From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 11/19/2025 3:52 PM, Maciej Wo+|niak wrote:

On 11/19/2025 2:18 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

And yes,
the postulates of special and general relativity pass the test.
(so far)
Euclidean geometry does not,

Any brainwashed idiot can assert it doesn't.
But which, precisely, of your precious
experiments is violating which, precisely,
Euclidean theorem?

Category error.
Experiments cannot violate theorems,

They can't. Samely as your fellow
idiots you can't lie non stop, it
seems. How did GE fail its "test"
then?

No answer, poor trash? Of course.

For innocent kiddies: no tests,
a mumbling idiot has screamed
"Listen to me!! I have POSTULATES!!!
And it's blatantly obvious that my
postulates are GOOD and elementary
math is WRONG!!!" and waved his arms.
Some other idiots have bought it,
and now they lie about alleged "tests"
elementary math didn't pass. Pathetic,
isn't it, dear innocent kiddies?

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Den 01.04.2026 13:22, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

For innocent kiddies: no tests,
a mumbling idiot has screamed
"Listen to me!! I have POSTULATES!!!
And it's blatantly obvious that my
postulates are GOOD and elementary
math is WRONG!!!" and waved his arms.
Some other idiots have bought it,
and now they lie about alleged "tests"
elementary math didn't pass. Pathetic,
isn't it, dear innocent kiddies?

I suppose that this incoherent babble is
a claim that the experiments that test SR and GR
don't pass elementary math.

Here are some of those tests.
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

Can you please explain which of these tests
don't pass elementary math?

Of course I know that you can't.
You have never read a scientific paper, because you can't.

Prove me wrong!
--
Paul

https://paulba.no/
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 4/1/2026 1:58 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 01.04.2026 13:22, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

For innocent kiddies: no tests,
a mumbling idiot has screamed
"Listen to me!! I have POSTULATES!!!
And it's blatantly obvious that my
postulates are GOOD and elementary
math is WRONG!!!" and waved his arms.
Some other idiots have bought it,
and now they lie about alleged "tests"
elementary math didn't pass. Pathetic,
isn't it, dear innocent kiddies?

I suppose that this incoherent babble is
a claim that the experiments that test SR and GR

And that's because you're an idiot unable to read,
as expected from a brainwashed relativistic
doggie.


--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Den 01.04.2026 15:07, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

On 4/1/2026 1:58 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 01.04.2026 13:22, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

For innocent kiddies: no tests,
a mumbling idiot has screamed
"Listen to me!! I have POSTULATES!!!
And it's blatantly obvious that my
postulates are GOOD and elementary
math is WRONG!!!" and waved his arms.
Some other idiots have bought it,
and now they lie about alleged "tests"
elementary math didn't pass. Pathetic,
isn't it, dear innocent kiddies?

I suppose that this incoherent babble is
a claim that the experiments that test SR and GR
don't pass elementary math.

Here are some of those tests.
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

Can you please explain which of these tests
don't pass elementary math?

Of course I know that you can't.
You have never read a scientific paper, because you can't.

And that's because you're an idiot unable to read,
as expected from a brainwashed relativistic
doggie.

Thanks for the confirmation of my words.
--
Paul

https://paulba.no/
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 4/1/2026 10:26 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 01.04.2026 15:07, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

On 4/1/2026 1:58 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 01.04.2026 13:22, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

For innocent kiddies: no tests,
a mumbling idiot has screamed
"Listen to me!! I have POSTULATES!!!
And it's blatantly obvious that my
postulates are GOOD and elementary
math is WRONG!!!" and waved his arms.
Some other idiots have bought it,
and now they lie about alleged "tests"
elementary math didn't pass. Pathetic,
isn't it, dear innocent kiddies?

I suppose that this incoherent babble is
a claim that the experiments that test SR and GR
don't pass elementary math.

You suppose that because you're a because you're
an idiot unable to read, as expected from a
brainwashed relativistic doggie.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Den 02.04.2026 00:20, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

On 4/1/2026 10:26 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 01.04.2026 15:07, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

On 4/1/2026 1:58 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 01.04.2026 13:22, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

For innocent kiddies: no tests,
a mumbling idiot has screamed
"Listen to me!! I have POSTULATES!!!
And it's blatantly obvious that my
postulates are GOOD and elementary
math is WRONG!!!" and waved his arms.
Some other idiots have bought it,
and now they lie about alleged "tests"
elementary math didn't pass. Pathetic,
isn't it, dear innocent kiddies?

I suppose that this incoherent babble is
a claim that the experiments that test SR and GR
don't pass elementary math.

You suppose that because you're a because you're
an idiot unable to read, as expected from a
brainwashed relativistic doggie.

Do you mean that I haven't read the papers below
because I am unable to read, but you have read them
because you can?

Here are some of those tests.
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

Can you please explain which of these tests
don't pass elementary math?

Of course I know that you can't.
You have never read a scientific paper, because you can't.

And that's because you're an idiot unable to read,
as expected from a brainwashed relativistic
doggie.

If I am the one that are unable to read, then why
haven't you, who _are_ able to read, explained
which of these tests don't pass elementary math?

https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

Could it possibly be because you have never read
a scientific paper, because you can't ?


It won't help, but I am laughing anyway! :-D
--
Paul

https://paulba.no/
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 4/2/2026 1:51 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 02.04.2026 00:20, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

On 4/1/2026 10:26 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 01.04.2026 15:07, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

On 4/1/2026 1:58 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 01.04.2026 13:22, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:

For innocent kiddies: no tests,
a mumbling idiot has screamed
"Listen to me!! I have POSTULATES!!!
And it's blatantly obvious that my
postulates are GOOD and elementary
math is WRONG!!!" and waved his arms.
Some other idiots have bought it,
and now they lie about alleged "tests"
elementary math didn't pass. Pathetic,
isn't it, dear innocent kiddies?

I suppose that this incoherent babble is
a claim that the experiments that test SR and GR
don't pass elementary math.

You suppose that because you're a because you're
an idiot unable to read, as expected from a
brainwashed relativistic doggie.

Do you mean that I haven't read the papers below

I mean you didn't read what I was talking about.
Once again - I was asking poor JJ about the
alleged "test" Euclidean geometry allegedly
failed.
Of course, JJ was lying, so he run away. There
was no test, just a word of your idiot guru was
enough for idiots like JJ and yourself to
believe that elementary math fails.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2