From Newsgroup: sci.math
Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 06/18/2026 05:41 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
I doubted you. But your typedef irked me big time. also C/C++, odd for
me... But Ross has his chops for sure. Be sure to read the following
thread:
Cantor pairing... For Moebius...
shit happens.
Thanks for writing. If it helps make the world a more rational,
enlightened, and ideal place, and improves happiness, that's
a usual virtue.
ull isn't a bad typedef for unsigned long long int.
However, ulli would be more apropos.
It's a long enough type that a typedef could be useful if the type were
often used.
This often comes about when looking at numbers in the billions, because unsigned long int will only hold up to a little under 4 billion, which
isn't near enough for the calculations we like to do in certain programs.
--
We eat the night, we drink the time
Make our dreams come true
And hungry eyes are passing by
On streets we call the zoo
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2