From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

On 11/22/2024 12:16 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 11/22/2024 10:44 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 11/21/2024 10:30 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

How about put a Weber bar next to a cyclotron and turn it on and off?

Have you tried turning it on and off?

How about you put a linac through a cyclotron,
and variously turn them on and off?

How about one of those hand helicopters?
Or just one of those tree seeds that wafts its way down?

It may seem kind of simple, you get a linear accelerator
or linac with a neutron stream, and a cyclotron with
charged particle beam next to it, then you start the
linac and then cycle the cyclotron and observe the
resulting bumps in the linac according to the
space-contraction in the cyclotron, thus establishing
space-contraction in the cyclotron, comcomitant
to the space-contraction in the linac.



The linac being linear and the cyclotron rotational, ...,
demonstrating along with Einstein's second-most
famous mass-energy equivalency function that
it's rotational-only with respect to relativistic mass,
while the linear stays Galilean though with, "space-contraction",
and for frame-dragging and so on, the linear and
rotational being fundamentally different, yet of
course of the same combined overall principles,
of the mechanics.


If you want to, "prove", which is an un-scientific way
of saying something, "Einstein's e=mc^2 has a central moment".

Of course, any difference in effect,
observed apart neutral linac and charged cyclotron,
verses observed combined on-and-off variously,
would be a non-null result both falsifying
"standard photon-diluted not-exotic-anymore model particles",
and,
"space-less and stretched-point SR-ians",
while,
not falsifying
space-contraction-linear
and
space-contraction-rotational,
seeing
a bump in the cyclotron,
and
a hump in the linac.

Before plugging that into your NSF or DARPA grant calculator,
one imagines true academics would thoroughly research "prior art".

Most programs would have
these kinds of things laying around, ...,
though it would probably involve
a bit of a shove getting them together.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2