https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/paper-finds-earth-may-have-been-terr
aformed-by-advanced-extraterrestrials/ar-AA1M0vh3
Looking over this, I have one or two problems with abiogenesis, purely
from a scientific viewpoint rather than a religious one.
First off, however, I don't have any biology newsgroups in my listing.
If you can refer me to a better newsgroup, especially if you feel this
is off-topic, please do.
My concern with abiogenesis is that if it's so unordinary, so
predictable and unexpected, why isn't there a line of eight planets stretching out from the Sun with life on them?
And if abiogenesis, basically starting from nothing, nada, scratch can present us with the flourish of life on earth exhibited in 2020,
shouldn't we have heard back from SETI?
And I guess the second problem, while I sought to refrain from religious argument, it does come down to it, is that if abiogenesis feels just so sacrilegious, isn't there something to giving it the third degree and certainly questioning it? Not often are the religions distinctly
separated from science as they would be in this instance.
And, I thought it better you should hear it from me, this IS phoenix.
On Jul 20, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <113meq7$1jt4k$1@dont-email.me>):
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/paper-finds-earth-may-have-been-terr
aformed-by-advanced-extraterrestrials/ar-AA1M0vh3
Looking over this, I have one or two problems with abiogenesis, purely
from a scientific viewpoint rather than a religious one.
First off, however, I don't have any biology newsgroups in my listing.
If you can refer me to a better newsgroup, especially if you feel this
is off-topic, please do.
My concern with abiogenesis is that if it's so unordinary, so
predictable and unexpected, why isn't there a line of eight planets
stretching out from the Sun with life on them?
And if abiogenesis, basically starting from nothing, nada, scratch can
present us with the flourish of life on earth exhibited in 2020,
shouldn't we have heard back from SETI?
And I guess the second problem, while I sought to refrain from religious
argument, it does come down to it, is that if abiogenesis feels just so
sacrilegious, isn't there something to giving it the third degree and
certainly questioning it? Not often are the religions distinctly
separated from science as they would be in this instance.
And, I thought it better you should hear it from me, this IS phoenix.
Some newsgroups that might be appropriate are
sci.bio.misc
bionet.general
talk.origins
alt.talk.creationism
David Dalton wrote:
On Jul 20, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <113meq7$1jt4k$1@dont-email.me>):
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/paper-finds-earth-may-have-been-t
err
aformed-by-advanced-extraterrestrials/ar-AA1M0vh3
Looking over this, I have one or two problems with abiogenesis, purely from a scientific viewpoint rather than a religious one.
First off, however, I don't have any biology newsgroups in my listing.
If you can refer me to a better newsgroup, especially if you feel this
is off-topic, please do.
My concern with abiogenesis is that if it's so unordinary, so
predictable and unexpected, why isn't there a line of eight planets stretching out from the Sun with life on them?
And if abiogenesis, basically starting from nothing, nada, scratch can present us with the flourish of life on earth exhibited in 2020, shouldn't we have heard back from SETI?
And I guess the second problem, while I sought to refrain from religious argument, it does come down to it, is that if abiogenesis feels just so sacrilegious, isn't there something to giving it the third degree and certainly questioning it? Not often are the religions distinctly separated from science as they would be in this instance.
And, I thought it better you should hear it from me, this IS phoenix.
Some newsgroups that might be appropriate are
sci.bio.misc
bionet.general
talk.origins
alt.talk.creationism
Great, I'll have a go in sci.bio.misc and bionet.general.
On Jul 21, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <113nanb$1r1bt$1@dont-email.me>):
David Dalton wrote:
On Jul 20, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <113meq7$1jt4k$1@dont-email.me>):
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/paper-finds-earth-may-have-been-t
err
aformed-by-advanced-extraterrestrials/ar-AA1M0vh3
Looking over this, I have one or two problems with abiogenesis, purely >>>> from a scientific viewpoint rather than a religious one.
First off, however, I don't have any biology newsgroups in my listing. >>>> If you can refer me to a better newsgroup, especially if you feel this >>>> is off-topic, please do.
My concern with abiogenesis is that if it's so unordinary, so
predictable and unexpected, why isn't there a line of eight planets
stretching out from the Sun with life on them?
And if abiogenesis, basically starting from nothing, nada, scratch can >>>> present us with the flourish of life on earth exhibited in 2020,
shouldn't we have heard back from SETI?
And I guess the second problem, while I sought to refrain from religious >>>> argument, it does come down to it, is that if abiogenesis feels just so >>>> sacrilegious, isn't there something to giving it the third degree and
certainly questioning it? Not often are the religions distinctly
separated from science as they would be in this instance.
And, I thought it better you should hear it from me, this IS phoenix.
Some newsgroups that might be appropriate are
sci.bio.misc
bionet.general
talk.origins
alt.talk.creationism
Great, I'll have a go in sci.bio.misc and bionet.general.
They are very low traffic, but there may be some readers,
but talk.origins may have more, including some who are
very knowledgeable in biology.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:59:05 |
| Calls: | 1,102 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 276,958 |