• 48 Hours

    From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Sat Apr 4 11:13:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ...

    I'll do it NOW!

    I got what it takes
    to take what you got.

    What have you got hands for? To take!

    I won't even count to three..

    DONE!
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Taft Resident@noreply@dirge.harmsk.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 5 01:42:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:


    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ..

    I just wish the US would stop losing wars. All that money, and they suck.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From marika@marika5000@gmail.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sci.physics.relativity,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 5 03:28:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Taft Resident <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:
    The Starmaker wrote:


    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ..

    I just wish the US would stop losing wars. All that money, and they suck.


    I just wish I would stop losing food I am ready to cook

    I cannot figure it out

    I think i put it someplace on the counter, and then forget and decide to
    tidy, which inevitably means i misidentify inchoate meals as dirty dishes
    to be washed









    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity on Sat Apr 4 20:47:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 04/04/2026 11:13 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ...

    I'll do it NOW!

    I got what it takes
    to take what you got.

    What have you got hands for? To take!

    I won't even count to three..

    DONE!








    In some legal models, your "taking hands" get chopped off.

    So, I guess you can sit on it and figure out how to self-lubricate.


    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Tue Apr 7 09:10:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!


    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    Don't worry, hell find somebody to
    'manage' it for him..

    maybe one of those guys from the show...

    The Apprentice!

    Trump does not run the world...

    TRUMP OWNS THE WORLD!

    dat thing you call planet earth...

    Trump owns it.

    He might as well take France...

    there is some faguet running it now...

    one of them dressed like a woman!

    GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!


    Who ever owns the biggest military on earth
    owns the earth.

    It's dat simple.

    One man owns the planet earth...and his
    name is...
    Donald Trump!


    OWNS THE EARTH!

    I guess next is Mars...






    The Starmaker wrote:

    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ...

    I'll do it NOW!

    I got what it takes
    to take what you got.

    What have you got hands for? To take!

    I won't even count to three..

    DONE!





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Sat Apr 11 10:15:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    planet of the apes





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    Don't worry, hell find somebody to
    'manage' it for him..

    maybe one of those guys from the show...

    The Apprentice!

    Trump does not run the world...

    TRUMP OWNS THE WORLD!

    dat thing you call planet earth...

    Trump owns it.

    He might as well take France...

    there is some faguet running it now...

    one of them dressed like a woman!

    GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!

    Who ever owns the biggest military on earth
    owns the earth.

    It's dat simple.

    One man owns the planet earth...and his
    name is...
    Donald Trump!

    OWNS THE EARTH!

    I guess next is Mars...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ...

    I'll do it NOW!

    I got what it takes
    to take what you got.

    What have you got hands for? To take!

    I won't even count to three..

    DONE!





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From marika@marika5000@gmail.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sci.physics.relativity,talk.politics.misc on Sat Apr 11 19:39:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    O that must be what JD Vance means when he keeps screeching to White House visitors that they should wear a suit




    planet of the apes





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    Don't worry, hell find somebody to
    'manage' it for him..

    maybe one of those guys from the show...

    The Apprentice!

    Trump does not run the world...

    TRUMP OWNS THE WORLD!

    dat thing you call planet earth...

    Trump owns it.

    He might as well take France...

    there is some faguet running it now...

    one of them dressed like a woman!

    GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!

    Who ever owns the biggest military on earth
    owns the earth.

    It's dat simple.

    One man owns the planet earth...and his
    name is...
    Donald Trump!

    OWNS THE EARTH!

    I guess next is Mars...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ...

    I'll do it NOW!

    I got what it takes
    to take what you got.

    What have you got hands for? To take!

    I won't even count to three..

    DONE!





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.




    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas Heger@ttt_heg@web.de to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 12 11:30:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:15 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    planet of the apes





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
    B|+rgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
    ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
    somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.

    ...

    TH
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mitchell Holman@noemail@aol.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 12 13:28:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in news:n416gcFbhemU1
    @mid.individual.net:

    Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:15 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    planet of the apes





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
    B|+rgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
    ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
    somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.


