• Practical applications of complex numbers

    From Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson@johann@myrkraverk.invalid to sci.math on Sat Aug 1 20:30:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Dear sci.math,

    Can you please fill me in on more useful practical applications of
    complex numbers than just the Mandelbrot visualization?

    I was just reading about them (again) in the /Linear Algebra Done
    Right/ book, but it seems the first chapter doesn't have an example
    of a practical applications. And I'm out of touch with higher
    mathematics.


    Thank you.
    --
    Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
    I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ram@ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) to sci.math on Sat Aug 1 13:20:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> wrote or quoted:
    Can you please fill me in on more useful practical applications of
    complex numbers than just the Mandelbrot visualization?

    Physics is full of them, especially in quantum theory.

    The following example does not actually require quantum theory:

    A /glass plate/ can shift the phase of a light beam travelling
    through it. A plate with a certain thickness d will change the
    amplitude from a to -a.

    Change of amplitude from a to -a

    Before

    | .....---...
    | ...'' ''.. ..
    | ..' ''.. ..'
    | ..'' `'. ..'
    |.' `'. ..' |-------------------------------`----------------------------.''--------
    | `'.. ..'
    | `.. ..'
    | ''.. ...'
    | ''-.......''

    After

    |
    | .....'--...
    | ..'' '''..
    | ..'' ''.
    | ..' `'.
    | ..' '.. |-.---------------------------:'-------------------------------`--------
    | `'. ..' `'.
    | `'.. ..' `'..
    | ''.. ...'' ''
    | ''--......''
    |

    Introducing /two/ such plates, we get -(-a), which is the original
    wave again.

    Each plate multiplies the amplitude by -1, and their combination has
    the effect of /two/ multiplications by -1, i.e., of (-1)*(-1)=1.

    So, a plate of thickness d multiplies by -1.

    If we combine /two/ plates of thickness d/2 we still get a multipli-
    cation by -1. So what does /one/ plate of thickness d/2 multiply
    the amplitude with?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Hasler@john@sugarbit.com to sci.math on Sat Aug 1 08:23:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

    And of course they are used extensively in electrical engineering.
    --
    John Hasler
    john@sugarbit.com
    Dancing Horse Hill
    Elmwood, WI USA
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson@johann@myrkraverk.invalid to sci.math,alt.ascii-art on Sat Aug 1 22:10:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    On 01/08/2026 9:20 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
    Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> wrote or quoted:
    Can you please fill me in on more useful practical applications of
    complex numbers than just the Mandelbrot visualization?

    Physics is full of them, especially in quantum theory.

    The following example does not actually require quantum theory:

    A /glass plate/ can shift the phase of a light beam travelling
    through it. A plate with a certain thickness d will change the
    amplitude from a to -a.

    Change of amplitude from a to -a

    Before

    | .....---...
    | ...'' ''.. ..
    | ..' ''.. ..'
    | ..'' `'. ..'
    |.' `'. ..' |-------------------------------`----------------------------.''--------
    | `'.. ..'
    | `.. ..'
    | ''.. ...'
    | ''-.......''

    After

    |
    | .....'--...
    | ..'' '''..
    | ..'' ''.
    | ..' `'.
    | ..' '.. |-.---------------------------:'-------------------------------`--------
    | `'. ..' `'.
    | `'.. ..' `'..
    | ''.. ...'' ''
    | ''--......''
    |

    This is some beautiful ASCII art rendering of waves. Do you have a tool
    that does this, or do you keep this pre-rendered in a text file for just
    such occasions?
    I'm not asking completely idly, I am wondering if I can make such a tool myself. Preferably without resorting to look at anything but the output
    above; I mean, not any ready made source code.

    Cross posting to alt.ascii-art, and you can see some of my old art re-
    posted there recently.


    Introducing /two/ such plates, we get -(-a), which is the original
    wave again.

    Each plate multiplies the amplitude by -1, and their combination has
    the effect of /two/ multiplications by -1, i.e., of (-1)*(-1)=1.

    So, a plate of thickness d multiplies by -1.

    If we combine /two/ plates of thickness d/2 we still get a multipli-
    cation by -1. So what does /one/ plate of thickness d/2 multiply
    the amplitude with?


