So, there's at least three accounts of what can define "measurement of
time", in the micro, meso, and macro.
Then these days pretty much the world relies on "the naval observatory
in Colorado" if not so much "the clock tower in Greenwich", as with
regards to ye olde UTC, CUT, "Zulu", and so on, time.
About relativity theory and "measuring rods and clocks", then, it's
similar that "metric and norm" for "length and distance" also has
about the Planckian what are "iota-values" as it would be, or, "Pauli Plancks", or "Dirac's Pauli Plancks", of measuring space, vis-a-vis, measuring time.
So, there are at least three accounts of what defines measuring time,
and at least three accounts of what defines measuring space.
Then, since relativity theory is defined by what does that,
it has the various ways, to so fulfill doing that.
Yeah, I know, most "professional physicists" only have one of those
on their little note-card with which they passed graduate school.
Hi,
Hyperspectral measurements for inter-calibration,
reached a significant milestone this summer.
The naval observatory only uses fidget spinners
to measure time, so forget Colorado.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
So, there's at least three accounts of what can define "measurement of
time", in the micro, meso, and macro.
Then these days pretty much the world relies on "the naval observatory
in Colorado" if not so much "the clock tower in Greenwich", as with
regards to ye olde UTC, CUT, "Zulu", and so on, time.
About relativity theory and "measuring rods and clocks", then, it's
similar that "metric and norm" for "length and distance" also has
about the Planckian what are "iota-values" as it would be, or, "Pauli
Plancks", or "Dirac's Pauli Plancks", of measuring space, vis-a-vis,
measuring time.
So, there are at least three accounts of what defines measuring time,
and at least three accounts of what defines measuring space.
Then, since relativity theory is defined by what does that,
it has the various ways, to so fulfill doing that.
Yeah, I know, most "professional physicists" only have one of those
on their little note-card with which they passed graduate school.
On 07/27/2026 01:41 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
Hi,
Hyperspectral measurements for inter-calibration,
reached a significant milestone this summer.
The naval observatory only uses fidget spinners
to measure time, so forget Colorado.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
So, there's at least three accounts of what can define "measurement of
time", in the micro, meso, and macro.
Then these days pretty much the world relies on "the naval observatory
in Colorado" if not so much "the clock tower in Greenwich", as with
regards to ye olde UTC, CUT, "Zulu", and so on, time.
About relativity theory and "measuring rods and clocks", then, it's
similar that "metric and norm" for "length and distance" also has
about the Planckian what are "iota-values" as it would be, or, "Pauli
Plancks", or "Dirac's Pauli Plancks", of measuring space, vis-a-vis,
measuring time.
So, there are at least three accounts of what defines measuring time,
and at least three accounts of what defines measuring space.
Then, since relativity theory is defined by what does that,
it has the various ways, to so fulfill doing that.
Yeah, I know, most "professional physicists" only have one of those
on their little note-card with which they passed graduate school.
"Hyper [....]"-a Hyper-active.
Tweakers aren't reliable.
On 07/27/2026 01:41 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
Hi,
Hyperspectral measurements for inter-calibration,
reached a significant milestone this summer.
The naval observatory only uses fidget spinners
to measure time, so forget Colorado.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
So, there's at least three accounts of what can define "measurement of
time", in the micro, meso, and macro.
Then these days pretty much the world relies on "the naval observatory
in Colorado" if not so much "the clock tower in Greenwich", as with
regards to ye olde UTC, CUT, "Zulu", and so on, time.
About relativity theory and "measuring rods and clocks", then, it's
similar that "metric and norm" for "length and distance" also has
about the Planckian what are "iota-values" as it would be, or, "Pauli
Plancks", or "Dirac's Pauli Plancks", of measuring space, vis-a-vis,
measuring time.
So, there are at least three accounts of what defines measuring time,
and at least three accounts of what defines measuring space.
Then, since relativity theory is defined by what does that,
it has the various ways, to so fulfill doing that.
Yeah, I know, most "professional physicists" only have one of those
on their little note-card with which they passed graduate school.
"Hyper [....]"-a Hyper-active.
Tweakers aren't reliable.
Hi,
The nature of time has puzzled people -- from the ancient
Greeks to the present day -- Especially the nosomatic
perception of time is a hot topic now.
How does time evolve inside a GPU with multiple units
or a CPU with multiple cores. GPUs even having multiple
logical threads inside a group.
Forget the von Neumann model of computing. You need
a total new thinking of shared memory and more
message passing, and have a grip of vector and
matrix tiling of problems. -C-WAM already deploys
logic tiling in its Seven Eleven demonstrator. So forget
everything you have learned in your BASIC computer
course for your Sputnik Commodore C64 with 8088.
Bye
Hi,
Hyperspectral measurements for inter-calibration,
reached a significant milestone this summer.
The naval observatory only uses fidget spinners
to measure time, so forget Colorado.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
So, there's at least three accounts of what can define "measurement of
time", in the micro, meso, and macro.
Then these days pretty much the world relies on "the naval observatory
in Colorado" if not so much "the clock tower in Greenwich", as with
regards to ye olde UTC, CUT, "Zulu", and so on, time.
About relativity theory and "measuring rods and clocks", then, it's
similar that "metric and norm" for "length and distance" also has
about the Planckian what are "iota-values" as it would be, or, "Pauli
Plancks", or "Dirac's Pauli Plancks", of measuring space, vis-a-vis,
measuring time.
So, there are at least three accounts of what defines measuring time,
and at least three accounts of what defines measuring space.
Then, since relativity theory is defined by what does that,
it has the various ways, to so fulfill doing that.
Yeah, I know, most "professional physicists" only have one of those
on their little note-card with which they passed graduate school.
On 07/27/2026 01:41 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
Hi,
Hyperspectral measurements for inter-calibration,
reached a significant milestone this summer.
The naval observatory only uses fidget spinners
to measure time, so forget Colorado.
Bye
Ross Finlayson schrieb:
So, there's at least three accounts of what can define "measurement of
time", in the micro, meso, and macro.
Then these days pretty much the world relies on "the naval observatory
in Colorado" if not so much "the clock tower in Greenwich", as with
regards to ye olde UTC, CUT, "Zulu", and so on, time.
About relativity theory and "measuring rods and clocks", then, it's
similar that "metric and norm" for "length and distance" also has
about the Planckian what are "iota-values" as it would be, or, "Pauli
Plancks", or "Dirac's Pauli Plancks", of measuring space, vis-a-vis,
measuring time.
So, there are at least three accounts of what defines measuring time,
and at least three accounts of what defines measuring space.
Then, since relativity theory is defined by what does that,
it has the various ways, to so fulfill doing that.
Yeah, I know, most "professional physicists" only have one of those
on their little note-card with which they passed graduate school.
Well, like Einstein says, relativity is defined
by at least two different clocks -
might as well be three.
That's a good quote, I quote me on that.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 49:03:29 |
| Calls: | 1,100 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 275,768 |