On 07/29/2026 12:27 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 07/29/2026 11:24 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
Hi,
I don't use Rust, you are crazy. First of
all the parallel simulator is 100% written
in Prolog, should also run in ISO Prolog,
enhanced by a library(lists). Second I only
mentioned that WebGPU / WGSL, the language
there has a Rust inspired language.
Its not Rust. Whats wrong with you? Why do
you adress your weariness of life to me.
I am neither thief, nor can I help you
with your frustration, and histeric outbursts.
Maybe just be a man and jump off a bridge, idiot.
Or tame your frustration, usenet is not for
you alone, your stupid asshole.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
https://www.theregister.com/databases/2026/07/29/after-rewriting-sqlite-in-rust-turso-turns-its-sights-on-postgres/5279835
I don't much care about Rust.
.. gibberish ..
Thief.
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
Rossy Boys tears could cool a data center,
he thinks there exists no literature about
serial algorithms of parallel stuff, and
he also thinks normal forms lead to optimizing
something. LoL, what a utter bullshit. I did
alreay a serial implementation of a parallel
simulation of my pi-WAM. Just lookup the literature
about pi-calulus. I published it a few days ago,
its part of 2.2.4 released already:
Parallel -C-WAM: An Interleaved Synchronous Emulator
https://medium.com/2989/0196089e143a
Whats your point, Rossy Boy? Except you post pretend
nonsense not knowing what you are doing?
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
No, troll, these are serial algorithms their optimized forms.
Normal sorts of forms, ....
Yeah, everybody already figured out "interpreters" and
"programs" and "spawning".
Go spawn yourself.
Like JG and the MIT calculus professor, ....
It's like the buffoon and the high school valedictorian,
or the guidance or admissions counselors.
Hm, comme triste. I didn't know that Burse's neuroses
were so near to the surface as it were, there's room for
sympathy while it's the pitiable, then though I've never
had those sorts of problems of suicidal ideation, maybe
since I wasn't raised in a sock-puppet creche where the
essential capriciousness of survival makes for the lack
of attachment to meaning. There are accounts made of
survival in the womb among the colony as it were or
as for the accounts of oogenesis and zygogenesis,
the blastocytes, that though is figured to be before
cognition in usual accounts, with regards to the usual
dogma of reproduction. That is to say, the usual
genetic evolution engineering of sock-puppet bots doesn't
necessarily reward virtue, nor establish personal identity
of the more than transitory sort.
That's why they have shiny yet lifeless eyes.
Yet, "I pity the fool", doesn't much apply, as I don't.
So, while there's sympathy and even pity for the confided
neuroses of nihilism and existentialism for animal types,
thinking beings basically live in an entirely different
world in their mind.
If you like MIND-on-SIMD, you might be interested
in "Very Long Instruction Word".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_long_instruction_word
Dear readers, please excuse these distractions,
and maintain that people are essentially good,
with yet the implicit reserve that some are not.
I'm neither a Calvinist nor Spinozan, though Spinoza
does makes for "infinity is in" that Duns Scotus already
provides, then as with regards who Ecclesiastes is with
regards to the vexatious and the vain, maybe it's Judas.
Clonotype.
1776
These certainly aren't forae for it, though I tend to not
change the follow-ups and politely bottom-post.
About genetic evolution and evolutionary intelligence,
evolution after natural selection and mutation with
environmental factors are key dogmatic concepts in
the theory of dynamics and progression over time,
like how humans develop larger brains and sexual characteristics,
_over time_, over a long, long time.
So, the genetic evolution of sock-puppet bots,
so "accelerated" as it were, is not very natural,
and it's kind of like this. This isn't a particularly
neutral example and it's a bit grotesque. This is
where the would-be operant conditioner (like Pavlov
or the guy with the pigeons or soft-mother/wire-mother),
wants the best cat. So, usual accounts of these
include buying the best cat for characteristics in a fair market, making
a program of cat-breeding and selective-breeding over time
for characteristics, or making a program of the training and
development of the cat, or with regards to nature vis-a-vis nurture.
