• Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru

    From Frauly Margareta@ayaea@eyrtt.net to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Thu Mar 26 21:31:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Maciej Wo+|niak wrote:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second As seen, the definition of second
    loved so much to be invoked by relativistic morons - wasn't valid in the
    time when their idiot guru lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.

    it has nothing to do with, a second from a mechanical watch makes the
    point, also in relativity, but you have to undrestand it first. In short,
    a second as quantity does not matter, once you assume it's fixed

    the physics are still there if say, a 2 sec is expected to make 1 sec. The interval will always be delta_t = t_1 - t_0.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2