    I have a feeling the answer should be /i/, but I'm not sure. Feel free
    to recommend books, websites, or PDF files where I can brush up on light physics.
    --
    Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
    I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lane W@cactus_DAC@yahoo.com to sci.math on Sat Aug 1 08:14:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
    Dear sci.math,

    Can you please fill me in on more useful practical applications of
    complex numbers than just the Mandelbrot visualization?

    I was just reading about them (again) in the /Linear Algebra Done
    Right/ book, but it seems the first chapter doesn't have an example
    of a practical applications.-a And I'm out of touch with higher
    mathematics.


    Thank you.

    https://study.com/cimages/multimages/16/complex-number-representation1439546104989929617.png

    Complex numbers turn hard AC (alternating current) circuit math into
    simple algebra by tracking both signal size and timing shifts (phase) at
    the same time. Engineers use the symbol \(j\) instead of \(i\) for the imaginary unit so it does not get mixed up with current (\(i\)).

    Key Concepts

    The \(j\)-operator: Represents a 90-degree phase shift. Multiplying by
    \(j\) turns a value along the vertical axis, matching how inductors and capacitors offset waves.

    Impedance (\(Z\)): Combines resistance (\(R\), real part) and reactance (\(X\), imaginary part) into a single complex value: \(Z = R + jX\).

    Forms of Expression:

    - Rectangular Form: \(A + jB\) (best for adding and subtracting).

    - Polar/Exponential Form: \(Magnitude \angle \theta\) or \(Ae^{j\theta
    }\) (best for multiplying and dividing, like using Ohm's Law with AC).

    Main Uses

    AC Circuit Analysis: Changes messy differential calculus equations into
    easy linear algebra using complex impedances.

    Power Systems: Separates real power (doing actual work) from reactive
    power (storing and returning energy) using real and imaginary components.

    Signal Processing: Powers tools like the Fourier transform to analyze
    radio frequencies, waves, and communication channels.

    -- Lane W.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson@johann@myrkraverk.invalid to sci.math,alt.ascii-art on Sat Aug 1 22:58:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    On 01/08/2026 10:37 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
    Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> wrote or quoted:
    This is some beautiful ASCII art rendering of waves. Do you have a tool
    that does this, or do you keep this pre-rendered in a text file for just
    such occasions?

    I've written a Python script that renders pixels to an array
    and then tries to match rectangles with such pixels to ASCII
    characters; it is using a specific raster font. The raw results
    of this approach did not look very good, and I found out that
    I can improve the result by restricting the set of characters to
    just a few selected characters like ".". Also, I take the slope
    of the curve into account. For example, the downward moving
    accent "`" is only used where the curve does move downward with
    approximately this angle (as can be seen in the sine plots).
    But this Python script is not yet ready for publication. I also
    edited two characters of the plots manually in my previous post.

    I see. And you can see some of my old hand drawn curves at this art
    gallery.

    https://asciiart.website/search.php?q=myrkraverk&sort_by=random

    I never thought to automate it until your graph inspired me. It's going
    to be a nice side project. And no worries about your Python script, I
    prefer to write my own code. I appreciate the tip about the slope.


    If we combine /two/ plates of thickness d/2 we still get a multipli-
    cation by -1. So what does /one/ plate of thickness d/2 multiply
    the amplitude with?
    I have a feeling the answer should be /i/, but I'm not sure. Feel free
    to recommend books, websites, or PDF files where I can brush up on light
    physics.

    This example was taken from a book about quantum physics that is
    as easy and readable as a book about this topic can possibly be:

    "Quantum Processes, Systems, and Information" (2010) -
    Benjamin Schumacher and Michael D. Westmoreland.

    (Schumacher is known for his coinage of the word "qubit".)

    The authors write in section 2.1:

    |Glass plates can be made in a continuous range of thicknesses,
    |producing a continuous range of phase shifts. For this to be
    |possible, the beam phases a must be complex quantities, with
    |both real and imaginary parts. A plate with thickness d/2 may
    |multiply the amplitude by a factor of i = sqrt reA1. This does not
    |change the magnitude of the complex phase a, since |a| = |ia|.
    |Two such plates (or a single plate of thickness d) multiply
    |the phase by i^2 = reA1, as required.