    The US has adverse possession laws regarding
    land, but aside from that the law is the same as
    what you describe. Even good faith buyers lose in
    court when the original owner can prove their
    claim.


    https://share.america.gov/stolen-paintings-found-at-auction-will-be-
    returned/


    https://medium.com/true-crime-road-trip/detour-artwork-recovered-
    32bbb154a170










    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 12 11:18:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:15 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    planet of the apes





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
    B|+rgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
    ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
    somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.

    ...

    TH


    "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little
    longer." - Henry Kissinger


    The law is...there are no laws.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn@PointedEars@web.de to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sci.physics.relativity,talk.politics.misc on Mon Apr 13 03:07:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    marika amok-crossposted to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity, talk.politics.misc:
    The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    O that must be what JD Vance means when he keeps screeching to White House visitors that they should wear a suit
    [...]

    If you absolutely must continue to feed the "The Starmaker" troll: At least check *to where* you post, and before replying remove groups from the target list where the discussion is off-topic. OK?

    F'up2 poster
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sci.physics.relativity,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 12 21:04:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    marika amok-crossposted to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity, talk.politics.misc:
    The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    O that must be what JD Vance means when he keeps screeching to White House visitors that they should wear a suit
    [...]

    If you absolutely must continue to feed the "The Starmaker" troll: At least check *to where* you post, and before replying remove groups from the target list where the discussion is off-topic. OK?

    F'up2 poster

    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.



    This is the desperate, finger-wagging death rattle of 1995 Usenet
    etiquette trying to cosplay as wisdom in 2026.

    The entire osolutiono is built on a platform that no longer exists.
    Usenet newsgroups, cross-posting headers, and oFAup2o directives
    died with dial-up. There is no otarget listo to edit on X, Reddit,
    Discord, or anywhere else people actually argue today. The advice is
    literally instructing people to perform an action that is technically impossible on every platform that matters.
    It pretends ooff-topico is an objective, enforceable category.
    Every single sentence assumes there exists some neutral, universally agreed-upon definition of relevance. In practice, relevance is whatever
    the loudest 200 users in a thread decide it is. Telling someone to
    oremove groupso is the intellectual equivalent of telling a boxer to
    only punch inside the ring while the opponent is swinging chairs from
    the bleachers.
    The core premise (ostop feeding trollso) is self-refuting garbage.
    The author is feeding the troll by writing a smug, italicized,
    multi-line lecture about how to feed trolls correctly. This is
    performative pearl-clutching disguised as strategy. It doesnAt reduce
    noise; it adds another sanctimonious meta-layer that trolls love to
    quote and mock.
    It ignores the actual game dynamics of attention.
    Trolls donAt post because they want on-topic discussion. They post
    because outrage, derailment, and screenshots of righteous replies
    generate dopamine and engagement. Removing three obscure newsgroups from
    a header changes exactly zero incentive structures.



    Assumes every reader still uses a newsreader with editable newsgroup
    lists instead of an algorithm-driven feed.
    Assumes posters care about onetiquetteo more than winning the
    argument or farming clout.
    Assumes oPointedEarso signature + passive-aggressive oPlease do not
    cc meo makes the author an authority instead of a punchline.


    Real humans will screenshot this exact post, reply oOK boomero in the
    most off-topic group possible, and rack up 50k likes while the author
    mutters about how nobody respects proper FAup2 procedure. The advice
    creates the perfect martyr complex for the complainer and perfect
    ammunition for the troll. Game theory 101: you just handed the enemy the
    moral high ground while demanding they obey 30-year-old software rules.
    At any scale larger than a single dead mailing list this collapses
    instantly. Modern platforms have zero mechanism to enforce oremove
    groups from the target list.o Even if they did, the marginal cost of
    posting is near zero and the reward for virality is massive. Your
    osolutiono requires coordinated behavior change across millions of users
    who have zero incentive to comply and every incentive to do the
    opposite. Physics says: impossible.
    Everything. The entire framework of oproper cross-posting etiquetteo
    must be deleted. The smug oif you absolutely musto framing, the FAup2 directive, the signature block flexing Twitter handle and bilingual
    email request u all of it is performative nostalgia that needs to be incinerated. Replace with actual platform-native tools or shut up.
    None. Not a single clause survives contact with reality.
    You didnAt offer a solution to trolls. You offered a museum exhibit
    label for a problem that already evolved past you. Stop. Just stop. This paragraph is intellectual junk food served by a ghost.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sci.physics.relativity,talk.politics.misc on Sun Apr 12 21:22:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    marika amok-crossposted to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity, talk.politics.misc:
    The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    O that must be what JD Vance means when he keeps screeching to White House
    visitors that they should wear a suit
    [...]