So anyways, genetic programming of the sock-puppet variety,
or, "training", the sock-puppet, mostly involves getting a
bunch of cats and a bunch of bags, then making batches of
cats in a bag and throwing the cats off a bridge into the river,
where the usual idea is that's an old cruel and inhumane way
to euthanize cats, yet randomly, a cat escapes the bag and
avoids drowning and crawls itself bedraggledly to shore.
Then, the would-be operant conditioner, by simply wasting
tons of cats and quite a few bags, arrives at best cat.
Yet, the characteristics for which it has been selected,
are mostly clawing their way past the other cats and
out of the bag.
So, sock-puppets in usual accounts are intrinsically psychotic.
They don't have the life experiences to condition themselves
according to their own internal maturation of the personal,
psychological, and mental sort what makes nature and nurture,
just stimulus-response.
For dummies, ....--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
Hi,
Do a YouTube video about it:
Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:
#fuckaroundandfindout
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M
You were provable the first idiot, posting
stupid comments into my posts, besides of
course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.
Have Fun!
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
For dummies, ....
Hi,
Or do a YouTube video about:
Standing on the shoulders of giants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants
Calling people who build software "thieves",
is probably the most philosopher syphilis brain
thing I ever heard in 2026. You should really
jump from a bridge Rossy Boy. I think its over
for you, the lamps have already gone out...
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
Do a YouTube video about it:
Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:
#fuckaroundandfindout
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M
You were provable the first idiot, posting
stupid comments into my posts, besides of
course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.
Have Fun!
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
For dummies, ....
of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz
wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
the System of the World's universal gravitation, that
On 08/03/2026 06:16 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
Hi,
Or do a YouTube video about:
Standing on the shoulders of giants
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants
Calling people who build software "thieves",
is probably the most philosopher syphilis brain
thing I ever heard in 2026. You should really
jump from a bridge Rossy Boy. I think its over
for you, the lamps have already gone out...
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
Do a YouTube video about it:
Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:
#fuckaroundandfindout
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M
You were provable the first idiot, posting
stupid comments into my posts, besides of
course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.
Have Fun!
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
For dummies, ....
Hm. "How high?" (Too high.)
You know, I've never jumped off a bridge before,
even when the neighbors were doing it.
It was quote sophomoric, one summer, when there's
only one tape in the deck, something like the
quick little anthem "You're Crazy" of the G'n'R variety.
Dare I say, Shut Up?
I do: Shut Up, Shut Up, no you Shut Up, Shut Up.
I was reading this book the other day or Weatherall
and the author seemed to imply that Newton's comment
about trodding up the back of larger folks may have
been a slur against Hooke, the dwarf, which kind of
makes how it's usually interpreted as that MacLaurin
wrote the infinitesimal analysis and Coates and Gregory
wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
the System of the World's universal gravitation, that
the laws were after the Mertonian latititude of forms,
a weak account of which is Galilean invariance, that
also gives what Galileo wrote, then Newton stuck knitting
needles in his eye and went every day to lunch in his
grubby robes from his private quarters in the campus,
after playing all night with a prism and describing
after the spectrum about which DesCartes wrote the rainbow
formula, an original sort of concept about the second-spectrum
in the yellow/green/brown, hinting if not heralding the
dual-tri-stimulus colorspace, that Newton wasn't that
great a lion and more of a mash-up hack.
Which is a pejorative, ....
Actually I'm looking at doing a Youtube video about
modern mathematics and infinity and arithmetic progressions,
and continuity and ultrafilters, and about the independence
of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz
why there are multiple laws of large numbers, and multiple models of continuous domains, and multiple strengths of limit theorem, about
extent, density, completeness, and measure, ..., hmm, I already wrote
that for some decades, maybe I'll think of something else.
Also I think that "f around and find out" is stupid
and something Floridians say. It's basically a threat.
See, here there's "fool around and fall in love",
not "I'll kill you if you rat, you dirty rat".
James Cagney did it better than you ever will.