    Thank you for the recommendation. I've added it to my list of books
    to read in the near future.
    --
    Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
    I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.math on Sat Aug 1 12:58:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    On 08/01/2026 05:30 AM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
    Dear sci.math,

    Can you please fill me in on more useful practical applications of
    complex numbers than just the Mandelbrot visualization?

    I was just reading about them (again) in the /Linear Algebra Done
    Right/ book, but it seems the first chapter doesn't have an example
    of a practical applications. And I'm out of touch with higher
    mathematics.


    Thank you.

    Complex numbers with deMoivre from trigonometry then Euler's theorem
    which is after telescoping limits then "the Gaussian" make for that
    the deMoivre-Euler-Gauss is used a lot in the things like contour
    integrals and Gauss-Bonnet-Ostogradsky, and about the roots of unity,
    has that what they do is agree on the diagram of the complex plane, C,
    on R^2, the two-dimensional real plane with a Cartesian basis. So,
    other ways to do this include starting with the Cartanian, after
    Elie Cartan makes for reflections and rotations, where this is then
    often directly, yet not necessarily, connected to the complex numbers
    then later the hypercomplex numbers and Clifford algebras and geometric algebras, point being the reflect the geometric about reflections
    and rotations, the Cartanian. Then, the accounts of Argand and Wessell
    (sp.) planes, if complex numbers are around some Bombelli, usually are
    said to agree, yet have different motivations and perspectives.

    Complex numbers have one aspect that's non-Gaussian, it's that
    division, the operation, is not unique, and admits two quotients,
    here called "left-complex" and right-complex", that, the Gaussian
    branch of division for complex analysis is usual, yet not unique.

    So, complex analysis is useful, yet not necessary, per se. Then,
    it's ubiquitous, yet, also open, or a multiplicity, about division,
    so all the derivations have implicit openings and are only closed
    by convention.

    This is then sometimes summed up as about "complex-analyticity",
    that measure and the analytical basis exists, since "real-analyticity",
    is about measure and its relation to the geometric, as the "uniqueness
    up to isomorphism of the complete ordered field", including both
    R and C as complete ordered fields, when that, as mentioned above,
    division is not unique. Then also there are counterexamples of
    complete ordered fields with field operations in [-1, 1], which
    makes another account of analytical basis.


    So, accounts of complex-analyticity, are open at least two ways,
    then that's sometimes called "almost-analytic", which is "not quite",
    then usually called good enough and ignored, which doesn't satisfy
    everyone's requirements called rigor.


    Then, often used in functional analysis, for example about Hilbert
    space, for convenience, since after Euler's identity then in the
    differential that members of C are in terms of e, about the differential
    and e and addition-formulae and so on and Euler's identity involving e
    and pi relating to trigonometry and involving e, pi, and -1
    involving subtraction-formulae, is pretty much what it's about.




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ross Finlayson@ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com to sci.math on Sat Aug 1 13:08:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    On 08/01/2026 12:58 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On 08/01/2026 05:30 AM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
    Dear sci.math,

    Can you please fill me in on more useful practical applications of
    complex numbers than just the Mandelbrot visualization?

    I was just reading about them (again) in the /Linear Algebra Done
    Right/ book, but it seems the first chapter doesn't have an example
    of a practical applications. And I'm out of touch with higher
    mathematics.


    Thank you.

    Complex numbers with deMoivre from trigonometry then Euler's theorem
    which is after telescoping limits then "the Gaussian" make for that
    the deMoivre-Euler-Gauss is used a lot in the things like contour
    integrals and Gauss-Bonnet-Ostogradsky, and about the roots of unity,
    has that what they do is agree on the diagram of the complex plane, C,
    on R^2, the two-dimensional real plane with a Cartesian basis. So,
    other ways to do this include starting with the Cartanian, after
    Elie Cartan makes for reflections and rotations, where this is then
    often directly, yet not necessarily, connected to the complex numbers
    then later the hypercomplex numbers and Clifford algebras and geometric algebras, point being the reflect the geometric about reflections
    and rotations, the Cartanian. Then, the accounts of Argand and Wessell
    (sp.) planes, if complex numbers are around some Bombelli, usually are
    said to agree, yet have different motivations and perspectives.

