• Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not

    From The Starmaker@starmaker@ix.netcom.com to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,sci.physics on Sun Aug 16 22:52:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics

    =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote:

    On 8/16/2026 10:29 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
    Den 15.08.2026 21:41, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:
    On 8/15/2026 8:33 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
    Den 14.08.2026 19:14, skrev Maciej Wo+|niak:


    the clocks of GPS are synchronized, just like
    the engineers postulated them to be.
    Not indentical, as postulated by some mumbling
    madmen.


    Maciej, you obviously don't know what the words "postulate"
    and "synchronise" mean.

    Paul, you obviously impudently lie, as expected
    from- a piece of fanatic, relativistic shit.

    So you snip everything I wrote without reading it,
    and call it a lie. Pathetic!

    Sorry, poor piece of shit, snipping
    impudent lies is no way pathetic.


    I challenge you:
    Read the following, and if you find something which you think
    is wrong, quote me literally and explain exactly what is wrong.


    Let's see what engineers _specify_ about the GPS SV clocks:
    (SV = Space Vehicle, satellite)

    GPS Interface Specification Document: https://www.gps.gov/sites/default/files/2025-07/IS-GPS-200N.pdf

    Quote from 3.3.1.1 Frequency Plan:
    - "The carrier frequencies for the L1 and L2 signals shall be
    - - coherently derived from a common frequency source within the SV."

    It is a frequency standard which defines the rate of the SV-clock.
    This frequency standard is an atomic clock (oscillator) with the SI-definition of second inbuilt.

    A lie, of course - your SI idiocy
    is demanding 9 192 631 770 , SV
    clock have 9 192 631 774. You were admitting
    it many times, pathetic lying piece of shit.

    - "The nominal frequency of this source -- as it appears to an
    - - observer on the ground -- is 10.23 MHz."

    This means that the frequency standard is 10.23 MHz whether it is
    in the SV or on the ground. This is according to the SI-definition
    of second. 10.23 MHz = 10230000 cycles per SI-second.
    The SI-definition of second is the same in the SV, on the ground
    and everywhere.

    Nobody cares what your SI idiocy is.
    The second of GPS is different. Engineers
    made it according to their own postulates,
    not the postulates of your idiot guru.

    - "The SV carrier frequency and clock rates
    - - -- as they would appear to an observer located in the SV

    - - -- are offset to compensate for relativistic effects.
    - - The clock rates are offset by- +of/f = -4.4647E-10.
    - - This is equal to 10.2299999954326 MHz."

    NOTE THIS:
    ==========
    This means:
    If the SV-clock were emitting the frequency 10.23 MHz,
    then the frequency received on the ground would be
    10.23*(1 + 4.4647E-10) MHz = 10.2300000045674 MHz.

    No, poor trash, that doesn't mean.

    So to make the clock in the SV have the same rate
    as a clock on the ground, the frequency standard in
    the SV has to be adjusted down by the factor (1 - 4.4647E-10).
    10.23*(1 - 4.4647E-10)MHz = 10.2299999954326 MHz.

    "would appear" that it has. Or maybe wouldn't.
    A MEASUREMENT - comparing this frequency to a REAL
    (not gedanken) clock on a satellite will give
    10.23MHz. That's because engineers fucked mad
    postulates of your idiot guru and make clocks
    according to their own.


    This is predicted by the General Theory of Relativity,
    and is now thoroughly confirmed by the fact that the GPS works.

    Even such a disgusting piece of lying shit
    as you are, Paul, can't lie non stop -
    so sometimes you admit that the real measurement
    results have little in common with that
    mad mumble of your idiot guru.


    I don't know where people get the idea that General Theory of Relativity
    has anything to do with GPS???

    I guess they will say eventually that it was the General Theory of
    Relativity of Asteroids thatt killed the dinosaurs, ...and General
    Theory of Relativity confirmed it.

    There is a name for this 'kind' of science...Jewish Science.


    Indoctrination.

    Indoctrination is the act of teaching a person or group to accept a set
    of beliefs, ideas, or rules without questioning them.
    It relies on repetition and discourages critical thinking or alternative
    views.

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define++Indoctrination


    dats the foundation of all Jewish Science.


    If you happen to know any Jewish persons in the field of science, tell
    them to
    take all their money and go back to Israel.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2