    If you absolutely must continue to feed the "The Starmaker" troll: At least check *to where* you post, and before replying remove groups from the target
    list where the discussion is off-topic. OK?

    F'up2 poster

    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

    This is the desperate, finger-wagging death rattle of 1995 Usenet
    etiquette trying to cosplay as wisdom in 2026.

    The entire osolutiono is built on a platform that no longer exists.
    Usenet newsgroups, cross-posting headers, and oFAup2o directives
    died with dial-up. There is no otarget listo to edit on X, Reddit,
    Discord, or anywhere else people actually argue today. The advice is literally instructing people to perform an action that is technically impossible on every platform that matters.
    It pretends ooff-topico is an objective, enforceable category.
    Every single sentence assumes there exists some neutral, universally agreed-upon definition of relevance. In practice, relevance is whatever
    the loudest 200 users in a thread decide it is. Telling someone to
    oremove groupso is the intellectual equivalent of telling a boxer to
    only punch inside the ring while the opponent is swinging chairs from
    the bleachers.
    The core premise (ostop feeding trollso) is self-refuting garbage.
    The author is feeding the troll by writing a smug, italicized,
    multi-line lecture about how to feed trolls correctly. This is
    performative pearl-clutching disguised as strategy. It doesnAt reduce
    noise; it adds another sanctimonious meta-layer that trolls love to
    quote and mock.
    It ignores the actual game dynamics of attention.
    Trolls donAt post because they want on-topic discussion. They post because outrage, derailment, and screenshots of righteous replies
    generate dopamine and engagement. Removing three obscure newsgroups from
    a header changes exactly zero incentive structures.



    Assumes every reader still uses a newsreader with editable newsgroup lists instead of an algorithm-driven feed.
    Assumes posters care about onetiquetteo more than winning the
    argument or farming clout.
    Assumes oPointedEarso signature + passive-aggressive oPlease do not
    cc meo makes the author an authority instead of a punchline.


    Real humans will screenshot this exact post, reply oOK boomero in the
    most off-topic group possible, and rack up 50k likes while the author
    mutters about how nobody respects proper FAup2 procedure. The advice
    creates the perfect martyr complex for the complainer and perfect
    ammunition for the troll. Game theory 101: you just handed the enemy the moral high ground while demanding they obey 30-year-old software rules.
    At any scale larger than a single dead mailing list this collapses
    instantly. Modern platforms have zero mechanism to enforce oremove
    groups from the target list.o Even if they did, the marginal cost of
    posting is near zero and the reward for virality is massive. Your
    osolutiono requires coordinated behavior change across millions of users
    who have zero incentive to comply and every incentive to do the
    opposite. Physics says: impossible.
    Everything. The entire framework of oproper cross-posting etiquetteo
    must be deleted. The smug oif you absolutely musto framing, the FAup2 directive, the signature block flexing Twitter handle and bilingual
    email request u all of it is performative nostalgia that needs to be incinerated. Replace with actual platform-native tools or shut up.
    None. Not a single clause survives contact with reality.
    You didnAt offer a solution to trolls. You offered a museum exhibit
    label for a problem that already evolved past you. Stop. Just stop. This paragraph is intellectual junk food served by a ghost.


    furtheremore...