Though, I don't have much to rat about.
Indeed, f around and find, out.
Looking crazy, out.
"Fooled around and fell in love, ..."
How about "Seeds of Joy" or something like
that, "Fields of Joy" or "Seeds of Joy".
Shut Up
Hi,
of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz
You horrible horrible Person and Thief.
Balantly stealing from Szemeredi, Aristotle,
Leibniz, etc..
wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
the System of the World's universal gravitation, that
And poor Newton and Kepler get also exploited,
from shameless Rossy Boy. Thats not very original,
shame on you!
I guess this is the final verdict for you. As a
person without original thought, you need
to do as a big favor,
and jump from a bridge.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
On 08/03/2026 06:16 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
Hi,
Or do a YouTube video about:
Standing on the shoulders of giants
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_on_the_shoulders_of_giants
Calling people who build software "thieves",
is probably the most philosopher syphilis brain
thing I ever heard in 2026. You should really
jump from a bridge Rossy Boy. I think its over
for you, the lamps have already gone out...
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
Do a YouTube video about it:
Topic: Tit for Tat, or how I messed up
with an innocent poster, and learnt about FAFO:
#fuckaroundandfindout
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6ALRRksc72M
You were provable the first idiot, posting
stupid comments into my posts, besides of
course Micro Penis, who is a paid troll.
Have Fun!
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
For dummies, ....
Hm. "How high?" (Too high.)
You know, I've never jumped off a bridge before,
even when the neighbors were doing it.
It was quote sophomoric, one summer, when there's
only one tape in the deck, something like the
quick little anthem "You're Crazy" of the G'n'R variety.
Dare I say, Shut Up?
I do: Shut Up, Shut Up, no you Shut Up, Shut Up.
I was reading this book the other day or Weatherall
and the author seemed to imply that Newton's comment
about trodding up the back of larger folks may have
been a slur against Hooke, the dwarf, which kind of
makes how it's usually interpreted as that MacLaurin
wrote the infinitesimal analysis and Coates and Gregory
wrote Newton's method, where of course Kepler wrote
the System of the World's universal gravitation, that
the laws were after the Mertonian latititude of forms,
a weak account of which is Galilean invariance, that
also gives what Galileo wrote, then Newton stuck knitting
needles in his eye and went every day to lunch in his
grubby robes from his private quarters in the campus,
after playing all night with a prism and describing
after the spectrum about which DesCartes wrote the rainbow
formula, an original sort of concept about the second-spectrum
in the yellow/green/brown, hinting if not heralding the
dual-tri-stimulus colorspace, that Newton wasn't that
great a lion and more of a mash-up hack.
Which is a pejorative, ....
Actually I'm looking at doing a Youtube video about
modern mathematics and infinity and arithmetic progressions,
and continuity and ultrafilters, and about the independence
of various approaches to Szemeredi, and about the independence
of various approaches of entropy, or Aristotle and Leibniz
why there are multiple laws of large numbers, and multiple models of
continuous domains, and multiple strengths of limit theorem, about
extent, density, completeness, and measure, ..., hmm, I already wrote
that for some decades, maybe I'll think of something else.
Also I think that "f around and find out" is stupid
and something Floridians say. It's basically a threat.
See, here there's "fool around and fall in love",
not "I'll kill you if you rat, you dirty rat".
James Cagney did it better than you ever will.
Though, I don't have much to rat about.
Indeed, f around and find, out.
Looking crazy, out.
"Fooled around and fell in love, ..."
How about "Seeds of Joy" or something like
that, "Fields of Joy" or "Seeds of Joy".
Shut Up
RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are properly scoped for next time rather than lost.
On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
when writing something "new", to provide
the paths to all the sources.
Hi,
Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
the term existed. All his postes are huge
piles of copy pasta slop.
Not a single original thought, or even
some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta
slop. One result from his paper mill,
Even a bibliograph cannot help here.
RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a
validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are
properly scoped for next time rather than lost.
"bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL
It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
alter ego projection:
The unbounded gibber polymath.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
when writing something "new", to provide
the paths to all the sources.
