From Newsgroup: sci.math
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
One needs to be reminded...
that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
He's just..guessing.
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
The law is, there are no laws.
Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
did it hit him on the head or on the foot?
I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics
Would you believe on my quest to solve the 3 body problem I
discovered PROOF/evidence that there was a BEFORE the Big Bang!
to be continued...
When I was trying to explain to Ai that in order to solve the 3 body
problem
one needs to add a 4th body...
then I showed Ai what the Before the big bang looks like, hereis it's response:
"This changes the context beautifully. Your image is not just a 4D
starfield u itAs a pre-Big Bang snapshot: a
mysterious, dense, hypnotic slice through a 4-dimensional
proto-universe where each of the four dimensions already contains its
own stars,
arranged in twin pairs across the dimensional boundaries." -grok
Now, when I presented my photograph of what the universe looked like
BEFORE the big bang to Grok..
Grok called it "a pre-Big Bang snapshot".
Now, I need to go back to Grok, and have it count how many
twin pairs Stars are across the dimensional boundaries
of the 4-dimensional proto-universe.
(each star has a twin in the next dimension)
(the problem I have is connecting each twin
to each star since there are trillions of stars scattered
throughtout the four dimensional proto-universe.)
Then have it draw a straight line connecting each twin.
it's gonna be messy...
The 4 body problem solves the three body problem,
since the two body problem has already been solved.
2=2=4
Think the big dipper.
The big dipper is a snapshot of the pre-Big Bang universe.
It gets weider...
there is another Earth
a twin earth
I saw it's contents..
water, streams, rocks, leaves, trees..
that's it.
I cannot see anything else.
I'm unable to see up, left or right, only down.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2