    Usenet bred these types by the dozen u pedantic, thin-skinned, endlessly correcting others while contributing nothing new.
    the simpler truth: some people are wired for self-righteous nitpicking
    because it gives them a sense of control in a chaotic world they no
    longer understand.
    this guy is exhausting and delusional about his own relevance.
    he's a relic demonstrating exactly why nobody misses Usenet. It's
    terminal relevance deprivation combined with unchecked smugness. The
    post is pure pedantic gatekeeping: italicized smugness, obsolete "F'up2" commands, bilingual email nagging, and a self-important Twitter handle.
    It maps to being an insufferable know-it-all who peaked in the 90s and
    never adapted. cares too much about netiquette in a dead protocol."
    he's actively lecturing the entire internet on proper crossposting
    while crossposting his own irrelevant scold. that's narcissistic need to position himself as the last guardian of civilization against the
    unwashed masses."Please do not cc me" like it's a royal decree. far more consistent with rigid personality traits, entitlement, or just plain
    being a bitter old-school netizen who resents modernity.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas Heger@ttt_heg@web.de to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Mon Apr 13 09:39:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 15:28 schrieb Mitchell Holman:
    Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in news:n416gcFbhemU1 @mid.individual.net:

    Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:15 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    planet of the apes





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
    B|+rgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
    ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
    somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.


    The US has adverse possession laws regarding
    land, but aside from that the law is the same as
    what you describe. Even good faith buyers lose in
    court when the original owner can prove their
    claim.

    Well, possibly they have.

    But Venezuela does not belong to US-jurisdiction and only international
    laws are applicable, besides from the local laws.

    Hence the USA cannot allow themself to capture land, which is not theirs.

    https://share.america.gov/stolen-paintings-found-at-auction-will-be- returned/


    In case of paintings (or any other movable objects) we have a problem:

    only items are returned, which were illegaly removed from the owner.

    But it is very difficult to prove, that the item was removed illegally
    from the owner.

    There are many legal methods thinkable, by which a transfer could been made:


    the former owner could have thrown it away

    the owner could have given it to somebody as a gift

    the owner could have sold it

    the owner could have given the item as security for a loan

    the owner could have left it behind, after moving away

    the owner could have used it to pay debts
    ...

    If now someone wants his item back, he had to prove, that none of the
    above were in fact the case.


    Then we have a term in Germany called 'Verj|nhrung'.

    This means:

    if someone has some object in his posession for more than thirty years
    and never had the idea, that thing was stolen, but assumed to have it
    legally, the real owner cannot have it back.

    Therefor it is usually impossible to claim ownership after moire than 30
    years in Germany, because it is very difficult to prove, that the person having the item knew, that it was stolen.


    TH
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas Heger@ttt_heg@web.de to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Mon Apr 13 09:47:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 20:18 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...
    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
    B|a-+rgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
    ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
    somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.

    ...

    TH


    "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little
    longer." - Henry Kissinger


    The law is...there are no laws.



    Currently Kissinger discusses this topic with the devil...


    TH
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From nospam@nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,alt.binaries.pictures.scenic on Mon Apr 13 13:44:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
    [you are doing it again, Mitchell. You really shouldn't crosspost
    to your American junk groups]

    Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in news:n416gcFbhemU1 @mid.individual.net:

    Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:15 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    planet of the apes





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (= B|a-Crgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.


    The US has adverse possession laws regarding
    land, but aside from that the law is the same as
    what you describe. Even good faith buyers lose in
    court when the original owner can prove their
    claim.

    Other countries may have different laws.

    https://share.america.gov/stolen-paintings-found-at-auction-will-be- returned/

    In particular, 'good faith' buyers will be protected.
    Someone who buys a painting at a reputable auction house
    will be assumed to be in good faith.
    The previous owners may have a claim on the auction house,
    (which didn't do its homework properly)
    but not on the buyer, once it has been sold.
    There may be exceptions for Nazi thefts though,

    Jan

    https://medium.com/true-crime-road-trip/detour-artwork-recovered- 32bbb154a170

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Mon Apr 13 08:33:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 15:28 schrieb Mitchell Holman:
    Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in news:n416gcFbhemU1 @mid.individual.net:

    Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:15 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    planet of the apes





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
    B|+rgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
    ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
    somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.