    Complex numbers have one aspect that's non-Gaussian, it's that
    division, the operation, is not unique, and admits two quotients,
    here called "left-complex" and right-complex", that, the Gaussian
    branch of division for complex analysis is usual, yet not unique.

    So, complex analysis is useful, yet not necessary, per se. Then,
    it's ubiquitous, yet, also open, or a multiplicity, about division,
    so all the derivations have implicit openings and are only closed
    by convention.

    This is then sometimes summed up as about "complex-analyticity",
    that measure and the analytical basis exists, since "real-analyticity",
    is about measure and its relation to the geometric, as the "uniqueness
    up to isomorphism of the complete ordered field", including both
    R and C as complete ordered fields, when that, as mentioned above,
    division is not unique. Then also there are counterexamples of
    complete ordered fields with field operations in [-1, 1], which
    makes another account of analytical basis.


    So, accounts of complex-analyticity, are open at least two ways,
    then that's sometimes called "almost-analytic", which is "not quite",
    then usually called good enough and ignored, which doesn't satisfy
    everyone's requirements called rigor.


    Then, often used in functional analysis, for example about Hilbert
    space, for convenience, since after Euler's identity then in the
    differential that members of C are in terms of e, about the differential
    and e and addition-formulae and so on and Euler's identity involving e
    and pi relating to trigonometry and involving e, pi, and -1
    involving subtraction-formulae, is pretty much what it's about.





    Usual idea being to equate things to 1 or 0 and call them equal,
    identities with addition-formulae and subtraction-formulae,
    then there's "0, 1, and infinity", where accounts of things like
    singular integrals with space inversion have that "0, 1, and infinity"
    are the regular singular points of the hyper-geometric, of which
    Gauss has a particularly contrived example, which isn't itself unique.

    Singular integrals with space-inversion often include "infinity"
    in the numbers, where, for example, differential geometry doesn't
    just exclude "infinity" for tangents of what are curves of what
    are defined "functions", also excluding "zero".

    Then, the usual account of "function", classical and smooth functions,
    is wider than its account in "differential geometry", then yet wider
    with "singular integrals" and about "the hypergeometric".



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lane W@cactus_DAC@yahoo.com to sci.math on Sat Aug 1 16:25:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Lane W wrote:
    Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
    Dear sci.math,

    Can you please fill me in on more useful practical applications of
    complex numbers than just the Mandelbrot visualization?

    I was just reading about them (again) in the /Linear Algebra Done
    Right/ book, but it seems the first chapter doesn't have an example
    of a practical applications.-a And I'm out of touch with higher
    mathematics.


    Thank you.

    https://study.com/cimages/multimages/16/complex-number-representation1439546104989929617.png


    Complex numbers turn hard AC (alternating current) circuit math into
    simple algebra by tracking both signal size and timing shifts (phase) at
    the same time. Engineers use the symbol \(j\) instead of \(i\) for the imaginary unit so it does not get mixed up with current (\(i\)).

    Key Concepts

    The \(j\)-operator: Represents a 90-degree phase shift. Multiplying by
    \(j\) turns a value along the vertical axis, matching how inductors and capacitors offset waves.

    Impedance (\(Z\)): Combines resistance (\(R\), real part) and reactance (\(X\), imaginary part) into a single complex value: \(Z = R + jX\).

    Forms of Expression:

    -a- Rectangular Form: \(A + jB\) (best for adding and subtracting).

    -a- Polar/Exponential Form: \(Magnitude \angle \theta\) or \(Ae^{j\theta }\) (best for multiplying and dividing, like using Ohm's Law with AC).

    Main Uses

    AC Circuit Analysis: Changes messy differential calculus equations into
    easy linear algebra using complex impedances.

    This is where I used it. These equations would be extremely unwieldy
    without resorting to complex numbers.

    I also considered it in Signal Processing, over Fourier Transforms, but
    those were never to my liking and I put them in dark recesses of my mind.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2