants and it
    doesn't make any sense.

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
    the term existed. All his postes are huge
    piles of copy pasta slop.

    Not a single original thought, or even
    some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
    he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta

    slop. One result from his paper mill,
    Even a bibliograph cannot help here.

    RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
    mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
    two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a
    validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
    calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
    design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
    stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are
    properly scoped for next time rather than lost.

    "bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL

    It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
    knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
    alter ego projection:

    The unbounded gibber polymath.

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
    when writing something "new", to provide
    the paths to all the sources.


    Hm, was "too high on self, rude to passersby, ignorant,
    duplicitous", now either "illiterate" or "libelous/slanderous".

    That bot's got some wires crossed, maybe COVID caught up
    with its sock-puppet groper and the projections about
    brain problems are compounding its various other
    ailments and maladies.


    About Bernoulli trials, has that probability theory
    fundamentally has a bit of a gap, about measure theory,
    since there's an account that sampling a real number
    between zero and one using Bernoulli trials takes
    infinitely-many fair coin tosses. Yet, while refining
    the sample, also new samples begin at each toss.
    Thusly, when a sample actually occurs of the real-valued
    as by the binary random decision, it's an infinite set
    of samples.

    So, the gap is that in the usual account, it's entirely
    un-likely for that to be a rational number, yet, what
    _is_ a rational sample, is infinitely-more weighted
    since all its refinements are also rational samples.

    This points to be a big gap in probability theory
    about measure theory, and helps explain for both
    Pythagoreans and Cantorians why actually both of
    them have an account, while they glare at each other
    plotting throwing each other off the boat.


    The boat doesn't care, see. It just floats.


    Anyways what Kimi said today was: "The core insightrCothat SIMD registers
    can be treated as a domain-specific character machine with a fixed
    register layout and a narrow, honest kernelrCois a strong one. The
    discipline of the SBC-less/SBC-free distinction, properly scoped, is a
    genuine contribution to how we think about vectorized text processing."


    See, even large, competent, conscientious, co-operative reasoners
    of the frontier LLM AI reasoning agents can learn a thing or two.


    Not sure about old dog and old tricks, though.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris M. Thomasson@chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Wed Aug 5 13:08:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 8/4/2026 8:13 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On 08/04/2026 09:23 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Hi,

    Even statistics gave up in the face of
    the copy pasta slop by Rossy Boy. There
    simply no salient truth in it anymore.

    Although the output token window gets
    bigger and bigger, but if the propability
    for a salient truth is low p = (1/2)^k

    for k big, then a N wide output token window,
    is justa kind of N times repeated Bernoulli
    experiment, leading to not much more

    than a Binomial distribution:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution

    p = 1/2 would still have a mean value
    of N/2 salient truths, with the drawback
    of maximum variance N/4, on the other hand

    p = (1/2)^k for k big has only mean
    value N/2^k and 2^k as a function grows
    faster than N as a function. And variance

    is much lower N/2^k*(1-1/2^k), so you
    are either cornered in the left or right
    corner. Somehow explains why I can post

    whatever I want and it makes sense, while
    Rossy Boy can post what ever he wants and it
    doesn't make any sense.

    Bye

    Mild Shock schrieb:
    Hi,

    Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
    the term existed. All his postes are huge
    piles of copy pasta slop.

    Not a single original thought, or even
    some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
    he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta

    slop. One result from his paper mill,
    Even a bibliograph cannot help here.

    RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
    mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
    two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a
    validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
    calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
    design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
    stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are >>>> properly scoped for next time rather than lost.

    "bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL

    It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
    knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
    alter ego projection:

    The unbounded gibber polymath.

    Bye

    Ross Finlayson schrieb:
    On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
    when writing something "new", to provide
    the paths to all the sources.


    Hm, was "too high on self, rude to passersby, ignorant,
    duplicitous", now either "illiterate" or "libelous/slanderous".

    That bot's got some wires crossed, maybe COVID caught up
    with its sock-puppet groper and the projections about
    brain problems are compounding its various other
    ailments and maladies.
    Scary!

    [...]
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2