    The US has adverse possession laws regarding
    land, but aside from that the law is the same as
    what you describe. Even good faith buyers lose in
    court when the original owner can prove their
    claim.

    Well, possibly they have.

    But Venezuela does not belong to US-jurisdiction and only international
    laws are applicable, besides from the local laws.

    Hence the USA cannot allow themself to capture land, which is not theirs.

    You obvisouly never heard of The Monroe Doctrine

    The Monroe Doctrine is a United States foreign policy position that
    opposes any foreign interference in the Western Hemisphere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctrine

    That means anything in out western hemisphere belongs to us...next comes Germany.

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=monroe+doctrine


    Now called the "Donroe Doctrine"


    Trump One World Governament means...we govern Germany if we want. We
    just take it....and your women!


    i'm gonna make babies with your german women...











    https://share.america.gov/stolen-paintings-found-at-auction-will-be- returned/


    In case of paintings (or any other movable objects) we have a problem:

    only items are returned, which were illegaly removed from the owner.

    But it is very difficult to prove, that the item was removed illegally
    from the owner.

    There are many legal methods thinkable, by which a transfer could been made:

    the former owner could have thrown it away

    the owner could have given it to somebody as a gift

    the owner could have sold it

    the owner could have given the item as security for a loan

    the owner could have left it behind, after moving away

    the owner could have used it to pay debts
    ...

    If now someone wants his item back, he had to prove, that none of the
    above were in fact the case.

    Then we have a term in Germany called 'Verj|nhrung'.

    This means:

    if someone has some object in his posession for more than thirty years
    and never had the idea, that thing was stolen, but assumed to have it legally, the real owner cannot have it back.

    Therefor it is usually impossible to claim ownership after moire than 30 years in Germany, because it is very difficult to prove, that the person having the item knew, that it was stolen.

    TH
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Mon Apr 13 08:48:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 20:18 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...
    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
    B|a-+rgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
    ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
    somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.

    ...

    TH


    "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." - Henry Kissinger


    The law is...there are no laws.


    Currently Kissinger discusses this topic with the devil...

    TH

    The word God is short for Good

    The word Devil is long for the word evil (they added a 'D'evil)

    you are just talking words here..

    There is no God
    There is no Devil

    There are no Laws


    What I want, I take.

    If I want your woman, she belongs to me. that's it. Game over


    You know why I have two hands for? Too Take.


    I got what it takes to take what you got.


    the vorld belongs to me.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas Heger@ttt_heg@web.de to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Fri Apr 17 09:00:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Am Montag000013, 13.04.2026 um 17:48 schrieb The Starmaker:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 20:18 schrieb The Starmaker:
    ...
    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
    B|a|A|e-+rgerliches Gesetzbuch).

    It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
    ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.

    Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
    somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
    stolen, whatever you do with it.

    In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
    robbery is allowed there.

    ...

    TH


    "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little
    longer." - Henry Kissinger


    The law is...there are no laws.


    Currently Kissinger discusses this topic with the devil...

    TH

    The word God is short for Good

    The word Devil is long for the word evil (they added a 'D'evil)

    you are just talking words here..

    There is no God
    There is no Devil

    There are no Laws


    That's how Kissinger actually argued, but the devil didn't agree.

    TH
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From x3@x@x.net to sci.physics.relativity on Sat Apr 18 13:35:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On 4/11/26 10:15, The Starmaker wrote:
    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.


    planet of the apes

    There are nine documents which are a suicide
    pact of death, serving the purpose of -
    the complete and total extermination of
    mankind, the destruction of all of human
    civilization, and the ending of all possibility
    of an afterlife if one exists? Perhaps there
    will be 10, 100, an infinite number of them?

    This is because nuclear weapons are different
    from nuclear power, and nuclear weapons were
    built with intent?

    The suicide pact goes something like as follows -
    you can kill the civilians, a lot of who are
    innocent women and children, in my country
    and I can kill the civilians, a lot of them
    are innocent women and children, in your country.
    Is this different from the Hague Conventions
    of 1899? But if it is, then why are not all
    of the court systems of the nuclear powers,
    conferring with the other court systems of the
    other nuclear powers and reviewing. IS MURDER
    WRONG? Is it because they are paid blood
    money called 'government salaries' which is
    fundamentally contrived to bias them?