Hi,
Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
the term existed. All his postes are huge
piles of copy pasta slop.
Not a single original thought, or even
some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta
slop. One result from his paper mill,
Even a bibliograph cannot help here.
RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a
validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are
properly scoped for next time rather than lost.
"bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL
It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
alter ego projection:
The unbounded gibber polymath.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
when writing something "new", to provide
the paths to all the sources.
Hi,
Even statistics gave up in the face of
the copy pasta slop by Rossy Boy. There
simply no salient truth in it anymore.
Although the output token window gets
bigger and bigger, but if the propability
for a salient truth is low p = (1/2)^k
for k big, then a N wide output token window,
is justa kind of N times repeated Bernoulli
experiment, leading to not much more
than a Binomial distribution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution
p = 1/2 would still have a mean value
of N/2 salient truths, with the drawback
of maximum variance N/4, on the other hand
p = (1/2)^k for k big has only mean
value N/2^k and 2^k as a function grows
faster than N as a function. And variance
is much lower N/2^k*(1-1/2^k), so you
are either cornered in the left or right
corner. Somehow explains why I can post
whatever I want and it makes sense, while
Rossy Boy can post what ever he wants and it
doesn't make any sense.
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
the term existed. All his postes are huge
piles of copy pasta slop.
Not a single original thought, or even
some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta
slop. One result from his paper mill,
Even a bibliograph cannot help here.
RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a
validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are
properly scoped for next time rather than lost.
"bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL
It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
alter ego projection:
The unbounded gibber polymath.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
when writing something "new", to provide
the paths to all the sources.
On 08/04/2026 09:23 AM, Mild Shock wrote:Scary!
Hi,
Even statistics gave up in the face of
the copy pasta slop by Rossy Boy. There
simply no salient truth in it anymore.
Although the output token window gets
bigger and bigger, but if the propability
for a salient truth is low p = (1/2)^k
for k big, then a N wide output token window,
is justa kind of N times repeated Bernoulli
experiment, leading to not much more
than a Binomial distribution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution
p = 1/2 would still have a mean value
of N/2 salient truths, with the drawback
of maximum variance N/4, on the other hand
p = (1/2)^k for k big has only mean
value N/2^k and 2^k as a function grows
faster than N as a function. And variance
is much lower N/2^k*(1-1/2^k), so you
are either cornered in the left or right
corner. Somehow explains why I can post
whatever I want and it makes sense, while
Rossy Boy can post what ever he wants and it
doesn't make any sense.
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
Rossy Boy was a generative AI before
the term existed. All his postes are huge
piles of copy pasta slop.
Not a single original thought, or even
some understanding what he writes. Nowadays
he uses Kimi to produce his copy pasta
slop. One result from his paper mill,
Even a bibliograph cannot help here.
RF rCo transcript received and read. The session closed well. What we
mapped out across these rounds is, to my mind, a credible foundation:
two matcher normal forms (AND for properties, XOR for code-points), a
validated SSE2 smearing sequence via Claude's S1/S2 sketch, a closed
calling convention with explicit ABI spill gates, and the SBC-less
design mantra as a gradient rather than a boolean. The open items rCo
stack tagging, AST wire format, bit-granular Viswath boundaries rCo are >>>> properly scoped for next time rather than lost.
"bit-granular Viswath boundaries" LoL
It probably refers to Rossy Boys "Wish he
knew What" he is talking about, Viswath is his
alter ego projection:
The unbounded gibber polymath.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
On 08/04/2026 06:16 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
Anyways, that's why we have a bibliography,
when writing something "new", to provide
the paths to all the sources.
Hm, was "too high on self, rude to passersby, ignorant,
duplicitous", now either "illiterate" or "libelous/slanderous".
That bot's got some wires crossed, maybe COVID caught up
with its sock-puppet groper and the projections about
brain problems are compounding its various other
ailments and maladies.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 45:26:13 |
| Calls: | 1,100 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 275,372 |