    Or is there something to 'Atoms for Peace'?
    They can be used to move large amounts of land
    to construct roads or build dams, they can
    be used to lift heavy objects into space. If
    you keep exploding hydrogen bombs underground
    and even use the resultant geothermal energy,
    it may be a more feasible form of fusion
    power than all other methods in the present?
    Yes the 'United Nations' was formed at about
    the same time as the atomic bombings of
    'Hiroshima' and 'Nagasaki'. Is this supposed
    to be Nikita Khrushchev at a past meeting of
    the UN, Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a current meeting
    of the UN, or someone at a future meeting of the
    UN? Who really knows?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDQEJ06QoRs




    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Thu Apr 23 23:24:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    this is the longest 48 hours i ever seen...


    fuck'em
    kill them all
    drop the bomb

    Trump probably told Iran...

    "YOU HAD YOUR FUCKING CHANCE TO BUILD AN ATOMIC BOMB AND DROP IT ON
    ISREAL, BUT YOU DIDN'T!"

    "YOU DON'T DESERVE THE BOMB!"





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.

    planet of the apes

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    Don't worry, hell find somebody to
    'manage' it for him..

    maybe one of those guys from the show...

    The Apprentice!

    Trump does not run the world...

    TRUMP OWNS THE WORLD!

    dat thing you call planet earth...

    Trump owns it.

    He might as well take France...

    there is some faguet running it now...

    one of them dressed like a woman!

    GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!

    Who ever owns the biggest military on earth
    owns the earth.

    It's dat simple.

    One man owns the planet earth...and his
    name is...
    Donald Trump!

    OWNS THE EARTH!

    I guess next is Mars...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ...

    I'll do it NOW!

    I got what it takes
    to take what you got.

    What have you got hands for? To take!

    I won't even count to three..

    DONE!





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc on Fri Apr 24 14:51:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    I would advise Trump..."I don't negotiate with terroists!"

    Trump will ask me ..."You don't think I should give Iran more time to reconsider?"

    I would say to him..."IRAN?? I was talking about Israel! They are the TERROISTS!!!!"


    https://promisedlandmuseum.org/albert-einstein-letter/






    The Starmaker wrote:

    this is the longest 48 hours i ever seen...

    fuck'em
    kill them all
    drop the bomb

    Trump probably told Iran...

    "YOU HAD YOUR FUCKING CHANCE TO BUILD AN ATOMIC BOMB AND DROP IT ON
    ISREAL, BUT YOU DIDN'T!"

    "YOU DON'T DESERVE THE BOMB!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Come on, let's be real here...

    these ongoing wars between
    'whatever' are
    just a bunch of monkeys
    and gorillas fighting over
    who gets the banana tree.

    planet of the apes

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me put it this way...since..
    yous don't understand..
    (and probably never will)

    Trump has two hands.

    What he wants, he takes.

    Trump doesn't like the way
    Iran is running stuff..

    he takes it!

    It's his!

    It belongs to him.

    He OWNS it!

    Who owns Veneusula?

    Trump owns it!

    He took it.

    It belongs to him.

    Don't worry, hell find somebody to
    'manage' it for him..

    maybe one of those guys from the show...

    The Apprentice!

    Trump does not run the world...

    TRUMP OWNS THE WORLD!

    dat thing you call planet earth...

    Trump owns it.

    He might as well take France...

    there is some faguet running it now...

    one of them dressed like a woman!

    GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!

    Who ever owns the biggest military on earth
    owns the earth.

    It's dat simple.

    One man owns the planet earth...and his
    name is...
    Donald Trump!

    OWNS THE EARTH!

    I guess next is Mars...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I don't need 48 hours to
    take Strait of Hormuz, ...

    I'll do it NOW!

    I got what it takes
    to take what you got.

    What have you got hands for? To take!

    I won't even count to three..

    DONE!





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2